Re: At Gene Cash, re: wrong error message.
And the headlight bulb.
33022 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
In the past I've had two Subarus throw up apparent engine problems. Checking the error log shows ECU cannot regulate engine speed. Problem - regular enough to be Googlable - faulty switch reporting it's in neutral when it isn't so ECU tries to set idle speed. Current car has so far had two wheel sensors replaced. Vehicles are increasingly dependent on electronics and the sensors that feed them; those sensors need to be a good deal more reliable than they are, otherwise it's GIGO.
"Portability and durability are my most important parameters."
At present.
Whether 4x3 meets your needs better depends on those needs. Working on 2 A4 documents side by side needs a lot of pixels across the screen. In order for those pixels to be useful they need to be big enough. That determines the width. Yes, a lot of screen height would also be handy to allow more of each page to be seen at a glance but that compromises portability.
OTOH I've been reworking the slides for a lecture next year because I realised that 4x3 was going to project better on the screen the hall we use.
I like to remind pedants in Britainland that the word "holiday" was traditionally used on the right-hand side of the Atlantic right into the 20th century to mean any time off from work, not just full-on seasonal vacations.
Pedants will remind you that "holiday" is just a mis-spelling/pronunciation of "holy day" and that Christmas meets that definition. If you don't want to recognise it as such get back to work.
"So if there is no default password, how do you do the initial login to change the password in a semi-secure manner ?"
Not a problem. On boot from out of box or factory reset it presents a password-setting dialog before it will connect to the net. It shouldn't even matter if there is a default password, password-less login or a dialog without a login at this stage as the user-defined password will be in place by the time it connects. If the password's forgotten then a factory reset allows you to enter a new one. My router works this way so it's not a startlingly novel requirement.
"2) You move the goal posts and say it si the sellers responsibility to ensure the IoT toy complies - How many of these sellers will even be aware of the requirements? How can they in turn force the company to implement proper security at point of manufacture?"
No moving of goalposts required for this. The Bill makes it an offence to import or distribute the product. From the point of an individual country it doesn't matter if the tat-makers keep making tat if it isn't imported. Globally, if enough markets enact such provisions then the tat-makers have the options of dealing with shrinking markets or complying.
The fly in the ointment here is that the likes of Amazon Marletplace & eBay seem to be given an out in that they're neither importers nor distributors - if all else fails section 55(11) seems to excuse them. What's missing is recognition of a role of gatekeeper. If it becomes expensive for them to allow non-compliant devices to be sold via their services then they will no doubt close the gates PDQ.
The PDF of the Bill is back online. It seems that the Sec of State has the powers to deem products to be relevant which future-proofs it against as yet undeveloped products.
The bad news is that as far as I can see the likes of Amazon other than as a direct seller, eBay and the like escape. Even if there was an attempt to treat them as importers or distributors it looks as if 55(11) gives them the option to plead that they're "ostensible suppliers" and not the "effective suppliers" who are the relevant persons within the meaning of the Bill.
It certainly needs to be drafted to include online market places in those who can be fined. The "fact sheet" ( https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-product-security-and-telecommunications-infrastructure-psti-bill-product-security-factsheet ) is detailed about the sorts of devices covered but vague about who will be held responsible. It also seems to be handing over enforcement to the Dept. of Culture Media. Perhaps a beefed up Trading Standards service would have been better: we could certainly do with it being strengthened even without this.
"Our Bill will put a firewall around everyday tech"
And what's more, we have the hashtags to do it. It's all very well having seen the words but they should really let a techie review what they're intending to say in public before they say it.
As a really good start it seems to have disappeared from the Parliament site already.
Software can be one of the tools of the scientist's trade. If it is then there's no reason why the skills to write it shouldn't be learned to a suitably proficient standard. If you use microscopy you need to know how to set up the microscope. If you need some piece of S/W that doesn't exist you need to know how to write something that isn't a tangled mess.
Having said that it doesn't follow that everyone has the appropriate talent; over 50 years ago it was decided that ?everyone in our lab would go on a FORTRAN course. (Oddly enough SWMBO didn't, nor did our head of lab who sent the rest of us.) One of the research students who went on the course alongside me got back to the lab and proceeded to demonstrate that you can write a BASIC program in any language.
It also doesn't follow that a complex piece of S/W will be within the capabilities of a beginner. That's where experience comes into play but that applies whether it's someone writing S/W for a living or as a tool of some other trade. It may also be necessary to consult someone who is a professional developer just as it may be necessary to consult someone who's a professional statistician to get the analysis right.
If their leaders (perhaps "keepers" would have been a better word) are already prepared to prevent those of the people who can read English from reading Stephen Fry's tweets then whatever we do would make little difference it that regard. It would, however, stop incursions from their side.
Unfortunately this sort of action wasn't taken years ago to nip the whole thing in the bud.
"it's traditional software development from which the element of direct remuneration has largely been removed."
Except when it's either a corporation developing it deliberately as open source and paying people to do it or co-development by multiple corporates who pay people to work on it. Rust seems to have started out as the first and become the second. AFAICS your description doesn't apply to Rust nor to many (maybe any) large, successful open source project.
There is, of course, an alternative. The moderation team stays in place and the core team resigns. That way the project can have a spotless reputation and only lack a product.
On the subject of the product - why on Earth does the language have "let" as a keyword? It seemed a backward step when Informix introduced it in their 4GL. After a few more decades it seems odd beyond belief.
According to TFA the decision comes from the top. It includes a link to an interview with the Digital Minister. It doesn't seem as if tepid support from the top and "too important" will be a problem. What else was there? Oh, yes, mention of openoffice. TFA says LibreOffice. If they dump MSO coexistence isn't even a thing let alone a problem.
as soon as they were ready to use something else
And that getting ready would involve a lot of running around in blue-arsed fly mode. Far better to be there ahead of time.
people would switch somewhat quickly
See above.
many of them having jumped ship long before that
See above. It's unlikely that MS would actually make the moves drastically enough to make the ship-jumping moment noticeable. The trick would be to do it sufficiently slowly that there's no single point at which it would be easy to say "That's too much".
In fact, from what I read the push towards subscriptions is well under way. The frog's water is already aired.
A while ago I discovered that PlusNet had secured their supplied router from their end. (Administration accessible from the WAN! Secure? Really?) locking the LAN admin out from managing the DHCP server. I replaced it. The new one insists the straight out of the box or from a factory reset that the user change the password before going on to set up the external connection so at least somebody does it right.
"Given that almost all the software that's written these days contains swathes of unverified code from unknown sources we need to get better at managing the consequences."
We also need to get better at not containing swathes of unverified code from unknown sources. The two approaches are complementary.
Does your website (a) complain or (b) fail to do anything at all when it finds a visitor running NoScript? If so, you're part of the problem.
"IBM appeared to have the possibility of a fresh start with the departure of key executives ... But if Schenfeld's case heads to trial, IBM's new regime may have to deal with the consequences of old business decisions."
I suppose they have the option of settling and attributing it all to "former officers of the company".