well done, Register
"EU tells Meta" ... hurrah ... the Register is able to write "EU" in title when "EU" is meant.
Well done. Keep it up.
94 publicly visible posts • joined 26 Oct 2014
"The (poor) quality of the RFC’s compared to the OSI specifications, was one of the issues identified back in the 1980s."
Does X.400 count as an OSI spec? If so:
As an intern, around 1990/1991, I implemented an X.400 system (of course over X.25) at a government. What a horror, because of all those specs.
I used SMTP at the university, but expected X.400 would be much better, because of all those great features and specs. Not so. That was quite a lesson for me: KISS.
"Anyone desiring a new public IPv4 address since then has had to rely on address ranges being recovered from organizations shutting down or surrendering them as they migrate to IPv6."
1) migrating to IPv6 is a not solution for IPv4 shortage. Unless you introduce NAT64. But then ... :
2) organizations like ISPs are introducing NAT444 aka CGNAT for eligible customers. And then selling those freed-up IPv4 addresses to ... AWS and startup ISPs.
About NAT444 aka CGNAT: Works for 95% of consumer customers aka eligible customers: normal mom and pop customers, like my neighbours and my sister. Of course not for us very special hacker customers with servers at home that must reachable from IPv4 Internet.
Let the downvotes come in!
... so what is the focus?
School-kids: must work with school stuff, no support should be needed, must be cheap, and solid,
AI ... nice gadget ... for 1% gadget freaks?
So what is it going to be, dear productmanagers? If it is again "1000+ euro per laptop, but ... great battery life and always online", like the previous try, I think it's not going to be a big success.
What is the proposition for the potential customer? Which customer's problem is it going to solve? So far I haven't heard other people saying "I want Windows on ARM on my laptop to make my life better"
... so it's also for ... Belarus and UK?
Or does the author mean EU?
Or are we expecting the Brussels Effect: "The Brussels effect is the process of unilateral regulatory globalisation caused by the European Union de facto externalising its laws outside its borders", so indeed for Belarus and UK?
I wonder how happy SK Broadband is with this?
- less traffic, less traffic cost, so ... great
- less income, but some other paying content party will take the place
- less income, "hmmm, that was not our goal!! That is so nasty of Twitch!"
- Twitch watchers need less bandwidth, get a cheaper plan, so less income for SK Broadband
- ...
"It would be another tech giant that would kill off Sun once and for all"?
I would say Linux did that; In 2000 I worked at a telco, and telco's loved Sun. However, already in 2000, Linux with mySQL on a Dell was better performing than SUN with Oracle, for only a small part of the price. So we switched the AAA systems for ADSL from SUN to Linux.
Yes! Turbo Pascal! First year at university ... programming in Turbo Pascal ... a big room with 40 PCs (XT? 286?) in 1987. Turbo Pascal was superfast. No need to think long if a line was correct, just compile and see what Turbo Pascal said. It made you a lazy programmer. Great.
Later on, I tried Turbo C ... wow, that was slow. Luckily, in 1989 I did C on a SUN pizzabox. Multi-tasking. I still use Linux for the non-office stuff.
"The real solution is not to buy tech with an artificially shortened best before date in the first place".
First step would be: before buying, check the best-before-date of the Chromebook.
Google hit: "Google is also working on extending these dates and, as of November 2020, it announced new models would have longer lives, which roughly translates to anywhere from seven to eight years or more."
Eight years seems OK to me; after 8 years the typical Chromebook hardware (CPU and MEM and disk) itself is outdated? Is that "artificially shortened best before date"? I would say No.
Having said that: an i5/i7 can still be OK after 8 years (after upgrading memory to current needs, if possible). But I wouldn't buy a Chromebook with an i5.
Here in the Netherlands, as of 31 december 2021, IPv6 is compulsory for government websites and mailservers. See https://www.logius.nl/actueel/vanaf-31-december-moeten-websites-en-e-mails-van-overheidsinstellingen-bereikbaar-zijn-ipv6
So I checked my local government's website ... yup, IPv6 enabled.
Note: that does not mean they must use IPv6 on their LANs. But it is a first nice step.
"NAT44 means they have to give your device both an IPv4 and an IPv6 address." ... why?
My mobile operator has my phone on an RFC1918 address, so behind NAT (NAT44). But I have no IPv6 address from them. And yes, I cannot reach ipv6.google.com.
If operators were obliged to give IPv6 to customers (hello government!), the NAT64 could be become interesting. Until then: IPv6 is so scary!
I saw an advertisement for "IPv6-only" VPS for cheap. I was very interested how that was working, so I ordered such a VPS ... and I was disappointed: IPv6 working, but IPv4 too ... behind NAT. So IPv4 after all.
The AWS announcement "pay for public IPv4 address" is therefore more correct: Still IPv4 connectivy to the outside world, via NAT. And pay a little something if you want to be reachable via IPv4 / public IPv4 address
$ host www.theregister.com
www.theregister.com has address 104.18.5.22
www.theregister.com has address 104.18.4.22
And 104.18.5.22 is cloudflare, which offers IPv6, so I wonder why theregister has turned that off? Why, why, oh why? Turning it on for www.theregister.com should not be complicated. For forums.theregister.com there might be things with anti-spamming.
"TL;DR: with modern Android/iOS/macOS devices it works quite well. " ... it could work well ... indeed with NAT64 and DNS-conversion etc ... provided by your mobile operator ... which is work for the mobile operator.
Which is doable, but it can be easier for mobile operator to put you behind CGNAT ... which do they. So, everybody, check it now: on your Android, turn off Wifi (so that you're only connected to mobile), and find your IP-address in your Android -> Settings. Mine is 10.149.142.255. So non-public, so my phone is behind NAT of my mobile operator. Easy for them.
Now with wifi back on: RFC1918 LAN address, plus ... IPv6 by my fixed ISP.
"those wanting a new public IPv4 address have had to rely on address ranges being recovered, either from from organizations that close down or those that return addresses they no longer require as they migrate to IPv6."
There's another source: existing ISP's that move most of their consumer customers to CGNAT and sell a part of their IPv4 addresses. And, this will be cursing in the church, CGNAT works quite nicely for regular customers like your neighbour and your sister. Not for us techy people, of course!
More cursing in the church: giving IPv6 to customers does not take away the need for their IPv4 connectivity: more than half of the webservers don't do IPv6 at all. We'll need dual stack for the next decade(s). With plain IPv4, or CGNAT-IPv4. And yes, I know there is IPv4-over-IPv6 etc ... but good luck introducing that to your 100.000+ customers and their installed base of routers.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package says "The rules specified in the DSA primarily concern online intermediaries and platforms. For example, online marketplaces,"
So Amazon is saying it's not an online marketplace? Or is it saying the EU is wrong about what the DSA is?
And what would be the real reason? Too much work? Or keep it a secret? Or they know they are things that are illegal under EU law?
What a strange letter:
"In light of the serious threat to European citizens’ rights, the European Commission ... "
The EC is about the EU, and thus EU citizens. Not about "European" citizens, like UK and Belarus.
A letter to EC should just say: "If the UK continues with this, please revoke the equivalance, to protect EU citizens".
"Will that remain with VoIP?" Yes, but different:
Here in the Netherlands, ISPs are legally obliged to pre-inform the government about the physical address of a VoIP-customer. So ISPs periodically (daily?) send a list of VoIP-numbers (probably also POTS numbers) plus their address (and customer name) to the government.
So at the moment you call from your VoIP-connection, the government knows your address, based on the prefilled database.
Same is true for IP address: daily list towards the government.
Here in the Netherlands, when you call 112 with your mobile, the operator will receive your location based on the antenna location, plus exact location based on Advanced Mobile Location
Government info: https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/alarmnummer-112/vraag-en-antwoord/plaats-nummer-bekend-bij-112-bellen
112 is an EU standard, used in a lot more countries, even the UK. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_telephone_number#/media/File:Emergency_telephone_numbers_in_the_world.svg