Re: I for one...
I think you'll find that they did write the script.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Kidnapping_Act
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cirg/tactical-operations
6157 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Oct 2015
My math teacher at uni who also taught us FORTRAN77 (I just missed having to use punch cards by 6 months) liked to tell the story of that one guy in a Deutsche Bank data centre who dropped a stack of jobs on punch cards down a flight of stairs on his way to the stack feeder/reader, swept them all up again as they were and dumed them in the feeder. Allegedly bricked the mainframe for a week.
That's always the "problem" with basic research. You'll never know if or when any practical (or commercially interesting) applications emerge. Sometimes it's years, sometimes it's centuries, usually there is no way of telling.
Re the usual 'tax payer's money' blurb - compared with the amounts of money poured into schemes like bank bailouts, mass surveillance, feel free to add to this list - a couple of millions is not even bits of peelings from small potatoes.
Being a taxpayer myself I see money spend on basic research as something like croundfunding a kickstarter project.
"lack of neocortical reasoning power" have an upvote for this little gem...
Also, a very accurate description of the mindset. Problem is, a lot of other guys you could end up working for have pretty much the same mindset, i.e. corporation types. It starts with calling them(selves) officers.
Have an upvote! I've never looked at it that way, but you are spot on: Colossus wasn't just a souped up adding machine, it was IoT with nukes. (Hey, I like the ring of that. IoT with nukes!).
Apart from that, one point in Geschickter's presentation has been on my mind as well lately:
"He recommended basing that effort on a network operations centre, only one tuned to handle high volumes of data coming over diverse connections.
If every fridge and toaster and god knows what else connects to "the net" it will generate a huge amount of traffic. Throw in the traffic that is generated by running and storing everything in "the cloud" - how long until the infrastructure can't keep up? Will the next big economic crisis triggered by congested pipes? Where is the tipping point? Who will pay for upgrading the existing physical connections?
You beat me to it... if you need drones to to that, your depots aren't run properly. In one of my former lives (15-20years back) I was involved in designing and building half a dozend new depots for Lidl and upgrading half a dozend older ones. They didn't even need GPS or CCTV for that, I'm pretty sure anyone suggesting something like drones would have been shown the door.
This looks more like seeking attention or a desperate groping for new ideas, possibly a bit of both.
Learned this some 30 years in a statistics class I had to take (which, in retrospect, I'm really grateful for). Unless you do not know exactly how the raw data was gathered and how it was filtered and processed it is meaningless. However, that is no obstacle at all for gently guiding it in the right direction, i.e. have the data show whatever it is that you wanted it to show in the first place. A lot of this actually happens unintentional, because (for example) having a degree, even a scientific one, doesn't mean per se that you know and unterstand statistics. (I'm looking at you, medical doctors. Also: economics is not a science, sorry Tim, it rather bears all the hallmarks of religion.)
Data trawling faces the same problems. Given that it is usually done with a business plan in mind, results are bound to be biased at least a bit - if only to justify the cost of the data trawling.
Ah, well... everything that's fun is either
- illegal
- immoral
- makes you fat
- causes cancer in lab animals
Blah blah CLOUD blah CLOUD blah CLOUD CLOUD CLOUD ...
2 points, though:
1. SAP could well profit from the 'safe harbour' Charlie Foxtrot
2. never ever underestimate IBM, they could teach the BOSH some new tricks, and then some
http://musicmp3.ru/artist_the-lightning-seeds__album_cloudcuckooland.html
This is a toy. My younger me would have leapt at it, of course, but that's neither here not there. In the time I take out my phone, unlock it, start the app and wait for the BT to connect to the bulb I can switch on any light in my flat and put the kettle on. Would like it if the next door neighbours buy this though as it would make for an interessting way to field test the range of BT devices.
"We found that comet Lovejoy was releasing as much alcohol as in at least 500 bottles of wine every second during its peak activity," said Nicolas Biver of the Paris Observatory, France, lead author of a paper on the discovery published October 23 in Science Advances.
Time to upgrade The Reg online standards converter!
I've just checked - there is no conversion for 'Alcohol Content'. I suggest a Comet-to-Beer-to-Wine-to-Booze ratio.
No, it was Sir Francis Walsingham...
ELINT goes back to the days of the first telegraph. SIGINT (in a broader sense) goes back so far that you can't really date it. Spying realy is 'The second-oldest profession'.
This is about computer networks, and Bletchley Park didn't spy on them because there weren't any yet. The NSA, however...
... anyway: pedant mode OFF, have a nice weekend, a pint an an upvote. Bletchley Park references always get one (I think it's in the forum rules somewhere).
When I read the probe being referred to as a spacecraft my initial reaction was a kind of 'yeah, right'-smirk. Then I remembered that scene from 'Flight of the Phoenix' where Hardy Krüger explains to James Stewart that the size of the machine doesn't matter - what matters is that the engineering is done properly. Yes, it is a proper spacecraft, and it is going where no spacecraft has gone before, and it is amazing.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059183/?ref_=fn_al_tt_4