* Posts by JohnFen

5648 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Feb 2015

Ooh, watch out Google. You've got competition. Verizon has a new 'privacy-focused' search engine

JohnFen

Re: Startpage tarnished ?

Yes, that looks really, really bad.

And since we can't really know what, if any, tracking Startpage is/will be doing, that appearance is plenty enough to get me to avoid using or recommending it.

JohnFen
Stop

Nope

I trust Verizon to maintain privacy (or even define it properly) as much as I trust Google to do the same -- which is not at all.

If you never thought you'd hear a Microsoftie tell you to stop using Internet Explorer, lap it up: 'I beg you, let it retire to great bitbucket in the sky'

JohnFen

Re: Just as soon as you release a stable alternative...

> "Win10 isn't fit for purpose"! Come on, it's more usable than windows 7, more secure and more capable.

I think that all of those points are debatable.

JohnFen

Re: I don't get it

Although a minority, lots of people haven't let go of it -- when I see it, it's usually people who hate Edge but don't want to bother investigating third-party browsers. IE is acceptable to them and is the path of least resistance.

JohnFen

*raises hand*

> or spoofed User-Agent request headers to appear to be doing so.

Guilty as charged!

Safari's Intelligent Tracking Protection is misspelled, says Google: It should be Dumb Browser Stalking Enabler

JohnFen

Re: Even so

> Its an obvious shortcoming of Apple's method and it actually decreases your privacy because it adds another fingerprinting technique.

Actually decreases on the whole? Are you sure? I'd love to see the evidence for this. Yes, it's another fingerprinting technique, and that's not great, but it also provides real privacy protection in other directions. The important bit is not whether it introduces a new fingerprinting signal, but whether the effort increases privacy on the whole.

Google has not provided any evidence or argument that it does, and given that Google despises things like ITP in the first place, such evidence or strong argument is absolutely required. We can't just take them at their word on this.

JohnFen

Even so

Even if Google is correct and these can't actually be fixed (for the sake of argument -- I see no reason to take Google's word for this), it's still a lot better than the alternatives, and better than the nonsense that Google has come up with under the "privacy sandbox" effort so far.

Who honestly has a crown prince in their threat model? UN report officially fingers Saudi royal as Bezos hacker

JohnFen

Re: Alarmingly small?

That just makes the comment more mysterious to me, then. My total data usage, ingress+egress is around a half a meg a day, assuming we're just talking about cell data use.

JohnFen

Alarmingly small?

> One odd detail: according to the report, Bezos used an alarmingly small amount of data (averaging 430KB a day) in his day-to-day use of his phone

Wait, that's odd? That's roughly how much I use, too. What's alarming about it?

Microsoft boffin inadvertently highlights .NET image woes by running C# on Windows 3.11

JohnFen

Re: Only need to look at the preferred IDE to see why no one young wants it

Not just the young! I'm old, and I'd be thrilled if I never had to use Visual Studio again.

JohnFen

Re: BTW if you need a cross-platform GUI development solution

> you still want the underlying engine to be the same so the application layer can share as much code as possible.

True, although I'd say "as much as practical," not "as much as possible," I also really think that the user experience should not be sacrificed in order to achieve this. All of the methods I've seen in this direction so far (with WIn8+ being the poster child for this) have sacrificed the user experience.

If saving on production costs makes things worse for the user, then those savings should be skipped.

JohnFen

I must be too old...

I'm a 50-something developer, but I have little interest in .NET -- although I do prefer C# over Java.

From WordPad to WordAds: Microsoft caught sneaking nagging Office promos into venerable text editor beta

JohnFen

Re: To be fair...

> I agree. I have several websites that I pay someone to host.

Me as well -- I have four. I pay for the hosting out of pocket (it's not really that expensive), and I don't carry ads or engage in any sort of monetization. I avoid trying to generate money with them because doing so strongly reduces the value of the sites.

JohnFen

> up until now, that "pesky" Windows 7 has always given people a much better alternative.

I think it still does, to be honest.

JohnFen

Re: Hey Microsoft: Just drop wordpad FFS

Yes, I use WordPad too. Not often, but a few times a month. LibreOffice and Word are both huge applications that consume lots of resources and take a long time to start. When I want to do something relatively simple, they're serious overkill.

JohnFen

Re: Except...

If I clicked on one of those and it dropped my into the Play store to do the rating, I'd be sorely tempted to give it a bad rating because of the nag alone.

But I'm not really quite that mean. Instead, when I see one of those I just immediately uninstall the app (I run rooted, so I can uninstall anything I want).

JohnFen

Re: Where did it all go wrong?

> people forget that this is the price they pay (paid) for free sh*t and complain bitterly.

I think people start complaining not because they forget, but because the price gets increased to an unacceptable level later.

JohnFen

Re: To be fair...

> Just like I understand local radio plays ads to get some income, that doesn't mean I don't immediately switch to another radio station until (at least) the ads have finished.

You're more generous than I! Advertising is why I don't listen to the radio or watch television.

JohnFen

Re: M$ should have enough money to not need ads

Businesses are different, but there are many humans that understand that there's an optimal level of wealth, and having more than that makes you less happy.

JohnFen

Re: On loathing ads

> If simple non-targeted ads, say, in the form of text-based billboards, could be incorporated into webpages and apps, then I wouldn't object to them.

In webpages? I could tolerate that, as long as they're not bringing any tracking along with them. In apps or operating systems? No way would I tolerate that, period.

Chrome suddenly using Bing after installing Office 365 Pro Plus... Yeah, that might have been us, mumbles Microsoft

JohnFen

Re: Phew!

Chrome comes into this because that's the browser singled out for first deployment. Yes, they'll be adding the modern Firefox and (probably) any browser that has more than 1% adoption -- but I don't use the modern Firefox or a browser that has that much adoption, so I should be good.

JohnFen

Phew!

As someone who is unfortunately required to use O365 at work, this makes me glad (once again) that I don't use Chrome!

The Foot of Cupid emits final burst of flatulence in honour of fallen Python Terry Jones

JohnFen

Re: Captain Buzzkill

Few things are as relevant and important to the industry as Monty Python.

JohnFen

Maybe

Maybe he's just pining for the fjords.

Flinging resource-hungry apps at landfill Android? Ubuntu daddy wants to lure you into Anbox Cloud

JohnFen

> I guess the wheel keeps on turning.

And I, for one, will let it roll on without me.

WebAssembly: Key to a high-performance web, or ideal for malware? Reg speaks to co-designer Andreas Rossberg

JohnFen

Re: Malware already runs in JS

Your arguments here are assuming that we need web servers to be able to run code client-side. I assert that not only don't we really need this, the ability to do this is actively harmful.

JohnFen

No WASM for me

I will not allow WASM stuff to run, for the same reason that I don't allow JS to run. It exposes my machine too much, sandbox or not.

I'm particularly uninterested in standalone WASM applications. I've yet to see a web-based application that is actually good when compared to native apps, so I'll stick with the native apps.

Remember that Sonos speaker you bought a few years back that works perfectly? It's about to be screwed for... reasons

JohnFen

Another great example

This is another great example of why I will never buy a device that requires the services of a company to continue working.

And I will doubly never buy anything Sonos.

EU declares it'll Make USB-C Great Again™. You hear that, Apple?

JohnFen

Re: Good start

> I've been driving for thirty years (no, not continuously) and used to enjoy driving at night. Now I avoid it whenever possible, as headlights are mostly far too bright.

This -- I call those "I-hate-you-and-want-you-to-die" headlights.

Even worse -- I bicycle as my primary transportation, and starting a couple of years ago, people have taken to using bike lights that are even brighter than car headlights. It's impossible to bike by them without being utterly blinded. I get actively angry at bicyclists who use those things.

JohnFen

Re: Your toothbrush is broken

I use the old manual ones. No need for power at all! I think it's the superior solution.

JohnFen

> it becomes a de-facto standard by virtue of sheer volume of sales.

This is what irritates me about Apple. So many of their design decisions are things that I actively don't want (if I did, then I'd use Apple devices), but they end up polluting all the competing products anyway.

JohnFen

Devices that use USB-C should always have at least two of them. I know they don't, but they absolutely should.

JohnFen

Re: What problem are they trying to fix?

> I wonder , are all these TVs failing

I don't know -- but I do know that people in my area have been putting these things out on their curb for collection often enough that many of my friends have been picking them up. They are almost always not operating correctly, but almost always because the electrolytic capacitors have failed. A few dollars worth of new capacitors and an afternoon with a soldering iron gets them working as good as new.

JohnFen

Re: I know I'm weird

I'm sure that I'll find out. It's inevitable that I'll eventually be unable to avoid USB-C. However, literally everybody that I personally know has had problems (occassionally, serious problems) because of the cable confusion.

I suspect that I'll have to start doing what we used to have to do in the bad ol' days -- label all cables and dedicate them to certain devices/uses.

JohnFen

Re: What's wrong with a round power connector?

And don't forget the two possible polarities for each voltage!

JohnFen

> IANAElectricalEngineer, but given that most high voltage transmission lines are DC anyway, surely it would be more efficient to not convert to AC outside of a town and then back to DC in every device.

It's complicated.

HVDC is used for long-haul transmission lines because it's more efficient and there isn't the need to do a lot of converting between voltages. But it has to be high voltage to work -- at lower voltages, the losses would be too large and you'd need to use much thicker cables.

When you're near consumers of electricity, though, you need to convert those voltages to something more reasonable that your customers can use (and not all of them use the same voltage -- you have to account for industrial uses too). It is far, far more efficient to shift voltages up and down with AC vs DC.

The current system of using HVDC for long-haul transmission, and converting to AC when you're near customers actually using the electricity, is pretty much the most efficient way to do it. Power companies and grid operators have a very strong economic incentive for maximizing this efficiency.

JohnFen

Re: Good start

This was absolutely possible with the last car that I owned. I did it roadside (well, in the parking lot of the auto parts store) in about 3 minutes without tools.

JohnFen

Re: Usb-c isn’t really standard

Oh, USB-C is a standard, all right. It's just a bad standard.

JohnFen

I hope not, out of environmental concerns. Wireless charging wastes a lot of electricity.

JohnFen

I know I'm weird

But I just took a quick mental inventory and I'm sure that I don't own a single device that has a USB-C port on it (nor do I own Apple devices). I'm not looking forward to having to wade into the USB-C cabling mess.

Looks like the party's over, folks: Global PC sales set to shrink as Windows 10 upgrade cycle tails off, says Gartner

JohnFen

Re: Nobody upgraded at my job.

> We're outsourcing a lot of our needs to external managed apps and most of us are working on browser based apps and infra management cloud services

Oh, that's awful. I'm so sorry!

JohnFen

Re: "there will not be a Windows 11"

> You expect to never have to upgrade your PC hardware?

PS hardware became more than good enough to meet my needs a long time ago. While I wouldn't say that I'd never have to upgrade, the need to do so is pretty low and infrequent.

JohnFen

> there is a much larger market for refurbished systems

Indeed. I purchased 10 PCs last year. 7 of those were refurbished PCs I got from my local electronics recycler.

Let’s check in on the .org sale fiasco: Senators say No, internet grandees say Yes – and ICANN pretends there's absolutely nothing to see here

JohnFen

Opportunity squandered

This was a clear opportunity for ICANN to look like a hero and perhaps make their past problematic behavior dim a bit in history. But no, they're squandering it instead.

It's such a shame, and it's scary that they are (theoretically) in control of such a critical part of the internet.

'I am done with open source': Developer of Rust Actix web framework quits, appoints new maintainer

JohnFen

Re: He's not wrong

There used to be. Perhaps there isn't anymore. In any case, this behavior has become very common across projects -- so much so that it's why I've essentially left the wider OSS community (if such a thing exists) and no longer participate in OSS projects that aren't mine.

JohnFen

Re: Not just open source

> This could apply to any software project.

I suppose it could, but I've been in this industry for 30 years or so, and I've rarely encountered this sort of problem outside of the OSS community, and even there, it's only become a real issue over the last 10 years or so.

JohnFen

He's not wrong

Large swaths of the open source community have become intolerable. It's why I stopped actively participating in the OSS community a few years back -- it's just not worth the trouble.

I release most of my software into the public domain these days, but I do still release some software under OSS licenses. However, none of them are community-driven. I offer them on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.

Time to burst out graphing: Get the Windows Insider experience... by taping a calculator to your monitor

JohnFen

Re: Broken search

Isn't it easier just to use a good third-party search utility?

Top Euro court advised: Cops, spies yelling 'national security' isn’t enough to force ISPs to hand over massive piles of people's private data

JohnFen

Re: "the ECJ has made clear that national security concerns do not override citizens’ data privacy"

> There will be one bastion of freedom and privacy, the EU, and there will be the rest of the world living in totalitarian surveillance states "for your protection, citizen".

I get the same sense. I wish that I could join the EU myself.