Re: Glad I'm retired
Well, the rumours and concerns about the 787s, particularly the ones built in South Carolina, have been around for years. There've been several whistleblowers (including the one recently who 'committed suicide') over the years about that.
And it's claimed that build quality at one point was so shoddy that Qatar Airways' CEO at the time, Akbar Al-Baker, famously gave Boeing the ultimatum that he would categorically not accept delivery of *any* Qatar Airways 787 built in South Carolina until they'd a) sorted the problem, b) proved it was solved (and didn't apply to his jets), and c) guaranteed it wouldn't happen again. Boeing shifted the airline's orders from Charlotte to Seattle to make the man happy. To be fair, as much as Al-Baker was a monumental pain in the ass for the aircraft manufacturers, he also had good reason given that he wanted Qatar to have the best airline on the planet with the best quality equipment (and ask Airbus sometime about his tiff with them over the A350... monumental).
Other airlines clearly happily swallowed Boeing's explanations, just like they did for the subsequent issues of quality control in both South Carolina and Washington. A year or two ago, Boeing shifted *all* 787 manufacturing to South Carolina (which frees up factory floor space in Washington for expansion of the 737 lines, and the 777-X and 767 tanker programmes), so *any* 787 in recent years from the -8 to the -10 could have the issues being raised.
Those who think that Airbus has similar problems, no they don't, because Airbus has a couple more decades of experience with this kind of manufacturing than Boeing does. The concept of JIT manufacturing in aviation and pulling parts from different factories across the globe was pretty much pioneered by the company from the very beginning. Unfortunately Airbus withdrew a book written about its history from Amazon, or others would've been able to read about the amount of engineering effort and machinations behind that core manufacturing tenet in the company.