* Posts by Commswonk

1777 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Sep 2015

Tarmac for America's self-driving car future is being laid right now

Commswonk

Re: saving lives, expanding mobility and reducing congestion

Congestion - a factor in congestion is often poor driver behaviour, so there really is some potential there.

I might suggest that a more consistent factor is too many vehicles trying to use the same bit of road at the same time, and quite how autonomous (or semi - autonomous) cars are going to solve that problem isn't obvious. I'm not trying to argue that poor driver behaviour doesn't exist, or that it isn't a factor in some congestion scenarios, but your comment overlooks the rather bigger contribution made by the sheer number of vehicles on the road.

Nadella says senior management pay now linked to improving gender diversity

Commswonk

...history shows that BOTH approaches (leaving things to itself and affirmative action) have their downsides.

Or to put it another way life is inherently unfair. Get used to it.

Commswonk

Re: Quality over quantity...

Within the field of technology shouldn't you be focusing on qualifications over gender?

(Pause for thought)

Within the field of technology work shouldn't you be focusing on qualifications over gender?

If I was in hospital facing complicated surgery I would want the surgeon to be the very most qualified and experienced, not the one who could accumulate the greatest number of ticks in "disadvantaged" boxes or the one who is there based on some sort of "quota".

Amadeus booking software outages smack airports across world

Commswonk

Re: 'we experienced a network issue '

Further to #8...

#9: Ryanair, who have screwed things up by cancelling a shedload of flights.

TalkTalk once told GCHQ: Cyberattack? We'd act fast – to get sport streams back up

Commswonk

I think blaming the PR team might be a little unfair; their role is to try to make the best of a bad job.

C suite occupants are fair game, though; they created the "bad job" in the first place.

I find myself wondering what the TalkTalk Data Controller has said about the security of customer data; he/she has a statutory responsibility for its protection even if the responsibility doesn't extend as far as ensuring effective cybersecurity.

Commswonk

TalkTalk was a negligent custodian

Borrowing Doctor Syntax's comment as a subject...

Former boss Dido Harding later told MPs there was no specific line manager for cyber security as the responsibility cuts across multiple roles in the company.

That tells us all we needed to know about the Blessed Dido Harding in the job she was supposed to be doing.

If we didn't know it already, that is.

You forgot that you hired me and now you're saying it's my fault?

Commswonk

Re: Ah, 'booking'

@chivo243:

Looks of "What devilish sourcery is this?" abounded.

+1 isn't enough ;-}

Actually +1 is too generous, because it should have been sorcery not sourcery

Now EE's challenging UK regulator's mobile spectrum proposals

Commswonk

Re: Bald men fighting over a comb

Can we please enforce 100% (and decent quality signal not some micro fraction of a signal bar quality) coverage of the UK.

A cynic writes:

If you think about it EE ought to be doing that as a matter of course, given their (supposed?) commitment to ESR. Note the weasel word "ought".

Drones aren't evil and won't trigger the Rise of the Machines: MoD

Commswonk

Re: We are supposed to trust ...

... the Lizard People at the Mod?

Since you ask... yes.

They are on secondment from the Ministry of Truth.

Missed patch caused Equifax data breach

Commswonk

More lessons are going to be learnt at Equifax I think.

"More lessons need to be learnt at Equifax I think" would be closer to the truth. There are no grounds for believing that the lessons are just "going" to be learnt as if by osmosis.

Commswonk
Devil

Re: Job offer

What is the preferred method of delivery?

Something lingering with boiling oil in it

(W.S.Gilbert)

UK's new Data Protection Bill will be 'liberal' not 'libertarian', says digi minister

Commswonk
Unhappy

But not enough to stop GCHQ trawling through any of it whenever they feel like it.

From a purely personal perspective I am much less concerned about that possibility than I about the fact that there is a good chance that there is more personal information about me sitting on a server in the US belonging to a US company and thus effectively beyond the control of any UK legal oversight. I have no fundamental objection to someone keeping a file noting my creditworthiness as long is contains nothing beyond what is a matter of public record; CCJs, bankruptcies and so on. If it contains anything like bank details, NI / NHS numbers and so on - none of which have any connection with my underlying reliability - then I find that highly objectionable.

I fear that Matt Hancock will remain silent if matters like that are brought to his limited attention. Is he happy that US citizens have more sovereignty over my data than I have?

I suspect the answer is that he doesn't give a shit, really...

Commswonk

If he meant "Liberal with your privacy, security, safety and other miscellaneous rights" then I'm inclined to think he might have been telling the truth.

It all sounds too much like "light touch regulation" to me; remember where that got us.

Users shop cold-calling telco to ICO: 'She said she was from Openreach'

Commswonk

Re: BT franchise and research

Oh and don't get me started on "Market research" which don't have to abide by the TPS regs...

Quite so, because they aren't selling anything. However, agree to participate in this "research" at your peril, because any answer you give may be interpreted as your permission for a follow - up sales call. My invariable response to "lifestyle survey" calls is "we do not participate in lifestyle survey calls".

Or what seems to be the "pestilence du jour" of calls about grants for new boilers / insulation / double glazing et al.

Anyone else noticed how "pressing 8" to be removed from the calling lists is singularly ineffective?

44m UK consumers on Equifax's books. How many pwned? Blighty eagerly awaits spex on the breach

Commswonk

Re: EU data protection?

I'd be curious on which legal basis they hold the data in the US.

I'd be equally curious about the legal basis on which they contacted Equifax in connection with me in the first place. By way of example, when I added broadband to my telephone account all those years ago it was all done over the 'phone and there was certainly no caveat that "we are going to discuss you with Equifax just to be on the safe side"; similarly I have no recollection of any similar warnings when we have changed energy supplier.

So never mind holding the data in the US; what is the basis of it being shared with another party in the first place without my clear informed consent? Do I sue Equifax with which I have no contract, or do I sue the organisations that shared information about me with Equifax?

Commswonk
Facepalm

Re: Proof reading?

This sentence could do with a spot of proof-reading too.

I think you meant That sentence could do with a spot of proof-reading too.

Muphry's Law strikes again. It can never be repealed.

Gov claws back £645m in BT broadband from subsidy

Commswonk

Re: Only 4.8m homes in the UK?

DDCMS estimated that almost 94 per cent of UK homes and businesses (4.5m) currently have the option to buy superfast broadband

Assuming the above statement to be correct (other than the 4.5m that has already been questioned) I wonder why the DCMS never seems to put out the sentence that follows from it, specifically "of those 94% "x%" have taken up the option while the remainder have not".

It might be both revealing and informative.

Commswonk

Er.. what?

Gov claws back £645m in BT broadband from subsidy

I think the headline might benefit from a small rewrite.

London Tube tracking trial may make commuting less miserable

Commswonk

Re: One thing I always failed to understand....

Why people leave their phones to constantly search for wifi networks.

Separation anxiety, plus a modern variant of I think therefore I am that boils down to "I am online, therefore I am"

Commswonk

Re: Headline should be ..

UK public body gets it right for once. I am amazed that they got someone in who knows about ICO guidelines and data security.

Equally creditable was that there was someone in house who knew that would be a smart move and who managed to convince others of the fact.

UK.gov launches 'co-ordination hub' for driverless car industry

Commswonk

Oh dear...

The government has today unveiled a "co-ordination hub" to test driverless cars under its £100m Connected and Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) investment programme.

It might have been nice if someone had checkled that the initials "CAV" didn't already have some meaning within the automotive industry. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_Industries#CAV.

Too much to hope for I suppose...

Dude who claimed he invented email is told by judge: It's safe to say you didn't invent email

Commswonk

Re: Only the best will do

When I hear any politician say "the fact is..." I take it as read that whatever follows is a complete "notfact".

Brit aviation regulator is hiring a space 'n' drones manager

Commswonk

From the article...

"Our Innovation Team is dedicated to facilitating developments in the aviation industry that will be valuable to UK citizens; securing safe outcomes is the primary objective of the team's work. Currently the team is focussed on three main projects – a UK commercial spaceflight capability, exploitation of unmanned aircraft technology and aviation defences against evolving cyber threats," a CAA spokesman told us.

Experience in "aviation or other safety-critical industry" and "good commercial awareness" are advantages, naturally. So what does the post actually entail?

Two things spring to mind; the first is to shout House very loudly and the second is to suspect that another requirement will be the successful candidate will be able to work in a buzzword - rich environment without laughing.

It's official: Users navigate flat UI designs 22 per cent slower

Commswonk

Re: It's everywhere, but sometimes you can fix it

The rot has even gotten to LibreOffice our local <redacted> shop

Some bright whizz bought new tills for our local shop. The customer display (say 6 x 5 inches) displays individual items & price in black on near white, but in something like Font size 6 or smaller. The total however - while in a bigger font - is in pale yellow letters on a pale grey background.

Utterly effing useless; needless to say complaining achieves nothing. What tosspot thought that was a good customer - friendly design?

And sometimes you can't fix it...

UK.gov unveils six areas to pilot full-fat fibre, and London ain't on the list

Commswonk

Re: London not on the list

If only somebody had given it a few minutes thought before announcing full electrification in the first place...

Steady on; we are talking about "politicians" here. A "few minutes' thought" takes them beyond their attention span. On top of which there is the ever - present problem of politicians trying to understand engineering / technology matters, and that is a mix that rarely if ever has a satisfactory outcome.

Commswonk

Re: London not on the list

@ HPCJohn: Not related to fibre optic lines, but the electrification of Queen Street station in Glasgow involved lowering the FLOOR of the tunnels by a few inches.

Please will a rail enthusiast explain further?

I cannot make any claims to be a "rail enthusiast" but the simple answer is to make space for the overhead 25 kV line and the pantograph.

Or did you mean why lower the floor rather than "raise the roof"? If so then I suggest the following: (a) enlarging the roofspace would have risked a rock fall from above - assuming that it is rock overhead and that the tunnels aren't through softer material with a lining to prevent collapses; (b) enlarging the roofspace would / may have been prejudicial to the integrity of roadways, buildings, or underground services (water mains, sewers, etc) above the tunnel. Lowering the tunnel floor was probably seen as the option with the least likelihood of adverse outcomes. It might also have been less expensive!

Doing either on the TransPennine route would almost certainly require the closure of the route for the duration.

A further thought arises about electrifying the (main) route across the Pennines. The objective always seems to be "faster trains", but there is no clear reason why this can only be accompllished by using electric traction. IIRC the reason for the slowness of services on that route is that the trains stop at intermediate stations, so any significant reduction in journey time can only be achieved by having trains that don't stop at them. It follows from that that either (a) the intermediate stations are closed, with no stopping trains at all, or (b) slow and fast services have to coexist on the same tracks. (b) can only work if there are passing loops available (which there may not be) or if the intermediate stations are big enough to allow fast trains to pass through while the slow / stopping trains are standing at platforms. That may be a possibility somewhere like (say) Huddersfield, but then again it may not.

It all seems to boil down to the fact that the politicians have got it into their heads that faster trains will cure all economic ills, but then as Rich 11 stated right at the start of this thread All politicians create their own alternative reality.

Commswonk

Re: London not on the list

Don't the tunnels have much higher voltage lines running through them these days?

Er, yes. Might make running trains a bit problematic.

In respect of the Manchester / Leeds / York route there are tunnels on it as well, and I very much doubt if there is the headroom to accommodate a 25 kV overhead and the associated pantographs along their lengths; I expect the tunnels would have to be rebored in their entirety. A project like that falls in to the category of "easier said than done".

A line near to where I live is in the process of being electrified and the amount of work that has been required to either rebuild bridges and / or lower the trackbed to achieve the necessary headroom is |enormous, and that is without any long tunnels; there is a short one.

China's cybersecurity law grants government 'unprecedented' control over foreign tech

Commswonk

Or to put it another way...

All your IP are belong to us

The "West" may be about to find that the joy of being able to buy shiny things cheaply comes at a terrible longer term price.

Clausewitz once said War is the continuation of politics by other means and I suspect that the Chinese may have realised they can avoid the messiness of war by "industrial aggression". The later thread about Chinese smartphone cable-maker chucks sueball at Apple is but another example.

UK council fined £70k for leaving vulnerable people's data open to world+dog

Commswonk

Re: Train them

I would suggest that ALL workers should attend an annual IT security course, sign to show they have attended and be held responsible for lapses like that in the article.

Impossible to argue against that, but I might argue that a data protection failure would not necessarily be covered by IT security; data protection is the responsibility of an organisation's Data Controller - capitalised because it is a responsibility mandated by the DPA. AFAIK there is nothing that requires the function to fall within "IT".

At the same time if the data was set up to be accessible to "social care providers" then it follows that it passes outside the boundaries that the (Council) Data Controller has to take responsibility for; each of the "social care providers" would have their own Data Controllers (I hope!) who would each have to oversee how the data was managed once it was in their own organisation's possession.

Although I would not say that it happened in this case it is entirely possible that the best efforts of one organisation can be completely undone by carelessness, stupidity, or malice in another. (But see Hanlon's Razor!)

It might be interesting to know (even if not wholly relevant in this case) how many "social care providers" have proper Data Controllers to oversee the proper management of client data, and how many organisations have breaches of the DPA as a disciplinary offence down to the individual employee level.

Uber squints, makes room for another probe: This time it's bribery

Commswonk

Re: Another day,

Is there anything that company hasn't tried that's shady?

Please let's not make it easy for them and provide a pick - list... providing we can actually think of anything, that is.

PS; I think you meant to type "has tried that isn't shady" but your intent was blindingly obvious anyway. :)

We're not the 'world leader' in electric cars, Nissan insists

Commswonk

Re: Grammatical pedantry aside...

An AC wrote: And that's usually you.

Invariably you would have been more accurate.

For once, Uber takes it up the tailpipe: Robo-ride gets rear-ended

Commswonk

Re: Er, no, don't.

Is "wrist discomfort" worse than whiplash?

Only if you forget to change hands from time to time.

US Navy develops underwater wireless battery-charging tech

Commswonk

Re: Charging station ?

From the article: Wayne Liu showed he was able to run a proof-of-concept with his mobile phone, protected in a plastic bag, charging on a pad.

This sounds as though it was effectively a very small degaussing coil, a technology that is now highly developed for the demagnetisation of ships' hulls.

Trouble is that to transfer enough power to charge a submersible's batteries the amount of "input" power required would require a surface or submarine vessel to generate it; obviously enough a surface vessel would be visible (security risk) although a submarine would not be.

However, in order to get enough power into the uncrewed drone the magnetic field needed would be large enough to be moderately easy to detect by a hostile power using its own submarines or uncrewed drones. At the risk of stating the obvious this would compromise the security of any submarine charging vessel.

The "torpedo tube" approach would appear to have a lot to offer; the technology to enable bits of hardware to mate in orbit is now routine so an underwater equivalent should not be beyond reach. Of course it depends - at least in part - on the relative sizes of the drones and the "mothership".

New York Police scrap 36,000 Windows smartphones

Commswonk

On the plus side...

...it's nice to know that procurement cock - ups aren't a uniquely British phenomenon. I wonder how much the development of custom apps added to the total.

And given the reports about her "management style" I wonder who had the courage to tell her that this enterprise was a cul - de - sac.

WannaCrypt NHS victim Lanarkshire infected by malware again

Commswonk

Re: @Chris G

It's must be a strong candidate for the world's prime example of this management style.

Or this one: https://www.slideshare.net/apanitsch/the-management-rowing-race.

I know it's getting on a bit but "many a true word is said in jest".

'Driverless' lorry platoons will soon be on a motorway near you

Commswonk

Re: Convoy

@nick_rampart: C'mon....why is it a platoon?

Listening with half an ear to Today on Radio 4 this morning it's because a company working on the technology has Peloton in its name, and Peloton is French for platoon.

Simples <squeak>

Commswonk

Re: "The convoy part only means the back lorries will copy the front one's"

@ John Smith 19: So much like that EU project a few years ago with the other cars staying a pre set distance apart and all vehicles braking and accelerating as a unit...

...This technology really is cutting edge.

If I try very hard I can just about see "synchronous braking", but "accelerating as a unit" no

OK if there are 3 identical LGVs, identically loaded then perhaps, but if the same vehicles are loaded with different weights then their acceleration performance is going to differ. The drive trains may have 8 / 12 / 16 gears, given range - change gearboxes and splitters, and for synchronised acceleration to work then those gear changes are going to have to be more or less synchronous as well. If the lead vehicle is lightly loaded it may only have to drop a single gear (which might necessitate a range change) while a following heavier - loaded vehicle might have to drop two gears (or even more) and might definitely need a range change to match any acceleration.

Or are following vehicles going to be able to / have to signal forwards with "I cannot accelerate that fast; reduce Δv"?

If the vehicles are of different design or manufacture (or even age) then their drive trains might be radically different (in terms of number of gears available and their ratios) so that one vehicle might require gear changes that another does not; LGVs have significantly different power bands (as indicated by the green segment on the rev counter) and so on...<further techy stuff omitted>

I would hate to have be the driver in a "following" vehicle; I simply couldn't tolerate being forced to be that close to the vehicle ahead. Apart from that I would be in a state of perpetual worry about how far my legal liability extended in the event of a mishap.

Biometrics watchdog breaks cover, slams UK cops over facial recog

Commswonk

Re: ACPO, the Home Office's ever helpful "arms length" not-a-company

FWIW ACPO no longer exists, so there is no point in blaming it for anything post 2015 - April I think.

It was replaced by the National Police Chiefs' Council, which may or may not be every bit as bad.

Blaming an extinct organisation for something that is happening now is a bit silly.

British broadband is confusing and speeds are crap, says survey

Commswonk

Re: Webpages that crash

A website that pulls in scripts from two dozen sources to just display the frontpage of whatever is slow and annoying...

And may the Good Lord forgive me for saying it, but IME this website is one of them. Sometimes the little display in the bottom left hand corner of my monitor suggests uploading from numerous sites.

Commswonk

If BT had rolled out a fibre network in the 90s like everyone else...

A couple of points... which "everybody else" would that have been then? And IIRC from comments made by others on various BB threads, BT were prevented from delivering a proper network.

Commswonk

Re: UK ISP are uniformly terrible.

@ Gordon Pryra: The service they offer their customers is appealing...

Not to me it isn't, but then I think you meant appalling.

Verizon kicks out hot new Unlimited* plans

Commswonk

Re: Post-modern advertising

Verizon offer "unlimited" which is limited.

Ah, this is obviously some strange usage of the word 'unlimited' that I wasn't previously aware of.

Equally obviously with acknowledgements to Douglas Adams...

US Navy suffers third ship collision this year

Commswonk

Somebody call Tesla and Mr. Musk, and order autopilot stat!

How do you now that they didn't fit one months ago? Seems entirely likely.

The answer, of course, will be "it's helmsman assist..."

Commswonk

Re: Good job it wasn't a lighthouse

How can it be an "urban" myth when it concerns events on the high seas?

Anyway in this case is wasn't a myth; it was a direct hit.

Commswonk
FAIL

That explains it, then...

During the "pause" US Navy investigators would be "focused on navigation, ships' mechanical systems and bridge resource management", according to Admiral Swift.

Any navy that has concepts like "bridge resource managment" deserves to have accidents. I await the defence from the Officer of the Watch reading along the lines "I was trying to decode a load of management bollocks in Part 1 Orders* and I could thus not concentrate on where the ship was going".

* Or whatever the USN has as an equivalent

Cognitive Services, Clippy? AI's silent infiltration of Microsoft's Office stack

Commswonk

Re: Custom Decision Service?

Computer says no becomes a reality.

Disbanding your security team may not be an entirely dumb idea

Commswonk

Re: I met one security officer who said his team is known as the 'business prevention department'

I immediately thought of Mordac the Preventer of IT Services.

See Dilbert passim.

UK industry mouthpiece wants 'near-universal' broadband speeds of 30Mbps by 2020

Commswonk

Re: 30Mbps? By 2020! Sad! Nay, Pathetic!

Not to mention Romania.

From some of the figures in the linked article and a look here: http://uk.businessinsider.com/brexit-eu-members-net-contributions-and-net-funding-2016-12 it may well be that Romania was in the happy position of being able to provide decent broadband at someone else's expense entirely.

I don't doubt that if the UK received a pile of money every year from somewhere else it might have been able to provide better BB services.

Commswonk

Re: Use cases please?

An AC wrote: You are doing exactly the same in reverse, but you can't see. (and you do it everytime there is a post regarding Fibre)

We get it. You're desperate about keeping your copper Line for Emergencies such as Aid Call (Age Concern) devices.

Right, and wrong in that order. I will cheerfully admit to "projecting" a view, not so much about retaining copper pair into the premises to the exclusion of fibre, but on the basis of keeping domestic users' costs down to a "manageable" level. If BT were to offer me FTTP at the same cost as FTTC in perpetuity then I would be quite happy to have it, as I suspect would everyone else. But they won't; there are (significant) costs to be recovered and that can only be achieved by increasing the costs to the end user. If the aim is to have "everybody" on - line then pricing a service at too high a level will result in digital exclusion, which would be entirely counterproductive. There is also the point that higher fixed line costs might result in more users ditching fixed line altogether and relying on smartphones for internet access. (I don't and won't have a smartphone and if I need access when "away" I use an external dongle on my laptop, but that can be an expensive way of doing things as well.)

Another point that is apparent from one or two posts is that business and domestic use are being conflated; I will happily accept that business users may well need higher speeds but that need does not translate directly into everybody needing higher speeds; a business case for higher speeds only applies for business users, and it is dishonest to argue that the same case applies to all and sundry. Fair enough; if someone wants higher speeds to support a housefull of teenagers then they are perfectly at liberty to make their case; they are not at liberty to claim that that case applies to everyone.

Go and visit a supermarket at a busy period; some will have trolleys groaning under the weight of "stuff", possibly because they are buying for a housefull; other trolleys are less heavily loaded because the buying is for a lesser number. Nobody in their right mind would shop for (say) 6 if the household contains only 2 people.

I have never tried arguing that nobody should have FTTP; I just wish that those who do want it would stop claiming that "everybody" wants or needs it.

Commswonk

Re: Use cases please?

An AC wrote: Nope people want FTTP...

An assertion based on what, may I ask? I strongly suspect that most people, faced with things like FTTP, FTTC, ACSL, VDSL and so on wouldn't have the faintest idea what they actually meant.

I suspect that you are taking your own wants (I concede that in your case they might genuinely be "needs") and projecting them on to everyone else in the hope that your requirements will be met, effectively by forcing others to pay increased charges to reduce yours.

FTTC is not perfect, but it has the advantage that it can provide a reasonable service at a reasonable price with a reasonable rate of roll - out. FTTP would undoubtedly provide a faster service (even if users don't actually need it) but at a significantly increased price to the end user and with a slower rate of provision.

I suspect that you are indulging in the marketing game of trying to persuade people that they need something that they, er, don't. See my point about television advertisements...