Outlook for Mac talks to my Exchange Server just fine. You do need to enable Exchange Web Services on it though, and don't activate the "new" version of Outlook.
Posts by katrinab
6393 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Aug 2016
Page:
- ← Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- Next →
Sorry Pat, but it's looking like Arm PCs are inevitable
Banks, shops, car show rooms, dental practices, hospital receptions; are all use cases where the cheapest iPad could do the job just fine.
Increasingly in shops I do see iPads being used. Haven't been to a car showroom recently, but that seems like a perfect place to have iPads instead of desktops, because they can carry it around with them rather than have to go back to the desk to use it.
Tenfold electric vehicles on 2030 roads could be a shock to the system
Re: People vastly overrate the amount of at home charging
About 34.5p/kWh excluding VAT for the fuel. [source: Boiler Juice, which says the average price of red diesel today is 86.34p/l. Dividing by 2.5 to get from litres to kWh].
Given the current prices including 20% for electricity from a public charger, you would make a gross margin on that. I don't know if it would be enough to cover the transaction, maintenance, and capital costs.
But mostly, if you have a large warehouse, and you want to fast-charge all the lorries while they are unloading/loading, it is probably the only way to do it.
Re: People vastly overrate the amount of at home charging
This is all absolutely true. I am just looking at the amount of electricity required to power all our road vehicles.
Another thing: Public service bus operators can claim back the fuel duty. I'm not sure if this is shown in the HMRC figures as a reduction in tax revenue, or somewhere else as an expense.
Re: People vastly overrate the amount of at home charging
9kWh in a litre of petrol, 10kWh in a litre of diesel. Slightly more diesel sold than petrol, but it is pretty close to 50:50.
Electric cars are somewhere between 2-3 times more efficient than petrol/diesel, because the efficiency losses mostly take place before the electricity reaches your meter.
So somewhere in the order of 180TWh per year, in addition to the 300TWh we currently use.
Re: People vastly overrate the amount of at home charging
HMRC collects about £2bn per month in fuel tax. At 52.95p/l, that is about 3.8bn litres of petrol and diesel every month. Replacing all that with electricity is a lot more than just a few kw per vehicle per night.
Yes it may be true that "most" people only drive a few miles per day. But it certainly is not the case that most fuel is purchased by people who only drive a few miles per day.
Amazon Ads rolls out generative AI for ad image composition
Pope tempted by Python! Signs off on coding scheme for kids
Wayland heading for default status as Mint devs mix it into Cinnamon 6 bun
SBF on trial: The Python code that allegedly let Alameda hedge fund spend people's FTX deposits
Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection scripts under EU law
Firefox 119 unleashes PDF prowess and Sync sorcery
Ubuntu LTS kernels will get one decade of fixes … still
"Oracle adds Btrfs to its CentOS rebuild, but not ZFS, even though Oracle owns all of Sun's original Solaris code – including ZFS. One would think it could find some way to grant itself rights to things it already owns."
Maybe it doesn't want to give other people those rights? If it released a version of linux with zfs, it would be releasing it under a GPL-compatible licence, or alternatively releasing a pirated version of the linux kernel.
CEO Satya Nadella thinks Microsoft hung up on Windows Phone too soon
The Raspberry Pi 5 is now available ... if you pre-ordered
UK to crack down on imported Chinese optical fiber cables
French IT behemoth Atos facing calls for nationalization as it tries to restructure
Teens take a million metaverse Ryanair flights in Roblox
FreeBSD 14's RC2 dances to the tune of OpenZFS 2.2
Martin Goetz, recipient of the first software patent, logs off at 93
Windows 11: The number you have dialed has been disconnected
AMD gives 7000-series Threadrippers a frequency bump with Epyc core counts
Corner cutting of nuclear proportions as duo admit to falsifying safety tests 29 times
In-memory database Redis wants to dabble in disk
Indian authorities raid fake tech support rings after tipoff from Amazon and Microsoft
First Brexit, now X-it: Musk 'considering' pulling platform from EU over probe
US prosecutors slam Autonomy tycoon's attempt to get charges tossed
Apple finds another use for USB-C – a cheaper Pencil
Take Windows 11... please. Leaks confirm low numbers for Microsoft's latest OS
X marks the bot: Musk thinks spammers won't pay $1 a year
Boris Johnson's mad hydrogen for homes bubble bursts
Down and out: Barclays Bank takes unplanned digital detox, customers not invited
Raspberry Pi 5: Hot takes and cooler mistakes
British boffins say aircraft could fly on trash, cutting pollution debt by 80%
Re: more BS university studies
The "Looney Greens" don't want people flying at all. They want them to use electric trains powered by renewable energy.
Certainly some routes could be replaced with train services, but not all of them.
The people promoting this sort of stuff are greenwashers and people who's business plan is to raise money in investment rather than deliver an actual product.
As it prepares to abandon its on-prem server products, Atlassian is content. Users? Not so much
TaxWatch finds astute scheme minimizes Big Tech's UK tax bill by over $2B
Page:
- ← Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- Next →