Re: And so ad infinitum
Known in the biz as Kubla Cantch 22. Bite 'em.
825 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Apr 2015
What I'd like to see is some Turing-like proof that ANYTHING "smart" CAN and WILL be hacked to cause physical harm, then present the proof to mainstream news as a means to convince legislators to regulate such products to save lives.
Including electrical or gas board smart meters. The challenge to attackers, whether state-sponsored or mischievous kiddies, is substantial. But the scale of damage possible is staggering. </rant>
Thank you @Doctor Syntax, for your concern. This is the next post. Now that I've taken the test, and almost understand it, I see how the "rare" deadly side effect could be a better option than doing the test in the obvious way--which would probably bring into play the same side effect.
Nonetheless, I will remain vigilant around those who say "We feel confident ..."
I'm about to take a medical test which can kill me by method X, but that was described in the pamphlet as "rare". I felt good about that until the next paragraph, when method Y was described as "very rare".
So, as always, the thought in my heart is "it's been good to know you all" fellow castard bommentards, but perhaps this time it's worth stating. I will post again, Very-Rarity-willing.
NSA comes out of this looking incompetent and vindictive. Sure, it was the judge who said nine, but any lesser number could have been sought by the NSA. Maybe they're warming up for Assange and Snowden (if they can get mitts on him). Maybe they're stretching their wings on the dubious practice of loading up the charges followed by a plea agreement. It prevents a fair trial. Who knows, he might have got off with treatment and community service if a trial had found that hoarding is a mental illness. So, also not a good day for US jurisprudence. IANAW - I am not a whatever.
I wonder if eventually we'll have an Al Capone moment, where an edifice is brought down not by proof of direct naughtiness, but for something like evading VAT. Just blue-skying.
The most significant moment in today's article, to me, was the fact that Deloitte required Autonomy to produce a document saying that a particular transaction was arm's-length. So HPE's case is built upon suspicions that the auditors had all along? I haven't been dipping into the supply, but rest assured that popcorn will be deployed again before this trial concludes. Pirate popcorn, with butt-ARR. But rest assured, IANAL.
So big company H can sue the remnants of big company A for kidding the world about their latest wares, but nobody's suggesting that punter D should be able to do likewise. I've restocked the popcorn, but confess I haven't HAD any yet because the entertainment factor has begun to lag. In California terms ....
Maybe he should claim that his coding contains Planned Obsolescence, thus turning a potential felony into a classic business practice. I am not trying to excuse him, nor am I trying to excuse purveyors of Planned Obsolescence in the field of computer software.
It would be funny if the trick could be defeated by turning back the system clock.
In a similar vein, both Opera and Vivaldi (admittedly both Chromium-based) are better than Chrome, which I deleted from my machines some years ago. Neither Opera nor Vivaldi will fiddle their offerings to increase the weight of black ink at the bottom of Google's financials. Simply not using Chrome, shifts this problem from being worrisome to being remote enough to ignore.
If it was a sshow before the purchase, HP didn't do its homework. If it was a sshow during the purchase, well of course acquisitions produce nervousness. If it was a sshow after the purchase, that is HP's fault, because they were in charge. In all cases, sshowing does not advance HP's case.
Paris would understand.
For quite a while I've thought that Canada's scuttling of its AVRO Arrow super-sonic jet was due not so much to Prime Minister Diefenbaker's qualms about carrying nuclear weapons, as it was due to the best efforts of the US Military-Industrial-Political complex, whether overt (but covered by Canada to avoid embarrassment) or covert, or even psychological. I still have no evidence, but the events of the last couple of decades have done nothing to make me revise the theory. As long as it's the USA's game, they profit by it.
But these are HP's witnesses
Does the defence need to call witnesses? When the offence scores an own goal, it is not necessary for the beneficiary to prance about flexing their knee joints.
But yes, please call witnesses, Messrs. Lynch and Hussain. I continue to find this circus profoundly entertaining. Biggest regret: need to buy more popcorn.
I wonder how many fb accounts there are with the name Joseph Smith? Not just the JS's but also admirers of the historical figure? How could ICE tell one from another? And if they get the wrong one, does that mean you're denied entry?
In the old days, you could search for people on fb, and find dozens with even your own not-so-popular name. They've throttled the search results back now. But there's still a lot of people on each of most conceivable user names.
A malicious entity could create full-on First Amendment (free speech) accounts in the names of selected foreigners. We already know that free speech does not apply to foreigners... For enhanced authenticity, and less work, all they'd need to do is copy the existing posts of a gen-u-whine wingnut. Even if the malicious account gets terminated by fb, how does that get treated in the ICE-universe?
No, I have to suggest that the current measures are not the end of the measures. They will creep into spheres that everybody (not just the majority, as now) finds reprehensible. You will conclude that Orwell was an optimist. War is Peace. Ice is furore.
If the customer opts out, then perhaps the customer's privacy is protected. But what about persons other than the customer? Is there anything from preventing the sale, for example, of the customer's e-mail address book, not as such, but simply as a collection of e-mail addresses? We've seen this sort of situation bite, before.
That's not the first time that the Bluenose has defeated the very best technology that the Americans could muster...
I'll put a dime on that. Since they put that on the dime.
Although, musically, the Mary Ellen Carter (aka "Rise Again" by Stan Rogers) is much more rousing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uirXFig0IQ , for example.
Your mention of license plates in TX prisons made me think that hackers might be passing info along to makers of phony license plates. License plates are not expensive to make, but annual registration fees can add up. It would be handy if the purveyors of phony could provide a plate whose legit cousin is ensconced on the same make and colour of automobile. This would avoid twigging random police checks. Obsessive? No, ma'am, just part of the service.
Hear hear! This is a f-load better than f-book. Hole, it's even better than Rumpole. And it's real!
I want a silk brocade gown of red roses to wear while reading El Reg's daily dalliance with this case.
On to a different matter. I regularly write outrageous things, and am deservedly downvoted. However, sometimes the utter bollards I write are especially tasteless but receive no downvotes. I'm not at all convinced that in those cases the egregious comment(s) has (have) even been transmitted to the other honourable El Reg forum comment readers. Thus they could attract no downvotes. May I respectfully suggest that El Reg apply AI (referring in this case to Intelligence) and assign to each rejected remark RND (100) downvotes. Then the authors--such as I--of that garbage would continue to think that our muck is getting the bollocking that it so richly deserves. You don't want us doubting the discernment of our fellow commentards, do you, o exalted Registrants?
>> I'll say no more on the matter.
> Well that gives us something to look forward to.
It gives us nothing to look forward to. Which is even better. FTFY.
Getting back to the topic, I would not be glib about immunity. IANAL. In other cases, we see prosecutors offering reduced charges to witnesses (I understand this is not immunity, but it is a kind of immunity), but when on examination or cross-examination it is revealed that the witness's evidence doesn't convince a jury (the prosecutor may have told the witness to shade the testimony or even to lie), the deal is removed or reneged. Then the witness is no further ahead, and also has to live with the consequences of how the prosecutor told him or her to shade the testimony. Is "immunity" an essentially different beast? Are different charges part of the immunity protection? USA has a lot of laws, and so do its States. For all we know, it might be illegal to take in a lungful of air in Tennessee and then breathe it out in Kentucky. Surely once they've cajoled out of Chelsea whatever dirt they desire, they will feel free to "throw the book" at her in unrelated ways. I think they'll be lining up to show how hard-nosed they are. They're quite hard-nosed even when the perp is not a transsexual tritch, all it takes is for one not to belong to a privileged class. For example, levying a fine with a penalty for late payment on a person who can't afford to pay the fine. That's the best treadmill since the abolition of Slavery.
Say it ain't so, Joe.
No DrWhoSexual or Quiphiloquian has suggested Jodie Whitaker's accent as the sexiest. I wonder why that is.
Nobody has suggested that Canadian is the sexiest British Accent. After all, Mike Myers learned everything he knew about accents in suburban Toronto and from his Scottish father. At first I thought "Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me" was so ridiculous that it wasn't even funny. But eventually, all reason dissolved. As it so often does.
Joking aside, when I first visited England, I feared (ever so slightly of course) that my neutral Canadian accent would provide an opportunity for those who were so inclined to look down on me. I didn't find that at all. Maybe my powers of observation were underdeveloped sufficiently that I could not recognize a British put-down (but, boy, speaking French in Paris it didn't take a microsecond to recognize one). But I think the real reason is that a neutral Canadian accent most closely resembles, in those green and pleasant isles, the accent of an English person (not an Irish person) from Dublin. Again, from the perspective of somebody in England, fairly neutral.
I find Welsh accents beguiling, for example Eve Myles = Gwen Cooper on Torchwood, silly plots, gappy teeth and all. Please don't tell Mrs. Bunch.
My father had an accent. But all the people I met in his company were too polite to inquire about it. I never thought about it until I was 40 and my sister made a point of mentioning it. Accents may change over a lifetime, as I discovered when listening to recordings my parents made on wax cylinders during WW II, before I was born. My dad sounded much more English matinee-idol than I had ever heard, but the bigger shock was that my mom had a strong Ottawa River Valley accent that she shed in later life. They both spoke faster than they did later, a bit like if you've ever seen the "Thin Man" movie from 1934.
OK, I'm brain-dead, but I do find the first example of a Kotlin programme in the Wikipedia to be confusing. My first but not only confusion is the variable name, which seems to be scope. To me, that word wants to be a keyword. If it is not a keyword, then don't use it.
// Hello, World! example
fun main() {
val scope = "World"
println("Hello, $scope!")
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
for (arg in args) {
println(arg)
}
}
The discussion so far has been remarkably blood-free, considering that it is about religion.
Uncle Sam accuses Chinese pair of romping through Anthem's servers for almost a year
A year is rather a long time to be holding your hand over your wallet. Especially if you're running at the same time.
Mine's the one with the pocketbook* in the left breast pocket.
* That's what my father called it; he lived in England for a almost a decade and had English parents. Wikipedia, though, says it should be called a "breast wallet" or a "secretary wallet".
MMV
Would you like a sherry?
Flagrant contempt of court was shown by the US lawyer with Egan. He's the one who stopped the proceedings. He did not ask permission. Slightly less flagrant would have been to cut the transmission without warning, click.
US prosecutors seem to have used Pavlovian conditioning on Egan. I thought that only happened in police procedural TV shows, with the young cop saying "you can't do that", and the old wizened cop replying "just watch me", "this is how you get a confession" or making his reply a slap on the suspect's person, whilst keeping shtum. Whatever. The admissibility of Pavlovian conditioning (you could call it a form of torture) does not reflect any virtue upon the USA legal system. "Countrymen, I come to praise it." [exit stage left].
I could get along OK without a telephone. Problem solved. But other members of the family, not so much. E-mail, great, computer video-calling maybe not as great as it used to be, but OK. But banks, even the cable company, seem to be implementing 2FA - two-factor authentication and the first thing they want is a phone number. So how does that mesh with methods sending all calls from unknown numbers to an answering machine, etc? A naive mind wants to know.
Dr. Gábor Maté suggests that ayahuasca may be good for more than the article prints on the packet, for example, to treat addiction:
https://www.straight.com/life/918656/dr-gabor-mate-recounts-experiences-ayahuasca-forthcoming-documentary-path-shaman
That would make it at once a drug, and an anti-drug.