Re: what does it change?
"If you're told you've been in contact with an infected person, you're supposed to isolate yourself for two weeks so you don't pass the disease on. Regardless of whether you have symptoms. That's what it does (supposedly), and if it worked it's very relevant."
The first thing we need to know about whether it's relevant is the number of false positives that will be generated.
Without testing it's quite possible that either:
- Large numbers of people will be self-isolating needlessly
- The system rapidly loses public trust and is ignored
or
- In order to avoid the above the threshold is set so high that it generates large numbers of false negatives instead.