106 posts • joined 24 May 2017
Re: Aren't Vendors Supposed To NOT Store The CVV?
You are correct. Hence the idea that the hack exfiltrated live information (like a key-logger). Also ties in with BA giving exact to-the-minute timings for the start and end of the vulnerability.
Value for money
Unless the fine is bigger than the savings made by outsourcing IT to India then it will be seen as money well spent.
"OnePlus are not registered in the UK which is why you aren't paying any UK VAT to claim back. If you buy direct you are buying from Europe somewhere."
How does that work? Surely you (should) pay VAT at UK customs if you import privately goods bought overseas (even if via mailorder/internet).
It ain't always so
On mobiles.co.uk you can get a Galaxy S9 with 4GB data over 24 months for total cost of £667. That is £115 up front and 24 months at £23. Or SIM-free for £699.
Or SIM-free on Amazon for £739 (pukka UK version, not the various other versions via Hong Kong).
So bundled with 4GB data is cheaper than the sim free handset. Or am I missing something?
And the uk.gov gateway (access to details about your pension, tax, national insurance, driving licence, car tax, everything - your whole government ID) has a password requirement of 8-12 alphanumerics, no special characters allowed.
You put your finger on it when you recounted the experience setting up a virgin Google account. All defaults are max-slurp. The devil is in the detail - no local phone account to save contacts under, no local gallery app to view photos etc, all the better to funnel all that data to Google the moment you forget to disable whichever sync default.
So I figure it's bad enough having to do business with the devil, but I'm sure not going to sit down to dinner as well. If I must use Android, no way ever is it going to be on Google's own phone. Never.
Re: Conspiracy theory.
I can't help noticing that much of what some people fashionably deride as 'bloat' in manufacturer skins is what informs and inspires the next round of new features in Android. Without the constant innovation and differentiation of the manufacturer skins Android would have settled to a far more sedate and self-satisfied pace of change.
This is why I hate the use of percentages in contexts where the increase is above a two figure percentage. And yet, the lure of 'big number' is almost always too great for journalists to resist.
Re: Choices, choices...
My other half just got the Moto G6 Plus. In many ways a nice phone. One thing I noticed, being stock Android, it really pushes you to give all your data to Google. For example there is no local account, you have to store all your contacts against your google account, so unless you are aware and disable google contacts sync then they slurp them automagically. Similar for photos, no local 'gallery' app, only google photos, so if you are not careful then your photos are suddenly corporate property too. Basically all the defaults point your personal data to google.
Re: "Pricey? I would say so..."
In the UK Samsung offer a £200 trade in for the Note 4. Even so, I will keep mine. Having just spent a fortnight camping the swappable battery was invaluable. And I actually do make regular use of the IR blaster.The flat screen is a bonus too. All in, I actually prefer my Note 4, despite my gadget lust.
Is this sort of a return to the mainframe and dumb terminals setup of old, except that now the terminals pack their own horsepower?
Re: Selectivity, again...
Well, if I give "Sample APPLICATION" permission to read my emails, I expect the reading to be done by Sample Application. So that would be an algorithm, artificial intelligence, a machine - not a person. There is a difference.
Misuse would imply the reading of your email was not covered by a 'permission'. So on a technical level this is not misuse. But by any common understanding, well, did the users properly understand the permissions? Did anybody really suppose they had understood, or rather is this enterprise predicated on their expected ignorance?
To me they read like you are giving permission for the application itself to read your emails, artificial intelligence, not flesh and blood.
One major difference I see is that, in the main, flaws that have come to light over the years in cars have been defects in the design and build which were present from the start, whereas with phones they are generally vulnerabilities to new exploits which did not pertain when the phone was launched.
1) All this scary noise about security updates for phones; OK, I get the basic idea (my phone *could* be vulnerable to exploit xyz), but I've simply never heard of anyone having it happen to them. Loads of headlines about the possibility, none about the fact.
2) My front door lock *could* be picked - is Yale obligated to upgrade it so it is hardened against the latest developments in lockpicking techniques?
Re: Just Pixel?
Actually, I could use a primer here. Google apps? What are they, for example? I don't use Chrome or Gmail etc, I actually prefer the Samsung 'crapware' alternatives. Does using the Play app store fall into the category of 'Google apps'? What exactly am I saying goodbye to if I " press cancel on the sign-up"?
Which makes me curious - the author implicitly prefers the slurpy Google apps when he characterises the alternatives as 'crapware', even whilst writing this anti-slurp manifesto. Contradictory?
Re: Still with the removable storage thing?
Unlike a Lambo, bragging rights is not the only factor at stake with storage. I've known two phones die with loads of photos locked inside. One reason why mine are all on the SD card. How much faster than fast enough they get there, I don't care. And yes, it's backed up to a NAS as well, before you jump on that one.
Re: Own domain
"so long as you keep paying the registration fees every year it won't be taken away."
Unless it is a .EU domain.
yup, the hinge! SO many years later, STILL in thrall to the same demon.
Re: Can we stop calling it a Psion please?
Yes, the calendar application. Android is still in the dark ages compared to its slick usability. Why does android keep giving me alarms at midnight?! Etc. Please, Mr Android, get hold of a working Psion 5MX and have a play.
The one thing Psion never got right was the hinge - always over complex and too fragile. Every one I had broke. I see they are going for a trick hinge again...
They keyboard, never equalled. All in, I know I was far more productive on a Psion than ever on a smartphone. Smartphones are very beguiling, but ultimately fall far short in usability. Type a report, build a database, actually use the diary, easy on Psion, nightmare on smartphone.
So if they are taking their ball home...
EU? Ironic that they continue to use the English name for the organisation. Surely after we leave they should be denied that privilege and be forced to change the TLD to .UE, or whatever language they can agree upon from within their own pot. Or, erm, does the common concept of Grandfather rights seem relevant here?
Re: History repeating itself...
That's the RISC you take.
Re: Look Who Wants to Wet Their Beaks
A properly functioning market is if no value?
Re: Let's get some perspective here
No, not like when some HIV clinic CCs a newsletter to all their patients!
Re: Irregular verbs
Surely HMxx should be using HM Queen's English. "Shuttered"?
Re: I'm failing to see how this is Just Eat's fault
"This is surely an impossibility unless JE literally handles all the SMS stuff themselves and bans the restaurant from direct contact with the customer except the delivery itself. "
Far from impossible, but clearly JE want the money but not the work involved.
They just need to look at how Amazon let traders communicate with you by email, but without giving up your email address. A proxy system. No reason why JE could not do the same with your phone number, so that it was never revealed to the restaurant, and JE could audit texts etc.
Re: This is a serious problem.
So you are saying there could be contributory negligence? Maybe not an open and shut case then?
Yes, the cost of these 'solutions'. Reminds me of the old stand-up gag about the husband who did not report his wife's stolen credit card. The thief was spending less than his wife.
Re: OK, so which part do I register?
Reminds me of Trigger's broom (Only Fools and Horses).
Scrap car tax, simples.
Just get rid of car tax, save every penny spent on its administration. Put the tax on fuel.
The argument used to be that the tax disc was a useful check that a car was insured. That no longer applies. Scrap the tax.
That's a favourite with Virgin too. Trumpet their "totally free" speed increases one month, then push through an "inflation" price rise the following month.
Re: Problem for OLED
Can't see any burn in on my Note 4. Even though I am now paranoid, and have changed the browser settings to display full screen, so as to remove the clock etc from permanent display - but no actual sign of burn in from the time display which has been up there for over two years until now.
Maybe if websites could all offer a choice of a black background (as dpreview.com) we would suffer less screen (and retina) burn.
The green shift, yes. But did wonder why I should be looking at my device sideways however... face on seems more natural.
Shirley, all that the nag screen proves is that the manufacturer had culpable knowledge that the sat nav was a distraction to safe driving, yet failed to remedy it.
I don't understand how they get away with selling phones on what amounts to Hire Purchase without having to comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act, such as quoting the APR and total cost of borrowing.
And that is the sad truth. We humans beat machines/AI hands down when it comes to menial 'unskilled' tasks like doing the ironing, folding and putting away clothes, dusting the mantlepiece, etc. Are those the jobs we will be left with once the machines take over all the skilled jobs? Who serves who?
An offer I can't refuse
The power imbalance is what annoys me. So Microsoft (or whichever) can include T&Cs that basically state, "we can slurp your data and do what we like with it, you forego any rights to class actions, etc. By continuing to use the software you confirm your consent".
So my choice is to prostitute my legitimate expectations of privacy, or opt out of the norms of participation in modern economy.
So I don't have an "account" with Equifax, nothing I can log in to, so there is no password or mother's maiden name to steal. But obviously Equifux still have loads of data about me to lose/leave on the bus/park bench. But the way they tell it, it is account details etc that were stolen. How does that play for peeps like me with no account?
Flat earth, obviously
The earth is flat. It flew off the edge.Did nobody think of that?
Re: Am I stupid (be kind)?
@Dr Syntax. Thank you. I was not explicit enough, but you expressed it much better. Indeed I was referring to the sharing of cars rather than sharing of journeys. As others point out, we already can share journeys if we wish, driverless changes nothing there. Driverless means we can share the car (sequentially, as another has helpfully clarified) instead of owning it. And as you point out with the Uber example, why would that not add to conjestion?
Am I stupid (be kind)?
Ok, I'm maybe being thick, but I don't get how car sharing reduces congestion. Just because everybody has their own personal car parked somewhere (i.e. static), how does that increase traffic congestion? If anything, lots of shared cars transiting to their next assignment can only add to the number of vehicle movements.
Re: Someome needs to tell
Whose aggressive chuggers?
Re: What could possibly go wrong?
Is that a reference to Elop?
How is it that simple? I don't take decisons about using Microsoft, only about using Libre Office? Etc.
Paws four thought
Cats can be pawed, ergo liquid.
Re: Like fingerprints
Sure, but since at least two cops will have gooned at it already it will revert to requiring your pass code by the time they have you in a headlock.
Maybe they did you a favour?
Cynical, possibly. But if you do actually trade on a .co.uk site, customers etc, are you happy to let the .uk doppleganger go to someone else? Like who? Just maybe, despite themselves, 123 have done you a favour of sorts. The real charlatans are those who created .uk - for what purpose?
...and so, as processing power increased and memory multiplied like clover, they, uh, cut back on the 3D stuff.
And I thought it was me. I thought it was my fault I struggled to see the wood for the trees, or could not readily decipher light grey 6-point text on an expansive white background, or even know where to look to find the wretched button. Actually, I'm lying. I thought, "which tosser ever thought it was clever to camouflage the UX."