1238 posts • joined 3 Sep 2015
"Stadler was arrested..."
Ach for you ze car is over...
@ Ledswinger:I hope you feel guilty, now because its people like you that create the demand for this stuff.
No; I don't - not even slightly. Why should I? I have no idea where you are, but I am in the UK where I have no access to US - based information that has not been "polluted" by others who
probably have their own axes to grind.
Am I expected to form judgements on the basis of hearsay evidence? Or am I expected to fall into line with the prejudices of others in conformance with a herd mentality? Or am I expected to agree with an opinion (in this case yours) merely because you tell me to?
Comey does appear to have been a somewhat dangerous, out of control individual in a position of great power who abused his position.
It would certainly seem so. Having read his A Higher Loyalty recently this lapse seems to be at odds with his presentation of himself as pillar of rectitude, a claim that he makes more than once, almost to the point of tedium on the reader's part if not his own.
...the man needs to be dragged to military barber's for a squaddie regulation haircut...
Ah yes; the famous tale (probably not aprocryphal) about the RSM inspecting some squaddies prior to some major parade: Am I hurting you laddie? I ought to be because I'm standing on your hair.
Re: I'm sure he's thinking...
"...I got a lot less hassle flogging shampoo for a living."
I'm sure he's hoping for something like this obligatory Dilbert: http://dilbert.com/strip/1992-08-27. All it needs is the name changing.
From the article: A Google-backed think tank report has called on UK.gov to, erm, help the local tech startup scene flourish in a post-Brexit Britain by agreeing to underwrite a newbie business' first customer contract.
Let's try again: A Google-backed think tank report has called on TAXPAYERS to help the local tech startup scene flourish in a post-Brexit Britain by agreeing to underwrite a newbie business' first customer contract.
I think taxpayers already have more than enough to pay for without anyone finding new ways of splurging their cash.
Re: "concerns over its debts owed to private equity parent, Rutland Partners"
Why should they?
Re: True story.
Half listening to Radio 4 earlier this morning it was reported that 3 health "think tanks" (Oh <deity> how I hate those two words) were recommending an annual increase in NHS funding of 4% above inflation.
Why should we be forced to pay more so that this level of incompetence and indifference can continue unabated?
The perpetrators of this sort of avoidable blunder (and there are far too many examples for comfort) should be out of work if not immediately at least after a formal warning to the effect that next time "you're out".
In the same programme (Today) it was reported that a doctor who had beheaded (unquote) a baby during birth was to be allowed to continue to practise.
We are all human, and thus vulnerable to making mistakes, but some mistakes are simply too big to permit those making them to remain employed. There is a simple catch - all for getting rid of people like that - bringing the organisation into disrepute, and it's high time that particular ban - hammer was used a bit more effectively.
Re: Tesco Does Not Know More About Me
But I bet they are tracking you via your phone.
Not when it's switched of, they aren't. And mine is switched off, because that's the way I live my life, not enslaved to a device. In any case it's a PAYG with no frills whatsoever; anything more than that would serve the needs of others rather than just mine.
Anyway, as it happens cellphone coverage in our nearest Tesco is utterly shit so what's the point in it being on?
Re: I'll have some of that business please
£23m includes the cost of the extended warranty and a premium rate phone call to the customer care team at Lockheed Martin.
"So that we can deal with your query properly please tell us in a few words about the problem you are experiencing."
"I'm sorry I didn't get that; so that we can deal with your query properly please tell us in a few words about the problem you are experiencing."
(repeat, ad nauseam)
Remember that $5,000 you spent on Tesla's Autopilot and then sued when it didn't deliver? We have good news...
Better Known As...
Meanwhile Tesla CEO Elon Musk continues to complain about news coverage of car crashes that may have been caused by the Autopilot system.
Is this not a simple case of shooting the messenger, or at least trying to? If this august publication is typical he seems to have succeeded; a thread on the subject a few days ago had more people commenting on the shortcomings of "the media" than the shortcomings of Tesla and its messianic leader.
Re: Market conditions
Are these the same "market conditions" that forced me to have and pay for a faster service than I actually need, as happened last year with BT? I (we) had about 56 Mb down which was quite enough; BT offered 72 Mb at an increased cost, but after a phone call they agreed to my paying the same as previously and staying with 56 Mb.
Only weeks later an enforced price rise came along and put me on 76 Mb anyway. I was not amused.
So... if BT suddenly comes along with FTTP in our area will I be forced to have it in place of the current FTTC? If yes then what market forces are going to be available to me to resist? I suspect none; it will be FTTP or nothing, I suspect. More money, please; look at the bandwidth we're giving you. But I don't need the bandwidth. Shut up and pay up...
The "digital divide" risks widening, not narrowing, if advancing technology is enforced at increased cost, and users without shedloads of spare money start to wonder if they can afford to contnue having broadband at all.
Re: Is there something which..prevents these people..understanding how the internet functions?
And another "yes" from me.
If "it" wasn't on his PPE course (yes; Hancock studied the Politician's Favorite) then "it" simply doesn't exist.
I wonder whether we should read more into the following in his Wikipedia entry: After university, Hancock briefly worked for his family’s computer software company, such as "he left because he didn't understand it". I wonder just how short a time "briefly" actually means.
Re: It's no good BT complaining 'WiFi'
@ Neil Barnes: Perhaps the majority of customers do connect via wi-fi, but even the "fastest wif-fi in the world" cannot overcome the problem of attenuation due to internal walls (etc) or the multipath propagation arising from the same walls and other reflecting surfaces in a domestic or other environment and guarantee to provide the same speed as a properly wired connection.
A search for "how far will my wi-fi go" will produce no sensible answers, because no manufacturer would be so silly as to specify a figure when they cannot control the environment in which their product will be used.
IIRC speedtesters tend to state that wi-fi should not be used, along with advising that whatever is used for the test should not have anything else running at the same time.
Complaining about wi-fi inclusive speedtests not achieving a certain supposed "up to" or any other target speed is a bit like complaining that a car does not achieve its rated acceleration or fuel consumption figures when towing a caravan.
...the boy has his PC wired into the router for whatever purposes teenaged boys use the internet - gaming I'd assume.
You might think that, I'm afraid I couldn't possibly comment.
I wouldn't want to be responsible for your disillusionment.
Do you have a Men Only toilet at home?
No, which means I can't even get away with leaving the seat up. That abomination causes more trouble than anything physiological.
I need a vacation to over this outrage.
And they are holidays not vacations.
I was reminded of the toilet scene in one of The IT Crowd episodes...
Pah; nothing like as traumatic as what happened to me >25 years ago when I worked for <never mind>...
Nature called, so I took myself off to the Gents and, er, locked myself in. It is probable that the performance was accompanied by the usual sound and other effects.
I was mortified when I emerged to find a lady cleaning the place; my discombobulation was compounded by my boss thinking the whole thing was very funny.
Post Traumatic Shit Disorder set in immediately.
Re: It's not a sink
Old Joke Alert....
What's the difference between a bison and a buffalo?
You can't wash your hands in a buffalo.
(Well I did warn you...)
Re: ISP email
...or BT which is provided by Yahoo!, which I suppose could almost be amalgamated into BooHoo?
Not entirely true. Some BT email is provided by Yahoo, some is not. Mine is in the latter category.
Better avoid the "chocolate log" just in case...
Thanks for providing that link; I had not seen that previously. I would describe that as a report that was written to be read, not left gathering dust somewhere.
I was more than a little surprised when I looked at the list of participants; there are, IMHO, some "large gaps in the coverage". I would have expected a much more significant presence from the Emergency Services, but there seems to have been just a single PC from Lancashire Constabulary. Now it might have been that ES communication (TETRA / Airwave) was much more resilient than other communications systems, but if that was the case then I would have expected a report such as this to have highlighted that fact so that how and why it was better protected could have been the subject of comment.
Similarly BT appears not to have been represented, and only EE there to speak for MNOs. Perhaps they were invited but chose not to participate.
While it was (IMVHO) an excellent report I was left with the slight feeling of a golden opportunity having been missed. Doubtless other agencies will have conducted their own post mortems, but it would have been nice if there had been a bit more in this report for public awareness.
Re: But Shirley...
@ Martin an gof: I think it is/was data capacity; you are right about the need for linear power amplifiers but I suspect that that is not really a major issue.
Of course one thing that TETRA was not is cheap, and the EE ESN supposedly comes in at a lot less that whatever TETRA is costing. Ha! - we will see. How on earth any bidder for the contract could put a price on things that had yet to be developed escapes me completely.
And of course there will be the problem that any data - hungry system tends to guzzle battery capacity, especially if it is having to transmit it.
Re: But Shirley...
They'll just use their devices in relay mode
By "their devices" I assume that you mean "users", in which case, er, they won't. Firstly handportable terminals cannot sensibly be made to act as repeaters, secondly... even if they could there would need to be one strategically located to act as a repeater for others*; unlikely... and thirdly, the last I heard Samsung hadn't even made a "vehicle" set work. Yes, vehicle sets can be made to act as repeaters, subject to their getting sufficient signal from the nearest base station, but how well that would fit the spec for 4G I don't know.
* In addition, portable to portable "direct" (DMO in TETRA - speak) gives rather disappointing ranges.
...EE must have achieved that level of coverage as an integral part of its commitment to provide the new ESN.
Re: Probably mentioned already but
@ Simon Harris: My mother always threatened that if I misbehaved she'd 'pull my pants down and smack my bottom... even if we were in the middle of the shop'. (that was the early 1970s when that sort of thing was still allowed!)
Can you please assure us that you were under (say) 5 at the time and not rather older?
Re: Can we have porn by SMS next...
Ahh... ASCII Art. I have behind me an ASCII Art picture of the (then) Post Office Tower in London, printed off by a teleprinter. As readers may or may not be able to imagine the tape that generated it was rather long... the image itself is over 2' high, and was done on a Sagem teleprinter back in the late 60s or early 70s.
Correction; it isn't ASCII Art; that uses the 7 - bit ITA No 5; this was done with the 5 - bit ITA No 2 running at 50 Bauds. It was not a quick job.
Re: inches and pounds
Seeing all that tech documentation in inches and pounds just makes me want to cry.
(Likely Downvote Alert!)
Re: Sense of humor
@ M. Poolman: Yeah, can't see why they needed the extra clause in their permit!
I assume you meant claws...
Re: Why can I not...
Is that too much to ask?
Yes, I regret to say.
Was The Survey Big Enough...
...to quantify the people for whom a mobile phone is a purely utilitarian device used to make or receive occasional calls and send or receive occasional texts when away from home? Those who don't give a shit about Twitter or any other social medium, along with those who are perfectly capable of spending an entire day (or longer) without ordering something they don't need from the internet?
If their performance so far is anything to go by, you should have something from them around mid October.
Yes... all well and good... but mid October which year?
@ Jemma: ...possibly a clapped out Lee Enfield or Marconi Henry
I think you meant Martini Henry. (It's difficult to think what else you could mean.)
That is only marginally funny.
@ J27:Considering the relatively high population density and small land mass I would have expected that 4G service would be quite fast in the UK. Problem with communications monopolies?
I suspect that you identified the problem (at least in large part) within the first 6 words: high population density. If all the users bar one on any given cell went somewhere else than that "one" would enjoy a really spectacular download speed; a high population density brings with it more people fighting over / having to share a finite resource.
A bit like trying to travel on the M25*...
*Other congested roads are available.
And Another Thing...
@ Adam Jarvis:4G/5G ubiquitous high speed data streaming on the move is an Ofcom fairytale until we have a proper "connected" strategy regards the rollout of a ubiquitous fibre backhaul throughout the UK.
You can't have one (high speed 5G data services) without the other (fibre backhaul), yet these articles always fail to mention the fibre backhaul requirements of any 4G/5G rollout.
Assuming those assertions to be correct, the capital cost of setting up 5G coverage is going to be immense; think of all those picocells needing fibre connectivity back to "Deep Thought".
High capital cost results in high revenue costs to end - users, i.e. the paying customers. Can the MNOs be utterly certain that customers are going to be willing to stump up every month at the level that will be necessary to achieve the ROI? Or are the customers going to decide that what they can achieve with 5G is not sufficiently essential for the additional cost to be worth it?
Or are the MNOs going to force eveyone's hand by shutting down legacy systems?
If the perennial tales of woe about the GBP (not ££!) being under financial pressure are true then 5G investment might not be the wisest idea, because the returns might not materialise.
Somewhere between "not much" and "no".
O2 was BT, but that's a very long time ago. A very long time.
Re: As always...
Sharon White/Ofcom "Where is the all this (dark) fibre to support all this new mobile spectrum?"
Oh dear... how is Sharon White (or anyone else) to know where the fibre needs to run to, and in what quantity until the MNOs draw up their plans and place orders?
And if she (or anyone else) said to fibre installers "JFDI" their response would - quite reasonably - be "who is going to pay for this?"
It is, or will be, the MNOs problem to decide what network connections they require, and then to order and pay for them, either up front or via a negotiated long term lease.
Or are you expecting the taxpayer to fund a semi - speculative network in the hope that the MNOs will eventually pay enough to cover the costs?
And rural locations are generally short of street lights anyway.
@ Dave 137:Apologies as I'm an ex ISP customer service/tech support drone
If you are looking for sympathy you have come to entirely the wrong place. The "apologies..." should be enough to ensure you live to tell the tale, though.
The British government has declared it is waiting for industry and international regulators to start creating standards for autonomous vehicles.
While I would agree that enacting standards and regulations now would probably be a mistake, the topic should, nonetheless, be the subject of rigorous informed discussion starting not later than , er, now.
Why is HMG sitting on its hands waiting to adopt other peoples' ideas when it ought to be ready to participate in future discussions from a more or less equal starting point?
And what if everyone else does the same thing? A last minute dash to get something enacted, with all the usual consequences of a knee - jerk reaction.
Perhaps it's the "informed" bit that's causing difficulties.
As per usual, we are being let down. No change there then...
Re: Experience of autopilot
It really is unfortunate that the term "autopilot" has been allowed to enter the lexicon of motoring, however much or little control it is actually able to exert.
Comparisons with aviation are completely misleading, IMHO. Certainly in commercial aviation the aircraft will be equipped with "autopilot", and it will doubtless be enabled for some part of a flight. However, the same aircraft will be equipped with two fully qualified pilots, but the use of "autopilot" does not enable both of them to do their crosswords of choice (or whatever!) at the same time. One or other of them is always keeping watch on what the aircraft is doing while the autopilot is flying the aircraft.
Furthermore aircraft occupy distinct corridors based on track and height, those corridors being specifically designed to keep aircraft well apart and thus minimise (or hopefully eliminate!) any chance of a mid - air collision. Yes; there are lanes to follow but they do not have white lines within in which both human and auto pilots are required to remain. On top of that ground controllers do keep an eye on what air traffic is doing; for example any change of height does or may need clearance from ATC before putting it into effect. Other than when on the ground air travel is mercifully clear of fixed obstacles and other influences that might upset a pleasant journey.
As if those weren't sufficient differences in themselves, any event that requires the intervention of a human pilot should have a sufficient interval in both time and space between that intervention being required and something really nasty happening, but the same cannot be said of cars more or less bumper to bumper (fender to fender if you really must!) on congested roads.
In my view there is simply no sensible similarity between what happens in aviation and what happens in motoring; the differences between the two concepts of travel are so great that allowing them to share the word "autopilot" is profoundly, and dangerously wrong.
Somehow (and no; I don't know how either) the word "autopilot" has to be expunged from land - based travel.
In my neck of the woods there are streets without lane markings. They are painted on, wear off and are never repainted.
At the other end of the spectrum I know several roundabouts (am I right in thinking these are unknown in the US?) where there are myriad white lines, sometimes crossing live lanes, and single lanes splitting into two and all sorts of confusion for a human driver, especially one with possibly limited knowledge of the area.
And others where the designer appears to have settled on a bizarre layout just to see if he can get away with it.
Just the sort of things to make a (semi) autonomous car think "I want to go home".
Re: No surprise
@ Tom 7:
We had 100% control - we could veto pretty much anything we wanted to.
Sorry, but that is simply not true.
Re: So long, farewell...
Oh bloody brilliant. How long have you been waiting to use that?
Re: Step 1
@ The Nazz:
Whenever a Company/Organisation acts outside of the law, make each and every board member be jointly liable for such actions.
To demonstrate its simplicity even further, please tell us exactly which UK laws Facebook, CA & other associated individuals may have broken over the US Presidential Election and / or the EU Referendum.
I think I would venture "not quite that simple" after all.
Re: Inside Track
Here's a Peer who knows a thing or two about the subject - is she on the panel?
Yes but are they the right things? I might be doing her a tremendous disservice but I suspect not.
Rather Irrelevant, Really.
A number of points spring to mind.
Given the global nature of the internet I'm afraid that no nation can effectively regulate how it operates, given that any nationally - devised Law or Regulation runs out of steam at that nation's border. There is often criticism of the US on El Reg for demonstrating its belief that its legal remit is global, so it would be indefensible to support any other government trying a similar trick.
Facebook (to name but one) is barely answerable to the US government, and it certainly won't be answerable to the UK one; this has been nicely demonstrated by MZ deciding to send a minion to tell the HoC to sod off (which is what it will amount to) rather than doing the proper thing and coming himself. In the specific case of Facebook (although the same argument can be used with other "undesirables") the only real option would be to block its operation in the UK, and I cannot see any government wanting to go down that route for a number of reasons, not least the fact that it would put the UK on a par with (say) NK.
The Consitutional position of the HoL is similarly irrelevant; although I have to admit to having no strong objections to its existence, it is essentially undemocratic, but in and of itself that fact does not preclude its coming up with good policies or policy suggestions. In this specific case it might well come to sensible conclusions that attract the support of many or even most in the HoC, but getting government support is something else entirely.
Even then when it comes to "actual" policy making there is the inescapable disease of corporate lobbying to contend with. Almost by definition corporate lobbying takes place in the shadows unseen by the great unwashed (that includes me, I'm afraid to say) so what emerges at the end of any policy - making process can all too easily be a completely emasculated version of what was originally envisaged, leaving ordinary citizens every bit as vulnerable to being misled, or having their personal data abused as they were before any sort of policy was deemed necessary. No; I don't like it, but I don't think I am under any illusions about things changing for the better any time soon.
Finally (for now anyway) even if the "internet" could be perfectly regulated in the UK (actually it's not the internet that needs any sort of regulation; it's people misusing it that's the problem) that would not prevent misuse taking place beyond the reach of any UK regulation, such as the alleged Russian interference in the US Presidential Election. The abuse could be "processed" elsewhere, but stopping the product of that abuse crossing the UK border would be another matter entirely, not least because the mindset would become one of "we have effectively stopped abuse of the internet in the UK" which in turn would create a misplaced confidence in the belief that as a result no abuse was creeping in (flooding in, more likely) from elsewhere.
Manager >> Manger >> Pig at trough?
Surely any ambiguity between "manger" and "manager" can be resolved with a Crib Sheet.
Mine's the one with the straw in the pocket...
Re: If I wrote spill chuckers...
Negative patient care outcome > patient died
ISTR seeing that in one of Michael Bond's Monsieur Pamplemousse books, along with
Patient failed to achieve his wellness potential. Its meaning is much the same.
I wish I could remember exactly which book it was, because I would enjoy reading it again.
In Other News...
The use of a single LIDAR sensor is all the more remarkable given that other companies running self-driving programs use significantly more: Google-owned Waymo has six on its cars; General Motors uses five.
Uber rediscovers the concept of the Single Point of Failure.