About ball mice....
Anyone else remember a tiny ball mouse which would clip to the side of a laptop keyboard?
Wonderful idea but haven't seen one for decades.
1606 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jan 2007
More likely they were seeing increased use of the tool set and decided to include the repo in the standard install.
My suspicion is that for the users the penny didn't drop that any standard repo will obviously be polled for changes every time you update.
The maintainers could consider this so blindingly obvious that they didn't think that they had to mention it explicitly.
Probably a large part of the user base just updated (or new installed) without reading the release notes.
I hold my hand up to doing that with a quick and dirty install from time to time.
The biggest flaw in all this was the perhaps lazy assumption that the software was safe and secure.
It is an overwhelming challenge to trust noone. Not the OS, not the network, not the AV, none of the applications in house or external.
Not the compilers, source code country, nothing.
Paranoia is expensive, though, and there is a temptation to assume that somebody else has checked it because they are using it.
We are all doomed, aren't we?
My probably dumb assumption is that the dialogue box is merely a front end to save the dumb user from having to use the command line and remember the options.
If so it shouldn't (hah!) be a major development to update the dialogue box to allow a larger cluster size and larger volume.
Unless I am missing something obvious.
As already mentioned upstream this might be all down to the money and time available to the core developers to look internally at their processes and not just at the agressive targets for the next commercial release.
Like a high security business with massive front office security, turnstiles, finger and retinal printing etc. Which, it turns out, makes it impossible for the developers in the basement working 7 days weeks to meet an arbitrary deadline to get out of hours pizza deliveries. So they modify a back door to the server room so the alarm doesn't sound when the delivery guy calls.
Possible moral is to spend a bit more on your core team even if it makes the performance metrics look worse.
We didn't get hacked because.....is very hard to prove.
No doubt the blame will fall on the developers and not those responsible for not funding internal security.
Noting also that if you are a criminal one of your primary aims is to subvert the police force. Also noting Burgess et al.
Too busy cooking and eating to check for a new episode.
However I am with the PFY in not wanting to touch home systems.
Unless trying to install the same software on Windows from 2000 to 10 plus Apple variants, chrome books, that interesting ARM device, a netbook running obsolete Linux......is seen as an interesting challenge.
Well, unless the aim is to nuke them all from orbit.
Memories of a {cough} few years ago coming back from a holiday in Italy.
Flights disrupted, Italian passengers mobbed information desks shouting and screaming and all the staff ran away and hid.
All very strange, but apparently traditional.
Very different from the "Sorry, old chap, hate to bother you but..." approach traditional in the UK at the time. (See icon.)
If the software checks for active monitoring software and access to the Internet then presumably passive monitoring at the network boundary would see the traffic.
Getting towards watching the horse bolt out of the stable door, but at least you can watch which way it is going.
Some time after the last cat died (aged 23) I was investigating an overheating problem in our PCs.
Apart from the usual fluff, all the fins of the CPU heat sinks had become smooth with all the gaps between the fins filling up with crud.
I assume it was cat related.
All working again apart from one which may have a flaky PSU.
I'm a bit wary of investigating that for fur, fluff and filth
If the ethnic Japanese continue in this way then the required replacements will eventually be provided by immigration from other cultures
Either there will be a constant flow of young people who are willing to assimilate and not breed or the new young will not accept the conditions which are currently depressing the birth rate.
Either way there will be genetic and cultural drift until the whole thing sorts itself out.
Over population and over work to prop up a society which does not want to breed is eventually self limiting.
Which makes me also wonder if ethnic Japanese who want a work life balance and to raise kids will emigrate to other societies which offer these options, thus making the situation even worse for Japan but possibly better for the diverse human race.
For those saying effectively "well we colonised America, how hard can it be?" I could point out that America (and Australia for another example) were already populated by humans when the modern invaders arrived.
There were abundant supplies of food and water and plenty of raw materials to build shelters and the climate was agreeable for most of the year.
Survival required little more than basic tools to get started, although you did need some survival knowledge and tool making and agricultural skills would help (remarkably lacking in a lot of early expeditions I read).
Those talking about masses of people moving off Earth. This is not the most fuel efficient way to populate a new planet. Far more efficient to move well engineered production facilities out and replicate humans on site. Ovaries and testes are remarkably compact compared to the finished product and you can screen for (in your view) desirable traits in the producers. Compare this to our planet where the "bangs per buck" made it cost effective to move humans in bulk to provide labour in the colonies. Hence prisoners and slaves.
The poor aren't going to get a look in either. The high cost of shipping humans to orbit and beyond and sustaining them will almost certainly lead to an indentured elite living off Earth under conditions dictated by the financiers who provided the transport and accomodation.
So for the race overall it makes sense to move off planet and spread the risk. For all but a vanishingly small minority it will make no difference. We are stuck on this polluted mud ball and so are our descendants.
The planet will most likely survive in some form whatever hits it. It has so far. Life will also survive, although not as we know it (Jim). Humanity is a fly speck on the timeline of Earth.
Anyway, go Elon. Humanity needs to infect the Universe before this local infestation gets sterilised.
I seem to be with the majority who find the whole UI far too complicated and counter intuitive.
If there were modes with different levels of complexity, starting with very simple, the perhaps more users would adopt it and gradually unlock more of the complexity.
This is not an unusual concept.
Consider computer games. Many have novice or training levels which gradually progress to expert as you learn how to use the controls and unlock the more complex and challenging features.
Potential users might give up if thrown into a game where knowledge of all the keystrokes, short cuts, and other fancy features was required to stop you getting killed off in the first few seconds every time.
For image editing my baseline requirement is to crop and resize an image (photo or screen shot) and then upload it to a web site to share.
I am almost 100% Windows at the moment and just use Paint.
In the past I have used Linux far more and have painful memories of trying to use Gimp for simple things and being overwhelmed by the complexity.
Still, Happy Birthday.
Probably far harder to sell the concept of robots exploring the solar system than people.
One could vicariously imagine oneself flying into space, but not get invested in the idea of some gadget being sent there.
Very rich people are queueing up to go to (or near) space because it is still seen as romantic and special.
So I am all in favour of manned (personned) missions because they are more likely to get public support and a lot of science gets done anyway.
Sometimes justified as preparation for human missions
Noting that asymmetric public key cryptography isn't usually used for transmitting data.
It is slow, and vulnerable to analysis if bulk data is transmitted.
Public keys are usually used for the exchange of symmetric keys which are much faster and more secure.
Apologies if this is already stated down thread.
For testing the Beta software so that I don't have to.
I'm still waiting for good quality news reports quantifying how many people have been correctly identified as at risk, then processed by the track and trace (and isolate?) system and successfully quarantined with all their contacts also traced. Plus those in need being given immediate financial support to enable them to self isolate and still pay for food, accomodation, heating etc.
Until then this just seems, to my cynical mind, to be an exercise in magical thinking. We have an App. Problem solved!
Seriously, so far I haven't seen any articles quantifying the benefits that this App has produced. Apart from financial ones for the developers.
England and Wales seem to be drifting into another massive surge in new infections. How is this App helping to limit this?
Mind you, I haven't seen anything quantifying how Scotland and NI are making gains from their systems either.
There must be some obvious benefits or why are we doing this?
I seem to recall some figure like only 28% of people who are supposed to self isolate actually do. So this is surely the area to focus on.
It reminds me of governments' love of passing new legislation to make something illegal and claiming that they have fixed the problem, when there aren't enough police to enforce the law and anyone charged has to wait 2-3 years to get processed by the massively under funded and under resourced court system.
So you install the App and get a notification. Then what???
{and BREATHE}
As far as I can recall there is very little full automation on the UK railways.
Docklands Light Railway is one, and was built from scratch to be driverless.
Everything else seems to have been built in the era of drivers.
Of course the unions might have had some say in this.
IMHO the same applies to road transport.
A main transport network designed for and dedicated to autonomous vehicles would be able to solve most of the thorny issues associated with legacy road networks and interactions with human drivers.
I recall a holiday in the USA when we hired an RV which was huge.
Cruising on the main highways was in general easy as the roads were very wide and not crowded. Easy to automate.
However due to the satnav not knowing how big the vehicle was it took us through SF from the 49ers stadium (good RV park there) to the Golden Gate bridge.
I suspect an autonomous vehicle might have had a nervous breakdown in the traffic.
I relied on the facts that the RV was conspicuously marked as a hire vehicle and was mostly the largest thing around by some margin.
So I don't expect universal vehicle automation any time soon.
I note the clutching of pearls generally.
My first thought when I read about this was "If you have a problem matching a supported language then fall back to English as a sensible default.
It is, after all, one of the major global business languages and there is a good chance that anyone using the App would understand it.
Or have a contact who could."
Major software blunder to output nothing.
It also highlights the lack of thoughtful testing.
Or the unwillingness to accept testing results.
I bought a Makita manufactured Site drill from Screwfix with two spare batteries.
I have since bought a Makita drill body (situations like drill and counter sink) and a Makita impact driver body (kicks ass driving in screws) and generally manage OK without needing a spare battery on charge.
Good solid kit.
Reportedly bought some standard webcam software and ended up with a stash of amateur shagger videos.
This suggests that there are/were an awful lot of unsecured webcams pointing at shagging locations. Either not intended to be public or part of a video dogging network. If such a thing exists which it more than likely does
I was seeing the indignant reaction to this on Twitter with no idea what it was about.
Then I remembered that I had blocked HMG on Twitter because I didn't need reminding all day every day that I needed to update my export procedures by this December.
Given that I don't export anything.
I can see some benefits for the traditional wet string connections.
Way back in the day before I had VM cable the ADSL line would go flaky from time to time.
I had a PERL script which monitored the modem for this and could tinker with various settings to try and struggle on.
A utility which regularly checked that you were getting acceptable bandwidth and low error rates and alerted the ISP if things started to degrade could be helpful.
I assume Open Reach could also do this but would demand payment from the ISPs.