Re: A solution?
It was set up to benefit we the people.
It's now being run to benefit the government officials, employees and the self anointed "elite".
104 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jan 2015
The biggest threat to American's freedom and prosperity is the ever growing federal government. The Freedom Caucus is working to not just keep it in line but to get it back to something like the founders intended and the Constitution allows.
The Freedom Caucus is fighting FOR freedom and AGAINST an increasingly tyrannical federal government.
You folks on the other side of the pond have similar problems, and in many ways a lot worse.
Way back before the turn of the century I was working for a really big computer company that sold business machines internationally...
Anyway, one an email came in from a vice president in the large systems storage division warning us about a new computer virus.
This guy was high enough up that had access to the corporate email list and this warning went out to everyone who worked for the company WORLDWIDE.
And he got taken in by a hoax, the virus wasn't real.
Shortly after that a VERY sternly worded warning came out from the corporate network security people NO ONE was to send out virus warnings except for them.
I expect that VP didn't get a very good review that year!
Raphael's intern was a newbie and had that as an excuse, that VP was anything but.
I'm old enough that when I was a kid processors were part of big machines in the basements of banks, and while my first computer had a processor in the megahertz range it was single digit megahertz... 3.25 to be exact.
Kids today don't know the struggle!
I'm in Eastern North Carolina have ATT cellular.
My phone has been working fine, no problems, and I've heard plenty of reports of people with ATT phones who also haven't been having problems. However, my car had no connectivity, and I believe it connects using ATT's LTE network.
From what I've been hearing is the problem is with the LTE network, my phone is on the 5G network and has been unaffected.
I live in North Carolina and get my power from Duke Energy, AKA "The Duke of Darkness" (a sobriquet inspired by Britain's own Lucas Electric, AK "The Prince of Darkness").
For about 20 years I got my power from Carolina Power and Light, and Progress Energy (which took over CP&L). During that time I can only recall one significant power failure, and that was due to Hurricane Fran.
Now with Duke, if a month goes by without a power failure it's a cause for celebration. If Duke's system is an example of a "self healing grid" we are screwed.
And we really aren't going to be able to provide sufficient reliable, reasonably priced, 24x7x365 power using wind and solar. Those systems aren't nearly consistent enough and generally require economic subsidies to make any economic sense at all... and if an industry needs subsidies from the taxpayer to operate it's not an economically viable industry.
In fact very few Americans own machine guns, the number is closer to thousands than millions.
Not only are they very expensive, starting at well over $10,000, but you have to get a even more expensive federal license to own one.
You are probably thinking of semiautomatic rifles, some versions of which, like the AR-15 (which is neither a machine gun nor an assault rifle) are sometimes called "assault weapons". An assault rifle is defined as a rifle that can be switched between semiautomatic (one pull of the trigger fires one round), and fully auto (pull the trigger and the gun keeps firing until it runs out of rounds).
The media and the left like to talk about "assault weapons", which is really a political term that can be best defined as "scary looking gun".
Right now, if this works as hoped it can be a boon for many disabled people.
However, as the technology matures it could be so much more than that. It could lead to a direct neural interface that would let us have images and sounds going directly into our brains. Not only would that be a tremendous advance in helping the blind and deaf but it could lead to something that is pretty much indistinguishable from actual telepathy.
I could also see fighter pilots and the pilots of Musk's Mars ships connected directly into their crafts, no joy sticks, screens or any of that, direct input and control.
Never mind the opportunities for entertainment... a system that could have you see, hear, and feel whatever was programed has some fascinating potential...and could be used for some genuine evil.
Companies and governments spent billions upgrading code and hardware to head off the Y2K bug... and as the article points out they were largely successful.
But there was something else that no one seems to think about. All those billions were spent on new hardware (or kit to our friends on the other side of the pond). The hardware companies were booming because of all those sales.
Then Y2K came and went, most companies had tons of new equipment, their refresh cycles had gotten totally out of whack so they didn't need to buy new equipment for a while.
Those booming hardware sales collapsed, and in March of 2000, the .com bubble burst.
That's 100% correct. If you can't charge at home you are likely better off not buying an EV.
For the first couple of weeks I had mine it was a pain to get to a Supercharger all the time. Then the electrician did his bit and now I leave home every day with a full charge.
The courts have ruled, properly, that if a proposed rule has a significant impact outside of what was in the law passed by Congress than it's not a valid rule.
The EPA can enact a rule limiting tailpipe emissions (to a point), but it cannot issue a rule outlawing ICE vehicles without an act of Congress authorizing it to do so. And if the automakers weren't so dependent on the feds and with their (now fading) dream of pots of gold from electric cars they would be suing the EPA for overstepping its authority.
While I have no strong opinions on any of these individual cases we do have a real problem with out of control Executive Branch agencies.
All too often these agencies come up with rules that are, at the very least, strange interpretations of the laws they purport to enforce. Then they punish people and companies for violating those rules.
The current administration is especially bad about this, and at least one of it's decrees, from the EPA about CO2, got slapped down by the Supreme Court last year, as well it should have been. Regardless of whither the rule was a good idea or not Congress never passed a law authorizing the EPA to issue such a law, which makes it unconstitutional.
If the entity being punished fights back it can be very expensive... the agency has the feds unlimited credit card... and the agencies myrmidons and fellow travelers in the media will prattle away about who the entity is anti environment/woman/children/democracy/worker... or whatever.
Plus, some of these agencies, notably the SEC, have their own courts, which amazingly find for the agency well over 90% of the time.
What some are calling the Administrative State is out of control, needs to be slapped down HARD, and hopefully these cases will help do that.
Then maybe Congress will be forced to do ITS job and write clear and specific laws.
There is another advantage to LFP batteries, from what we know about them so far they will last longer than Li-ion batteries.
Another plus is that it doesn't bother them to be charged to 100%, in fact if they AREN'T charged to 100% once a week or so it's bad for them. While it's hard on the Li-ion batteries to be fully charged.
Tesla recommends only charging Li-ion batteries to 100% if you are about to go on a road trip.
When I was considering a Model 3 at first I was looking at the dual motor long range, but the real world longer range is only about 50 miles, which wasn't enough to justify the additional $7,000 price.
No, not ethanol, we can combine CO2 and hydrogen and create gasoline, Diesel, or any other hydrocarbon. All it takes is CO2 (from carbon capture or the atmosphere), hydrogen and lots of energy.
You could, theoretically, set up such an installation on a seashore, use direct solar energy to distill seawater, and then electricity from panels or windmills to make the gasoline. No input other than seawater and sunlight, and gasoline output.
More efficiently you could set up the installation over a white hydrogen well. The hydrogen could power the system as well as being feedstock for the fuel.
Porsche is has a pilot plant in operation even now. https://techcrunch.com/2022/12/20/porsche-pumps-first-synthetic-fuel-as-chilean-plant-finally-starts-producing/
I was really happy to read about this one.
While this Google system is limited because of its depth big companies building these systems will likely lead to further advances. No matter where on the planet you are if you dig deep enough it's HOT. Deep geothermal could be, and should be, a major power source.
It's non polluting, no pesky fuel to worry about, and could even be located at the site of existing plants to take advantage of the already established electrical infrastructure. In some locations deep geothermal could directly replace coal fired boilers and power the same turbines.
This is good stuff!
History has shown us that when dealing with rockets rapid unexpected disassembly is common in during the development process.
How many Falcons did Space X blow up before getting them figured out? Now it's the most reliable launch system out there.
Trying something, seeing what breaks, fixing that and moving on is a very common and legitimate development tool, and Space X has a history of doing it effectively.
It's just rather spectacular when something breaks.
We live in pretty dark times, and what Space X is doing reminds us of the positive things we humans can accomplish.
There is nothing wrong with creating these images, nor is there anything wrong with using them.
What IS wrong is misrepresenting them.
One example might be telling a true story about the sinking of the Titanic. As you are telling your story you include images of the ship... her sailing along in the sunshine before the collision, then the ship and iceberg, and finally the open ocean with a few life rafts.
As long as somewhere it's made clear that the images are not actual photographs there is nothing wrong with using them.
In telling a story about the current unpleasantness in Israel and Gaza again, there is nothing wrong with showing the image of a street of destroyed buildings, again, as long as you make it clear it's representative of what is happening and not an actual photograph.
Good storytelling (fact or fiction), often includes images these days, and you pick ones that best illustrate the story you are trying to tell, but if you are being honest you have to make clear they are just that, illustrative.
True enough, but when shopping for a new tablet recently I bought a Surface Pro. It's not Apple (I don't do iStuff), and unlike Android I know how to make Windows do what I want.
If I had it to do over again the only thing I'd have done differently is spring for a higher spec machine.
Yes, but it was also a private road. If it was a public road there would have been signs and barricades.
The landowner and the driver are responsible for this. Yes, Google should have updated its maps, but ultimately it's up to the driver to drive safely.
I work for a big defense contractor, you can't even get in our building without being a US citizen.
Musk says you can't work for SpaceX unless you are a US citizen or have a green card. That sounds eminently reasonable. In fact, with that's been the law for years. Ages ago when I was hiring people one of the requirements is verifying they could work here legally, and that was by checking their Social Security or green card. If they didn't have one or the other I couldn't hire them.
And THIS DOJ isn't an objective enforcer of the law, it's a political organization that is rotting from the top down.
This is a very interesting idea, hope something comes of it, it could be a game changer for a lot of things.
As to the comment about some of us on this side of the pond being hostile to climate change initiatives you're right, and we have good reason to be. Literally trillions of dollars are being spent to "decarbonize" our economy with no real evidence that all this spending will actually make any difference in the climate. But what it WILL do is make energy less reliable and much more expensive.
However, when an idea comes along that not only makes environmental sense it also makes economic sense a lot of us are all for it. This sounds like one of those ideas and I look forward to hearing about further developments.
In fact things in the US have almost flipped on their heads.
Today's Republicans are a lot closer to classical liberals than pretty much anyone in the Democratic party. We actually do believe in equal rights and that this should be a color blind society, without extra benefits for anyone because of their race.
The Democrats insist on extra benefits and schemes such as "Affirmative Action", which is about as racist as the Jim Crow laws that same party passed a few generations ago.
The Republicans believe that children should be protected from deviant behavior such as men in drag, AKA "woman face" and pornographic books. For the most part we also believe that if adults want to do that kind of thing with other adults that's their business.
We also oppose gentile mutilation of children... a twelve year old can't get a tattoo but in some places it's not only legal but encouraged that they get vital body parts cut off, sometimes without the parents even being told. That's NOT being liberal, that's child abuse.
And on the real topic, the Red Chinese government going on about socialism is a joke, socialism is bad enough, but Red China is a communist dictatorship that has no problem enslaving people, making them disappear if they are too inconvenient. As to prohibiting discrimination... I'm sure the Uyghurs would be happy to hear that.
I'm wondering when the Chicoms will try to get spaceflight banned except when done by governments.
I can easily see them pressuring some of their bought and paid for politicians and environmental groups putting pressure on the government to find excuses to shut down SpaceX. I expect we are seeing some of that in the FAA's delaying launches.
Maybe I'm being a conspiracy theorist here, but we've seen too many "conspiracy theories" come true in the past few years.
I used to be an IBMer and had a sign in my cube that said "Nunquam Permissium Opus, Interfere Per Plactium"... Internet Latin for "Never Let the Work Interfere With the Meetings"
I figure if your going to be a smarta$$ at work it's best to do it in Latin. It's classier and no one knows what it means anyway (except I'd tell anyone who would listen).
Considering that a robot (or drone, these aren't exactly robots) could be made pretty much bulletproof it would make all sorts of sense to build in a few none lethal methods of controlling someone. So let the perp shoot at the machine all he wants as it comes up to him and uses gas, a really loud sound, a net, or whatever to incapacitate him.
It's not nearly as easy as you seem to think to get a handgun.
Where I live in North Carolina the first step is to fill out a permit request with the country sheriffs office. They do a background check and if you pass it you will get a permit to purchase a pistol.
That may take anywhere from a few days to a few weeks.
Once you have your permit you can go to a dealer licensed by the federal government, and after showing your ID and permit you can buy a pistol.
If you go through the much more rigorous process of getting a concealed carry permit, which costs several hundred dollars and you have to take classes it's much easier to get a handgun. You go into the gun store, show them your CCH (Concealed Carry Handgun), and your driver's license, then you can go ahead and purchase your gun.
And yes, sadly there have been situations where someone has reached for something and gotten shot... but in a situation where say, you have been pulled over by an officer the LAST thing you want to do is something he sees as threating. He has no way of knowing if you are reaching for a gun or a pack of gum, and far too many police officers have died in just this kind of scenario, only the person they were dealing with DID reach for a gun.
Another fact of the matter is white people are more likely to be shot by the police than blacks, and blacks are most likely to be shot by other blacks.
Where I used to work we handled equipment leased out by IBM.
We received a pallet of some pretty expensive servers that someone had gotten the bright idea to liquid cool with some kind of oil. The things were literally dripping with the stuff.
Now our job was to receive the equipment, record it's condition, and then get it ready for resale... that could be anything from a full refurb to as good or better than new condition to scrap it.
There was no way we could clean those servers, they were scrapped and someone got a BIG bill.
Of course if it's something designed for immersion cooling that's different, but these were standard 1U servers.
There IS another way to get meat without the methane from cattle (or killing them).
What's now being called "cultured meat" is real meat, but grown in a vat kind of like cheese or beer.
It doesn't need thousands of acers of land, it's clean, there is no chance of parasites, and it's much more humane than raising cattle (or pigs, or chickens) just to kill them for meat.
It's also far FAR less processed than something like "Beyond Meat".
There are companies in the US and Israel, and likely other places, working on this, and at least one of those places you can take a tour and taste the meat. Right now one of the biggest roadblocks is getting government approval to sell it.
And, going into the future it's very unlikely we are going to be taking meat animals into space anytime soon, but one of these facilities could be set up on the moon or Mars.