Re: Microsoft can't design a UI anymore...
Cheap? Do they have a version of Photoshop that charges them every time the apply a drop shadow? The flat thing is Microsoft trying to do stylish and failing miserably because it's just not in their DNA.
2739 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jul 2007
I was going to comment "Cue relevant Douglas Adams comment, you know the one" but you beat me to it. Maybe we should have an index to save time. I think this should be number three or four after the bit about the whale and the marketing department of the Sirius Cybernetic Corporation and whatever that other one is that you happen to like.
This discussion of submarine technology is fascinating but almost entirely irrelevant. In general the military's 'economics is not an issue' approach makes their choice of expensive toys a poor guide for the rest of us. I mean you don't see ordinary people non-Americans driving around in Humvees.
but I read the article to the end. The fraud there involved a candidate getting his friends/supporters to pretend they lived in his electorate so they could vote for him. Nothing to do with multiple voting and not something an ID card would likely prevent (though the existing system did so easily).
There's a grand tradition of distinguished physicists approaching retirement deciding to solve the problems of philosophy. The general response of philosophers to there ideas is a long the lines of "well that was a good solution when Aristotle/Hume/Kant/Russel first proposed it".
@You aint sin me, roit
"As for Hawking's physical limitations... neither of us know, but maybe he spends a lot of time just "thinking"."
That's the problem: Philosophy is done by thinking but you can no more do real philosophy by "just thinking" than you can do real science without peer review. Without the social structures of science even the greatest genius will end up a crank the way Newton and Tesla did. When the genius is a scientist trying to do philosophy the problem is only exacerbated.
As for philosophers not understanding science: It's pretty common for academic philosophers to have degrees in other disciplines. Unsurprisingly, physics is a favourite in that respect.
Electric powered azimuth thrusters are common enough and manage to spend their entire working lives underwater without problems. The seals on the the Tesla's motors might are probably not that good but good enough to protect against constant road water should be good enough for a few seconds immersion.
just so someone could say "ground control to Major Tim". (Someone did say that didn't they?)
Seriously, I'm not British so I don't have a stake in this but doesn't it come down to whether you want to play with the big boys or sulk in the corner? Because, for the big boys 80 million is small change. Go ask Elon.
No one made any effort to point out that Dylann Roof didn't represent Christians or white people because no one was saying it in the first place. "Lone wolf" or "deranged" is the default interpretation when a white person engages in act act of mass violence even where their ideological motivations are quite explicit.
For what it's worth I agree that Islamacists would be much less of a problem without the illegal meddling of powerful states (including the Saudis) in the affairs of third world countries.
"They remove some of this propaganda material from the terrorist, but not everything, calming that some of it doesn't break their rules."
This just as it should be. If you want to say that ISIS represents the "pinnacle of human efforts to live as Allah demands we should" you're exercising freedom of speech. If you say "come join ISIS and help us kill infidels" you're recruiting for a terrorist organisation. Sure, sometimes it's a fine line and people will often get it wrong but making the effort is what democracies do and dictatorships have no interest in doing.
Look, I'm not anti-Google. I accept that it does in fact "quickly remove videos violating these policies when flagged by our users". But not wanting to look evil is fairly week motivation. The threat of lawsuits is a better one (even when they fail as I suspect this one will). And why is a company with the most powerful content detection algorithms in the world relying on users to flag objectionable videos. I suspect some extra motivation is in fact required.