Even still...
...that's much much better than SAP.
1244 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Aug 2007
I posted on my blog about how NIS07 has to download about 46 separate files just to check to see if there are any updates. It takes about a full minute even with high speed Internet - just to CHECK for updates. My blog post on this subject included a cut-and-paste text grab of the entire 3-foot long process of checking for updates. What was their first reaction? They disabled right-click in that update window (as if that slowed me down by even 5 seconds). They really 'fixed it' in NIS08 by hiding the details of the world's most inefficient update check process. They're not only stupid, but they also have an evil streak too.
I bought Norton Internet Security 2007 3-pack for my three PCs. I became so amazingly frustrated that I had to start a Symantec-Sucks blog simply to have somewhere to paste the many cut-and-paste screen captures of their blatant cock-ups. Image after image of blatant errors on their part. The blog has more than 100 posts now. And these are not silly little blame-the-user finger problems. These are plainly stupid errors on their part documented with screen captures.
I've removed the NIS crap from my old XP desktop (works much better now). The next two PCs will go freeware once the Symantec subscriptions expire. Why anyone would steal a pile of dung is beyond me. What next, steal a copy SAP? Gag me with a fork.
Yep. 41GB last month. 45GB the month before that. And this via an EV-DO mobile (cellphone) network using a dedicated USB gadget (application: house-in-the-forest).
Yes, we do have other hobbies.
PS: People on mobile data plans charging like $0.03 per kilobyte need to realize that this would cost more than $1.2 MILLION per month. Imagine getting that bill in the mail. The 40GB usage per month is perfectly normal. It's the $0.03 per kilobyte (kilobyte, LOL) that is criminally insane.
I use my PSP mostly for audio podcasts. It automatically downloads a selection (RSS) every night via WiFi, and when I have time I just plug in the earphones and listen. It's pretty sweet in this application; if it did nothing else it'd be worth every penny. But it does so much more too.
It would only require downloading 45 GB to achieve a bill of more than $1.3 million.
In fact, last month we did download a bit over 45 GB using our mobile EV-DO cell-phone-like gadget, but thankfully we're on a different plan than the usual or $0.03 per kilobyte. So our bill was just '$75' (actually $93.03 all in).
Our large 53-inch Rear Projection TV with three CRT projector tubes: I measured (using the 'Kill-o-watt' gadget) 1.1 amperes times 120 volts = 132 watts when in use. When I finally get around to replacing it with a 50+ inch LCD, I expect the power consumption will be higher.
Of course, in Canada, the heating season is about 8 months of the year. So the power consumption for 2/3 of the year is completely free, since it offsets the electric heat.
I was reading up on the global warming impact of the concrete industry (which is variously reported as being somewhere between big and huge, 'up to 15% of all man-made CO2 emissions' by some reports).
The concrete industry claim (I think they mean in the best case, the most energy efficient) that 40% of the CO2 from concrete comes from the fuel / energy required to burn the limestone, and 60% comes from the CO2 expelled from the burning limestone itself.
The next claim is that the 60% portion is all reabsorbed (from the atmosphere) into the crumbling concrete over the next few (many?) hundred years so it doesn't really count in the long run.
Anyway, here is the suggestion: A concrete plant is a perfect example of a major point source. So, whatever it costs, sequester the CO2 from all concrete plants. Just do it. The plants can even be relocated to optimum locations and the concrete moved around by train. You can't ask for better than major point sources where you can even adjust the schedule of emissions (unlike power plants). It doesn't get any better.
Now, with this plan, the concrete becomes a NEGATIVE source of CO2 as it reabsorbs CO2 (the 60%) from the atmosphere over the following few (many?) hundred years.
It's 1.6 for the price of 1.0 !!! And on major regional point sources that are already a best-case. And the concrete industry need not complain because if they accept this challenge, then we will throw huge buckets of money at them. They should get rich and deservedly so if they help out in this manner.
It's a no brainer.
Send the Nobel Prize via e-mail.
One initial machine provided with power and raw materials. Plug it in and let it run. Come back later and find at least four generations still working. Pull the plug before it gets out of hand. We can discuss the amount of human midwifery that might be permissible. Ideally, They (The Machines) should be able to take care of that themselves (plugging themselves into power for example).
Anything less (such as displayed here) is BS. There's a lot of metal and motors and wires in the second unit. Seems like a stretch to claim that they've accomplished anything significant.
The next step after basic meaningless reproduction (raises some interesting philosophical question abot humans...) would be to add some useful function. And scaling down to nano as mentioned above.
As Ian K mentioned, angular momentum can cause interesting effects. If these gadgets were used to replace batteries in hybrid cars, then it might be difficult (for example) to turn left. If you used two of them spinning in opposite directions to try to counter the effect, then the mount may (for example) flex up and down as the car turns left and right. Or the chassis may tilt left or right under acceleration. This sort of behaviour might be very useful for comedy cars.
For those with no wired (such as DSL or Cable) or well-known wireless (WiMax) high speed Internet option available in their neighbourhood, double check with your local mobe telecos (all of them) to see if any of them offer any EV-DO or HSPDA or whatever 3G mobile broadband options with a suitable tethered-friendly unlimited data plan that is actually more-or-less affordable. Just because these systems are sort-of intended for mobile and portable applications, doesn't prevent you from using it your house. Google EV-DO in NS for my experiences in this matter.
"...old folk's home??"
LOL. No - just a fairly-normal Canadian family with perhaps slightly more power bars than is usual.
BTW - May 3rd is still firmly in heating season in these parts. So turning all this gear off would have essentially zero impact on my household's overall power consumption. The electric heaters would simply duty-cycle up a bit to compensate. Mid-August would make more sense from the point of view of saving power.
Not in our house (with a Wii, 2 PS2s, 2 desktops, 1 laptop, 2 DSs, 3 PSPs, 2 mobes, 1 EV-DO USB stick, 3 routers, 4 satellite dishes, 9 satellite boxes, several XM satellite radios, 2 home theatres, a HF/VHF ham radio station, 50+ assorted radios, etc.)
Unless, perhaps, if there is a power failure. But even then I've got battery back-up for some of it. And solar panels.
My EV-DO broadband (used in my house-in-the-forest) is mobile-capable (I've used it in my car). So I could Skype even while mobile, but it would be akward to balance a laptop while walking around. My PSP has skype too, so I could tuck the EV-DO WiFi hotspot into my pocket and use the PSP to Skype even while walking around.
The era of nearly-free worldwide long distance is not far off. Five years tops? Invest accordingly.
Leslie: "...old diesel smoke belcher does 40mpg, and a new clean emissions car does 40mpg, then surely the effect on the environment is equal..."
Ah - no.
The traditional old pollutants (such as NOx) actually have significant greenhouse effects in addition to their good old fashioned air pollution effects. If I recall correctly, NOx is many many many (300?) times worse than CO2. So your old smoke belching diesel, even at 40 mpg, is an environmental pig from both the traditional air pollution view AND the greenhouse gases view. Sorry...
It is only the VERY latest clean burning diesels that are actually anything close to being green and clean. Congratulations to the engineers that made it so.
Unfortunately for the fate of the world, this fact makes a lie of the purported 'Global Warming' benefits of many public transit systems that relay on old smoke belching diesel powered buses. If those public transit systems were rapidly updated with modern clean-burning diesels, then perhaps they'd help. But I've noted that the smoke belching buses in many cities are THE prime source (by far!) of sidewalk level air pollution, not to mention noise pollution (only knuckle-dragging idiots on Harleys are worse), not to mention plugging up the roads, not to mention driving around most of the day empty. If only they provide the benefits attributed to them, oh if only...
This just in:
The CO2 output from the pine beetle infestation of British Columbia may exceed the entire CO2 output attributed to all Canadian human activities (excluding I suppose the long term mismanagement of the BC forests...).
So if humans were a logical species, we would immediately turn our attention to solving the pine beetle infestation in BC as the top Canadian priority. One single problem that would halve (HALVE!!!!) the CO2 output from Canada. But no... it's all window dressing and a primal, almost homosexual (not that there's anything wrong with that), fixation on automotive tail pipes. Even just the manufacture of concrete emits MANY times the CO2 of cars and airplanes combined.
We're doomed. And deservedly so. Because we're idiots.
We have a Wii and we have about 20 or so games for it. Surprisingly, there's a good selection of $20 games available for the Wii - some of which are even not bad. But we've also got some big name games ($50 each) too. Kids love Smash Bros for no apparent reason.
Our Wii's graphics output developed some nasty video noise (vertical scratch-like video noise). We sent it back and they replaced it. The replacement Wii has also developed the same video noise (vertical scratch-like video noise). I did some Googling and discovered it is not an uncommon problem ("Wii video noise" or "Wii GPU overheating"). It'll be going back too. Sigh...
My sons both have DS systems. They have about 40 game... (Daddy I lost three), about 37 game... (Daddy I lost two), about 35 game... (Daddy I lost five more), about 30 game cartridges for their DSes. It would be cheaper to own a camel.
By your "Pringles" etc. comment you appear to assume that the keyfob is transmitting in the 2.4 GHz. Not every consumer electronics uses the same 2.4 GHz band. My keyfob, like most, isn't 2.4 GHz. It is, like many, in the 300-something MHz band. Makes your high gain antenna pretty unweildy. Your Pringles can WiFi antenna would have to be replaced with a garbage can size keyfob-compatible antenna.
So, beware hackers loitering on the sidewalk and aiming tripod-mounted garbage cans in your direction while fiddling with their laptop.
"straw man"
It's not from tabloids (No, I don't get near them). It is from otherwise-respected "Science" shows such as PBS Nova and Science, and BBC WS radio, and magazines such as Scientific American and Nature. Also, TV interviews with the guilty parties. These sources are about as good as it gets for laypeople following science. It is certainly not a strawman argument. It is a clear trend. There are more than a few paleoanthropologists making up rubbish overly-detailed theories and then vigourously defending them. At least until a new bone tips up proving them wrong and then (and this is where it gets REALLY bad) the cycle repeats.
It is exactly the same cycle as the public health safety of the 'artifical sweetener du jour': "Perfect safe", RECALL!, Next!
"...I agree that the liberties taken in imagining the past are sometimes a bit too much..."
Exactly. Thanks.
Compare and contrast the following:
1) The assured self-confidence that these paleoanthro(a)pologists ('boffins' and their fanboys) display once they have their Theory Du Jour at hand - "Yes indeed, we know EXACTLY what happened 'X' millions or thousands of years ago. The first protohumans crossed the mouth of the Red Sea on a fine Tuesday morning exactly 47,017 years ago at about 10:30am (I'm sorry that we can't be more accurate than that), ate some fish for brunch, carried the shorter members of the band through the deeper sections,..." etc.
2) Their reaction when they find a new bone that changes EVERYTHING.
Paleoanthropologists - sigh... These idiots loop between State 1 and State 2 (above) continuously without even noticing the irony. Those of us that follow science closely get dizzy until we realize that this field ISN'T science. Reading prehistory bones leads to some clear individual facts (which is okay), but the detailed theories created from the sparse facts might as well come from 'reading' fresh chicken bones.
Most of the more prominent paleoanthropologist (the ones with the most detailed and imaginative theories) haven't got a clue. Seriously. They haven't got the first clue about knowing what they know, and (more importantly) knowing what they DON'T know.
If these people had gone into civil engineering, it would be lethal to live in built-up areas.
All Aircraft: ~2% of man-made CO2 emissions
Concrete: ~15% of man-made CO2 emissions
We should concentrate our attention on Bio-concrete...
By the way, when they make clean diesel fuel by removing the sulfur, are there truck-loads of sulfur leaving the refineries and heading where? Or do they simply open a valve and redirect the sulfur into the Bunker C ship fuel thereby short-circuiting everything (except, perhaps granting this, inner-city air pollution) but doing nothing about the global warming impact of NOW EVEN DIRTIER ship fuel?
By a trivial extension to your logic, DVD Rentals will never take off. Also, Pay-Per-View will also not exist.
Fact is that MANY (perhaps most?) people do not build up huge collections of DVDs, they simply rent the DVD for a couple of days and then take them back. Being able to do exactly the same thing less the 3-mile drive may be quite appealing.
I do see your point. I've got hundreds and hundreds of DVDs. But most of my coworkers are renters, not buyers.
The BBC 1 feed found on Sirius is BORING. I actually listened to it for an hour, I actually listened to it for an hour, I actually listened to it for an hour, I actually listened to it for an hour - and that's what it was like.
The BBC World Service feed found on XM is FAR less repetative. Still extremely repetative, but many times better than the Sirius feed. It was actually a deciding factor in chossing XM over Sirius.
Cheap mobile broadband leads to:
1) Virtually free telephone calls including international by means of VOIP+3G
2) Mobile and portable Internet radio (more or less changes everything to do with broadcast radio)
3) Almost anything else you can imagine.
The next 10 years will be very interesting. Those that just paid billions for spectrum are not stupid.
Allow me to tell my tale once again. My house-in-the-forest is too far from the nearest telephone CO to get DSL. Also, there's no Cable TV in the neighbourhood. WiMax is coming someday, but not yet. Internet by 2-way satellite sucks in so many ways that I don't know where to start. So we had nothing but dial-up for many, many years.
Then one day I noticed that the local mobile companys (a couple of them) had just started offering an unlimited "$75/month" EV-DO plan. The "$75" is actually $93.03 with the non-extra extras (such as "service", LOL). I checked the fine print about thirty times, and "unlimited" appeared to really mean unlimited.
With respect to billing issues associated with tethering, since I was planning to purchase one of their USB-only data modems, I couldn't see anyway for them to complain about me using the system for my PC since the device has no other purpose in life.
So I bought the $300 Sierra Wireless 595U and opted for a non-contract month-to-month plan. I also procured a $150 CradlePoint CTR-350 mobile router where the 595U plugs into the side and creates a WiFi hot spot. All the CTR-350 needs is a wee bit of power supplied by an AC adapter, or you could even rig up some batteries.
So now our house-in-the-forest has a WiFi hotspot (wide open since the property is so large). Everything works. We actually get download speeds of up to a bit over 2Mbps, and not usually any lower than 1Mbps. Although this isn't the ultimate in bandwidth it is perfectly usable for almost everything.
Actually it compares well to satellite where 1Mbps costs $100 per month, and 2Mbps would cost $200 per month.
Someday, when another option appears I will try to find something a bit cheaper, but "$75" per month isn't that bad since some of the other options that may become available in the future will probably cost "$55" per month anyway.
Although it is designed and intended for mobile, we use it for our house.
One thing I've yet to try is Yahoo video messaging while driving. It'll be like the early mobile telephone days, "We're video conferencing while driving!"
For more info about EV-DO in Nova Scotia, just Google: EV-DO NS
So to get back to the main point, all the 3G providers have to do is drop their rates from the insanely-stupid $85,000 to "$75" (some have) and then to "$55" and they may become the new default. The $75 is pretty close to the price point they need.
I don't see their market share going anywhere but up. And companys that make suitable mobile routers will probably do quite well too...
Where's the darn headphone jack? It should be on the front panel.
One knob? On a radio? Have these people ever seen a real radio? Google Image your way to 'R-5000' (for example) to see what a real radio should look like.
Many of these products can only access Internet Radio via pay-per-month indexing services such as Live365. So if they've built one that can access anything directly, then it's a big step ahead.
But I still haven't seen a proper Internet Radio that I'd be happy with. I'm looking for a box that will make Internet radio as fun and interesting as Shortwave radio used to be.
These suggestions to address the trivial are exceedingly dangerous. I call this sort of idiocy the 'False Finishing Touch'. Once you understand it, you'll see it everywhere...
It is exactly like someone putting a large 'coffee-can' tail-pipe on a clapped out Honda. It is exactly like someone purchasing expensive oxygen-free speaker cables for their modestly-priced home theater. It is exactly like someone suggesting that we need to fix the smallest end of the energy inefficiency spectrum while the larger end waits for funding - oh, sorry; that's this one.
Such idiotic nonsense wastes money (a very good measure of impacting the environment), diverts attention from issues with many more significant figures, and is a major disservice to humanity and the environment.
But it's not like I have strong feelings about it or anything...
For $600 Cdn (clearance), I recently brought home a Dell Inspiron 530 (1.6GHz dual core, 2GB DD2 ram, 320GB HDD, DVD burner, 3-yr warranty) including a nice 22-inch LCD monitor worth $300 by itself. That makes the 530 tower effectively a $300 item. So, $200 for a cut-down PC isn't so attractive.
YMMV.
What if your OS decides that NOW is the time to download some massive collection of updates? I've certainly seen a few MS Update Tuesdays that were hundreds of megabytes. What if other software on your PC decides to update itself while you're on the road? There are so many programs installed that it would be difficult to ensure that they're all switched off. And many that you do switch off the auto-update function start to get quite naggy.
One problem is that some 3G operators, and some of their stupid data plans, treat every bit as precious (i.e. expensive). Someone should write a mocking song to the tune of Monty Python's 'Every Sperm is Precious' and replace sperm with bit.
Another problem is that the ability to control such behaviour is at best akward, and at worst almost impossible.
Paying such an insane bill is not an option. It's a case where common sense should over-rule contract law.
The worst thing that could happen would be to place "reasonable" limits on such bills, such as "only" one thousand Euros per month. Because then victims might actually be expected to pay the bills. Better to see stupidly insane bills so that the insanity is more clear to all.
Where are the failsafe aerobrakes that pop out at the wingtips when the rotational speed gets too high? Heck, it could be a simple glass plate, with a calibrated weight that breaks the glass, and a little parachute pops out. This should happen when the speed is above the operational limits, but below the damage limit. Duh.
I went out the very next evening and looked at the time and place when the small bits and pieces should have been going over head. I expected at least a few streaks of light as some of the broken rivets and small paint flecks re-entered the atmosphere at 7 miles per second. Nothing. Did anyone see anything burn up? Nada.
So, I'm going to stick with the "Meeting the Alien Space Fleet on the Opposite Side of the Globe from the Lunar Eclipse at Exactly the Same Time While the Astronomers are all Looking the Other Way" theory for now....but I'm open minded.
Symantec. The name leaves one shaking one's head.
I've got Norton Internet Security 2007. When I run that idiot LiveUpdate it wanders off to download FORTY-SIX catalog files. FORTY-SIX!! And this is before it actually downloads any updates!! What lunatic could even think that such a scheme is appropriate? Even if there are one thousand files associated with the application, then make a damn list of the revision levels of those one thousand files and send it along. Should take 2 or 3 seconds. Not 2 or 3 minutes.
There are dozens of similar idiot design decisions.
My conclusion is that they've got a lunatic running the show. This many bad decisions, consistently bad decisions, can only come from one mind.
@Adam Williamson: The "Connect $75" plan is just left of the "$100" version (at least on my screen). As I mentioned before, $75 := $93 with all the fees and taxes.
As far as 'tethering' goes, my EV-DO gadget is the Sierra Wireless 595U and its only purpose in life is to be tethered. They can't exactly complain...
Furthermore, I've plugged the 595U into a CTR-350 "Travel" router and placed the whole kit on a shelf. The only wired connection is the AC adapter. The house is now a WiFi hot-spot. It just plain works. I'm using it now.
It makes me laugh that this whole kit-and-kaboodle could easily be installed in a car and thus make the 'WiFi Limo'. The 595U even has a jack for an external antenna. Or, it is small enough to fit under a hat and could be powered by AA cells (using an external battery pack of some sort).
As already pointed out, Rogers charges $0.05 per kilobyte which is actually $50 per megabyte.
Telus offers a '$75/month' (actually about $83 + tax = $93) Unlimited plan that actually appears to be unlimited. It is so unlimited that my house-in-the-forest uses this EV-DO mobile technology to provide high speed Internet. I typically consume 13 to 19 GigeByte per month (or about $800,000 by Roger's math - LOL). There's no compression of graphics. And there's no complaints about using a laptop (not to mention two desktops, a Wii, two DS's, three PSP's, an Internet Radio appliance, and several more).
Please Google 'EV-DO in NS' and 'WiFi Limo' to learn more.
Disclaimer - I'm nothing but a satisfied customer.
I've not been to India, but if it is anything like the Philippines, then the roads will already be completely full of smoke-belching home-made rubbish. Mobile contraptions made from welded-up rebar, powered by clapped-out lawnmower engines trailing heaps and lumps of thick smoke. Jeepneys powered by long-expired diesel engines junked in other countries. It's so bad that the local police work very hard to take the 'smoke belchers' off the road.
So, please don't think of the Nano in terms of millions of people that have been staying home for the past ten thousand years (huh?) suddenly being given cars. That doesn't even make sense. Think of it terms of 'modernizing the fleet' (which is a VERY good thing). The road network (already full) will set hard limits on how many added vehicles are feasible.