Oh FSCK!
Full integration with W10 as the only platform?
1606 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jan 2007
I felt an unusual kinship with you after reading the article (feel free to shudder slightly).
In the UK shoe manufacturers just don't seem to understand wide feet. I think they expect you to just cram your feet into their chosen style and let your bones adjust over time.
For trainers I always end up with New Balance 4E fittings. No other trainer even seems to come in width fittings.
For "proper shoes" (not that I wear them much these days) I always end up with Clarkes Extra Wide. No other manufacturer seems to do width fittings in adult shoes. Remember Start Rite? Where is the "End Rite" range?
I can't even get proper cycling shoes with pedal cleats.
Thankfully, walking boots come in more generous widths.
I also do Yoga in bare (size 11) feet, so the image you painted also resonates. Scary or what?
If a company is being taken over such that the public shares will no longer exist, or as in this case
being taken private, then the original shares will no longer be valid and have to be exchanged for cash, new shares, or a combination.
In these cicumstances a minority of shareholders cannot block the deal.
Otherwise minority shareholders (one share?) would be able to hold everyone else to ransom.
Over someone who has been freely given information via a "freedom of information" request being sued for publishing it. It is obviously public information.
Trying to put the information "back in the box" after it has been published is also several types of crazy.
Identifying all the people who have downloaded the information (and presumably making them reveal where they in turn have posted it and so on up the tree to identify where every single copy is held) is pushing the bounds of logical stupidity.
Then again, this is lawyers. The UK has its' own brand of stupid, for example banning publication of information in England and Wales but not Scotland (as I understand it) or the rest of the world. Still, it makes money for the obviously needy.
Interesting point. If the on line business has no "front desk" where you can collect the goods that you ordered then the rule is absolutely pointless.
Presumably one way is for you to have a contract with a carrier where you have a "click and collect" point in each country which then forwards the goods to you. Business opportunity for someone but more expensive than shipping directly.
You have to take the order but you don't have to ship it - wierd.
I think that is what happens when you don't block ads.
Hmm..slimmed?
Something needs to be done about advertising.
Plus points - advertising is a ubiquitous micro payment mechanism funding large and very small websites. I noted some freetard further up saying web browsing was a right because it was a utility just like gas and electricity. No. You could argue that about an internet (not web) connection but the content on the internet has to be paid for somehow. You pay for connection and bandwidth. This money does not go to content providers. Web sites are not like gas which is paid for by your supplier.
Minus points - price per click is now so low that any quality checking has gone right out of the window. To keep increasing the volume of ads served and paid for the ad servers just push anything. Ad serving is getting like derivative trading. There are so many levels of re-direction that it is almost impossible to monitor the source sites of adverts and especially malverts.
Something needs to be done. Probably a quality assurance gateway which will block ad provider sites if they serve malware or overly large or complex ads. Funded by advertisers who can't be arsed to do their own quality checks. Policed by network providers who can block the ad service if it doesn't police the advertisers properly.
Is this where 3 is going? Who knows? Probably not, but someone should.
Eight year old hardware is modern.
Two years newer than first release of Windows Vista so newer than a lot of PCs still in general use.
COBOL is a tried and tested language and if the program requirements are stable then you are far safer maintaining this than handing it over to the equivalent of GDS to re-imagineer.
What would be the expected gains in re-implementing all this (apart from financial to consultancies)?
Is that I have been filling in Self Assessment tax returns on line yea these many years without any major problems.
For a short while I was a consultancy firm, and also did the company tax and VAT online. Even had a digital certificate to authenticate myself.
So why are online tax returns suddenly seen as a new digital thing?
They may need to encourage migration from paper and expand and enhance the services they offer, but the basic stuff has been around well over a decade.
Then again, GDS have done the marketing trick and redefined digital (that is, I am pretty sure that the previous service wasn't analogue).
Hope HMRC beat GDS off with a big shitty stick with several nails in.
The two factor add on to the Government Gateway is up and running.
I assume their note about "those who have difficulty using Verify" includes all the current Gateway clients.
Had reason to access my account yesterday and went through the extra steps.
Thankfully so far I haven't had to try and use Verify.
Yes, I know they help spy on you but I do get the occasional "freebie".
However I have so many (Waitrose, Tesco, Coop, Shell, Texaco, Nectar, Morrison.......) I have ended up with them in a separate wallet for ease of access.
An electronic wallet to hold them all (including the ones I use once a month or less) would be a good thing.
Extend it to library cards and the like - even better.
So this T1 is wired up to the eyeballs and the cloud, but doesn't have a low blood sugar alarm as part of his kit?
So he gets a phone call from Pop, which he answers, but he completely ignores the same phone which is playing the "sugar time" warning at full blast?
Be shit out of luck if Pop's phone was turned off.
Something very not right about this scenario.
At the moment I am favouring staying in.
So it is a shame that all the people shouting and tub thumping for remaining in are the ones you wouldn't trust to tell you if it was day or night without going outside to check first.
Then again there are some pretty dodgy geezers pushing for Brexit as well.
When I started over 40 years ago the company was hiring graduates or "partial graduates" that is people who had at least spent some time at University.
The idea was that these people would have a broader outlook than school leavers.
Programming aptitude test had to be passed first, of course.
There were (I think) no Computing graduates amongst the many disciplines.
At the time, University taught all sorts of fancy techniques to minimise use of memory because it was a scarce resource. This is not a trait to be encouraged in someone writing maintainable COBOL programmes. Nor is it required when you are using a large mainframe.
In my limited experience very few programming jobs require advanced engineering and mathematics. Good written English skills may be more important; being able to express yourself clearly and concisely in one language may tranfer to others.
As a digression the old CS sins can be found these days in clever scripters who keep code neat and short by the use of complex Regular Expressions. At least the writers of Obfuscated PERL are up front about it.