Re: Where did "ring" come from?
I don't know, but I always assumed that it was related to the use of the term "ring" to describe OS privilege levels. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_ring
5648 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Feb 2015
"but the really important information, the contact number, was tagged on the end"
I don't know why this surprised me, but it did.
When I'm leaving a business message, I state my name, contact info, and (if appropriate) account and/or invoice # at both the start and end of the message. I guess this is just one of those things that seems so obviously a good idea that I thought most people do this. That's an interesting blind spot, as when I think about it, it also seems obvious that a lot of people wouldn't. People gotta people.
"In point of fact, most spreadsheets make perfectly usable SMALL databases"
Indeed. This is primarily what I personally use spreadsheets for (I'm not a bean-counter, so they aren't much use to me in their primary role).
I know how to use a real DBMS -- I use a variety of them daily in my work, and use them personally at home. But for a lot of things, a spreadsheet is just as good and a whole lot more convenient. The right tool for the right job, and all that.
Fixing it state-by-state is better than doing nothing, but it isn't really fixing anything. The internet crosses state lines, after all. In order for the states to really fix it, they'd all have to get together and coordinate their legislation -- which is the entire purpose of the existence of Congress.
"given many hospitals have been using the older system for decades..."
Yes. I'm sure you didn't mean to imply that hospital using pneumatic tube systems are legacy, but just in case, I'd like to point out that a huge regional hospital was built in my area relatively recently, and it included an extensive new pneumatic tube system. The hospital is very proud of it and everyone I know who works there thinks it's great.
True, but not really worth the bother.
Plus, when I bought the thing, I didn't pay attention to (or even know about) these benchmarks -- so I can't honestly say that I was deceived by Samsung's practice, so it didn't harm me. Ethically, in my view, this means that I'm not really entitled to the $10.
Now that I think of it (this was a long time ago, my memory fades)...
Altavista was my main go-to. But more often than not, I'd use multiple search engines when looking for something, as each search engine seemed to have a different pool of websites in their databases.
This was what made Google so attractive to me when it came around -- it could come up with the results I'd otherwise need to use 4 or 5 search engines to find.
"Also Google News, which was once quite good."
Yes, it was quite sad when Google effectively destroyed Google News. But it got me to stop using it, which was probably for the best anyway.
At this point, the only Google service I use anymore is YouTube -- and even with that, I only use it on a tablet that is not used for anything else. Google is a company that is best kept at arm's length.
Indeed.
I remember when that acquisition happened. Doubleclick was a pretty awful company, and I actually thought that it might be possible that Google could do it better. And, for a while, they did -- but it didn't last. It's almost as if Doubleclick's corpse was infectious and Google caught the disease.
Perhaps, but I personally saw the search results drop noticeably once Google started "personalizing" search results, and it has continued declining ever since. I haven't seen other search engines suffering a drop in search result quality (in fact, they're mostly improving, albeit slowly).
As a result, I'm not so sure that this has much to do with the size of the web.
Indeed. I have a similar story, although mine was around some petty theft that happened at my workplace. After failing a polygraph (and being fired as a result) even though I was being truthful, I decided to look into the whole thing more. That's when I learned how useless they are, and how to game them so I wouldn't suffer a similar fate in the future.
"Self-driving cars for example cannot manage without a constant mothership connection."
They certainly could. That companies are deciding to tie those cars to the net has more to do with surveillance than technical need.
"Cleaning robots. Auto-delivery drones."
Neither of which need anything like 5G. My cleaning robot doesn't require any network connection at all (and, honestly, I have a hard time understanding what benefit it would bring).
"Fixed wireless is the "killer app" for 5G"
I suppose, in a roundabout way. Existing, mature technologies exist to do high-speed fixed wireless (without requiring massive subsidies to the telecoms), so it's not really that part.
What 5G really brings is the ability to service more endpoints. In very congested areas, cell providers have been hitting this limit for a long time now.