"we've regularly made enhancements to our industry-leading benefits as a part of the overall support we provide to our valued team members."
iPocrits.
3270 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jun 2017
About this topic, I would suggest to read the last column of Mr. Dabbs: Artificial unintelligence rides off into the sunset with all our jobs
Evicting staff is in marked contrast to US tech employers, typically pay laid-off staff several months severance and offer outplacement services to find them new gigs. Where's the workers' paradise now?
Is it a standard behaviour for US companies to offer flats to employees after 5 years of work?
According to 'Asia Times', YTMC being blacklisted by the US is less a question of security than a way to slash competition
Candid question: If merging NHS Digital with NHS England will bring "the NHS' national data and technology expertise into one organisation, creating a closer link between the collection and analysis of data to help drive improvement to patient outcomes", why was NHS Digital created in the first place?
As an outsider, the requirement looks like being made to favour one competitor over the other ones.
Global spending on the stuff is at $190 billion a year
Sounds huge, but how much is spent on IT worldwide? What do $190 billion represent compared to the whole of IT spending?
Some evaluate that the correct proportion should be 5%, are we near or far of that value?
Talking about trust: trust no one.
A sidewinder costs around $400,000. That's peanuts for the Pentagon. A F-22 has a cannon, but it must be funnier to spend a missile.
What is weird is that quite all media repeated the "spy balloon" story, when there was no evidence it was one and not a meteorological one for instance. I guess that now it was shot down and probably retrieved from the sea we will be shown the "spying equipment".
What would be the point of shooting it down? It isn't like there wasn't any Chinese spy satellite flying over the US already, so I doubt this balloon collects more information, if it does any. This is not a Fu-Go ballon bomb
I'm pissed off because of a documentary I saw recently on ArteTV, showing the german point of view that 'oh nuclear energy is dangerous and France endangers us all by having nuclear reactors', when at a same time not a word about the thousands of people killed each year because of German coal-fired power plants. They have killed more people than Chernobyl but let's be quiet, not a word about that.
Germany produces twice CO2 per capita than France, and this is mostly because of the choice not to use nuclear energy but coal and gas instead. Having those people daring to play the ecology preachers is appalling.
Let me recap the German situation: renewables account for 44% of electricity production, nuclear for 6%. Hard coal, lignite, gas, mineral oil account for 46.2%. It's much more urgent in term of climate and health to get rid of these 46.2% than anything else, I didn't hear yet about any plan to do so, on the contrary. Please correct me if I'm mistaken.
Thanks to the global warming, the winter wasn't that cold, helping to use less energy.
It doesn't mean some states (looking at Germany or Poland) should do much more to stop burning things (and especially coal) to produce electricity.
Germany doesn't like nuclear energy because it's potentially dangerous, but German people don't mind killings thousands of people each year across Europe with their coal-fired power plants. The coalition which the Grünen are part of even prefer to kill more people with coal just to close the last german nuclear power plants. Isn't that insane?
I'm not sure this is that amazing.
First, those HDDs aren't that old, 5 years at the maximum. Next, for the mechanical part the physics involved are known enough to be able to make a robust design. The parameter there would be rather the cost, being very reliable is more expensive. The less reliable part is IMHO the electronic part of the HDD. AFAIK, reliability of electronic components is not as much studied than their mechanical counterparts.
burning low levels of hydrogen for months
2H2 (g) + O2 (g) → 2H2O (g) + energy
Where's the pollution?
Even if in the atmosphere this could produce some nitrogen oxides, this is not necessarily a bad thing as nitrogen oxides degrade methane in the atmosphere.
The principle is great, but in reality it doesn't work for government. Some of the actions and decisions must stay in the dark, when related to the defence of the country for instance. It doesn't mean there shouldn't be control by independent bodies, but everything cannot be made public.
In France, the Senate hasn't the last word. The National Assembly does, and can rewrite any line put by Senators into the law.
Our Senate is a congregation of old notables put there to have a nice and long pre-retirement period with plenty of advantages at the cost of the taxpayers. Its only utility is to put a hold on laws for some times, it cannot do more. Senators are not elected directly by the people, ensuring an over representation of the Right. In the last 65 years, the Right had the majority for 62 years. If we could get rid of it, it could be a nice save. However, senators will never scuttle themselves.
About video-surveillance, I'm confident in the role the French Regulator (CNIL) can play. They are independent and with sharp teeth. Even megacorps fear them. If there's a risk about data, CNIL will tell.
I'm all in favor of getting rid of coal, which is probably the dirtiest way to produce electricity.
However, can we compare a power plant with renewables sources, when the latter ones are intermittent? To get the same functionality, there's a need of energy storage, either through batteries, mechanical storage (water pumped to some height then released through an alternator for instance...).
Hear, hear!
The problem is that too many times IT is still under the responsibility of the CFO, as if we were still in the 70s and IT used mainly by accounting. The first step would be for executive committees to place the CIO as the same level than the CFO. And too many times CFO can only think about reducing costs without understanding A) the gain in other departments B) the gain in term of having the final customers satisfied.
First, let's not forget that "the charges contained in the indictment are only allegations. A person is presumed innocent unless and until he or she is proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law."
Next, Too many times kids or young adults don't realize what can happen to them IRL. It seemed so easy to them to play nefarious games, they thought they were safe and even they were caught, they never imagined they could spend a very long time if not their whole life in the hell of a US prison.
Maximum publicity should be made around this case, so the next ones think twice before playing the black hat.
Who thought that once again Russia wanted to massacre Ukrainians?
You're right, the message wasn't explicit enough for IT-illiterate. I would suggest rather using "Do not touch this computer" with skulls and bones in ascii art.
This is the new mantra.
The latest word on the subject comes from Stephan van Rooij, a software architect with Smartersoft BV in the Netherlands and a Microsoft MVP in security [...] The Register asked the US spokesperson for Sweden-based Electrolux to comment.
Maybe El Reg should try the EU counterpart.
"Why is the Mayor of the Paw Patrol town constantly chasing her pet chicken Chickaletta rather than attending to civic duties?" And: "Why are puppies – not even fully grown dogs – tasked with rescuing townsfolk?"
Why are puppies talking but the chicken isn't? It's a clear illustration of species-bias.
What could be easier? And I mean that in the practical sense
Let's make a comparison:
You calculate the volume of a cube with a side of 4 feet and 2 inches, I calculate the same volume for a cube of 127 cm. Let's see who makes the fewest calculations.