Re: They have a court ruling ...
"The lower courts ruled/juries dismissed Google's fair use claim"
The lower courts backed Google. It was the federal appeals courts that overturned those decisions.
33006 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Make him an offer. Hand over the suspect phone along with his own private one. Make best efforts to crack both phones. If they succeed the contents of his phone get published for the world to see, this, of course, being the effect that success would ultimately have one everyone else's phone. If he doesn't like the deal he shouldn't inflict it on everyone else and anyway he doesn't have anything to hide, does he? Does he?
Yup. The initial assumption with carbon dating was that the constant cosmic ray flux would lead to a constant level of carbon 14 in the atmosphere. Then it was realised that the constant wasn't and that plus other factors resulted in variations so now we have calibrations from dendro samples.
In my case there's a W7 Starter edition on a little dual boot net-top. As of yesterday it had 4 updates that failed to install (5 really but one seems to be the one that warns of doom and EoL so I hid that). I'm not really persuaded that, even with best efforts to keep it updated, a current Windows box can be kept secure. Fortunately neither that nor the W2K VM are going to be used on the net.
I think that's what Linus wants to do. But it's hard for him to express this without the use of profanity... do this without contacting and getting the approval of all past kernel contributors including those who have experienced their own kernel panic and gone to that great dump partition in the sky.
FTFY
A database with a maximum record size even within sight of a feasible row size? Shudder.
But there's a lesson here for (Fr)agile development. Changing your code may be easy* but changing data is a different matter. If your data is doing the heavy lifting for a business there'll quite quickly be a lot of it and you'd better hope there's a window of time long enough for all your changes.
There's no substitute for getting the database design good enough to last for a long time and that means up-front design.
* Relatively depending on how well your automated testing works.
It used to be the case that your accounts system would have a postal address for a supplier, probably with some control management procedures to cover set-up and changes. Payments were made by printing out a piece of paper and posting it to that address. The supplier took the piece of paper to their bank to arrange for a credit transfer.
Of course this was far too cumbersome to continue into the C21st. We need something much slicker, otherwise we'd be taking the bread out of the mouths of children of fraudsters like this. That would be unacceptable.
"Check Steve Lehto on YouTube for commentary on that one."
Actually, I'd rather check the text. It's at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31996L0009&from=EN but the summary is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_Directive
"The bigger problem with mega cities is they are just too 'ing dense. Most people don't want to live in them so they find a house or flat in the burbs and commute."
Those are the second and third order problems. The first order problem is that they're too big in terms of both population and the volume of business being conducted in them. Distribute the business to smaller cities which need a smaller population, less density and less commuting.
There may, of course, be a zero order problem of too many people but we seem well overdue for a pandemic which could take care of that.
I bet the settlements were on the basis of "No admission of wrongdoing" or similar.
So do I.
Because a company can settle and then publicly deny the factor that lead them to settle I think they get into a habit of thinking that this applies to any dispute that went against them. Maybe this is why we then get companies continuing to deny an actual decision that went against them.
"it wouldn't be too much to ask the Boeing be broken up and sold off"
I can imagine something of that sort happening. The US would want to preserve the armaments business. If the loss of reputation on the passenger side were to put that at risk then breaking it up might follow PDQ.
"unless business as usual comes to a screeching halt over this, which I doubt"
If it has enough bad effect on sales it could well have that effect. Of course the armaments side of the business wouldn't be affected and the US govt obviously has an interest in keeping that going. I wonder if we'll see the corporation split to protect that.
"It seems to me that we in the west are perfectly happy if our data is being slurped by our own guys."
Speak for yourself.
Personally I'm fed up with being told I'm happy with this, approve that, demand something else when they're all things with which I disagree.
"Surely Virgin, Unimax (who?) and the US gov are more responsible for these phones since they actually make and distribute them."
The US gov makes or distributes phones? Since when?
OTOH I'd agree that the obvious line of attack would be those selling them, at least under European customer protection legislation. It's then up to the vendor to twist the arms of the makers.