Ah, that must be why I'm also on the naughty step. Though I thought it was traditional, I've seen lots of other corrections posted as comments. Post a correction as a comment, and make some sort of lame joke about it. And commentards asking for a proper web form for corrections instead of a mailto link. I'll also ask for that.
I also agree with Ledswinger, I thrive on feedback, but if you don't tell me what I did wrong, there's no chance I can correct it. The email I sent asking why didn't get a response. Might help to ease the workload of your moderators. And especially for those moderated for posting corrections, might encourage more proper corrections, instead of discouraging people due to the length of time taken for moderation.
From the "The Register Comments Guidelines" is this bit "We try to be broad-minded and consistent" which has not been true of the majority of the comments I have had rejected recently. Rejecting for the use of words that are considered by some to be bad language isn't broad-minded, and a search for those words shows they have been used in many comments, and even in El Reg articles, that's not consistent.
My last rejection I have no idea why it was rejected, makes no sense at all.
Being on the naughty step has cooled my commentarding output, I can't participate in conversations around here when it can take longer than a day for my comments to appear. My last two comments are on 16 hours and counting.
If I promise to not post corrections as comments, can I go back to not being moderated please? I'll even make a deal with you, since I'm a good proof reader, if you unreject those recent posts of mine that I mentioned above, I'll set up a special email folder with special rules and templates that I'll use to send in lots of corrections. Still not as easy as a web form on the same page as the article, but it'll help.