Re: As a Non Legal Opinion
In-house the PO and Fujitsu know or have access rights to know things about Horizon but in Scotland the Procurator Fiscal / staff / Prosecutors only know and only can know what the PO and or Horizon tell them. Unless the PF / Staff received documentary evidence that contradicts the instructions / witness statements they received how on earth are they to know that Horizon was riddled with errors and the PO / F staff have lied to cover up these problems?
I suspect that the person writing this about the process in Scotland knows v. little about how legal proceedings work.
I'm assuming that in Scotland (just like in England & Wales) the Prosecutor is under a duty to disclose to the defence documentary evidence that is adverse to the Prosecutor's case. Down south the PO of course had such material, but north of the border the PF will only have it if the PO had provided it. Knowing the PO as we now do, it probably didn't.
I doubt that the PF or its staff or Prosecutors were told about the Horizon defects.