Re: "prototype AI to show signs of life."
"he definitely considered that his robots were intelligent"
They were also fictional.
33144 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
First define intelligence. Not artificial intelligence, real intelligence because unless we agree on that we can't tell whether you've achieved your goal in producing an artificial version. Not in some airy-fairy philosophical terms but in terms which has be independently confirmed and agreed upon. 2030? Good luck in achieving that first step by then. Otherwise you're simply putting whatever you've got in a box, calling it AI and claiming success.
I've just finished re-reading Feynman's appendix to the Challenger report. His last sentence is something that should be borne in mind by anyone making such claims:
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled."
"The real story should be why such a course of action is so unpalatable to the UK."
It's unpalatable to half of the UK because we told the other half and they didn't want to listen or didn't believe it so we're lumbered with it. It's unpalatable to the other half because they were told and didn't want to listen, didn't believe it and probably in many cases still don't so they've lumbered themselves and us with it.
That could be supply and demand but hydrogen is certainly tricky stuff to handle. But I've no doubt supply and demand is operating between EV sales and public charging infrastructure is holding back EVs. It's not just range concerns, it's the huge percentage of properties with no private car parking where home chargers an be located and to a lesser extent charging times. I can always find a choice of petrol pumps with minimal queuing and only occupy one of them for a few minutes at a time. I can point to rows of houses near home with no chance of installing private charging facilities with numbers of vehicles parked outside far in excess of the capacity of the few local chargers. If government is serious about getting a move to EVs they need to take action to ensure that is remedied. The only effect of banning sales of ICE vehicles will be to grossly extend the working lives of the existing fleet and/or create an underclass who have no means of transport, bus services being a fraction of what they were 60 years ago. It's no use passing legislation that is little more than a pius hope greenwashing.
"The USPTO doesn't want any responses faxed - just emailed, which begs the question why that wouldn't work as a fax alternative."
Let me guess. With patents precedence matters. If the situation arises that two inventors submit similar claims at more or less the same time they need to decide who has precedence. With fax they know - transmission and reception are simultaneous. Enail is store and forwards so time of receipt is no indication of time of transmission and if that same situation arises they won't know and the loser will always claim theirs was first but delayed and/or dirty tricks were played with clock setting.
OTOH a prolonged outage of all forms of communication to USPTO wouldn't lose anything of value to humanity as a whole.
"because, obviously, who would configure a 90-second ringtone ?"
They made an assumption. Any assumption quickly becomes a limitation if not a bug. Assume as little as possible, Even so it should be a requirement of ringing a phone that the ring tone ill be cut off as soon as it's answered.
"Cloning the MAC Address of the original ISP router can be useful to avoid 'simple' detection if you replace the router"
Didn't bother, just stuck a TP-Link in as was. Only issue with that, several generations of router have been quite happy to live with the name I chose to give the router in my hosts file. This one doesn't like it so I just use the IP address to connect to it.
There's also a "dogfooding" aspect to the move. Fujitsu currently emphasizes its "Uvance" digital experience practice and methodologies.
Unlike some companies we could think of.
Of course it's possible they might need to sell off property to pay compensation to ex-sub-postmasters - if so, not before time. Justice delayed is justice denied.
"No-one suspects that something with four wheels contains something deadly until it goes KABOOM."
No-one?
Suspecting exactly that was SOP in Northern Ireland. It became law that an unoccupied car should be locked because of the increased risk of it being stolen and used as a bomb (which puzzled me why it seems to have been so easy to lift documents from a PSNI Super's car). There were substantial areas where it was illegal to park an unoccupied car (they may not have been aware of it but my children were sometimes car-sitters on weekends when I needed to run a quick errand into one of the zones).
Even so, my lab was bombed. Someone the IRA wrongly though worked there was targetted. They loaded his car, told him to drive there and held his family hostage. As he didn't work there the car never got beyond the double gate trap. Everyone was evacuated to the back of the site until it went off
I was down town in court at the time and got told about it by a couple of Peelers (even writing about it brings back the terminology of the time and place) while the defence had asked for a recess whilst they considered what I'd just said. Windows were blown in but not much real damage. I was greeted by a strong smell of clove oil as I entered the door. I used it as a dehydrating agent for preparing wood sections and had a 100 ml bottle near one of the windows that blown in. The spilled oil must have got trodden right down to the door.
An over-seas allowance? I'd have appreciated that. Instead I was up against the Civil Service/HMG mentality which says "We rate people who are qualified for their jobs by their education well below those who aren't, promotion comes with responsibility measured by direct reports, not by what the actual job is, and if we want a national pay policy the easiest place to start is with the public sector."
"Pastiche Generator" would be my description. They create pastiches of real statements, images or whatever. Whether the response to any prompt will be all true, all false, all irrelevant or somewhere in-between is, if not pure chance, at least not ready determinable ahead of time.
A statement based on reports that somebody reported a crime or was a witness at a trial and mangles them to say that that person was convicted of the crime is simply not true. Which epithet you choose to apply to the untruth is your personal choice and frankly doesn't matter very much. What matters is that people are trusting the system that creates such a statement.
"How much of a world model or theory of the world does a newly conceived human have?"
The newly conceived born human acquires a world model by being a physical entity and encountering the other physical entities around it. It starts to do so before starting to acquire language. Our non-human relatives do the same without ever acquiring language. Language - words - is/are the means by which we apply symbolic labels to the real world in order to build and manipulate ideas about them. They are not intrinsic to an internal model of the external world. But words are al LLMs have. They do not have the physicality to react with the physical world.
“take full control of our device” sounds more like Microsoft's approach. I think Apple is more along the lines of "it's your device but you're not going anywhere outside our walled garden". I suppose vulnerabilities like these could have also opened up the possibility of 3rd party stores such as F-Droid run for Android phones.
People have been using textual analysis for years to (try to) identify writers. Computers have been used in the Who Really Wrote Shakespeare game since they became available. But I don't see it working well by trying to score individual sentences. I'd have thought it would work better picking on a whole lot of factors, consistency of choice of grammatical constructions, consistency of shortening (e.g can't vs cannot vs can not) & so forth that would require gathering statistics from the entire text or at least substantial portions of it. It might be quite reasonable for all replies form any particular LLM to occupy quite a small portion of a multidimensional space defined in that way.