3346 posts • joined 3 Sep 2007
Re: Gravity always wins
Amazon is reinvesting its profits for growth, and is constantly looking for new business opportunities. Facebook on the other hand seems not to want to be more than a social network.
As an example, Amazon has a line of tablets which sell quite well. Facebook offered a phone, kind of, and it did not sell.
Blue Sky of Death?
I like it. May the expression stick!
Must be the NSA
Google would lose money on the deal, so the NSA is paying for it in order to use it to spy on the international deals going on in Singapore…
And the barges are also controlled by the NSA, the Google thing is just a smokescreen!
Sounds illogical to me
But hey, not an expert.
I would like to note, though, that even though people might claim a historical right to privacy, it is much harder to claim a historical right to anonymity. Before the internet, anonymity was strictly the domain of ROMANES EUNT DOMUS graffitis, anonymous letters, and possibly certain private clubs for the connoisseurs.
I'm old enough to remember the articles in the early noughties commenting how all this "newsgroup trolling" and general uncivility on the Web were due to this strange and novel anonymity enjoyed by Internet users.
Wait a minute
"Google got into fearful trouble by recording the location of WiFi transceivers without asking for their owners' permission"
No. Google got in trouble for recording the data that was going through the WiFi networks. Recording the location of the WiFi networks has not been a problem at all, as far as I can tell…
Nerf guns. Lots of them.
From where I sit right now, I can see seven of them.
EDIT: sorry, eight. One guy has two on his desk.
Re: Yup. Undervalued my backside.
Using your cash to buy back your shares already sends a bad signal to the investors. It means you have no clue what to do with the money. You are not planning to expand.
Apple makes very nice things, but there is a lot more that it can do. It has a kind-of cloud service that does not really live up to its name. It has a map service that is still playing catch-up. But Apple is not using its cash to try to make them better; it is paying a dividend instead. Google and Amazon would never do such a thing. As far as they are concerned, the sky is the limit and everything is invested for growth.
That is why using your cash to buy back your shares is a bad thing. Now, borrowing cash to buy back your shares is just plain stupid.
But isn't "sit" a stative verb? It is quite common to say "Are you sitting down?" What about "look", which is supposedly a stative verb, and the sentence "looking good today"?
I've been asked to find the best way to distribute accounts on forms, considering each account needed to be signed off by a different set of people. I used the greedy algorithm, which was plenty good enough for the sizes involved. But it certainly was not optimal, and the problem is likely NP-hard. Did not bother to prove it though.
EDIT: it must be the subset cover problem, now that I think of it.
They might edit other pages for money, but they are not going to edit their own wiki page, now are they?
That would just be too much!
Re: "This post best viewed in Netscape Navigator..."
Considering the Google products have kept working fine not only in Chrome, but also Safari, Firefox and Opera, I'd tend to think that this is a bug in IE rather than a bug in Google products.
There was however definitely a hint of smugness in Google's way to tell Microsoft they were not allowed to create a native YouTube app for Windows devices, and that Google would not bother to write one themselves for such a small market share.
Today I learned there is such a thing as Angry Bird perfume, so…
Almunia does not have time
He is trying to get this wrapped up before leaving. He'll probably try to resist a solution which makes meaningless the four years of work up to now. This is supposed to be his great achievement; starting litigation now would make it his great failure.
The politicians do not have this constraint…
Google respects robots.txt, which means that it does index links to pages disallowed by the robots.txt, but never attempts to read what is in those pages. This is as far as I understand what robots.txt is supposed to do.
What Murdoch and co would like is an intermediate settings between "rank this super low because I don't know what's inside" and "read everything on this page, and put everything on Google news, ensuring that people never bother to go read it".
The robots.txt protocol is indeed a bit coarse, but I understand that the propositions from Google to the EU included some sort of mechanism to give websites more control over what data Google can grab and display.
"It doesn't harm anyone's business interests"
Yeah right. Every time you watch these videos while being out and about makes you happy! And you are not paying anybody for this happiness.
Media corporations most certainly think that you should pay for this. They own the content, so they should be able to dictate exactly how and when you are allowed to watch it. If you want to watch it in any other way, there is a convenience fee for that.
Yes but at least in explorer
There is a "Rename" entry in the right-click menu. There might be a shortcut for it too.
Yes of course, *tap Return*
I use a Mac since 2008, but this has to be the most incomprehensible thing about the UI. The shortcut for opening a file or launching a program is Command-O, and for renaming it is Enter.
I can only conclude that there are people who rename their files more often than they open them.
Just because they have money…
does not mean they have to use complicated methods only.
Re: Why fire her anyway?
That was my reaction too. Even assuming there is something wrong with the cleavage, you can just ask her to dress differently…
On the matter of cultural diversity, let me say that I am very happy that television in most European countries do not treat women the way they are in Italy.
Clap clap clap
I wish I still lived in the US so I could subscribe to T-Mobile.
Did not even offer $3,141.59
Re: MUST NOT BE NAMED
@John: Read against the sentence quoted. It amounts to "disk [is] same or better better than disk".
But that sentence is indeed the elephant in the room of the article. Even assuming prices of disk storage ever gets as cheap as tape storage, they have a long way to go before they are as reliable in the long-term.
With all these loss-making factories, the German economy must be in shambles then!
Re: But Wait!
You can hardly call this ASCII
My reaction was: AMEN, sister!
So Bing must also include in its results links to Google services?
I am slightly dumber
For having read the comments on that web site.
I can understand technical people discussing the advantages of iPhone vs Android, but I am constantly amazed by the fans who have no clue and defend their brand.
What about VAT?
I have heard that there is no VAT paid on services such as those offered by Google. But would this be not a proper way to make large companies out of the country pay for running a business in the country?
PH, because she probably knows more than me about these money matters…
Now that Groklaw is gone, there is now only FOSS… They used to balance each other pretty well…
I used to do military service in electronic warfare, i.e. listening to the radio. We were only allowed to "identify", but not listen to, civil communications in our country. Everything else was fair game, including baby listening devices and old wireless phones which were still using non-digital transmission. We had trigonometric detection of the place of emission, so we could know that it was coming from outside the country.
Actually, it seems to me that Google's point is a good one.
If somebody sends an email, they are normally letting the recipient do whatever they want with the email, including forwarding it to third parties, publishing it in a newspaper, or indeed, letting Google read it.
I believe that in general, you make no assumption when sending a letter to someone that no one else has the right to read that letter. If the recipient decides to publish the letter, he publishes it.
In fact, only governments (ha!) seem able to restrict the right of the recipient to publish their letters. This is precisely the criticism that has been leveled at National Security letters and "super injunctions".
I think they should read again the company's mission statement. Not the thing about evil; the one about making the world's information universally and easily accessible.
Not showing things that are on the web goes directly against everything Google does; it's understandable that they are not trying hard to shoot themselves in the foot.
On the contrary!
Apple is usually famously tight-lipped; the fact that they go to the trouble of making this announcement today (only one month before earnings) shows they feel the need to prop up their stock price and reassure investors. (And it seems to have worked when you look at today's numbers)
But Apple would never have made such an announcement three years ago, when they were systematically beating all estimates every quarter…
Paraphrasing Thatcher, being successful is like being a lady; if you have to tell people you are one, you are not.
But… but… That would mean that at the end of my life, UTC time will be a whole minute out of sync with the rotation of the earth!?
Feeling sorry for them
Have felt that way for about three years now
Hey, we have another source of money
…So let's kill your business by offering everything you do for free.
If I remember correctly, some countries actually have laws against this (e.g in France, you are not allowed to sell something at loss unless during designated sales periods).
But then why does it look like junk?
I am looking for a new phone, but honestly, I would have preferred to buy an iPhone 5 rather than the new iPhone 5C.
Maybe I am too suspicious, but it feel as if the reason the iPhone 5 got replaced by the iPhone 5C is that otherwise, people would have bought the iPhone 5 instead of the 5S. Now, if you want an iPhone that looks good, you have to shell out for the 5S.
Maybe I'll go for the 4S instead…
The real number her is -8% revenue?
I bet that quite a few companies would be satisfied with -8% revenue, if it comes with a subscription model. Getting money constantly and predictably is far safer than always having to convince people to buy the next version of your product. Why do you think Adobe is doing this? Realistically, the features from five years ago would be enough for most people. They are far enough ahead on features that the biggest competitor for their new release is their own previous release.
I got tired long ago already of the then-fashionable idea that pants pockets are not supposed to contain anything.
It is Wunderkind, not wünderkind
I'll let you off starting this German noun with a capital, but I really don't think we need a metal umlaut here.
Seriously, I hope for the NSA that they have better means of gathering data than randomly grabbing 20 seconds of data from unsecured wifi networks while the car is passing in the street. I cannot possibly imagine how useful this data could be to anyone.
Doesn't matter much
They may all speak a different language, but they all read and write the same one…
Re: No wonder
No way English is one of the top three hardest languages to learn. Finnish and Czech have got to be harder, without even mentioning Navajo and Swiss German which cannot be pronounced if you did not hear them in the womb.
Though English does have this particularity that, say, a word ending in -ough can be pronounced in seven different ways:
- tough (as staff)
- trough (as scoff)
- though (as low)
- thorough (as law)
- through (as brew)
- bough (as how)
- hiccough (as cup)
Re: iPad Mini 2 - The screen on the current Mini is awful...
Apple clearly felt they had to go ahead with a poor resolution for the mini iPad, just to have an answer to the Nexus 7. Indeed, most of the presentation was comparing the two devices.
Now that they had one more year to work on it, they better announce a resolution that is a lot better than the first version. Whether they can do that within the same price is another question.
Re: "make 40$ per device"
I think if you check your numbers, you'll find that the number of phones they need to sell is a tenth of what you claim. 7.2 billions divided by 30 is not 2.4 billions.