Re: OMFG...
I'm sure I read an El-Reg article not four or five years ago about an individual who generated his own gut-alcohol every time he ate.
Or did I dream it?
1448 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Dec 2014
A good driver spends pretty much all of their time second-guessing what unexpected crazy shit other drivers might suddenly pull out of the bag, and making sure they're in a good position to deal with it.
But if your own car is liable to behave in ways that you don't expect, how do you even begin to factor that in?
I'm still not quite fully understanding just what kind of cheese it is though.
Presumably one of the softer varieties: Fairly malleable throughout, yet covered with a distinct outer "skin", such as with Brie or Camembert.
I'm no scientist though. Could the crust be artificial? Then we'd be talking Edam, or maybe even Baby Bel.
A certain imperial chemical industrial company I used to work for tried to impose similar must-use-the-handrail rules for employees going up and down stairs. Not holding onto the rail was a "yellow card" offence. (Seriously- all employees were expected to carry a yellow card around with them and shame their colleagues, referee-style, if they spotted them breaking such rules).
All well and good, but the main stairwell only had a single handrail, leaving us in a bit of a pickle if we happened to meet someone coming the other way...
All the UK news outlets simultaneously started pronouncing the name "Wah-way" around 4 weeks or so ago - a bit like when Princess Eugeeenie suddenly became Princess "Eu-zjhennie" overnight.
It's probably closer to the true pronunciation, but it certainly doesn't scan as well.
"but once you're down to electron spin..."
New Scientist did an interesting article on the "ultimate" computer around 25 years ago, assuming that Science & Ingenuity would always find a way around the limits of technology for speed / storage / etc, until you reached the physical properties of the atomic/subatomic particles that the thing was actually made of.
Fortunately we've still got quite a way to go yet.
Those VAX ringbinders had a non-standard three-hole configuration. Totally incompatible with your standard two or four hole-punch.
What was the thinking behind that?
Were they worried about counterfeiting? The useful recycling of old ringbinders? Engineers inserting their own notes?
The fact that I can't think of a good non-petty reason has niggled me for the past 25 years.
"Most hospitals won't even confirm receipt of a fax. If you're trying to refer a patient, that's dangerous."
*This*
Been a victim of this myself, 5 years ago. Couldn't believe that a) they were still using (and relying on) faxes and b) that there was no checking whatsoever that the fax had been received. No formal handover of the patient's notes at all.
I eventually got my heart scan months later after a second, successful, referral attempt (which only happened after I actively chased it down) and it came back good news. It still concerns me now that others may not have been so lucky, and for such a stupid reason.
"because energy applied to them just makes them heavier"
Very true, and succinctly explains why objects with mass can never be accelerated past light speed.
But I do remember reading aeons ago though that, according to the maths anyway, this wouldn't pose a problem to objects already travelling faster than light.
OK, so I'm nitpicking. But did anything ever come of this line of enquiry? Could such particles exist in the real world?