Wish they'd stop arguing
If we get bogged down in the argument of 'need more nurses and doctors' we'll never improve how the NHS operates.
The problems are demographic, not political.
2719 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jan 2014
I've said it before - why all this insistence on being able to mix conflicting operating systems. Just makes it a nightmare to find the relevant documentation. MS need to have some confidence in their own products rather than just confusing everyone.
Windows became dominant because it was easy to use rather than being the best. Now, they're making it more difficult to use but not making it any better - go figure.
I'm still pleased with my SP4. I just wish MS would do some more testing on their software updates. I seem to alternate between Wifi and Hello having problems after each update.
But I did only pay £500 for a £1500 device (MS demo machine, no checks at distributor for eligibility)
Whenever I try and mix Windows and Open Source, I hit the brickwall of conflicting documentation or lots of help for the wrong OS.
Just been through the pain of configuring Wordpress on Windows server. Now moving it all over to Linux - server's half the size but still faster.
MS need to have confidence in their own stuff and stop being distracted.
YMMV, but for me:
5 users O365 E3 with 5TB storage for each account
10 Windows 10 upgrade licences
bunch of Windows Server licences (I don't really understand the licensing of Server)
SQL Std (only 2 cores, ok for internal which is the intention)
$100 per month Azure credit (worth it just for that IMHO)
Then also:
Exchange licence
Bunch of stuff I don't use
>> Microsoft staffers complaining that MPN members do not engage with Microsoft,
How do we engage with MS then? By the time I've filled in one set of 'engagement' forms, they rename the process and release new documentation. There's a limit to the number of times I'm going to complete forms for them.
After the first release of XP, MS changed a lot of their internal workings and went for a security first mindset. Post SP1, XP was close to being a new release and it was very stable.
With the old 95/98 etc, a lot of the problem was being built on top of DOS. It was doing stuff it wasn't designed to do.
I think a bigger problem, in general terms, is that it's so much easier to patch software now. In the past, to release a service pack involved a lot of cost and distributing all those cover CDs. Now we can download a monthly patch to (hopefully) fix any problems. It's so easy that it's removed much of the incentive to test software.
A lot of the affected people aren't resellers. I'm a one man band. I don't resell any MS software, but I do provide services to customers who spend lots on MS. Part of the idea of Action Pack was to get the likes of me to be familiar with the MS software stack.
First technet subs went, now Action Pack is being restricted. I can't qualify for any of the programmes as they all need 2+ people to be qualified in some way.
From MS:
Product license use rights will be updated to be used for business development scenarios such as demonstration purposes, solution/services development purposes, and internal training.
That covers me for at least 90%. Rest I can switch to free MS or open source alternatives. I went through the pain of Dynamics CRM - so slow, I'd rather pay for something else.
I'm not sure it was even tested!
I registered after my March VAT return. Turns out that if you register before your VAT payment has been take, the money just isn't taken - HMRC can't see that the VAT is due as it's marked as paid in the old system.
I've made a manual payment, but I'm now expecting that amoun to be deducted from the first payment under the new scheme.
Coincidentally, none of the big accounting vendors offer perpetual licences any more - all those nasty monthly fees.
For the time being, I'm using some weird spreadsheet to upload my VAT to MTD. Hopefully, I'll be able to retire by the time we're forced to use cloud accounting software.
I use multcloud to move data between cloud accounts. At the moment, I just move stuff between personal and business OneDrive accounts, plus a little bit to DropBox. Free tier enough for me, but the paid thing is only a few pounds per month to shuttle your data all over the place. You still have to pay for the storage with MS, DropBox or Google, but it's almost as good as backup if you really don't want anything local.
I'm a freelancer. I've just had to write a business relience/continuity plan to keep a new customer happy.
I have regular, tested backups, plus no single piece of equipment that can't be swapped out in less than an hour. For power cuts, I have a generator. All data is stored in both cloud and locally.
I was pretty chuffed at how well I had unwittingly planned.
Only single point of failure is the landline needed for broadband. Even my mobile signal needs broadband as our mobile signal is too poor to use. Solution - alternative working location (my parents' house!).
I used to live within 30 minutes of Gatwick airport (south of London). In a penny-pinching move, company decided I had to fly from Luton even though an equivalent flight was available from Gatwick. It was at some ridiculously early time of day too.
Needless to say the return taxi trip to Luton soon made up the difference...