Re: problems getting started
Back up the back-light with a reflector and it doesn't need to consume so much of the battery.
33022 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"The logo is to show everyone else - not for the user"
I've had at least one laptop where the logo faced the user when the lid was closed. In fact I still find it mildly annoying that things changed. After all, it was me who paid for it, not someody across the room.
"Now, the shareholder class wants to collect damages from the company "
Shareholders are the company. So basically they're suing themselves in order to get back a fraction of what it'll cost them after the lawyers have taken their whack. Where on Earth do they think the money's going to come from except shareholders' funds? Or do they think the company is going to string a few cards together and whip up some Bitcoin to pay them?
They should have remembered that the guys who made money out of gold rushes were those who sold shovels.
"just as the measles vaccine hasn't yet eradicated that disease."
Measles' survival has been greatly assisted by nutjobs. Perhaps is and when we get a Covid-19 vaccine a current vaccination will be required for international travel, being employed, etc. and measles just included with it. It still won't eliminate either but it would reduce it further.
"If you sell anything in the EU, EU rules apply. If you sell stuff in the US, US rules apply."
So when an international deal takes place and the seller is physically in the US and the buyer physically in the EU where does the transaction actually take place? That's why such contracts specify the law and both parties agree to it.
"likely either null and void or at least not enforceable"
There's nothing in the article to say that the court made such a ruling. Also such matters can differ quite a bit between consumer and business deals and this appears to be B2B.
The difficulty with framing legislation is that it's not possible to anticipate all situations, especially when the situations include technology or changes in society that couldn't even be visualised at the time. That's why the UK and US legal systems rely on judges interpreting the law as it applies to the case before them. From time to time legislation can catch up to take advantage of what was learned applying the previous law and adapting to changes in the environment in which it has to work. Without that element legislation would be too inflexible.
"When your edit, compile, edit, compile cycle starts to get above about 10 minutes, you start to pay an awful lot of attention to your source code…"
10 minutes? Luxury. Punched card jobs run in batches. 2 hours turn-round, max 3 runs a day with the compiler losing track after the first error and rejecting every subsequent line. Then you really paid attention to your source code.
"It is worth reflecting perhaps on how little anyone knows right now. "
Societies react to pandemics in quite surprising ways. Estimate of the Black Death (late 1340s) are usually 30 - 50% of the population killed. This left a vast surplus of land and a shortage of labour. So rents fell and wages rose, OK? No. They were more or less unchanged for a generation. The Statute of Labourers was passed to hold wages down but you'd expect it to have been ineffective against market forces. This was the time of desertion of medieval villages but not because the landlords couldn't attract tenants, it was the time when landlords threw tenants out to convert to pastoralism which needed fewer people to operate. It wasn't until the peasants' revolt, triggered by the poll taxes of the late 1370s/early 1380s that things started to change.
You'd also expect the population to bounce back - the C13th had seen a substantial increase in population before the famine of the late 1310s. In fact it failed to start to recover until about 1500. Because populations are difficult to estimate before the census started estimates of when it finally recovered to 1314 levels are variable but probably not before 1600.
So good luck, Gartner with your crystal balls.
One of the lessons to take from the current situation is that when you need something relatively simple such as PPE urgently it's the non-automated, labour-intensive factories that can switch quickly to making it. By off-shoring that sort of work the western world has painted itself into a corner and Forrester's advice is that we collectively back ourselves into it even more firmly.
"95% false positives is one person passing it onto 1 person in 20 they came in contact with"
Maybe. The alternative view is that if the infection rate was 5% this is no better than random.
The report also included an interview with one person who'd received an alert. He wasn't offered a test, he was told to self-isolate and developed no symptoms. If this instruction was sent out to 79,000 people it means that 75,000 were taken out of circulation for a couple of weeks for no reason at all.
In Isreal the govt. might be able to enforce that. Here it would lead the app very quickly being deinstalled or the responses disregarded. This is why I keep saying that in order to work it needs to be backed up by quick tests for all alerts.
I think what was confusing the A/C is that the graphs of total positive results is remaining flat. What the A/C fails to take into account is the increasing number of tests and that there's going to be a correlation with number of tests as well as with the number of actual infections. Tricky things, sampling effects.
"Fact is, they are are extremely useful and successful at both reducing the the potential for person to transmit it, and for somebody to actually breath it in."
Two different things with two different requirements. Preventing breathing it in requires an expensive mask with a proper filter system to trap aerosols and HMG quite rightly doesn't want people stacking these up alongside their mountain of toilet rolls, paste, flour etc. when the front-line needs all they've got.
Preventing transmission of a disease people have needs something to catch larger droplets. It's a lower spec providing you don't take it off to cough but if you're coughing best to stay at home and do a proper job of avoiding transmitting the disease.
"They are really good at it."
It depends what you mean by good.
The report on the Beeb web site says they've picked up 4,000 who then tested positive, about 25% of the known cases. But they sent out 79,000 alerts so that looks like 95% false positives. What would the hit rate have been if they'd sent out 79,000 alerts to random people?
This roughly balances with the number of businesses saying they've cut staff. So about 2/3 have put money into IT and about 1/3 are making cuts.
My first reaction was to wonder who'll be proved right but I suspect the third who are cutting staff will probably claim they were proved right. They'll say they never put money into IT because they never get anything useful out of it.
"These experiments show that getting perfect reproduction of Office document formats on Linux is still not easy."
"It is worth noting too that there is an interaction with the printer driver in word processor documents, so you will not necessarily get exactly the same appearance on different computers even with Word."
Quite. And who really needs another proprietary document format?
"Finally, it might be worth checking the last paragraph of the article quoted in the parent thread to this."
Very interesting. The author seems to think this sort of thing should be left to insurance companies who have proper data scientists and academics should keep out. I wonder who trained those prper data scientists.
" This also allows for the possibility of it telling you that you had received a false alarm and can go back to life as normal."
False positives are likely to be feature. Being told - maybe - that it was a false alarm might come as a relief at first. After a few false alarms, maybe discovered false by being told or more likely by the non-appearance of symptoms, leading to days of unnecessary isolation, will likely lead to the app being removed or at least disregarded.
What's needed is the ability to follow up all these alerts with a test with a quick turn-round.
I got through most of the paper before going into skim-mode. In fact it doesn't quite seem to say what you think it says. That's just a summary of a large number of statements about how the system should work without pointing out that the govts. offering fails at a number of them. I wonder if it was written, at least in draft, before HMG confirmed what they were going to do. Alternatively it may have been craftily written so that at some future time they can point out that they were actually critical but without saying anything that will enable HMG to beat up on them right now.
I do like their phrase in support of mass-testing: “you cannot ‘big data’ your way out of a ‘no data’ situation”.
I agree risking a GDPR fine isn't going to enter into their calculations now and it probably didn't before. There's always budget to pay the fine even if there isn't budget to comply in the first place.
But being in a situation where their operations have become more complex doesn't make sense to cut down. The probably explanation is that manglements don't realise the added complexity and vulnerabilities they've taken on. They're not prepared for the budget to pay to support it - there may come a day when things go so badly wrong there won't be a budget bigi enough to fix it
"That [pay once, use forever], obviously, isn't sustainable for a service that incurs ongoing costs"
It would be if the upfront price was big enough to generate income to pay for the service - but then you'd probably never sell any.
Even worse - the company has been taken over a couple of times so that some of the users no longer represent payments to the present owner, they represent payments by him.