Re: "a seamless and cost-effective experience"
Not true.
I've heard of people winning Russian roulette.
845 publicly visible posts • joined 15 May 2016
"Clearly El Reg didn't use an 850 powered ARM Windows PC (they been fast enough already, long before the 8cX chip in this Surface X). I am using that in a Yoga C630, and its more than fast enough."
"The biggest issue is software."
To be fair, a 286 from the mid 80's was fast enough for the overwhelming majority of things I use a computer for. With today's software bloat and inefficiency, it'd be a doorstop at best.
The software is, has been, and probably will always be, the issue.
That just means you're using the originals as a form of backup. What about the media that you lack originals of, say digital pictures of the family? Can't trust the SD/CF cards to last forever in unaltered/usable state.
Need a more robust strategy, IMO. And once you have one, you no longer need the physical media. If it's free to store, keep them, surely--but play the what-if game harder for where you lack originals (or the originals are subject to damage (polaroids that you've scanned in but are slowly fading with the years, etc).
Main server, backup server, backups on site, backups off site, etc.
Fuck 'em. Anyone dumb enough to be offended by language, and particularly those who will take offense on someone else's behalf, needs to be wrapped in barbed wire and beaten until they understand 'harm'.
The music is always more important than the words. Getting worked up over the words is just nitpicking for people who aren't bright enough to understand that.
> Video interviews analyzed by a computer are going to be just as biased as a face-to-face interview.
To be completely fair, AI on the whole has yet to prove the "I" portion of the title--but HR does not have an "I" in it. And that's quite appropriate.
I believe that every time I've interviewed with the person whom I'd be directly reporting to, I've gotten an offer for employment. Convserely, when interviewing with someone who has a checklist and no true idea of what the job entails, I can't recall an offer being made, with one exception. (And to be completely truthful, I should have turned down that horrible cesspit!)
In a job interview, you're very probably dealing with HR rather than another medical person.
So the ability to explain things in layman's terms without actively sounding like you're talking down is very much an important skill, and one that a good doc will use with some frequency.
That's true of most trades that do any customer/client-facing roles, I'd think. If you can't explain it in a number of ways, odds are you don't understand it as well as you perhaps could.
And then afterwards, some banks will also send you a "How are we doing?" email or better another callbot to gauge your customer satisfaction with their services.
It's always nice to suggest that you've never seen such incompetence in any field and wonder precisely if their staff would be more useful to the world as fertilizer.
My own horror story with banking, seeing as we all have at minimum a half a dozen..... While applying for a morgage through the bank--and having every single step being treated as they had never done such a transaction before--was to have the underwriter deny it because my wife's job is on a year-to-year contract (like a schoolteacher). A little social engineering and time with a telephone got me the name of the specific person reviewing the morgage application at the underwriting office, and got me that person's boss's name. After further digging, I managed to directly call the woman's boss and suggest that if needed I could show up at the building in person (it was perhaps an hour's drive) to explain the employment terms in person. When I confirmed the address of the building and asked which parking lot I should use as a customer the boss got suddenly concerned for the mortal safety of the staff and asked how I was able to find out such 'secret' information.
I told them that my wife was, in fact, a professional researcher, and that their secrecy was perhaps not as good as they thought it was; I then suggested they focus on the actual job of reviewing the financial details of the morgage process in a competent fashion.
The application was approved and I got a terrified call from the morgage officer ten minutes later.
>Much simpler to slave a belt-fed Saiga-12 or 40mm AGL to the CCTV and load it with 'less lethal' rounds, all of which are available on the market today! Coupled with facial recognition and AI, and our streets will be so much safer!<
With hilarious results once the hackers show up.....
Tenner a month? Youch! You can do better, but what price convenience? I understand the inertia!
As for throwaway email addresses, it strikes me that it would not be all that expensive nor difficult to set up an inexpensive VPS and use something like mail-in-a-box on it, with an appropriately throw-away domain name. omfgscrewyou.com is still available and would be enjoyable to put on spammer's lists....
That may prove to be a project for another day, but a fun one.
>Maybe the Year of Linux on the (2nd hand) Desktop/Chromebook is nigh!
That's what I'm hoping. A big glut of these showing up on ebay and the like, driving the price down?
I wouldn't mind having a few chromebooks if they were down in the 'disposable' price range. Slap a linux of choice on it--probably Debian or variants for me, ymmv!--and off we go!
>The earth is below the active pins, so if it is partially inserted and a metal part drops from above, you can get into trouble.
Then it's installed upside down, actually. If you look at a US-spec outlet and see a face, it's wrong.
(Nevermind that in practice, basically all of them are that way--they really should go with the single pin skyward.)
No, they should absolutely make changes to it (the start menu)--it's fairly easy to override and put in something that undoes their efforts.
Of course, they could impress the hell out of everyone by simply writing in some flexibility so that the user has choices about what it looks like and how it works.... Nope, that won't be happening. This isn't about getting it right and leaving it alone, it's about making silly minor tweaks to justify one's own existence.
>Plus you're gonna have false alarms when the driver releases a hand to steer (as turning often can't be done with both hands in grip all the time, unless your body is made of plastic).<
A turn requiring that degree of input should pretty much never be made at highway speeds--at least on a public road. Racing etc is a different application, of course.