"set up to send data at just 27 kilobits per second"
Wow! That's massive speed! I had no idea space tech had progressed this far!
I didn't have more in 1994 here on earth..
3270 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jan 2015
"What percentage of people who actually care about audio quality actually expect to get it from a phone?"
The early ones were actually very good. As good as the dedicated iPods.
Today's aren't so good, as they don't play any music at all. You need some other hardware for that now.
I haven't tried the BT small things that Apple sell (no doubt for quite a lot), but I bet Mr Jobs would have sorted things out before it got so out of hand. There are smaller physical plugs than 3.5mm, for a start.
"For those with a real love of cables"
There's the thin cable coming out of a small 3.5mm connector. And there's the tangle of adapters and different cables... I don't have any love for the latter.
I do like good sound though, so any modern iPhone is off my list. Just one stupid annoyance factor I can do without.
"either way the DAC in the phone is now irrelevant"
Sure, if you are happy to carry around yet another gadget that needs charging, takes up space, and can get stolen or lost (and runs out of power). I think a simple 3.5mm jack with quality IEMs beats that proposition easily for portable everyday audio. And I own a Creative E5, which I use at home mainly.
" It's chosen to match the capabilities of the human ear - the complete capabilities of the perfect human ear."
Nahh.. It was chosen partly to match our ears capability, but mostly due to the technical limitations at the time. Using such a small margin between sampling frequency and actual Nyquist cut-off frequency introduced a lot of challenges. 16 bit's for the full +/- swing of a signal isn't that spectacular a resolution. Low level signals will be coded with poor resolution.
One question is why CDs are mastered with such awful "hot" (compressed) sound? Is it a result of the characteristics of CD sound? Or is it just engineers that are sh*t compared to the ones that did LP..
This reminds me how I just a few days ago had to quickly help my son with his PC, and realising I had to install something from my account I switched to sign in as myself. Guess what..
"Hi!"... "Installing updates, this may take a while".. "I'm the effing annoying text prompter that pretends I'm some effing AI robot from the future talking to you while doing some I'll implemented updates that takes forever".."Enjoy!"
Would it be too much to ask to not have updates installed upon switching user?
"A friend's Win 10 box can't even stream iPlayer without the video stuttering and crackles on the audio"
Assuming that is something from Apple, part of iTunes, that would most likely be an Apple issue.
iTunes is a POS on Windows compared to OSX. It's hard to know if it's Apple trying to punish Windows users and shift them to OSX, or MS trying to punish Apple, or just Apple hiring sh*t programmers for the Windows version (which, would be trying to punish WIndows users, as they certainly could afford making a proper effort).
" and I only have 8GB and a Core i5. Oh, and it's only using 500MB, with two windows (one Private) and multiple tabs active."
Lol!
You must be very (relatively) young!
Only 500MB (500'000'000 bytes) for TWO windows, with MULTIPLE tabs?
And that's before the memory leaking brings that to whatever number you may care to mention.
Now, 500MB would have been the equivalence of the combined RAM of 20 PCs not that long ago. And somehow I managed to have more than TWO windows with many tabs open on a single one of those PCs.
So, no, not bloated at all. Not at all.
I looked for a suitable laptop or surface clone, but they all seem like crap unless paying massive amounts. Why can't they use displays that are relevant compared to phones and tablets? Low DPI crap, and not even IPS in many cases. Development sure has stagnated. Forget CPU speed, fix the goddam displays!
Amy patent can look valid if it's broad enough. I hate these broad sweeping patents that seem to prove that the patent office just know eff all about what they grant patents for. Just take any obvious solution to some trivial problem and add some circumstantial stuff (web, internet, blablabla) and voila, a patent!
BTW for those who remember "Back Orifice" was also described as a "remote management tool."
In fairness to those who minted the expression, it's pretty darn clear what it means. I always assumed it meant exactly what is says.
since there weren't any changes in Earth's gravitational field that we're aware of, your wife obviously tried a *different* way that time
Define "different". Or, more to the point, define "same". Exactly the "same"!
Pretty hard.. The universe is ageing, if nothing else...
Apple is less of a nuisance than Google and MS in my opinion.
Yes, Apple introduced the much needed central app depository with vetting, and update management. It was horrible before that -trying to remember the bad old days with my various Nokias etc... But they never forced you to update anything. They did stop users from being idiots, which users try to be constantly, because they are. Just look at the Google silliness with letting apparently vetted apps ask for permission to access pretty much everything on your phone! Phat security that gives...
"Windows proved that Apple is wrong."
Explain your thinking here? OSX isn't closed. Windows isn't closed. In what way did Windows prove Apple wrong?
"Only countries that started digitalisation much later than us. When the UK did it, faxes were cool."
Ehh.. I had to use modems, the type that called someone on the other end of a landline who also has a modem, way into the 1990s. I used Pipex which had many of those modems somewhere, when I didn't dial straight into our office to use telnet and X11 to work from home.
Faxes may have been cool in the UK at the time though?
I have absolutely no memory of UK rolling out "broadband" particularly early compared to other 1st world countries. And it's not particularly good either. Or very cheap. It's a money spinner though for some inbred very large companies, that's for sure. When is the goddam line rental gonna be over or at least lowered to a reasonable figure? Has the 1970s copper been payed yet? (Do the sums.)
"Audio is often painfully bad in the big modern multiplexes near me (the area's moderately affluent, urban, well connected, and densely populated with a fair bit of cinema competition) and I can't understand why. There's usually far too much bass, the gain's generally cranked up so high the repro system distorts horribly, and I try to forget the rest of the flaws."
The speakers aren't specified correctly, leading to dynamic compression and distortion. Powerful PWM amps are no substitute for efficient large speakers with the ability to play soft as well as give proper slam. To give good slam you need dynamic headroom -i.e. the maximum deliverable sound pressure need to be a lot higher than what you actually take out of them during use.
It's just overall shoddy audio engineering today.
I think the decline in sound started when multiplexes became the norm.
My home setup sounds far superior to cinema audio.
AMD has better value CPUs if you don't need the absolutely fastest available. It has had this for a long time now. With Ryzen they may actually now compete, or beat, Intel in the top performance level too.
Cheap motherboards for AMD are easier to find, and AMD traditionally has had good upgrade paths for faster CPUs on older motherboards (i.e sockets). Meaning often RAM and Mobo investments can be kept for longer.
Sadly Ryzen isn't available for AM3+ sockets, so there is a definite break with the previous generation AMD CPUs. (AM3+ has had a good run though).
I have run AMD in all my PCs for the last 18 years, so someone may want to add Intel info and correct me on the value aspect..
P.S: There was a debacle about Intel's compilers fixing the binaries to run much faster on Intel CPUs, in effect making benchmark software (as well as actual applications) favour Intel. IRL AMDs are quite fast.
P.P.S: "Is there something about AMD i am missing - and why don't vendors use AMD more ?"
There is a lot of business decision making going on, with lock-ins, Intel leveraging it's size, sales trickery, and so on. Comparable to MS vs the rest.
P.P.P.S: The value of having at least one other player competing with Intel is immense. That's one reason II never abandoned AMD.