Re: the sun never sets on the British Empire
The reason the sun never sets on the British Empire according some old timers - "God doesn't trust the English'
4138 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Nov 2013
The flyboys and swabbies have had an ongoing mutual loathing since Billy Mitchell's farce in the 1920's. The flyboys claimed the swabbies were to ignorant to grasp bombs and torpedoes dropped by planes could sink ships, actually an outright lie. But swabbies in the bombing tests want bomb damage inspection so they knew how a bomb would damage a ship; they already knew what torpedoes could do. But Mitchell would not let the swabbies inspect the damage. What the flyboys ignored is the swabbies were genuinely concerned about bomb damage and desperately needed data. So it is not surprising the levels of skulduggery both will sink to.
It seems every month a major AV vendor gets clobber by the updates and some months several get nailed. But it is a different vendor every month. It is almost as if Slurp has decided every month which AV vendor to target with problems. I do not remember this level of problems with updates with AV stuff with earlier versions of Bloat (I might be showing some mileage though).
Yes and no, Shuttle's design was limited by Congressional funding of the project in the 70's and an unwillingness to spend money on a new series of orbiters about 20 or so years ago. The Shuttle was a very prototype vehicle class but they had some serious design issues caused by the original funding. After about 20 years of active service they should all have replaced with a new design based on the lessons learned from operating the originals. But Congress was unwilling to do so. The leadership of NASA was unwilling to fight Congress so the Shuttle was kept in service well beyond what any prototype should have been. Shuttle did prove reusable vehicles are viable but the thermal protection scheme could take another look for robustness.
Even manual counting of results should only result in a delay of a couple of days. So I wonder what Indonesia is doing to require a month to count. Most Western elections are certified within 24 hours or so pending all known recounts (many automatically triggered by law). Even the recounts typically only take a day or 2 before being official.
As posted below, similar systems have been spoofed off and on since WWII. Nothing new really other than someone cannot read a history book. Spoofing and jamming signals for various reasons has been since WWII on a wide scale by militaries in combat operations and possibly done to a limited extent in WWI.
Another way to secure your information is to limit what the phone is used for. If no financial and very restricted purchase activities are done on the phone then the damage malware can do is limited. The real problem is that many use a phone as if it is desktop with a hardwired connection to the router. Their phones are very juicy targets for miscreants.
One major flaw 'less “serious” user,' is an idiotic assumption. Photo editing software (as well as most of CC suite) is a mature product for both Adobe and their competitors. For most users, the software from anyone was feature complete as their needs a few versions ago. So the only reason to upgrade is for bug fixes and maybe some improvements in the algorithm speed. What the marketing weasels are touting, meh. Photo blogs and YouTube channels make this point. While each package has its strengths and weaknesses often which one to use is matter of personal preference than technical specifications.
The intent of the researchers is to find major problems so they can be fixed. Thus the publication of their findings. How many of these devices have already been hacked is unknown. Also, if the hack was used by a miscreant to aid in committing a crime before would the flatfeet have tried to check the device for signs of the hack; it would be a clue.
Didn't PT Barnum say something about a suckers being born every minute? Uber, Lyft, and the other 'darlings' of the idiot press (not the competent press) are bad bets as they are not profitable nor look to every be consistently profitable. Sooner or later they will burn through the cash with a rather messing crash and burn. It is as if the IPO was the only way to payoff the vultures who had invested in Uber before they go belly up.
Uber's primary 'advantage' is their app, something that can be duplicated by a conventional taxi company. The only other 'advantage' they have is they operate in more locations. But this is only important to some road warriors not to locals or most travelers. So they really do not offer a major advantage to over a conventional taxi when you step back and look at them.
This is a short term strategy that will leave any company in a poorer competitive position. Companies that value talent and ability do not care about the person's age, sex, etc. but about what they can bring to the table. They will hire grey hairs and those in diapers as they bring different skills they need and treat both with respect.
The antics of others are covered as they occur by El Reg. Plenty about Itty Bitty Morons, Leo the Planetary Idiot, and the blunderings of many others. Some are almost regular features as often as they flail about proving their mismanglement would be improved by hiring a few PHBs. And all of them have seem to have common features; they are companies run by the weasels in finance, marketing, and/or hr not by the sales or technical teams. They are not focused on the customer or technical excellence but on penny pinching, moral destruction, and violating labor laws.
Reminded of the adage 'Where there is smoke, there is a fire'. There are too many of these complaints for there not to be an illegal policy underlying these actions. There are a couple of problems. Any competent salesperson will tell you the '80 - 20 rule' is largely correct for your sales, your easiest sales come from existing customers even the small accounts, and showing the flag to all your customers is makes for happy customers. Also, customers will form relationships with good sales people and will give those they like a first crack at the business. However, your typical marketing weasel does not understand that often it is the strength of the personal relationship with the salesperson that will cement a deal.
Companies by marketing weasels and bean counters do not value either technical excellence or human relationships. Thus they do not value experience, 'lifers', and grey hairs for their knowledge and relationships. They do not value what only experience can bring; experience which costs money to keep. The diaper brigade may be cheaper but often their inexperience will alienate a customer (unintentionally) because of what they do not know about each account.
The Minions are doing what a company run by marketing weasels or bean counters does; get rid of the expensive staff (usually illegally) and replace them with cheaper diaper rash sufferers. Then they wonder what happened to their sales. This also points to an internal ethical problem that will scare many potential and current customers away. Repeat business is built on trust and trust implies the customer believes the vendor is overall an ethical organization.
The hype about the dark web is it secure from the monitoring of the local flatfeet if you use TOR or a VPN. I guess no one figure out delivery of goods and services requires outside parties to be innocently involved and will create a paper trail in meat space. If you are shipping drugs for delivery there is a carrier most likely innocently involved such as FedEx or DHL. The shipping documents automatically create a paper trail of the pickup/drop off point to the delivery point. Both are points that can or are monitored. Plus financial transactions even with Bitcoin create a paper trail that with patience can often be traced.
The problem that most have is the local flatfeet have been doing investigations using shipping and financial documents for a long time and they are pretty good at knowing what to look for.
Possibly the major problem with any AI system is the surprising poor quality of the data sets. For example, in the scientific literature only papers with a "positive" outcome are regularly printed. But papers with 'negative" outcomes are almost never printed. Thus the data set is skewed in a false way towards the 'positive' results. This is particularly troubling in areas where statistical methods are critical Any good statistician will tell you the 'positive' outcome could occur randomly so you need the negative outcomes to see if the outcome is a statistical fluke. So you train you artificial incompetence system on poor quality data that looks good and you will get poor quality output. GIGO, garbage in = garbage out.
Relational DBMS are not obsolete as they have certain characteristics that make them ideal certain applications that require absolute transactional integrity like banking. SQL is a language that used by RDBMS systems and in theory a variant could be used for other DBMS types.
Legacy compatibility is a chimera for the Minions. What is keeping people from moving is an unwillingness to bite the bullet and migrate to something else. Relational dbms all work on the basic theory and model so they are fundamentally all the same product. Vendors do try to have 'features' that they claim are must have which in most cases are syntactical sugar; nice, convenient but really necessary.
I suspect it is partly how much input the IT group had in some of the decisions and partly timing. As far as any system that fundamentally uses a relational dbms as its backend, it really does not matter which is used. All have their strengths and weaknesses. The stuff such as CRM is just a way to manage the information. Often these tools should be written in house rather than bought for a large company; the needs are too specialized to dumb source it in any way.
Customer will move to the cloud is true to a point. However, moving to the cloud does not mean to the Minions. AWS and Azure seem to be doing well for their masters and appear to have a better reputation. Moving to the cloud may be a long term way to banish the Minions permanently like Amazon has done.
Since Bloat 10 is nothing more than Spyware-as-a-Service, I will believe Slurp really cares when they give a simple, firm, obeyed option to not send anything to the mother ship. This is something I seriously doubt they will follow through on, hence the barfgab. Throw in enough weasel words and only the window has changed.
In many industries it is quite common for there to be regional office that might handle several countries in a region through local dealers/reps. The regional office is usually the regional parts depot and technical/sales support office for the reps. It seems that too many Silly Valley firms do not know how to do this or understand the need to do this.
Also, Amazon's original business (retail) is a notoriously low margin business. So Amazon grew up in a low margin business and tightening margins in the Cloud, etc. scare them less. Others are not used to retail type margins will have more difficulty adjusting as the markets mature. Web advertising, like all advertising will saturate as the growth of users slows and each user only has so much time to spend online.
My solution to this is to replace the income tax with other taxes such a national sales tax or VAT (Feraldom has neither). America's Native Criminal Class still gets line their pockets, the public does not need to file income taxes, these frauds go out of business (very few people would be filing sales taxes or VATs and they would already have accountants), and there is less information collected about everyone in the country that the ferals would have to protect (something they do a miserable job of already).
The net downside, it would be more difficult to prosecute people for tax evasion though the ones who are doing the most are likely involved some sort of criminal activity. However, you might be able to nail for failure to pay the required sales/VAT tax. Some people would lose there jobs, jobs that primarily exist because of the income tax.
First the parents are on school grounds. Second the school can set reasonable policies to control the situation. So the question is not whether the school can, they can but rather is it a reasonable policy. I suspect someone will sue to block this and it will a crap shoot to know how the court will rule.
As I think the point is not you cannot wear what you want but if you claim to be an adult start acting like one and set an example for the brats. This means when in certain public places you should have enough sense to dress with a minimum standard of taste and decency, not like trailer trash that just wandered out of bed and grab anything they could find on the floor.
This indirectly points to a common problem in US schools, the brats often are poorly disciplined at home and bring their lack of discipline to the school. The school is then caught with 'parents' who do not care what happens to their spawn and are forcing the school to be the parent; with the school failing.
The problem is most miscreants are using their main phone as the point of contact not a burner phone. Using your main phone leaves one vulnerable when a search is eventually done. In this case, it appears there substantial evidence from others that point to his main account. Thus, showing this evidence is actually from his account means he is toast. If he had used a series of burner phones and had ditched them periodically, it makes linking the messages to his account much more problematic, e.g. the flatfeet need to still prove it was his account during the relevant period.
As far as whether to use Bloat in the future there are few things to consider. One what applications are used and are there suitable replacements for them on another OS. Another is how much custom code has been written that would need to be rewritten in a new language. And how expensive would it be to retrain the staff who are largely just users not nerds. Primarily computers are tools to get a job done and you use the tools available and if those tools pin you to an OS you are stuck. Some companies have a lot of custom code written that would be royal pain to rewrite and revalidate to switch OSes. Doable but not cheap and somewhat to very risky. Most users are not nerds and do not really know how computer works so switching the software and OS will involve some retraining and loss of efficiency while they learn the new stuff. Even if the training time is relatively minimal per person, it is still time lost and money spent on the staff.
Each situation must be evaluate on its own and while many can easily ditch Bloat not all can.
Slurp looks to be trying to ditch home users and focus on enterprise users. Fewer but much more lucrative customers who will buy more than just a box and Orifice. Plus enterprises like subscriptions for accounting purpose and cash flow while home users are the opposite.