Re: What do we want?
If people must carry papers, let them be papers.
You made me think of the movie "The Great Escape"
(someone in a black trenchcoat always asking to see your papers)
10283 publicly visible posts • joined 1 May 2015
Although many bristle at the thought of vaccine passports, regarding them as inherently coercive, they look set to become an inevitable part of our post-COVID-19 life.
NOT "inevitable" if we RESIST it HARD ENOUGH. Remember the MAGNA CHARTA? And, other 'resistance' kinds of things? Like the Declaration of Independence for the U.S.? Or resisting Nazi occupation forces during WW2 in France? Yeah a perfect thing to post about on 5-july. Basically, it is NOT inevitable unless we the people ALLOW it to happen. Just sayin'.
And this is ALSO a continuation of why I don't plan on carrying a smart phone around with me, EVAR. A slab computer to read my e-mail (and stuff like that) is ok as long as I secure the connection properly, when using someone else's wifi (like at a customer site). But NO location tracking, contact tracing, or anything even REMOTELY similar, EVAR. I *RESIST*.
(I own a dumb phone. it works. as a phone. For emergency use only. It's nearly always OFF. And that's all I want/need)
Google conforms too much to the desires of the Communist government in China. The *FREE* world does *NOT* need to "go there".
keep with Win32 API. *YES* !!!
I still code old-school dialog-based applications with MFC on occasion, usually specialized code that has a specific use and so I want to make it work as fast as possible without any fiddle-farting with the UI.
The last one i did borrowed code from a Linux application written in C as a proof of concept for a customer. The Linux code uses the serial port [I wrote the open source comms code it made use of, and it had Win32 versions already there with #ifdef blocks, so the port was simple].
Point is, for someone who's been coding for windows FOR 30 YEARS, I've got a lot of sample code I could copy/pasta to make rapid prototypes with. I don't need some "new, shiny" to render all of my experience and sample code *WORTHLESS*.
So I stick with what I'm good at - Win32 and MFC.
Another day another UI framework.
Micros~1 "Moving Target" (their new product)
From article: will not be reassuring to UWP developers
All 14 of them
Also from article: Another way of looking at this is that Microsoft tried to get Windows developers to adopt its UWP model but too many of them refused
Yeah Lucy can only move the football so many times before MOST of us realize we're just getting jerked around and then we won't try kicking it any more.
and yet the bug/vulnerability exists even for NON-SERVER editions, if I read things correctly.
And YES, those are vulnerable to RANSOMWARE (and worse) as well...
[worth pointing out, a VERY RECENT ransomware epidemic - related? dunno yet, but I'd like to]
If Micros~1 has ANY integrity, they'll have patches for every windows version made available for direct download, and no encumberances.
Machine-kind aren't there yet. But they need to be. Don't YOU want a robot butler? (I do!)
the Electronic Frontier Foundation would prefer to see more measured limitations on facial-recognition technology on the basis that some uses can be positive.
I agree with this position, primarily for robot design. An AI brain will need some way to visually recognize humans from apes, dogs, cats, and dolls. And other robots.
Being able to tell one human from another is also necessary, as well as recognizing basic facial expressions (and when they're being faked or mocked). Doing so SHOULD be as natural to a robot as it is to another human or to an animal. It's not "mass surveilance" for a robot's facial recognition to simulate that of a human. in fact, with enough faces, people start seeing individuals as "the masses" (this happens at around 100). And it would take too much processing power away from important tasks for a robot to mass surveil everyone that comes across its field of vision.
Still it might be important for bots to notice familiar faces. That database, if small, won't be useful for spying on the general public. It would just mean that the hundreds of faces the robot came across were not recognized as 'familiar' whereas the one face that gets recognized (family friend, co-worker, checker at the grocery store) is a lot like one human recognizing another.
So it's not so much about BANNING the technology, but the banning the MISUSE of it. And that's a lot harder to do. But history proves that banning a thing outright only means that THOSE WHO ARE CRIMINALS (and evil governments) will be the only ones using and developing it. Sub in "encryption", for example, in place of 'facial recognition', for a possible parallel.
I think the title says it all.
Either
a) Amazon takes the position that CO2 is bad [which I do not believe, I might add] and does REAL reductions,
or
b) They should just be honest about what they're doing and stop acting like smug liberals, trying to justify it with a tap-dancing "scientist"
If you want to talk about science, and then use it to justify a "the solution to pollution is dilution" type of argument, you're only going to make yourself look like a GINORMOUS HYPOCRITE.
My personal belief is that CO2 is insignificant to any kind of climate change, not only because it's just 0.04% of the atmosphere (and in equilibrium), but because it does not absorb the IR frequencies (in any significant amount) to prevent black body radiation from cooling the earth at night. But I'll move along.
Be as it may a lot of governments STILL insist on controlling CO2. So if Amazon is trying to justify that it's ok if THEY emit it, because [insert excuse here], they're just trying to be treated "special" and be given "special exemptions", like some kind of 'corporate welfare' or a 2-tiered form of justice (i.e. one regulation for ME, and another for THEE).
Maybe Bezos should just build a NUCLEAR REACTOR with power output equal to Amazon's consumption. Then the carbon footprint will be ZERO.
running quickbooks required the printer service to be running (I just tested it). it had a very unusual crash when the print spooler was disabled and kept wanting to send some failure code someplace. This was on a Windows 7 workstation. I put the spooler in 'manual' startup mode after, will start to run things that need it, then stop again. Irritating,yeah.
I have to wonder if there's some easier way to prevent network access to a 7 workstation from exploiting this... (and don't say "Install WIn-10-nic" because THAT isn't happening)
Also since the article said Windows 7 was vulnerable, even when it is NOT a domain controller, what is the extent of this vulnerability on 7 as a workstation?
apparently it's too much extra weight. But yeah how many of us have used compressed air to blow dust off of things? (probably everyone reading El Reg)
So yeah, building an air compressor to suck Martian air and pressurize to 50psi or so [good enough to blow dust off of things] is not the problem. The size and weight of that compressor is the problem.
if it's electrostatic attraction, would a sudden electrostatic jolt of opposite polarity make the dust fall?
Not much, just alternating capacitive discharge on a mildly conductive surface while inverted...
(you'd have to make the surface out of conductive plastic though, like ESD bags)
Wonder if there is a difference the PHBs have missed?
* Uniqueness of the situation
* NOT self-serving (iike a PHB meeting PROBABLY is)
* Necessary (to brief everyone on certain specifics)
* Interesting (you actually want to know about the disaster)
the boredom that initiates the partial sleep state is most likely caused by the lack of "those things".
In particular, PHB meeting PROBABLY is a same-old self-serving unnecessary uninteresting series of pontifications by droning speakers that seem to like their own voices too much.
Result: *yawn*
how often do you NEED a kernel update for Linux? (my experience - not at all, for many years)
Nearly all of the security patches are for userland stuff. I don't even remember a security vuln being in the kernel, and unless there's a serious instability in the kernel itself, you might be able to just do a driver update with a new driver [rare as it is], by removing the old one, and doing 'modprobe' [or similar] on the new one, and just keep going without rebooting.
[I was using modprobe and similar utilities to do that sort of thing back in the day, working on kernel drivers for wifi routers, when the kernel was 2.4something]
and last I checked the 'dpkg' and 'apt' systems will shutdown and re-start daemons after installing an upgraded package and dependent libraries. That should pretty much refresh things, without that reboot.
Although Linux or FreeBSD would be a good choice, I would actually expect them to go with an RTOS which might be better suited to signage.
VxWorks (commercial OS) or FreeRTOS (FOSS) would be good choices.
Both would certainly have a lighter hardware requirement and may even support legacy things that Linux distros might not...
(Linksys and others have used VxWorks for a lot of their wifi router firmware, though i haven't specifically worked with it in over a decade)
If the game is big sign with lightweight network-connected display that "just works", the RTOS could be the best choice overall.
Water, in many ways, is special. Hydrogen bonds are responsible for a lot of this.
* universal solvent for ionic chemical reactions
* unusually high melting point, low boiling point, compared to other substances
* expands when it freezes - keeps ice floating on rivers or lakes, rather than freezing solid
* attaches to lots of chemicals to form hydrates, which remain as solids.
* high affinity for dissolved gasses
* absorbs a wide band of radiation in IR range [greenhouse effect]
* relatively transparent in all forms to visible light
* can super-saturate an atmosphere at temperatures where it should be liquid.
* is lighter than other atmospheric gasses, yet does not escape out into space like H2 and He (water=18, nitrogen=28, oxygen=32, argon=40, CO2=44) [methane apparently breaks down in upper atmosphere and does not actually escape it]
This "being special" is one reason (probably) why water is the basis of Earth life. So life NOT as we know it might be a little difficult, given other solvent chemicals NOT being like this.
your point is good - it's not about the "social network" services provided, but the AD NETWORK and NEWS FEED and (alleged) censorship and (alleged) 'Cancel Culture' where the (alleged) abuses are. THAT, and the (alleged) monetizing of the CUSTOMER through spying and tracking and targeting with ads. Alleged, that is.
Unfortunately, the indications are that this FTC case was NOT addressing the REAL problem. And unfortunately certain provisions in U.S. Law (the infamous section 230) let it happen. Allegedly.
From THIS article...
"Section 230 was enacted in 1996 as part of a law called the Communications Decency Act, which was primarily aimed at curbing online pornography."
"In practice, the law shields any website or service that hosts content – like news outlets’ comment sections, video services like YouTube and social media services like Facebook and Twitter – from lawsuits over content posted by users."
"The law includes a provision that says that, so long as sites act in “good faith,” they can remove content that is offensive or otherwise objectionable."
And the latter part (allegedly) is where the biggest bone of (alleged) contention (allegedly) is, and why MANY people (allegedly) want the social media providers reigned in, political "contributions in-kind" being one of the accusations involved.
(doing my best to address the 'donkey in the room' without getting El Reg in trouble)
In another language his last name 'Baca' sounds like the word for "idiot". Yes, it's the first thing that entered my head.
Then again, in yet another language from the same region of the world, my IRL first name sounds like the word for "simple" which COULD mean 'idiot'...
thanks for quoting me. But I think you missed the point. Linux is STILL a "desktop OS" because of how it's used. Windows is what it is because Micros~1 MADE it that way. And Micros~1 *STILL* does NOT respect what CUSTOMERS want, which is to have their OS be what THEY want it to be, and *NOT* what Micros~1 wants them to HAVE (by force, if necessary).
Those complaints would disappear if Micros~1 would just STOP being so TYRANNICAL (one size fits all users, no exceptions), and *ALLOW* *USER* *CUSTOMIZATION* *AGAIN*, including the COMPLETE removal of spyware, NOT being forced to update, the Windows 7/XP/2000/9x appearance, "control panel only" vs Schizoid-Settings, and, my favorite, 3D SKEUOMORPHIC (or for the FLATTY fans, all 12 of them, that too. as an option, NOT default).
Micros~1 lost touch with what sold Windows "as a desktop" back in the 90's. It had been available since the mid 80's, but nobody really wanted it. It wasn't until it went 3D SKEUOMORPHIC and had built-in games like Solitaire that people jammed the stores wanting to buy it. Micros~1 forgot that.
At first, they EMBRACED what the public wanted.
Then, they EXTENDED it to become 2k and XP, F'd up with Vista, but restored most of that in 7.
Then they EXTINGUISHED the best parts, until it became 10.
Whereas with OSS desktops, you have absolute FREEDOM as to how you want it to look and behave... by forking your own version, if there's not already enough to choose from.
And, worth mentioning, I get MORE work done using FreeBSD or Linux than I've ever been able to do with Windows, even though I nearly always install Cygwin, which WSL has tried to compete with for some reason, I might add... ANYWAY, I somewhat-recently brought a ~17 year old laptop into a new contract where they had no Linux machines available, even though I had a W10 machine available to me, and was able to work FASTER and GET MORE DONE even though it only had 500mb of RAM and a 1Ghz processor - so 2 days later I was handed a spare W10 CPU box and I took it home and put Linux on it for them (installer running while I played games), brought it back the next day, and used it for on-site dev work for months, and it is still running at the moment for remote-in things. WSL on the W10 box did not help much at all.
Yes. Linux _IS_ a "desktop OS" when it is used that way. And more.
but if they hype the marketing for LONG ENOUGH, they can announce something new+shiny (that's really just trivial) with great fanfare like it's truly an epic event, with shock and awe and hordes of newly converted fanboi customers stampeding to the local retailer to purchase it...
(Or so it MIGHT be if they MADE IT LOOK LIKE WINDOWS 7 and got rid of "SETTINGS" and the SPYING and the ADS, though keeping the 'rounded corners' would be allowable)
icon, because, facepalm
I've been using PLA to 3D print things. PLA has the advantage of being made from plants [as I recall] and is very biodegradable. Downside, it's biodegradable, meaning it'll fall apart after a while. But for testing designs, it works pretty well.
An online search shows that there are PLA food containers and single-use water bottles out there. This is definitely a good step in the right direction, in my bombastic opinion.
In the mean time there seem to be a lot of electronics recyclers. Occasionally they'll pick stuff up that you put out on the curb (at least in my area). So when the manufacturer cannot use PLA (due to lack of durability or some other reason) those can still be recycled through the usual places. And if it's convenient and easy, EVERYONE will recycle [more ore less]. In my bombastic opinion, at least.
So for the purposes of plastic pollution of the ocean and recycling plastics to make ABS and other structural things, I will assume that PLA is not included in that particular definition.
Unless I'm horribly mistaken, the USA and most western nations do NOT dump plastic into the oceans, at least not deliberately. This has been the case for DECADES as I understand it, starting with things like THIS.
I wonder who DOES dump all of that plastic?
If it's collecting in mats in the ocean on its own, so much the easier to dredge it. I wonder how much money you'd make recovering it... (or maybe just a worth-while charity that cleans the oceans up)
In any case, I'm of the opinion that when recycling is free and easy, EVERYONE will do it. I put the blue can out every other week, and rarely need to put the other one out. The fast majority of household trash (for me) is of the 'recyclable' variety - cardboard, plastics, etc. and that all goes into the blue can.
i actually thought of a project management tool, like the old "Microsoft Project" which may or may not still exist. Shift to the left, get it done earlier. To the right, it's delayed. Something like that.
Managers like gantt charts, they can slide 'em around like those birthday party puzzles we played with as kids, and announce stuff in meetings (like new deadlines) based on their sliding things around.
I can think of a few examples where shipping something "with a vulnerability" might be just fine. Here's one that I think epitomizes what I mean:
Let's say you ship embedded devices with Raspberry Pi and RPi OS on them, running your software and a touch screen interface. This is pretty popular from my observation.
You don't allow ssh or listening network services (except by using a special maintenance feature from the UI that end-users normally do not know about) but since the device DOES need to phone home to a server on the network, it has access to one. And the user/password is well known (say the default RPi user/password). because the screen logs in automatically on boot. Is THIS insecure? Or, because there are no listening services (and no way to add them via the UI) it's "secure enough" ?
Then you think about whether the latest polkit zero-day is worth LOTS OF EFFORT to patch right now because oh-my-god-it-can-be-exploited, or whether it can wait for the next round of maintenance updates several months from now... because there are NO listening ports! And, you have thousnds of pre-imaged SD cards on order, and you're shipping right now, and you STILL have SD cards that have not yet been delivered (in the pipeline), and you JUST heard of this vulnerability LAST WEEK.
and because of the nature of the devices, you don't want them using automatic package updates and ending up with the kinds of problems you see when a windows system failed to boot after doing this sort of thing... and the screen displays the error instead of the user interface. And so on. [controlled updates with a USB or download or by replacing the SD are acceptable because they've been tested]
Anyway, that throws a wrench into the works ("shipping with a vulnerability"), but in the case I outline, the system config already mitigates the vulnerabilities you need to patch at some point. If you can't ssh in, and can only view a UI that consists of pages written by the manufacturer [no external links], and it's not listening to incoming network traffic, nearly every possible vulnerability has been "dealt with". And exploiting a zero day (like with polkit) would require physical access. Might as well take the SD card out and muck with it from a laptop.
(yeah I'm kinda working on something similar to this)
He simply does not realise care that being on good terms with the west would do his country a LOT of good.
fixed it for ya. He's dictator for life (like Xi) after all.
Good job for the RN at dealing with this in the smartest way possible.
/me imagines Putie doing a "Line of Death" like Gaddafi. That would be both sad AND laughable at the same time.
will we be able to run it in a VM?
VMWare appears to have TPM virtualization. VirtualBox does NOT, as far as I can tell.
In my search on this subject I have run across one or two TPM software solutions, particularly one on github.
I would expect VirtualBox to support this eventually, but it could end up being a PAYED ENHANCEMENT of some kind (and may not be supported on Linux, and PROBABLY NOT on FreeBSD). But we shall see. If the tech needs ilcensing, money will end up changing hands.
needless to say, if TPM 2 is required, and I can't run it in a virtualbox VM, I will NOT be testing it.
so they don't want anyone running it in a VM, then? At least, not with VirtualBox...
(as far as I can tell VBox does not support TPM emulation, though it appears that VMWare _DOES_)
I guess this means I will NOT be trying out their new OS. Not like I *really* wanted to, though... (the last time around was JUST! TOO! DISAPPOINTING!!!)
or think of the developers HAVING TO PAY A TOLL to get cert signing or DRM tagging or whatever OTHER "security" scheme Apple comes up with, if they can't simply use the store to filter out what they do not like and get "a piece of the action" at the same time...
Side-loading MUST become possible WITHOUT certs and DRM crap. Otherwise it will be POINTLESS with Apple as the only gatekeeper. This is most important for independent developers and FOSS.
(Saying that removing Apple's exclusive gatekeeping would somehow HARM developers is BACKWARDS)
"it was decided" a while back that the nicname should be "Micros~1", remember?
If you do not mind living in a 3rd world country where paying off politicians keeps you out of trouble, $1b each would probably go a VERY long way. Buy your own compound, or your own island, hire locals as guards in a paramilitary kind of way, private airstrip and aircraft, ship things in from all over the world, and so on.
Several nations in the equatorial and south pacific region come to mind, as do many Latin American countries. Even Cuba. And since they're from Africa, perhaps a few places on THAT continent wouldn't mind having them, either.
a dodgy character regardless of where your money really came from
A quicky online search shows that there are a number of Swiss bitcoin exchanges. I expect it would be possible to trade the $2b or so in (de-valued) bitcoin for something a bit more "depositable" in a Swiss bank account, and hide your money the same way that "a dodgy character" would have done it over the last century or so.
I'm not saying that Swiss authorities could not somehow trace that it was done, or where the perps were when they did it, but once it becomes hard cash and gets deposited in a bank in Switzerland, it may become extremely difficult to trace.
Similarly for Caiman Islands and other "hide your money" places around the world.
However, like many have already mentioned, crooks make mistakes and that's how they get caught.
Any global bounty hunters out there looking for a reward to catch them? I'm sure the investors wouldn't mind forking over a percentage to get the rest of their money back.