Oh shit, reading the stuff in the link it's me!
But seriously, thanks for the link, interesting read.
Happy New Year!
6157 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Oct 2015
"Is it normal to be both thrilled and terrified at the prospect of utter failure, or possibly even random cases of success?"
Perfectly normal.
This is roughly on par with getting married - if it works it's bliss, if it doesn't, well... one way or another, it will cost you. So it won't hurt to think through a "what if" for the worst case and maybe an exit strategy/plan B.
Been there, more or less, when starting my own business. Didn't work as planned (but that's neither here nor there), still glad I went for it.
So, good luck & a happy new year!
Just came across another 'solution' for the Fermi paradox on Boing Boing:
Well, the internet is the open version of the closed ward.
On a related topic: if we are typical for a technical civilisation, the Fermi paradox isn't one.
Dear team at El Reg, fellow commentards: have a good 2017 anyway!
Budgets are for spending. Same thing in the oh so efficient private sector. (Ever tried giving money back to the beancounters? Way harder than getting some in the first place.)
As I'm in a somewhat feisty mood (christmas with the relatives, need I say more?) - technically your gripe is with the administration. As in a democracy, the government is the people. Technically.
Not my own country. (BTW, not God's own either... ^-^ )
"... such things need careful planning and execution in order to avoid fucking up other important infrastructure wot might be buried in the ground."
All in a day's work for a civil engineer. Who'll also know who keeps plans of what is buried where and how to read them. And can tell you in advance which permissions you'll need and how to get them. And at least a good approximation of how much it will cost. And how to set everything up so it will actally work.
"The government is asking for ideas on how it should splash £400m earmarked for fibre broadband investment."
How about, uh, hire companies that dig cable trenches and put fiber in them? In areas where there isn't any fiber yet? And connect everything "to the internet"?
Seriously dear Britons, sometimes your government seems a bit weird.
There is more to this. The problem(s) run deeper and the long term effects are cause for concern. Because Big Tech, and in fact any other corporate "sponsor", are not interested in education. They are interested in training. What's the difference, you ask?
Education gives you knowlege, the ability to learn and, most of all, the ability to think.
Training gives you a specific set of skills to do a specific range of jobs; preferably (from the trainer's point of view) without any original or, heaven forbid, critical thoughts.
"Please note that Self-Driving functionality is dependent upon extensive software validation and regulatory approval, which may vary widely by jurisdiction. It is not possible to know exactly when each element of the functionality described above will be available, as this is highly dependent on local regulatory approval."
= any time between next week and never.
"Please note also that using a self-driving Tesla for car sharing and ride hailing for friends and family is fine, but doing so for revenue purposes will only be permissible on the Tesla Network, details of which will be released next year."
= no Ubering on the side.
"Much agricultural machinery is connected to the internet, and a internet connected heavy vehicle that can be controlled remotely can be controlled remotely by a bad guy, too."
Which is a problem in itself, isn't it? Given the state of things, from what I read on El Reg alone, combine harvesters or tractors or any other heavy vehicle that is connected to the internet will be about as "secure" as any given CCTV or kettle.
"Gary and his mates were granted their wishes, practiced the job until they could do it in two hours and showed up on Christmas Eve confident of a fast and lucrative getaway."
"...since I’m not in the mood to make some big, dramatic, sweeping statement, I’ll just tell you this: God hates doctors, He truly does. You see all these old people in here? Well, any of ’em would give just about anything to be able to sashay off this planet, but most of ’em are gonna stay and they’re gonna live forever and ever and ever. And your Mr. Milligan, well, it turns out he’s just young enough to die. I mean, think about it: It’s the holidays, there’s a sweet little kid involved. Can’t you just feel it?"
Uber, which last week began offering rides in self-driving cars in San Francisco as an experiment, said it didn't need a permit to test its self-driving cars on state roads. It asserted that its self-driving cars don't qualify as autonomous vehicles under California law because they're operated under human supervision. Because fuck yeah, we're Uber!
FTFY.
Uber doesn't have a viable business model. Just a lot of VC cash and an absurd market capitalisation based on promises and little else. Which results in a lot of pressure to come up with something that will transform theoretical value into real money. Plus a C-suite of people of the 'we-are-the-masters-of-the-universe' ilk; all ego and no skills. That's not the proper mix for building something new that actually works. So right now it's a scam using mob tactics.
IF the EM drive should actually work I'd say we* will find that it doesn't break Newton's third law of motion as such, but somehow isn't within it's jurisdiction, so to speak.
* Where 'we' means the boffins that actually do the work whereas I will be reading a conveniently dumbed down article in a popular science magazine. As Ronald Balfour Corbett CBE used to say in that one sketch, I know my place.
"What do you get the girl who has everything?"
Why, making her secret whishes come true, of course.
Well, I'm already excited about the next Star Wars film, another sort-of-prequel, which is about something that I actually have been thinking about, on and off, since the first one came out almost 40 years ago. I did mention that my background is in civil engineering, didn't I?
Maggie Smith (as Patty Terwilliger Smith), Bob Newhart (Willard C. Gnatpole). Even the Jensen can't help him in his clumsy attempt to seduce Patty.
Classic: the scene between Marcus Pendleton aka Caesar Smith (Peter Ustinov) and the french real estate agent. All the time they talk completely at cross purposes and yet arrive at exactly the deal both want to achieve.
Oh, and Heathrow airport. New, shiny, very few passengers, lots of parking space... incredible.
PJ's tale about the Telemetrix CAD machines reminds me of Hot Millions.
One of the earliest films about computer crimes. The cleaning lady uses the mainframe to warm her tea, which enables Marcus Pendelton aka Ceasar Smith (Peter Ustinov) to finally break into it.
"Anyone can steal. Everybody does a bit. I've been embezzling!!"