"The trio of debris belts around Fomalhaut, with detail of a supposed exoplanet"
What's the black thing in the middle, that looks like a Photoshop mistake?
3284 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jan 2015
"Apple's designers used to act the same way, and that company even removed the whole function-key row and replaced it with a very shallow touch-sensitive display. It's interesting to note that Apple listened to its customers, reverted the decision, put back physical F-keys and scissor switches, and reinstated multiple ports to its pro-level kit that it had previously removed."
I had a look at apples website, and at least for the 13 inch MBP I only see one headphone jack, and two USB-C jacks.
And it uses that oled strip instead of function keys.
Lookling at the 14 and 16 inch models they do have real F-keys and some more ports. Guess the 13 inch model is on the way out. But boy are the 14 and 16 inch models pricey!
"Not fraud just because you aint very good with language and mistake could for must."
Stones, glass house...
Anyhow.. I didn't believe the £350m for a second, so this doesn't apply to me -no matter what kind of language they would have used. I'm merely observing that many did believe it. And it was a lie, no matter how you trie to cover it up with semantics.
"The money for the NHS? That 'could' go to the NHS?"
Yeah.. Guess Leavers aren't very good with language. Guess defrauding them is ok then?
You are basically saying: "all leaver idiots fell for it". I'm pretty sure you believed it too, at the time.
You do realise that "could" can also mean "will happen in the future, if you do this"?
"You could have this car, if you pay this much" doesn't mean you pay, and then MAYBE you get the car.
It's implied that it will happen under certain circumstances. Not that it's an empty promise that would never happen.
We left, so -> 350m PER WEEK extra should now go to the NHS. Is "should" too vague too? How about "must"?
I'm sure a court of law would be able to explain this and put the fraudsters in the slammer if this was a regular financial fraud.
"Wasnt much better being a Brexiter and pointing out the actual facts. Even now some will deny fact."
I don't recognise that. Perhaps you pointed out made up stuff? What facts are we denying even now?
Where's the £350m, by the way? You do realise you only "won" by lies like that, and 70m Turks being due to arrive.
"A royal who's been trained from birth to do what's best for the country is a better choice than many."
Perhaps, but he/she doesn't have to own so much, does he/she? Nor be showered with money every year. It's embarrassing the way things are.
"the UK becoming a republic with a president at the top of the shitheap will be without cost to the taxpayer"
Please explain? What would be the cost? And how would it be worse than maintaining the Royal Waste of Spaces?
Your suggestion doesn't make any sense.
"You are right. The EU was accepted as a self evident good by the remain campaign. 'To leave is lunacy' did not prove a convincing argument. How leavers laughed as we chased their bus and other specious lies. Now we live with the result. Sadly we have only our selves to blame."
But this just isn't true. Remainers were shouted down every time they tried to point out actual facts. And boy did we try.
The NHS doesn't seem to be very good at negotiating?
Why didn't they dangle a very large carrot further down the line to get free extension instead?
Making it clear that if MS isn't interested, they will look for other solutions.
All eggs in one basket, with no backup plan, is a surefire way to get fleeced.
Obviously, they should have planned for this a decade ago, but I guess some managers/planners got "incentivised" by MS...