3295 posts • joined 3 Sep 2007
Re: Oh dear, how sad, never mind!
Maybe I got it wrong; but from what I understand, even with acceptable ads, you still need to pay to get on the whitelist.
Which does sound slightly like a protection racket in a "nice advertising revenue you've got, shame if anything was to happen to it" way.
That's the same judge who originally ruled that API were not copyrightable. A shame it got overturned on appeal.
But can they Bing the jurors?
If I understand correctly, Oracle is assuming that it should get all the money Google ever made with Android?
Re: And now this is the worst
It was always possible to decrypt an iPhone. People who had any chance of breaking into an iPhone were already trying to do so.
However, it is now known that Apple will not roll over at the whim of random prosecutors. If they want an iPhone decrypted, they'll have to pay a professional company to do it, instead of just ordering Apple to do it whenever they want.
I'd say Apple won this one. And what's more, I'd say we all did.
Plane goes missing, search robot goes missing…
Coincidence? I think not!
So, the second Google cloud article in 24 hours and both of them are puff pieces full of windbaggery and basic bullsh*t.
In case you didn't know: Google is having their yearly conference on cloud at this moment. Expect a couple more articles on the subject.
Oh? Well, that explain things.
Let's see how it plays out, shall we?
If I remember correctly, the German publishers had a big campaign at some point asking their readers not to use ad blockers.
The campaign caused a huge rise in the use of ad blockers.
43 members in the team?? Drone races are more complex than I thought.
This is one of the case where the open source version is on par with, and possibly superior to commercial products.
... Moderated comments? This seems like a benign and uncontroversial subject, though.
Re: Woah there
What I mean is that the first word of the title was "Google", not because it was the most relevant thing about the story, but because people click more on any title containing the word Google.
And John went one step further, and apparently deduced that it was Google's fault. Maybe he's thinking about the Oracle lawsuit.
"British startup backed by Google stole code" ≠ "Google and its partners in copyright theft"
Using Google in the title of the article was clickbait. No need to rise to it.
Re: Google and copyright laws
US copyright laws are probably the world's most restrictive so it is the 'safest' choice as they don't have to worry about someone from Ghana coming along and claiming something that is public domain in the US is copyrighted there.
That's a terrible argument. By that argument, Google should follow the most restrictive censorship laws on the planet, so that "they don't have to worry about someone from Ghana coming along and claiming something that is [free speech] in the US is [illegal speech] there."
We all find it funny that it is forbidden in Thailand to insult the king, and we wouldn't dream of censoring our internet to follow that law. From what I can gather, Americans have the same feelings about Europe's right to be forgotten.
Re: Oh look
I *never* click to view the second page of an short article, and I only address the issues on the page I read.
That paragraph was on the first page.
So what are the requirements?
I suppose you need to be natural-born American, have a security clearance, and have worked for the government for ten years?
Always wanted to put on my face something greasy and smelling of fries.
I'd be happy to see more executives being held responsible for the misdeeds of companies!
I just wish this would happen for, say, companies that caused ecological disasters leading to the death of thousands rather than companies who defend the privacy rights of their users.
Embarrassing for Amazon, but…
I understand it's not at all rare for large corporations to have an embarrassingly complex reimbursement system, which are not at all optimized because you optimize very hard things for users, and you don't care about optimizing paying money to suppliers.
I remember a story about a similar company in which for anything over a couple of hundreds of dollars, a supplier needed to first get introduced into the payment database which was maintained by a third-party contractor in Poland, which meant that first-time suppliers needed to wait months until they saw a dime.
If I remember correctly, there was a story on this very web site about Google being sued by a supplier over a ridiculous amount of money, because after months of waiting, they still saw nothing coming, and that was the only way they could see of speeding things up.
Ooh ooh, and because the twin was in space, he's going to be younger than the one who stayed on Earth, right? Despite being twins, one is going to look like the father of the other one, and then some really interesting things is going to happen and…
Staying 340 days at the ISS, which does 7667 m/s, he's going to be younger by… (compute compute) a hundredth of a second. Hmpf…
…Never mind, then.
Sounds reasonable, but sampling is everything
I assume that all the amateurs and hobbyists who are coding an app or two for fun are mostly coding it for Android, since they are more likely to have an Android in the first place. On the other hand, people who develop anything for Windows are more likely to be professionals who fully intend to make real money out of it.
You would probably get similar results comparing say Python vs. Cobol developers. People who code in Python are dime-a-dozen and go from professional to high-schoolers, but nobody codes in Cobol unless they have somebody paying them good money for it.
So went the horses and carts
Innovation regularly makes whole industries redundant. That's a fact of life.
People in those industries can have trouble adapting. We may be able to help some of them.
For all the rest: This is why we need a good social security system.
The one mistake we should not commit is to refrain from innovating in order to protect existing industries.
Mind if we call you 'Bruce' to keep it clear?
Another water landing
Icon says it all...?
I'm getting bored of these useless outage reports
What I would like is a web site reporting clear metrics, displaying a graph of how much of the time during the past year there was a good service for 90%, 99%, and 99.9% of users.
This would be much more informative than irregular articles stating "there's an issue affecting some users today".
Re: Phone Plea..
Just buy a RAZR on eBay?
You don't want to see homeless people in the street? Have you tried living in a country with proper social security?
To be honest, income inequality is one of the reasons I have moved back from the US to Europe.
Re: Didn't everbody with a clue ...
This made me think. Google didn't exist 20 years ago. How did we ever manage??
Re: Talons and towels
If it was like any warehouse I've been, it stuffed itself to death with mice
Does it detect gorillas?
Re: 5 BEEELION DOLLARS!
It's an imperial short scale billion.
Another analyst living in cloud-cuckoo land
So Google is going to push updates to all Android phones? Who's going to check for compatibility issues? Because Google's sure as hell not going to do that.
This analyst knows less about phones than most reg readers.
This is wishful thinking
or it is possible to read the data off the flash chips and attack it in a VM until the password is brute-forced.
I don't see how it could be possible to stop this from happening. If a system exists that allows to enter a 4-digit code and decrypt the device, then surely, it is possible to reconstruct that system so that it does not erase the memory after N attempts.
The only way I can see to prevent this from happening is to protect the device not with a 4-digit PIN, but with a decryption key that is so long that trying all solutions would take centuries. But I frankly doubt anybody would want to type something that long every time they want to check their email.
Re: I'm puzzled...
... Like Facebook.
If your Bahasa's better than hours, feel free to get in touch with the details.
Alas, my knowledge of Bahasa is minute.
MNO is Mobile Network Operator
In case somebody was wondering.
Something that Google could have done is offering links to multiple services. They actually do that when you look up stock quotes like https://www.google.com/search?q=amzn; you get a box showing the data, but if you want more detail, you need to click on one of the small links below, choosing between Google Finance, Yahoo Finance and MSN Money.
It's interesting that they do that for stock market data but not for maps. I'd be curious to know why. Maybe it's because Yahoo Finance has more users than Google Finance, while Google Maps was probably #1 by an overwhelming margin for a long time.
It's because of puerile jokes of this kind that anonymity will soon be a thing of the past on the Internet.
Does that include doxing?
The ten years do not mean that Google has ten years to pay; they mean that Google did not pay enough tax for the past ten years, and they have to pay the total amount now, or at least very soon.
Actually, they certainly have to pay interest on that sum, so it would actually benefit the government if Google took a long time to pay.
Leap of net neutrality from "carriers shall not charge some content more" to "poor people shall not get free partial Internet" = astounding
With all due respect to Andreessen, there's very little difference between "charging some content more" and "offering some content free". Whether people who get it are poor or rich.
Now, whether the benefits outweigh the issues in this case is disputable. But the leap is not astounding, and it is in fact not a leap.
Re: Flash Web sites Hall of Shame
Google finance still uses flash for its scrollable and zoomable graphs.
Yahoo finance offer the same features without flash.
I tend to dislike arbitrary constraints on the use of products. For instance, it took many years for the whole industry to settle on USB, and it's hard enough to reach such a result, but then Apple specifically made sure that only iPods could connect to iTunes, and not the competing MP3 players…
Also coming to mind: HP selling printers cheap and ink for an arm and a leg, and using cryptography techniques to make it difficult for others to build compatible ink cartridges.
That said, I wonder how they plan on enforcing it. How would they notice if somebody modifies the product to run on Google hardware?
It's been so long, I would have sworn that this had died already. I wonder how much was spent in total on this train wreck? By the parties, and by the justice system?
Re: Oh FFS !
EDIT: Well, well… Seems to work.
I'm not clear on what the decision of the UN panel was taken? Considering that nobody is forcing him to stay there… Having breached his bail, it seems pretty normal that he would be arrested if caught, without even mentioning the Sweden thing.
One way or another, I doubt the UK cares about that UN ruling…
Re: Joke: Sometimes it sucks to use a Screen Reader...
Screen Readers suck: they turn what's supposed to be funny into stuff that's not & vice versa. =-j
Sometimes, this can be a feature!