Re: Endless recycling
A floor is just a big desktop.
33095 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I've spent a lifetime applying this principle to physical desks. It's known as the one heap system. "I know where it it. It's in there."*
The problem with that it that sometimes manglements tried to apply a clear desk policy** so the whole lot periodically got dumped into a pocket of a filing cabinet. At that point stuff was truly lost because after that had been done a few times I wouldn't know which pocket it was in.
*The same applies to a large extent to the desktop on my computer. It's one reason I prefer KDE - I can do that, something Gnome devs, obviously empty deskers, try to make difficult and, unlike some others, it's easier to setup so that stuff stays in the same place.
* *Believers in this policy keep saying things like "A clear desk means a clear mind." whereas I think "An empty desk means an empty head." usually applies to them.
"And so round and round we go, indefinitely, pointlessly, helplessly, until I take matters into my own hands and knock up a convincing "bill" in Adobe InDesign."
I had a couple of clients in the digital print industry. One dealt with security printing. Base stock (i.e. the stuff with all the logos, security background etc.) was printed on-site and any unused header or trailer securely shredded so no blank base stock ever left site. Visiting the other site I noticed a big paper recycling bin in the corner of the car park with blank base stock trailing out of it. Quite useful amounts of that could easily have gone missing. Not only would it not require faffing about with InDesign, it would have been the genuine article. That site printed bills for for several utilities.
"A command I typed on a nearly daily basis, many characters long, complete with numbers symbols, upper and lower case. I could even write it down on a piece of paper, or accidentally type it into a chat session and no one would even suspect it was my password."
That depends on who sees it. Folk like us could be deceived but there are plenty of people who might see that on your desk, think it makes no sense and start wondering whether it's a password.
"I very much doubt that anything they had in the day could have brute-forced that password in any time within a human lifetime."
It depends which day. The Cuckoo's Egg by Cliff Stoll is an interesting read. I can't remember the period to which it relates but I think it was the 386 era. Someone had hacked into a system he looked after and he discovered they'd copied the passwd file. In those days passwd contained actual passwords. They came back a few days later using some cracked passwords.
The passwd file needs to be universally readable so that programs can look up the owner name of a file from its numerical owner, e.g. ls -l That's why we don't now have passwords in passwd but in shadow.
"If it helps, I print less than 10 pages a month, on average."
I got a colour laser & now I find I'm printing a batch of colour handouts every week for SWMO's patchwork class.
OT she asked a local pub to send her a copy of their newly printed Christmas menu for another of her groups. Sending the PDF that went to their printer would have been too complicated so they sent a poor mobile phone photo of one and I had to retype it. I noticed a typo on it. They now have 500 copies of their 2019 menu dated 2017. Oops.
"just leave the faulty one resting for a bit!"
The service fairies - first cousins to the tooth fairies. I had the same with valves in an old PA amp. Periodically it would go seriously awry with one valve running its anode red hot and the other about as cold as an 807 (IIRC) can get. Swap in the resting valve for one of them and carry on for a few months.
I believe it was thought as a way for "planned obsolescence"
No doubt, but it doesn't work with the make money on cartridges problem; that works best if the cartridge design has a large installed base of printers to fit. If it only fits those you sold last week and maybe the week before it's not going to recoup its costs let alone those of the printer. I think HP's problem was too many ideas for screwing customers colliding with each other even without third party interventions.
"near" is the killer word there. I didn't find my Laserjet 3020 on the Mopria site. I'm not sure if it's not there or whether their website simply couldn't find it in a long list. I got the impression, however, that the website was simply cycling through the same list of Laserjet Pro, Laserjet Enterprise etc. The site wouldn't encourage me to use their drivers.
"Traditionally, printers were sold at a loss and the profit was generated by consumables over the lifetime of the device, in much the same way as the razor industry operates."
Just how old is this tradition? I doubt that printers were being sold at a loss when I first bought an HP printer. I suspect that somewhere along the line someone in what HP became decided that they could play this trick on customers provided they overcharged on cartridges. AFAICS there are a few of flaws with this.
The main one was that once third party makers realised they could make and sell cartridges profitably at much less than HP's price HP should have realised that that game was up. Cartridges had become a commodity and they should have readjusted then. Another is that if the disparity was great enough they could lose overall by customers replacing cheap printers before they'd bought enough cartridges to make back the upfront loss. Also, looking at the racks of different HP cartridge types in office supply shops I wonder if the cost of spreading cartridge sales across all that variety is cutting profits at that end of the chain.
"Maybe we should shut down hospitals too as that would help solve your resource problems?"
Well, yes, if we're into silly arguments. We could channel the extra money into clean water. Or we could abandon the clean water and put it all into more food. There's one word which you seem to have forgotten: balance.
All those LoC and everything else needed to put this together were intended to do something else and this was an accidental and totally unintentional side-effect? Or it was an unconscious doodle by some day-dreaming developer that by the magic of DevOps got released without anyone knowing it existed?
You might try not insulting our intelligence.
"No-deal Brexit instantly guarantees a hard Irish/NI border."
Not instantly. It'd take time. And that's only in terms the extend to anyone could guarantee such a thing.
I suspect the solution is going to be Boris crashing us out with no deal in defiance of the Benn Act followed by a strong dose of reality. After that the defiance of the Benn Act can be invoked as the basis for saying that it never happened, rather like the first prorogation never happened. Alternatively as a punishment Boris should be kept in place to run the mess he created up until the end of the fixed term Parliament next May.
"the Maybot (who voted remain) "
We don't know how she voted in the referendum. As a thoroughly house-trained Home Sec she'd have wanted to get out from under the ECJ but saying so in public would have ended her career after the expected Remain victory. I'm convinced that a minimal support for Remain was simply a career choice.
The international order follows county borders. I'm not sure how old those are but I'd guess they follow older parish and/or townland borders and maybe property borders before that. As at the time it was all one country it didn't matter too much if a property straddled a county border. Given partition the border had to be drawn somewhere and, short of sending out a team of surveyors and lawyers to argue every inch, the county boundaries would have seemed the most practical. But as to whether partition was ill-judged or not, the alternative would have been the north fighting a war of secession. Whether that would have settled the Irish Question permanently is a matter for speculation but as we know politicians favour a short term solution whatever the long-term cost.
People also do legitimate business over the internet. That requires that it should be possible to exchange information confidentially if that's required and essential to confirm a transaction reliably. By "reliably" I mean that it shouldn't be possible for some third person to intercept and amend the transaction, impersonate one of the parties, forge a transaction nor for one of the parties to repudiate their part in it. That requires an end-to-end secure system. Whilst that may upset some branches of government others, those concerned with trade and the economy, should be pressing for it.
While personally I'd not want to use anything provided by Facebook for such a purpose the need for a secure, end-to-end secure messaging system needs to be met somehow and the best way to achieve it would be through an open standard defined, in the internet way, by an RFC with multiple, including FOSS, implementations available. Email ought to provide that but doesn't, not without add-ons. Either e replacement standard is required for that or a new standard is needed to sit beside it to provide for such messaging.
"In any case, it seems that UK businesses are capable of just as much foresight as UK government."
Well, they can't have more foresight. They have to fit in with what actually happens and as HMG has spent several years not knowing that nobody else can know either. Making provision for 4 different outcomes is expensive with no guarantee as to whether something completely different will happen. As an example AFAIK the Irish farming industry still doesn't know if it will have to spend a few million on a new meat processing plant in the north.
" two down votes ... No explanations why!"
I think it works like this. Somebody posts something. You post an irrefutable reply which contradicts it. OP can either mutter "oh shit, why did I post that?" and move on or get upset and resentful. OP's only recourse is to keep downvoting every post you make.
TL;DR Wear your downvotes with pride, you were right and somebody knows it.