Re: Homoglyphs are DISGUSTING
what if they identify as ISO8859-1 ??
10282 publicly visible posts • joined 1 May 2015
Example, Bezos owns the Washington *BLEEP* (aka Washington [com]Post). It is well known as having a left-wing bias (long before Bezos bought it). I do not believe anything has really changed in their politics, from what I understand. They were the newspaper of Woodward and Bernstein (of Watergate fame), after all.
Now I do not believe Bezos interferes with their operations or hands down orders to them. Rather, he bought a newspaper that most likely agrees with what he believed already at the time, and probably still believes (politically).
And that's probably the case with many other "political owners".
no. you place blame inaccurately.
It's the final stage of un[der]regulated monopolies and trusts cornering the markets and controlling everything, similar to late 1800's and early 1900's Robber Barons.
It's a big part of why Teddy Roosevelt became president, back then (although that history is more subtle, he was McKinley's VP and became President following McKinley's death).
specific quotes are a bit much to remember
Uh, that's what search engines are for... right?
I've been pushing this mantra for the last decade... and all I've gotten in return is to be scoffed at, called paranoid and generally ignored.
the choir says "Amen"
I've been avoiding social media and even google for a long time, now. Sometimes when it makes sense I use their services, but I do it from SANDBOXED browsers that erase all history when I'm done.
and as for 'droid devices, I'm just careful.
“As of January 13, 2020, 25% of Fortune 500 retailers had blocked their websites from being visited by European IP addresses.”
and all they really had to do was STOP COLLECTING DATA WITHOUT PERMISSION... (and to reveal what the data was afterwards)
I wonder if I could simply code a web page that displays it all from an SQL (or other kind of) database for the user-specific stuff allowing user edits within any GDPR requirements. And as I recall, aggregate data isn't covered, right? Just the user-specific stuff, right? (it would be hard to deal with data NOT directly connected to a specific user anyway, like general sales statistics).
So, NOT hard from my limited understanding. OK maybe some basic clarifications might be needed, but a consulting service or three could make that possible (on a how-to web page) and evaluate things on the cheap, assuming it has not already been done. Then they do business in EU/UK and it pays for itself.
But NOOooo... they must WANT that data for some purpose. Otherwise, why not be consumer-friendly and above board? (I know I do not want to know the answer to that, it is probably obvious, see icon)
It should be BRAIN DEAD OBVIOUS: if it's covered by GDPR, don't transfer it in a way that violates GDPR.
I'm saddened by the fact that the USA does NOT have a GDPR-like data privacy protection law, and is allegedly being used to hide stuff through "data transfer" (if I read the article correctly).
well it's (sadly) not uncommon for lawsuits to do what "quality and price" competition can not... especially for those high profile mega corporations that border on being modern day "Robber Baron" trusts.
AWS and NSA - vs Micros~1 and JEDI. The military JEDI contract sounds a lot more constitutional and "above board" to me, vs NSA and allegations of data collection on citizens. I'm surprised Google wasn't in on THAT one. But I am NOT surprised that Amazon WAS.
Boeing really is having trouble keeping up, aren't they? They're kinda like IBM that way. Decades ago IBM laid off a bunch of middle and upper management all at once (quite possibly for reasons including age and retirement obligations, but that's another issue). But I think everyone around them agreed that there were too many "bosses" and not enough people doing work. It may be that Boeing has too many bosses and bureaucrats who circulate papers with one another and therefore "scamper" instead of run.
And THEN you naturally get a few high profile problems because NOBODY seems to have the time to SOLVE them.
I wonder if Boeing could simply build 10 rockets, launch the first, fix whatever it finds wrong with some creative hardware hacking, then launch the next and the next until they get one that works... yeah that's kinda how Musk did it I bet!
(ooh look, another fireball! back to the workshop...)
sorta like one of the first thing a sub crew often does when they get to periscope depth [when the situation permits] is to stick the snorkel mast up and ventilate for a while. Same idea. Equipment has a smell to it when it operates in an enclosed space for a relatively long time. Tighten up the hatches and recirculate the air and you actually start to accumulate the smells of paint, oil, and grease. Even with the best air conditioning designs possible, and with electrostatic precipitators in the ventilation system (better than anything you could get to deal with allergens in your home), and scrubbers and burners to take care of exhaled CO2 and organic smells (farts, cooking, oil, grease, paint) not all of it is dealt with completely and the stench slowly accumulates. You notice it the most if you stayed in for an underway period, and as soon as the boat pulls in you get back to the boat and it smells "like that" for a day or two. And so does the crew (and their clothing). Wives often complain "you smell like the boat".
So in reality it's not the farts. It's the equipment. At least, from my experience.
unfortunately there are those out there who LOVE the way SQL Server does things. I am NOT a fan of it, and have only used those features that are basic to any SQL database (the idea was to make the code DBMS-independent and do all of the real work in C). That argument was mostly philosophical, and you always had some advocate generating a specialized query using SQL Server specific features (like maybe a stored procedure) instead of something that would work EVERYWHERE, especially an edge case example, to try and make YOUR DESIGN look bad and gain brownie points. Never mind that once you're LOCKED in it's even HARDER to switch to something else down the road.
I'm a fan of PostgreSQL because (in my opinion) it provides an SQL that is compliant with the standards as well as being open source. So something written for PostgreSQL generally should work everywhere, except for when the implementation has quirks (like MySQL or maybe even Maria - string handling with embedded quotes comes to mind - yeah NOBODY has a '1/4" nut' in the description field right? Or calls something "Joe's favorite hammer").
In any case, my own preferences aside, the selling point for Micros~1's solutions is usually something that locks you in later down the road. Then you won't have a choice any more (not without cost at any rate). "Embrace, Extend". You are locked in with 'Extend'. And you know what follows, something that forces you to migrate to something even MORE proprietary and costly... you know, like maybe HAVING to use a Micros~1 server product instead of Linux to run SQL Server on, maybe? With per-seat licensing and/or monthly subscription, of course!
I take it you've seen the movie "Idiocracy" ??
I do not advocate gummint control, more like NOT control. It's just that people need to stop acting like IDIOTIC GENIUSES when it comes to maintaining a population on the planet. Smart people need to HAVE MORE KIDS. And gummints need to STOP INTIMIDATING AND INTERFERING with parents.
I'd do it except that GUMMINT has made it NOT WORTH IT to me... so the next generation will SUFFER WITHOUT MY GENETIC MATERIAL.
(spank your kids, let them do dangerous things as long as they know and understand the risk, and they become more resilient and independent. that's a GOOD thing, I say)
sending the target lots of emails that they think they must open and read
I have been getting a LOT of those lately. Fake inquiries for purchasing products, fake "our check did not get through" requests for banking info, LOTS of fake mail from my e-mail domain admin (I own the domain, I _AM_ the admin) telling me my mailbox is full or my pasword expires (etc.) and giving me a link to some phishing site to "fix" it, yotta yotta yotta. sometimes 15 or 20 per DAY, lately. It's pretty much a PLAGUE now.
Maybe it's a GOOD thing they went and made themselves "new special friends" of the NRA...
And it's just the sort of devious thinking and misdirection the NRA is known for.
Do you have actual EVIDENCE for that potentially less than accurate claim? Or are you merely trying to pander to an inaccurate perception in a failed attempt at humor?
Keep in mind the NY attorney general FAILED to go after Cuomo for a very, very, very long time. Other high profile (allegedly politicized) legal issues have been observed over the last few years coming out of their offices (such as actions against Trump - "trumped up" charges, yeah), and (mentioning it again) a COMPLETE FAILURE to do anything about (now former) governor Cuomo's NOW well known exploits they apparently knew about for a long time. Except NOW everybody ELSE knows about it too, and they have to "save face" with some token investigations...
So, keeping THAT in mind, I would suggest it is VEXATIOUS PROSECUTION, and politically motivated.
yeah exactly what _I_ was thinking.
Ransoming the NRA, even from half way around the world, is probably NOT a good idea, like teasing the lion or scaring the elephant. This is a group of people who strongly believe in self-defense and (if they're like me) RETALIATION. With weapons if necessary. Or lawyers wielded as weapons. Or, as I would put it, "Nothing is too good for our new special friends" (kinda like Charles Bronson in the Lethal Weapon series).
Yeah, the next "exception" ought to be GETTING RID OF DMCA and just using the prior copyright law to go after infringers who aren't merely engaging in "fair use".
But THAT would make TOO MUCH COMMON SENSE. *INSTEAD* we end up with BUREAUCRATS making this and that dictate in order to justify their own existence and intrusion into our lives.
(see icon)
Arizona has a relatively low cost of living (not run by a certain political party like Cali-Fornicate-You).
It also has a LOT of open land. They also have less expensive electrical power, apparently not being mandated to use "alternative" energy at much higher cost.
In short, LOWER OPERATING COST. And being on the border of Mexico, next to California and Nevada, and one state away from Texas, it's actually well located. And for various reasons the airport in Phoenix is a MAJOR connection hub.
There are other advantages to Arizona as well, but last time i was there southern Arizona was ok (close to Mexico, along highway 8) but in the north my allergies went berzerk.
whether there are tax breaks or not I do not know. But the dry climate might actually do better for making chips, too. Just a thought.
shipping things around by rail from Arizona would be pretty economical as well. It's way south of the Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada mountains, two major hurdles for railroads.
"what you said" plus lowering the voltage way below the 5V these systems used back in the 90's, so that you can use more current for switching, switch less voltage (making it a bit faster), and NOT burn out everything from the high wattage.
And, using different gate, channel, and substrate materials might help run on even LOWER voltages.
schotkey diodes have a forward bias voltage similar to germanium (0.2 to 0.3v) while silicon needs 0.6 to 0.7 . different dopings and materials might improve this enough to run at under 1V, let's say, allowing currents of ~50% more than what we're using now.
i think the power supply on my newer Ryzen boxes is in the neighborhood of 1.5V or something like that. Not sure how long they've been like this though.
the best screen saver in XScreenSaver is the one that does the LCD re-conditioning. I hate having ghosts on my LCD monitors
just shut off mate-screensaver or gnome-screensaver (or whatever) and run XScreenSaver on startup. Works for me. It complains about being out of date on FBSD though. I don't care.
perhaps we just need to make OpenGL high performance enough for games, and let the rest of that be managed on the back end.
I would think that OpenGL and dri would be enough... assuming the dev effort went THERE and not to some new, shiny pipe dream system (Wayland) to replace what already works.
no, Wayland is yet another thing (similar to what Poettering has done) being crammed at us by the 'new, shiny, it is OUR turn now" too-young-to-realize-what-they-are-doing types.
The fact that they do this in open source is NOT the problem (it has happened a LOT with Windows, after all). It's the fact that THEY ARE DOING IT.l Their narrow view of how computers are used (and possible demand that we play with our toys ONLY the way THEY tell us, and no other) just reflects a possible level of arrogance and disdain for normal people.
At least, In My Bombstic Opinion.
If Xorg were going to die I would probably do what I could to fork it. Problem is getting paid for my efforts - I do not have F.U. money and must do consulting gigs to survive. But now, seems good with a new maintainer.
And I am _ALWAYS_ using X11 over TCP with embedded devices running Linux. It just makes sense to edit and build things on them this way.
I have often pointed out where these misconceptions about the user base come from:
a) Marketeers and their "new shiny"
b) Looking ONLY at sales or new installs
c) Poor sampling with surveys (Stack Overflow is NOT a representative sample)
d) living in a bubble world [especially when MOST of the user base is OUTSIDE of your bubble]
e) "It's MY turn, now!!!"
and so on
Wayland sounds MORE like "The Micros~1 way of doing things" i.e. a large bloated monolithic solution vs something more distributed (even to the point of client and server across a network). SystemD is like this, Pulse Audio has been accused of being this, and a LOT of people vote with their installs by choosing Linux distros like Devuan that have NONE of that crap in them [except pulse audio is still there but I believe they're working on a way to get rid of that, too]
Wayland (IMBO) is Change for the sake of Change. So, NO. Just NO.
well In My Bombastic Opinion it was BETTER in older windows versions, particularly the 'File Open' 'common dialog' box. It loaded faster because it DID NOT HAVE TO DO ANALYSIS ON EVERY STINKING FILE EVERY TIME IT LISTED THEM so that MAYBE some shell extension would do something later IF you selected it. They could always populate icon lists and tree diagrams based on a cache or in a background thread, and NOT delay the selection of files for A SINGLE MOMENT LONGER than absolutely necessary.
Admittedly, gnome is just as bad - open up the /usr/bin directory some time in a 'File Open' box and ask "why is this thing SO SLOW???" [same reason why Micros~1 file open boxes are so slow, I say]
Meanwhile, you're bigging up a tech stack built on Windows 9x which is totally unsuited to modern programming challenges
etc.
(I don't know whether to laugh or facepalm)
that word "modern" - I do not think it means what you think it means
And as for wax cylinders, believe it or not, audio recording on a wax cylinder (with current tech, and slightly better materials) is likely to sound VERY good, as it is on high quality vinyl. Some people prefer the sound of vinyl recordings. They also like tube/valve amplifiers better. Just because it is old does not make it obsolete.
Microsoft have only done what a sensible business would do - try to predict what the future is going to bring
How's that working out for them, since the early noughties when Ballmer took over and introduced the ".Not" initiative ... ?
(they need to FIRE their astrologers and crystal gazers)
I cannot shout this loud enough: WIN32 and 3D SKEUOMORPHIC!!
If Micros~1 gets THAT right, we'll all be better off for it. But they won't. They're too busy trying to find the right lipstick to put on the non-oinky-end of the boar, i.e. TIFKAM and UWP and that eldritch abomination, ".Not".
If you are thinking "the right makes better memes" then your probably uncomfortably far left compared to the rest of the population.
no, I think the idea that the left is currently stifling humor is correct. That is, applying "cancel culture" means that the only thing left for, uh, "the left", is to PANDER TO THE PERCEPTION. And that's usually not funny except to those who laugh at whatever makes themselves look better at others' expense. Yeah, it's an "ego thing". My Bombastic Opinion.
good satire and humor is rooted in truth. Something like "How many cancel culture advocates does it take to change a light bulb? HOW DARE YOU SAY LIGHT BULB!!!" (yeah I just made that up. but some of these jokes just write themselves, ya know?) And THAT is why "The Left cannot meme".
I think Twitter may be "compensating". Banning Trump alienated a LOT of people.
Either that, or their algorithm detects TRUTH (for the more 'Conservative' posts, anyway. heh)
Also worth pointing out: right wing (usually wacky fascist and/or racist stuff) does not equal 'conservative' so I have to wonder exactly what they classify as "right wing". left wing is generally obvious when it orients towards socialism, social justice, universal basic income, and taxing "the rich": right wing (racist, fascist) may be more difficult to detect if it does not contain actual pejorative terms. And I wonder how they would even detect conservative posting unless it includes discussion about C.R.T. or parental involvement in schools or school choice or lower taxes/regulation or illegal immigration or states rights or less government in our lives (in general). [these concepts may be a little more vague for an algorithm so maybe they are detected as 'something else' ?].
I'd just conclude that algorithms really can't understand political things.
Something Micros~1 used to do, back in the day, is NOT force people to change.
You could easily see a Win2k menu from the start button if you wanted to.
It's too bad that Micros~1 does not let us choose an XP APPEARANCE in any version of windows since then.
(and that goes TRIPLE for the excessively-layered touch-friendly "setings" in Win-10-nic etc.)
I miss XP. It was always easy to find info and set up devices. All Micros~1 needed to do was keep the kernel and applications patched, NOT re-invent the "user experience".
maybe purging them with ammonia gas would neutralize the acidity ?? Metals in a slightly basic pH tend to form protective oxide layers.
OK that would be too simple and obvious. Just vent some ammonia into the thruster exhaust ports to keep the pH under control and voila! Problem solved! So what if it smells like glass cleaner.
fortunately I found a great place online to buy transformers (replacements for guitar amps anyway) for tube(valve) amplifiers, like 6L6 and KT88 (and other) power stages, even Hammond brand (but mostly amp replacements).
And I bet those transfomers won't corrode in Florida summertime weather, unlike Boeing's rocket fuel valves.
I spent the summer in Orlando back in the early 80's when I went to U.S. Navy Nuclear Power School there. Hot, humid, and gnats spiraling in clouds. And you could set your watch by the afternoon thunderstorms.
[Launches take place from Canaveral because it's one of the lowest latitude spots in the continental USA, and so earth spin gives you a slight boost on takeoff, saving fuel. So if you make a rocket it BETTER be Florida weather proof]
When I was in the Navy I was so used to electrical, electronic, and mechanical/pipe systems being weatherproof and salt-water tolerant that I'm kind of amazed that Starliner's engineers missed this obvious operational condition.
The web goes through standards bodies of very hard working people from many companies, all trying extremely hard to make a safe, secure web experience.
you have minutes from these collaborative meetings and/or mailing list archives available someplace? just curious...
(yes I'd like to see the actual discussion/debate that reportedly did NOT happen)
Most likely the "hard working people" are just a bunch of moderately sycophantic 3rd party marketeers brown-nosing Google to get what THEY want (and damn the end users, we're just being monetized after all)
no, the users do NOT demand a rapidly changing web. At least, none of the users I have known.
It's the MARKETEERS and AD SLINGERS who demand it. "New Shiny" - right?
Most people get tired of the CONSTANT UPDATING very quickly, especially if they get throttled for excess cell phone bandwidth usage or have their windows workstations taken over by all-too-frequent updates for several hours (when they really needed to use their computers) a few times too many.
All that moving target updating and "New Shiny" is HIGHLY overrated. And I think nearly everybody KNOWS this.