3412 posts • joined 3 Sep 2007
"The right combination of price, convenience, and inventory will do far more to reduce piracy than enforcement can."
No, no, no! Services should be as inconvenient and unavailable as possible! How else can you charge an arm and a leg for basic functionalities?
Only half of the conditions
In order to have investments, you need profits, but also competition. Take TWC and Comcast: they make profits, but are not competing against each other. They are even proclaiming it: one of the arguments they are advancing for their merger is that anyway, they are already not competing against each other, so nothing would change. No competition means no need to fight for customers means no investments. QED.
On the other hand, I don't think there is anybody who would claim that Apple and Google are not competing against each other. The fight for market share is real, constant, and there is even Microsoft trying to make a viable third horse. For them, banning a network means losing users. They are unlikely to play that game.
Oh, and about Google Fiber: considering it exists in about half a percent of the US, I doubt Google can leverage anything on that front.
It does feel like Catch-22
The FBI can hack into whatever computer in order to prove it is yours. Either you deny the computer is yours, in which case you are not protected by the 4th Amendment, and their evidence stands, or you admit yourself it is your computer, in which case their evidence is dismissed, but you have incriminated yourself; something you should have a right not to do according to the 5th Amendment…
If Android doesn't have something at that size there will be a hole in their portfolio
They've never heard of the Galaxy Note, have they?
Our remit does not include dealing with complaints from organisations that have had search results to their websites removed from a search engine
Whose job is this then? Is there no one responsible for that?
This applies to the offline world and should also apply to the online world.
Die Gedanken sind frei, wer kann sie erraten,
sie fliegen vorbei wie nächtliche Schatten.
Kein Mensch kann sie wissen, kein Jäger erschießen
mit Pulver und Blei: Die Gedanken sind frei!
If I had such an unlimited account, I'd feel like testing how "unlimited" it really is… Like, 10PB of white noise coming up!
I suppose Google can count on upload speed limits to keep it reasonable.
Tracing the bribery is exactly what it is all about.
I hope he realizes how much advertising he is doing for the new features …
So Microsoft is complaining that Google is twisting the arm of its competitors and making their life difficult? How very considerate of them <_<
Wasn't this inquiry started at the request of unhappy phone makers? Don't they already have enough dirt to back up their complaints?
Finding a way to reverse the hash function would mean an earthquake in theoretical computer science. It would be a discovery on the order of cold fusion. Scientists have tried for 30 years to solve such problems, and while we don't actually have proof, there is little chance that it can be done in a reasonable amount of time.
Re: Nobody will buy the smaller engine
Normally rear wheel drive is better in snow
Is it even relevant?
That I understand, Apple hardly pays anything to Ireland anyway, thanks to its double Irish Dutch sandwich… 2% or 20% of nothing is still nothing.
Re: Why can't they just be up front about what they want?
On one hand, the precise description of everything Google does with the data in all possible configurations would probably dwarf the Encyclopedia Britannica.
On the other hand, Google does not want to have to publish new T&Cs every time the data is used in a different way. I imagine there are several more every month.
Finally, Google might want to keep secret some uses of the data, to avoid competitors imitating them.
The way I read it, it is Stanford who wants to protect itself from accusations of impropriety, by ensuring Google money is not going to people who might be defending Google.
After the Lessig thing, it would make sense for the University to take steps. Now they can claim that Google is not paying their academics to write anything favorable to the company, since the Google money does not fund these people. See?
Of course, this is at best a semi-truth, considering Google money can fund other people working on unrelated things, and these other people would otherwise have to be paid by a different source of funds, which can now go to the privacy people.
Well, it's not because Samsung had the features first that their phones are better. I believe the fingerprint scanner existed on a Samsung before it did on an iPhone, but the rumors say the iPhone version works better.
On the other hand, this should put to rest the accusations that Android phones are copying iPhones.
Re: @Terry Barnes
Warning: I think half the AC in this thread are trolling… Well, that or parodying a merkin republican. Hard to tell sometimes.
That said, fuck the telcos.
…And seriously, what kind of setup would you have that lets the web server set environment variables with data from the user??
I would have called that a big gaping security hole in itself …
Well, that's the thing
Yahoo could theoretically give all the cash and stock they own to their shareholders, and it would be more than the official worth of the stock; then the shareholders would still own a business that makes a billion a year in profit.
I say good for them
Blizzard is one of the few companies able to look at a product being built, after a lot of work done, and say "not good enough". They've done it before, with the adventure game that was supposed to be about Thrall's youth.
That's what it means to have standards. I wish there were more companies like them.
((How do you insert a url?))
With old-fashioned HTML code, like this:
< a href="http://google.com">link</ a>
(This one is not made into a link because the tags contain spaces)
Italics and bold are also possible. You might have to have a silver badge though. Not sure if bronze is enough.
Re: Public domain.
Six months ago, I created prior art against such a patent in this post:
My idea to use echolocation to warn the user of incoming lampposts is much better.
And by the way, unless somebody filed a patent for that already, this post will count as prior art. I'll stuff a few keywords to make it easier for the experts to find it: Cell phone echolocation radar sonar detection lamppost wall advance warning system bullshit.
…Ok, now the USPTO will have to reject the patent for being insufficiently novel.
Nor an operating system with no sense of resolution independence.
When you control exclusively what devices can use the OS, you don't really need resolution independence. And when you want developers to write a lot of apps for your brand new OS, a single resolution is a feature, not a bug; as mentioned occasionally by Apple on the subject of Android fragmentation.
But indeed, they are paying for it now. Three different screen sizes, and the downscaling.
I find this downscaling rather curious coming from Apple. Surely it wouldn't have been very hard to have an actual 2208x1242 screen? Why such a compromise? Maybe the battery life…?
Re: Always Critical of Apple
Seriously, is anyone going to even consider the 16 gig flavour when there is no expansion possible?
I have a 16 GB Nexus 5 here, had it for a year. Never felt I needed more. In fact, I had to check in settings for the first time to know how much memory I had in total (~13 GB, I assume the rest is Android), and how much I was using (~9 GB, of which ~4GB of apps, ~3GB of pics and videos, and ~2GB for music and cached data).
Unless you have a lot of music or you are hoarding apps, I find 16 GB is plenty enough…
Essentially, stop showing its own products in a different way than standard results. Stop showing a map from Google Maps when searching for an address. Stop inserting a box of reviews from Google Hotel Finder when searching for "Hotel in London". Stop showing results from Google Flights when searching for "flight from LA to SF". Stop displaying results from Google Shopping with pictures.
Go back to displaying 15 blue links and ads and nothing else. Otherwise, they are unfairly displaying their products in a nicer way than those of competitors, which are only displayed as typical search results.
It would be arguably worse for the user; but it is precisely because the current situation makes it so convenient for the user to click on a Google product that the competitors are complaining. The day Google started displaying unit conversions when searching for "10 miles in km", a dozen websites lost 90% of their traffic. Just because Google answered right away the question of the user.
@Test Man: Welcome to planet Earth
If Microsoft US ultimately loses its appeal, and faces the prospect of heavy fines for not somehow turning over the data, they will order Microsoft Ireland to turn it over. Microsoft Ireland might well be technically an independent company, but it still has to do whatever Microsoft US tells it to do.
but I suspect it will loose
loose → lose
Why don't they just…
…check the GPS data of the pictures?
Re: Lets he honest
The accusations are overblown, but not entirely without foundations. Though the products that Google are pushing are often better or reasonably as good as competitors (Maps, News, Shopping), it sometimes shows reviews from Google+ more prominently that reviews from Yelp. And in that case, I dont feel users are better served.
Re: Am I the only one...
I'm not that into social networks in the first place, but I doubt it will be scrapped completely. The forced integration seems to be going away, but a lot of features are useful and can be recycled.
When I said income, I meant profit. Microsoft has a market cap slightly below Google, and a price to earnings ratio about half.
I don't get it
There is a company that is about the same size as Microsoft with only half the income. That company is Google, and it is hiring like crazy.
So why is Microsoft firing so many people, when it makes way more money?
How long have you been waiting to use that title?
"operator-led NFC payments system"
No. Just no. Operators are among the least trusted actors of the Internet economy. People would prefer anything rather than a payment system they control.
Re: BoringGreen Destroyed @Matt Bryant
I suspect he means, legally irrelevant. FinFisher is not in legal trouble because of this leak. It can go on selling its software to many a government except Russia.
should be required reading for geeks
Mine is on order.
For some reason, I'm reminded of Nestlé offering free milk formula to new mothers… I mean, I know the situation is very different for many reasons, but still, there's a resemblance.
Re: can't resist
Meh. Spain and Ireland are catholic countries, yet they are not particularly known for their corruption. On the other hand, China, India or Egypt have the reputation of being so corrupt it becomes a way of life, without being catholic.
I'd say if you discount Italy, it looks like corruption is more dependent on development than anything else.
Hmm… Complaining to a US court about allegedly corrupt legal proceedings in a different country. I'm sure Mexico is going to appreciate this immensely.
More likely, the plan was always to put sapphire glass on the watch, which is quite common from semi-expensive watches.
However, until one week ago, analysts and observers all thought that Apple would also put sapphire glass on phones. They risk nothing by pretending it, considering Apple emits about as much as a black hole.
By the way, sources in the know tell me that the next model will have a holographic display. You saw it here first!
Re: And of course...
I suspect it might work here:
Let's say I write a message reporp eht sniatnoc ti fo emos dna unicode control codes.
There. Now copy/paste the sentence in bold in a terminal or a dumb text editor, and you will have a surprise.
EDIT: Emacs displays the same text, but vi displays something else.
Re: no exact number?
More likely, they are allowed to specify in which range by 250… like 0-249, 250-499, 500-749, etc.
That's how Google has always reported these types of requests.
I really wonder if it makes sense to retain copyrights as they are, or if they are doomed by the advance of technology. I think that the only hope content producers have is already to make it easier to buy for their content rather than acquire it illegally…
You ATE it?
You… you monster!
"$90 mil a year seems pretty cheap for the trust of users worldwide." Csoghoian
Well, fuck you. Let's see you pay a third of your income fighting the government in a secret case that nobody would ever know about.
Re: Why the hell is Google buying things like this?
There is not even a casual link between an innovative company like Lift Labs and an Internet advertising company like Google
Google has already bought many robotics companies. Why not this one too?
Re: But what about the big boy who started the little and often update fad?
I assume they refuse to have anything to do with that.
Thieves… Nasty little thieves, they stole our precious!