staging
So Brazil is the staging environment for azure. Good to know.
32 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Oct 2014
My point was that the technical details of how he could get the files do not matter. The legal "details" is a different thing.
All these commentards trying to justify the theft because he could install Dropbox are wrong, IMO.
And Tesla's security is not inept, they caught the guy spot on.
And Elon Musk's recruiting strategy does not look reckless when you look what his teams do
In my small company complaints of sexual harassment allowed us to get rid of an ineffective lead dev. He spent years doing .. really not much .. his competences were clearly below average, but he stuck on the job because he was "a dev" and because management would not easily accept they did not hire the right person.
Thanks to reports of his misconduct he was swiftly dismissed and his former team is now much more productive. And no, we didn't pay any kind of "bonus" .
> So how do you prevent the site remembering your card?
Easy. You use a virtual credit card. Each card number generated has a fix amount that can be charged. You generate a new number for each payment. They can keep track of all the numbers, they can be used only once. So you don't care.
They bought a company whose IT relies on a technology owned by Oracle ( actually Oracle bought it before it could become a threat and made sure it will never become one ).
Maybe they could migrate to AWS' Aurora. Supposed to be compatible, several times the IO throughput, and you can easily set up replication.
If you don't want let's encrypt to issue certificate for your domain, you can block them ( via dns !). The issue issue here is dns hijacking. It seems fairly easy to understand that once you do not control name resolution for your domain it's complicated to discuss privacy, security etc, whatever the protocol or tools.
Maybe one the dev find it complicated to go through store process and explained it was faster to make the apk available for download.
The image for the link was not changed simply because they didn't have another available.
I have no difficulty to believe this mix of stupidity, incompetence and carelessness, I see it every day.
It looks they just copy the actions of a player making the best moves, and compare the result with the "average" player: the reward is based on a comparaison to the frame of the best move at the same time for the same game.
A real "learning" would consist in training on a variety of games but performing on a different dataset ( different games ). For me it looks like they just overfit on a specific game.
There is a serie a "déception challenges" on kaggle like this one:
https://www.kaggle.com/c/nips-2017-non-targeted-adversarial-attack
You have to modify an image so that a human won't notice the difference but certain classifiers will be fooled.
But deep learning is not the only victim. For ages english people ask me about the kind of "messages" i am looking for or to repeat some Peter Sellers lines..
1/ lvextend , resize2fs
2/ vg is full
2a/ physical server: replace first raid1 disk with a bigger one. Wait for sync. Replace 2nd drive. Create new array. Pvcreate vgextend go To 1/
2b/ virtual server: virsh attach. . Pvcreate.vgextend.go To 1/. Or shutdown ,take snapshot. Create bigger volume. Swap disk in vm. Boot. Fdisk. Pvresize. Go To 1/
3/ fix the crap and/or provision more storage.
4/ by the way: check backups are still working
Yes but we don't have the details of how it will work.
They say : "enabling HTTPS for your site will be as easy as installing a small piece of certificate management software on the server" .
If this means that a daemon runs on your server, generates private key + csr and send it to a CA, it is very likely that the "management software" will be exploited, sooner or later.
Let's assume it updates itself automatically - a "best practice" nowadays - it will be out of the control of the admin of the server.
You can argue this is already the case with many components on the client and server side, so maybe one more will not make a huge difference. But from the paranoid point of view you can't accept it as really secure solution.
I manage several sites with audience in europe, us and latin america, ie8 / winxp traffic is still something can you can hardly discard because "they should upgrade".
I suppose it would be even much more the case if we had customers in China. And I would like very much to have customers in China, and I would certainly not prevent them to pay for content because their browser is not sni capable.
SNI is not supported by ie 8 / win xp ( which supports tls ). It can make up significant percentage of your audience
So if you have a merchant site for example, this is not always something acceptable. Note that you can use a single certificate with multiple alternate subjects, but it is not practical for mutualised hosting.
If these certificates are not signed by an authority already installed in more than 98% of Web clients, the whole thing is pointless.
I have one. I like it, even with win8, the weird keyboard and the impossibility to replace the battery.
Unlike an android tablet it's a real pc and it's lighter than most laptops, with a great screen and a good battery life.
The main issues are the price and the locked container. no drive / memory / battery swap. Maybe they will fix it on the 4th generation.