Re: Fight Fair?
They are waging a campaign to win global dominance from the West, and are getting it done.
Only if we LET them do it... (fact is you canNOT trust Communists!! Apparently world leaders had forgotten that pre-Trump)
10282 publicly visible posts • joined 1 May 2015
am I allowed to say
NO, you are NOT allowed to say that... and I'm still laughing at your joke
(reminds me of an old 'book titles and authors' joke, something about a population explosion and 3 names commonly found in S.E. Asia, all strung together to make a funny phrase - a very very NAUGHTY funny phrase - rhyming with See Chuck's Tongue)
yes, uncovering their flaws will really SCREW your future "social credit" score.
Report them, and you'll end up in a burnt pile of bodies alongside former Wuhan district residents...
Conspiracy theory says it was all part of their plan, which has YET to completely backfire.
"I would imagine insurance companies may start asking what libraries are in place and what support agreements there for code maintenance."
I'd say "Nunya Business" and shop elsewhere...
Also, if a software shop is PRUDENT, they will HOST LIBS THEMSELVES and merge FULLY TESTED changes when necessary... and ONLY when necessary!
Too many cases where this JS "cloud sourced" "forced update" library HOUSE OF CARDS has bitten people in the ASS.
You ARE the weakest link - G'BYE!
This "constant update" JS library model was the *WEAKEST* it could have possibly been, from authors "pulling their schtuff" out of anger [causing disruptions in service EVERYWHERE] to "unmaintainable" source trees due to death, illness, incapacitation, or prison...
"Back in the day" I chose to ALWAYS static link libraries to PREVENT the "DLL Hell" in Windows. And in POSIX systems, if I don't build from source [or have a package available in the distro], I'll want to do the SAME THING for _MY_ stuff. Reason: A midnight phone call due to "some third party dweeb" screwing up or NOT being able to make swift updates [in the cases of a 'cloud update' model which I won't do anyway] won't happen to ME because some *IDIOT* "developer" was... THE WEAKEST LINK.
At least with other OSS projects, particularly those that have been abandoned or become unmaintainable (particularly on github, sourceforge, etc.) it is possible to fork it under a different name (or maybe the same name, with a different dev controlling the source tree). In some cases (like TigerVNC) it was done because the author of the source project (tightvnc in this case) chose to no longer support X11 properly. So over a short period of time, you could still use the old libs, but if you wanted updates, you had to switch to the newer package [no real problem except getting the word out].
But this "forced update" model used by JS libs is JUST! PLAIN! WRONG!. Weakest link indeed...
that's not a very 'libertarian' argument. It's more like an ANARCHIST argument.
Libertarians aren't against regulating [they are against BANNING, which is a different thing entirely]. Without regulation you have chaos, and Libertarians don't want chaos [only anarchists and revolutionaries want chaos].
The basic idea is that I should have as much freedom as possible as long as it's not negatively impacting anyone else, and whenever it could (or is), that's where regulations happen.
Simplest example: smoking. While banning all smoking would stop me from having to breathe someone else's tobacco exhaust, if that person smokes where I am _NOT_ I am not impacted. Therefore, regulation to prevent me from being FORCED to breathe tobacco exhaust is reasonable [and of course I can deliberately NOT go to those places where people smoke]. A "smoking area" with its own ventilation system is one example, so that the smoke never leaves that zone, in business establishments where they choose to allow such things. But, it's the nature of gummints to want to CONTROL MORE, and so they ALWAYS do "the ban" or something chaotic (which then leads to THEM 'providing a "solution" to the problem THEY caused').
Whoever that was that claimed this was a Libertarian argument (justifying price gouging during a declared emergency) does NOT understand Libertarianism.
"This is the epitome of democratic, free market capitalism?"
NO. It _may_ be what happens when you don't regulate anything i.e. anarchy or chaos. that is COMPLETELY different than suggesting ANY form of socialism would "fix" this. It is, however, human nature, for SOME people to engage in deliberate sociopathic behavior, which includes profiteering and "price gouging".
'capitalism' or 'free market' has been REGULATED since forever, in one form or another. Normally it is self-regulating through supply and demand. When monopolies, unfair trade practices (including price gouging) and exploitation occur, the existing laws are generally enough to put a stop to it.
Just like there have always been thieves [even though it is illegal to steal], there are also PROFITEERS (even though it is illegal to do this) during declared emergencies.
THAT is simply human nature, for a small percentage of people to do such things, and has nothing to do with free markets. If it were SOCIALISM or COMMUNISM, it would be "black markets". Same idea.
"And he feels he's the victim!"
yeah 'feel' the F word. heh.
This article was dated the next day (3/15), said that he donated over 17,000 bottles "after Tennessee officials announced they would investigate him for price gouging".
So yeah, the ban-hammer went a bit further than E-bay. Serves him right!
in the USA, during periods of declared emergencies, it's a violation of the law to (in any way) profiteer or "price gouge" or scalp or in any way charge grossly inflated prices for things that are in short supply.
So if these sellers are inside the USA, they cold be doing 2 years' JAIL TIME for such things.
I say TURN THEM IN! Then their stash will be confiscated and appropriately distributed to places that need these things that are part of the government, at the very least. [this would offset demand on the private sector and indirectly improve the situation]
and those 6 hour long "your system is updating" interruptions to cat videos, blogging, commenting on El Reg, and generally surfing the web...
reminds me of the time I saw a client's computer shut down for about that long because windows just HAD to update when he logged on at ~7:30 AM only to NOT be able to use his computer at ALL until ~2PM! And then it was really sluggish because of all of those "background" tasks... [so not really 'usable' for another half hour or so]
keep in mind that Android is ALSO linux-based, and has both x86 and ARM processors used by Android phones (as far as I'm aware, anyway). And, there is a bit of a technology race to provide those android phones with high resolution screens and whatnot. They'll most likely need OpenGL drivers for that. Good ones, too.
no worries. I think this may be ONE reason why MS is SUDDENLY INTERESTED in _FINALLY_ SUPPORTING OpenGL properly (see my earlier post)
Back in the 90's when DirectX first became "a thing" I was at a windows-related conference and I asked their engineers about things _like_ OpenGL, and they're like "no no, don't use THAT... use DirectX because it will be OPTIMIZED!"
I didn't really make use of DX so much either. It was interesting but didn't do what I wanted, and I didn't need the blistering performance, and it looked like making use of it was WAY too bit fiddly for what I needed to do [business presentation graphics for analyzed data, basically].
HOWEVER - the whole idea of "Don't use THAT, use OUR PROPRIETARY SYSTEM" seems to have been VERY prevalent among MS's engineers, and that's how we got where we are today.
FINALLY some "love" (or desperation?) for OpenGL and OpenCL!!! I shall be more "open" to the idea of writing applications that dedicate their UI to this.
In FACT, is there a toolkit out there that targets OpenGL for a GUI? I've heard of such things being done, for proprietary systems, and I think "something out there" (maybe Qt or GTK) has an OPTION for this. But it would stand to reason that if OpenGL is to become universally supported with PROPER optimi9zation, that it could IN FACT be THE CROSS PLATFORM GUI API STANDARD we've been looking for???
how much higher was your electric bill? I estimated $50-$100/month running things like that... screaming fans, CPU maxed out, etc.. There were a couple o' projects from the mid noughties I tried, Seti@Home being one of them. But modern CPUs have lightweight power usage during idle states, so no screaming fans, no high electric bills from leaving them on all the time... unless you run stuff like this.
and the other thing: It's a fair bet (in my mind) that these work units weren't coded using the MOST EFFICIENT TECHNIQUES. for all I know, they're doing the research scientists' equivalent of a BUBBLE SORT. So before they ask for my computer time to be donated, I'd like to see some peer review on their algorithms...
besides - the BEST research is being done by physicians in hospitals with various experimental (but promising) treatments on real patients right now. "Feel Good"-ism might warm up your house in the vicinity of your computer, but how much good is it REALLY doing?
/me proposes that ONE good programmer and data analyst is worth a MILLION 'screaming fan' machines... given a reasonable amount of time, coming up with efficient algorithms and simulations, rather than throwing data against a wall of computing resources, which is [in my opinion] VERY likely to be the case.
We're not cracking ENIGMA, which sometrimes involved a lot of repeated-trial-and-error until they found the one that worked. But then again, THEY made THEIR process efficient, back then, and were reading Hitler's mail in real time! And so we should do that NOW, make the virus research algorithms as efficient as possible, BEFORE recruiting a bunch of donated CPU resources.
I've been using things like youtube-dl for a long time (rarely though, youtube is a time eating monster). When I download first, I get the best resolution possible and just wait for it to finish downloading before watching. [and I can keep it locally if I like it]
reducing the bandwidth on an 110GB game FORCED WINDOWS UPDATE downloads will help
Now that I think about it, 110GB game images and kid/pet/selfy videos probably NOT the cause of any REAL bandwidth shortages... [and that could make what youtube as done a reaction to a problem NOT caused by them]
the problems may be in the middle, not at the ends...
but yeah in a "this is what would happen if EVERYBODY did" moment, just like missing products on otherwise crammed-full-o-stuff store shelves, when you count on a certain level of utilization, and it SUDDENLY increases beyond expectations, THIS is what you get. (fortunately, with capitalism, bread lines up for people, so it's just a matter of time for production to ramp up to meet demand).
At least it's not sociopathic to stream a lot of videos, like hoarding toilet paper would be...
this is actually distro-dependent but is reminiscent of a typical SysV init. I normally disabled the session managers and booted to console by altering the S01gdm to be a K01gdm in the most common run level (2 I think, on debian-based systems) and using startx. I like startx and console logins. They give the USER more control.
if you do 'man init' on your older SysV system, you'll get a breakdown of how it was set up by the distro-maker.
even on very old systems, logs tend to rotate. you keep the last 10 or something...
Now, if there's some application that keeps creating temp files that are never deleted, someone forgot to enable "clear out /tmp and /var/tmp on boot" which is a simple fix, but I suspect it's not that.
Most likely just an old system with failing hardware. SD cards and hard drives don't last forever. Let's say 10 years of continuous use... that'd be about right I think, to kill off an early solid state drive... or just your average hard drive.
yeah I wish that were true, but probably - since it's using LILO - it's a very very very old distro with a pile of uptime, and it wouldn't surprise me at all if the SD card storage [assuming it uses that] or maybe hard disk [if it uses that] has enough bad sectors by now to create problems like this...
meanwhile the occasional fsck may have corrected things up until now, until drive-cancer is larger than free space, and, well, there she blows!!!
/me replaced hard drives recently on 2 different FreeBSD systems because ZFS warned me of their impending doom... and so got new brain-storage, a few months apart, the same 2TB drive that was going for for around $70
AND, I might add, I'd much rather re-build a Linux or FreeBSD system from scratch onto a new hard drive (or restore via a file-by-file tarball backup) than to replace an ailing hard drive from a Windows box... [hello MS? I need an activation code. No, I'm NOT running Windows 10. I have XP. Oh, you can't give me a code any more? What the HELL??? It's an OLD system and it came WITH XP on it... but you don't care? Thanks a LOT, Slurp!]
*PRIVACY* and *FREEDOM* are *THE* *MOST* *IMPORTANT*!
Why do you even ASK that?
I'd rather *DIE* *FREE* than *LIVE* *AS* *A* *PRISONER*!
using personal devices to DOG COLLAR people - THAT! IS! INSANE!!!
(at least those ankle bracelets that home-confined prisoners wear are *DESERVED* and an *ALTERNATIVE* to a *REAL* *LOCKUP* - "locking up" people who are sick is *JUST* *PLAIN* *WRONG* and is what *COMMUNISTS* and *EVIL* *DICTATORS* do!!!))
it must be their ISP. Though for some odd reason, in the past, I've had problems with IPv6 connectivity via their cloud content provider, something about not honoring MTUs during https/SSL key exchange (or something like that). Well, maybe that's fixed now, haven't seen that pop up its ugly head in a while (ALSO not El Reg's fault).
It might actually explain the entire problem, depending on how you look at things.
"Microsoft says it's C++'s fault."
Blame the COMPILER and LIBRARY author!!! No, wait...
So what fix will we do in "older windows"? My guess: don't view documents with MS office products... ESPECIALLY not documents with embedded fonts!!!
(I'll want to know what effect it has with Libre Office)
I easily fit a Linux image in 16Gb on a micro SD card with more than enough room to spare, with chromium, a web server, custom daemons, and short instructional videos, yotta yotta yotta, operating in 'kiosk mode' on a Raspberry Pi. Set it up properly [and config the browser to only check for updates after 1000 years have passed] and you're all set! Well, you DO have to code it properly...
[and if you're worried about the GPL, you can try FreeBSD instead]
"Just how much is enough ?"
'all of it' plus 10% ?
early on I noticed that Win-10-nic does NOT clean up after itself when it "up"dates/grades. And so you can expect it to grow like *THE BLOB*
"Beware of The Blob it creeps, and leaps, and glides, and slides across the floor..." [Burt Bacharach, 1959 I think - theme song for the movie of the same name - "The Blob"]
"There wasn't even any tea in the supermarket the other day. Or milk."
I'm sure there were plenty of HOARDERS there to prevent anyone ELSE from having any before THEY get to it... (with nothing better to do than create shortages for EVERYONE ELSE).
as for Win-10-nic on a kiosk - it's like a self-inflicted wound.
got, Linux?
I find that leaving a radio on [when you don't have to be on a phone, etc.] helps me get work done. Usually it's conservative talk radio in the AM and music in the afternoon. I have an icecast server that randomly plays songs I've ripped on to my hard drive or I can set up a playlist easily enough, and an "internet radio" that can "tune into" my private icecast server, or any of a number of streaming radio stations for that matter.
Seriously it's a cool thing, doing the work-from-home with the radio on.
But... advice from someone who has done this a LONG time - do NOT TURN ON THE TELEVISION! TV is an attention whore and will RUIN your productivity.
I've worked on site a few times with people who'd recently been to China last December. One guy came back with a bad cold. who knows, it could have been Corona, but I don't know of anyone who's tested positive for the virus. I'm fine, he's fine, they're all fine, it was weeks ago, and for all I know we all caught it, and got over it. Or not. Can't say, because symptoms are often so mild you don't know you have it, or think it's just the passing flu crap (as usual), which I've had off and on for several weeks like every year. (hot showers, staying warm, spicy food, mentholatum up my nose, and liquor all seem to help).
And I might add, DON"T PANIC. No need or tracking people. That's just WRONG.
accuracy could be improved, disease state measured better, etc. - that is true, but also there is a general lack of accuracy on the INFECTION rate, which can only be confirmed via accurate testing. Since "accurate testing" is expensive, it only makes sense to test people who are at risk and who have related symptoms. Asymptomatic people really don't need to be tested, as long as they are aware that they could spread disease, so they should behave "courteously" and do reasonable precautions, not sneeze on people, and so on.
It's up to indiv9duals, and NOT "Big Nanny". Treat people as if they are intelligent, and it's a fair bet they'll act like they're intelligent. We don't need a "Big Nanny" to think and control FOR us.
it can only be tracked when it is ON. There's this thing called 'voice mail'. It generally works well when you do things like drive, etc. and leave the phone OFF (which you should do while driving, regardless). Then the phone is STILL good for use in emergencies, and you can listen to incoming messages when you get back home {or arrive at your destination, as needed).
besides, it's NOBODY'S BUSINESS where you are, except YOURS. "Big Nanny" can KISS my HAIRY FREEDOM LOVING ASS!
"It's time to track people's smartphones"
that's a reason NOT to have a so-called "smart" phone. And I leave my dumb-phone OFF unless I need to call someone [for an emergency, most likely, the only reason to have one on me as I see it].
If I want to know where I am, I'll read a map, thanks... (and I can print directions to wherever before I leave).
I need a *finger* icon with the caption "TRACK THIS!"
open listening ports for RDP or VNC are a _BAD_ idea, encrypted or otherwise.
best to use an end-end enrypted VPN, and all access to the corporate network (including remote desktops) is through THAT alone. With some creative firewalling, you could prevent normal network access via the VPN, and only allow the remote desktop-ing.
RDP is interesting, if it's supported [it's likely a smaller business has HOME versions of windows, which don't allow remote-in].
There is a VERY SIMPLE solution, however:
a) VPN login to corporate network
b) VNC server running on the desktop [you'll need to log in first and leave it logged in, turn off those annoying lock screens, etc.]
BUT... if you run Linux or another POSIX operating system chances are you have OTHER things available, too, like ssh, "remote desktop" via the DISPLAY environment variable, and so on.
VNC is probably the easiest (so long as you don't lose the login on the desktop)
and when it comes to outright performance, remote X11 desktops are probably as good as (or maybe even better) than RDP...
[I do not know if there's an open source RDP server out there for windows, but there MIGHT be one for POSIX systems...)
It's also possible, on a POSIX system, to use something like 'Tiger VNC' to operate on its very own desktop. I do this a LOT to test X11 applicaitons. Run vncviewer on the main desktop, run the test applications on the tigervnc's X server with a different desktop (usually loalhost:1). There's really no reason you cannot have that secondary desktop running on a network-visible IP address, and then you just need to be able to VPN into the corporate network to access it.