Re: The problem is
Microsoft has said it is working on a further firmware update to address the issue,
©2019 Boeing, Inc.
3426 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Oct 2014
DV clearance in the UK tends to be far more encompassing than just ‘Top Secret’. If you are likely to come into contact with any form of sensitive data or be working within a ‘knife-throw’ of any MP then you can often expect to be subject to microscopic checks. Unfortunately it can take many months to complete, which used to mean for me that a contractor had been vetted and completed the contract months before security rejected him/her as ‘failed’.
So was I. I think it is just illegal to buy aircraft that is militarised, or equipped with weapons, military mission systems eg fire control radars, or any other type of equipment or systems which have national security classifications.
Then again, I suppose throw enough money at the problem ...
I am inclined to agree with what you say with a major caveat: I do not think that anyone can possibly factor in the criminal intent of a member of staff to undermine or thwart your security above or beyond what secure measures you take to harden your Security Group firewall rules or IAMs role permissions.
Last year we had a client who had unfortunately not only failed to ensure that their MySQL instances on Azure had any proper automated backup or recovery in place but had created a backup instance in the same region as the database, thinking that was enough. After the North Europe region recovered from its 11 hour failure they realised that they had lost just about everything - the only backup was a development build over a year old.
Important lesson learned: do not only rely on one region but have a contingency plan for another cloud service just in case. iPaaS (Integration platform as a service) helps in this respect.
No, there is no experience of legally produced narcotics in the quantities that illegal drugs are being produced at.
So you "decriminalise" drugs. Do you think that Señor Billionaire Drug Trafficker is now going to
1) Go legit and run a huge drugs export business supplying high quality cocaine?
2) Carry on doing what he does at the moment, i.e. employing corrupt officials to let his product into the USA, Antwerp or Hamburg by the container load?
Lieutenant General Ivan Jones proudly declared: "6th Division focuses on Cyber, Electronic Warfare, Intelligence, Information Operations and unconventional warfare through niche capabilities such as the Specialised Infantry Battalions."
Most of the army might say that the General is aiming to become Commander of Unconventional New Tactics.
We are beginning to see the benefits from: strengthening our functions, culture and governance; improving relationships with our clients; recruiting significant talent to key roles; and investing in people and new client propositions
Google translate: "We are seriously in deep shit here folks."
(Icon: because there isn't a Schadenfreude icon)
I agree. Not only was there "Skype for Business" but also "Skype for Meetings" which looked similar, but wasn't. Added to "Skype" you then could end up with 3 apps .. almost like having Egg and Spam, Egg, bacon and Spam, Egg, bacon, sausage and Spam and Spam, bacon, sausage and Spam.
Then again, having endured the hell of morning standups over MS Lync I positively welcomed the introduction of Teams.
My cousin was involved in a major car crash in 2012, leaving her with permanent back pain (soft tissue injury) as well as a need for major surgery to repair a C2 fracture and a need for increased resilience support for the lumbar region of her spine. Capita's "We couldn't give ATOS" diagnosed her as effectively "workshy" since she could pick up a coin from the floor and failed her on all 15 points. Her appeal tribunal regarded the fact that she went to the ATOS assessment in Balham, South London as a reason why she could work and they actually quoted in their rejection of her appeal that since she attended the assessment she must therefore be fit to work.
Agree. As someone who regularly uses both companies (together with the huge invoices from them to prove it) I do sometimes find it vexing that their "security" scans can can be limited to "well we tried this method of injecting xss into your nodes and it worked" coupled with "your response headers give away too much information", which does seem to always be their fallback.
I have in the past had recourse to them over sites that they have vouched as "impervious to attack" which soon after have been found to be not exactly impervious.
Reforming the Computer Misuse Act would enable us to learn more about an attacker’s tactics and identify additional victims, addressing current barriers that often halt our defence investigations so as not to break the law.
How about companies such as NCC or Nettitude that approve or pass security scans on wrongdoers, such as Equifax or British Airways, should also be prosecuted?
A lot of the bad stuff that was said in Register forums about the USA justice
You mean the obvious comments about incredibly long sentences handed out for what would be perceived in the UK as a misdemeanour or the seemingly one way extradition process between the UK and the USA? This is but one case that we have seen where "justice", insofar as it applies in the USA, has been seen to be done.