* Posts by The_Idiot

334 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Sep 2013

Page:

Aged 18-24? Don't care about voting? Got a phone? Oh dear...

The_Idiot

Since I have no desire to do the job...

1: Find candidates who really, _really_ hate the idea of running things. Sentence them to 5 years of misery in office, but offer them sentence reductions for good economic results.

.

or

.

2: Immediately on election, all politicians have a non-removeable collar put on their necks. The collar has an explosive charge in it, and a random number encoded. Everyone in the country has a clicker device with the names of elected officers on. Each name can be clicked for 'good' or 'bad' at any time as often as the voter wishes. 'Good' clicks reduce a counter in the collar. 'Bad' clicks increase it. When Counter=Random number - the explosive charge initiates a new election requirement.

.

and

.

3: Immediately on election, all assets of the elected politician are frozen and placed in the public purse. At the end of their term the amount they get back is based on how much better or worse the worst off in society have fared compared to when the politician was elected.

.

OK. I know. I'm an Idiot...

Nokia boss smashes net neutrality activists

The_Idiot

Re: Hmmm

"bloke on teh intertubes dislikes something he misunderstands"

With apologies, and if I may:

"Bloke on the intertubes uses a deliberately emotive argument, however much he knows it's not really valid, to try to gain favour from the non-technical masses for his own agenda."

SanDisk launches 200GB microSD card

The_Idiot

Looks...

... sideways at his Raspberry Pi 2 and ponders.... :-)

BOFH: The ONE-NINE uptime solution

The_Idiot

Crashed? I remember crashed...

"No I mean crashed - as in into the footpath from the 6th floor"

Ah, me. Old war stories...

It was long ago, and far away, and in a country I no longer inhabit. But I had to go install a standard 'newer-faster' system for a client. Of course, 'newer-faster' also meant 'rather a lot smaller' as well. Which was lucky. The old system was on the second floor (UK) - so third floor for my US cousins - of the client's building. It was old, big iron. It was so big, when it was installed they'd had to take a wall out and crane it in. So it was a good job the new one was smaller. I had to fit it into a corner of the room. So I did, and all was well. The staff hated the old system and loved the new one. Great, right?

So two weeks later, I go back to do a site follow up. The company owner and managing director was waiting for me. He said I was to follow him to the machine room. He told me to shut down the new system. I could tell something was up - there was a double plastic sheet barrier at one end of the machine room and the end wall was missing (god knows how the new system survived the wall being taken out).

The site siren sounded, and all the staff started gathering behind a barrier on the ground.

Then the Board members came in. They took off their jackets, rolled up their sleeves - and started pushing the old system units on their old wheels. And they pushed and they pushed - through the double sheeting and all the way to the open wall. Then they pushed some more. While the staff down below cheered like mad (they _really_ hated the old system), the chairman turned to me and he said 'Well then. That's bloody decommissioned the bugger, right?'

Staff morale was never higher, and I'm sure that was why he did it. But lordy - that was a great day :-)))))))).

Ads watchdog: Er, what does woman in her undies have to do with ‘slim’ phone?

The_Idiot

Well and all...

... at least (or unfortunately - take your pick) it wasn't a Cadbury's Flake ad...

Yes. I'm old. There's rocks round here called me granfer when they was mountains.

MP resigns as security committee chair amid 'cash-for-access' claims

The_Idiot

Perhaps...

... the 'Honourable' Gentleman was being precise, and differentiating between 'I earn no money' and 'I am paid no money'. After all, and with no direct slur intended, one can be paid money, even (especially?) tax payer money without actually going to the trouble of 'earning' it...

TrueCrypt + Norton AV = BSOD, wail disgruntled users

The_Idiot

Re: "Who uses Norton?"

"has anyone ever seen a bought and registered WinZip?"

Yup. The one on my PC - for many years :-). And yes, I have and use 7Zip as well. But I bought and paid for WinZip a long, long time ago... I guess that makes me an Idiot - but we knew that already (blush).

iBank: RBS, NatWest first UK banks to allow Apple Touch ID logins

The_Idiot

I know...

... many other people have said this already. And said it a lot better than I ever could. But what the heck - I'm an Idiot. So I'll try anyway.

A fingerprint is not a password.

Note: I did not say a fingerprint cannot be _used_ as a password. I said it isn't one, because it fails most of the most (yes, I know I used most twice :-P) basic 'good practice' rules for a password. So what might they be:

1: Most security guidelines will tell you to implement a policy whereby passwords are subject to changes over time.

Fingerprint: FAIL.

2: Most security guidelines will tell you to use complex passwords.

Fingerprints overall are complex patterns: POTENTIALLY NON-FAIL.

Caveat: Many fingerprint readers and software use N-significant-point pattern reduction. N is potentially a low number, probably unknown to the user and outside the user's control. LOGICAL FAIL.

3: It should be possible to reliably reproduce a password when required. Fingerprint pattern reproduction (paper, fingerprint scanner etc) can and does have variable degrees of 100% reproduction, depending on temperature, finger pressure, scarring and the presence of the greasy remnants of late night finger food. Partly because of this, readers often reduce the complexity of the recognition problem with N-significant-point pattern reduction.

Fingerprint: See Point 2 - possible LOGICAL FAIL.

4: Most security guidelines will tell you not to write your password down on a real or metaphorical yellow sticky, and leave it where A N Other can find it. We write our fingerprints all over the bloody shop, whether we like it or not.

Fingerprint: FAIL.

For the sake of not appearing _too_ tin-foil hat-y, I'm going to ignore the ways widespread use of such a recognition process, coupled with Security Service, Police, Local Council and the nosy neighbour down the road access to such a system could be used to build a backdoor national fingerprint register.

To leave where I came in - if a fingerprint tells you anything, it may give you a confidence level that the mechanism presenting the fingerprint artifact is a specific individual. But while the level of confidence to assign, and the associated risk acceptance, is a matter for service providers - a fingerprint still isn't, or at least by any guidelines I ever came across, suitable as a BLOODY PASSWORD!

Yes. I'll shut up now. After all, I'm an Idiot.

Microsoft: Look at our cloudy privacy award. Isn't it so ... meaningful?

The_Idiot

Re: “If there is unauthorised access ... we’ll let you know about this,”

Lord Chris

"no-one is going to offer a commercial service that makes it impossible for them to get at your data if so requested by lawful authority"

You may well be right. And whether what you suggest to be reasonable is the case or not (as a commercial business decision, and not as a judgement of its reasonable-ness), it is simply one more reason, for me, not to use such services and to advise anyone i work for or deal with not to use such services. At a pinch, if the service is wholly and entirely hosted in the organisation's jurisdiction of domicile, maybe. And even then, I'd prefer not.

Of course - I'm an idiot (blush).

You'll NEVER guess who has bought I Taught Taylor Swift How To Give Head dot-com

The_Idiot

So for those who enjoy irony...

... including dwarves :-) - from what song, by what singer, does the following line come?

"But when you think: Tim McGraw..."

Not, you understand, that I would suggest anyone might have 'infringing the "(insert famous name here)" trademark, or that in fact Mr McGraw has in fact Trademarked his name (er - even if he did, first in April 1999), or that the use was not one for which permission had been granted. But it may have some small bearing on the fame of the name mentioned in the article above...

We'll ask GCHQ to DELETE records of 'MILLIONS' of people – Privacy International

The_Idiot

So if...

... the previous data sharing was, in fact, illegal (whether or not I agree with the view that it is now legal), then what will the legal consequences be for GCHQ as an entity, or for those individuals employed there who mandated, directed or otherwise authorised the illegal activity?

Oh. Right. How silly of me.

Shy, retiring British spies come out as MEGA HACKERS

The_Idiot

"...the Investigatory Powers Tribunal ruled that the spying revelations exposed by master blabbermouth Edward Snowden had accidentally made British spooks' data-sharing love-in with the NSA legal."

Thereby implicitly ruling (whether I agree with their current ruling or not) that prior to the revelations, the sharing being carried out was, in fact, illegal?

Hello?

Is anybody there?

Er - hello?

UK official LOSES Mark Duggan shooting discs IN THE POST

The_Idiot

Re: Hmmmm

"Downvoted because it's irrelevant what private companies get up to. At the end of the day they are just that. Private companies. You can choose to do business with them or not."

Lord Jimmy, with respect, I must disagree (not that my agreement or otherwise need have any merit or value). These days, whether from existing service contracts (third party or sub-contracted service delivery), or simply by transfer of negotiable currency, private sector organisations may have or be able to gain access to Government data. The same data you comment as being obtained under duress.

As a result, in cases where that is so, _I_ do _not_ have a choice as to whether to do business with them or not. I do business with them whether I choose to or not. yes, at one remove, but it's still my data, whether it be (now or in the future) health care, my driving record or any other, including tax activity, potential criminal past or any other form of 'Bad Person' check data.

I therefore, personally and without prejudice or assumption as to any other point of view, have to support the use of Private Sector practices as a valid supporting example of why the world is generally going to heck in a bloody handcart - and not _just_ when dealing with Guv'Mint.

Of course, I'm an Idiot - so I'm probably talking nonsense :-).

Is it humanly possible to watch Gigli and Battlefield Earth back-to-back?

The_Idiot

Re: Bad movies? I LOVE BAD MOVIES!

But... but... White Worm has Emilio Perez Machado and Stephen Powys doing 'The D'Ampton Worm'! Gloriously insane!

Although The Tossers version comes a close second, and is a lot easier to get hold of... :-).

EU copyright law: Is the Pirate Party's MEP in FAVOUR of it?

The_Idiot

I confess. I'm...

... a content producer. When we take away the magic words, that means I write stuff. And I'll confess again - I make enough to pay tax on, but not enough to take a vacation. Such is life. For now, at least (blush). But here's my five cents, worth a wooden nickel on the open market:

***********************************************************************************************

“The report recommends that any exceptions or limitations on copyright available in the offline world be extended to online activity”

.

Agreed. The manner of presentation is not the content – and it is the content that should, or should not, be protected.

**********

“…in particular that the "fair use" right existing in some countries to quote from copyrighted material should expressly include audio-visual snippets.”

.

Within the limitations of establishing ‘one rule to, um, rule them all’ – see above. If the consumer has fair use rights over content type X, then it’s hard for me to see the logic of not extending it to all content types.

**********

“Reda also said that automated data mining should be allowed on any legally acquired content. “If I ... have the right to read it, I should also be able to read it with the aid of a machine,” she said.”

.

I can’t fault her logic. My eyes and head data mine. If my senses are impaired, I may use devices to aid their function. To use devices to aid their ability to mine would appear only logical. The content is the same in all cases, it is only the tool that is being varied.

**********

Reda's report also takes issue with so-called counter-piracy measures, aka DRM:

“Legal protection against the circumvention of any effective technological measures [should be] conditional upon the publication of the source code or the interface specification; in particular, when the circumvention of technological measures is allowed, technological means to achieve such authorised circumvention must be available.”

Reg: “In other words, if a user wants to move his eBook from Kindle to another device, he should be able to. According to Reda, anti-copying technology is in fact creating a market for pirated material which is more easily transferable.”

.

This one, for me, is a little harder. I agree entirely that people should have the right to move content between their own devices. I also have to admit there are more reasons than preventing such movement that lead to DRM. However, fundamentally, DRM doesn’t bloody work anyway. Neither, of course, does relying on people’s better nature and honesty – mostly because they often have neither. But avoiding DRM is both cheaper, and less irritating to those readers who _are_ honest – so I’d call it a win. As it happens, so do my Publishers :-).

The Invisible Library – a playful, timey wimey, spook adventure tale

The_Idiot

I couldn't help but feel...

... stronger than usual echoes from other work - the three Librarian movies (Quest for the Spear (2004), Return to King Solomon's Mines (2006) and Curse of the Judas Chalice (2008)) and the current TV series 'The Librarians' - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Librarians_%282014_TV_series%29 :

But maybe that's just me. there _are_ only so many things to base a book/ movie/ TV series on after all :-).

Broadband isn't broadband unless it's 25Mbps, mulls FCC boss

The_Idiot

Re: The heck with...

Lord Donn

I fully recognise what broadband 'is' :-).

Rather, I'm suggesting that if we're going to mess around with _changing_ the current definition of what it is - let's _change_ it. Rather than give it a new coat of non-weatherproof paint and wonder why, after we've left it out in the storm that is Internet provision and consumption, it looks just as tatty and unusable as it is today in a week, month, year or some other period of time.

But I regret I did not make that clear, and my apology for my failure (blush).

And yes. Given the often vociferously discordant discussions over MegaBit, MegaeByte, megabit, megabyte, MB, mB, Mb and such - maybe we _should_ take a run at those as well, as ye comment.

Or not - after all, I'm an Idiot (blush).

The_Idiot

The heck with...

... any definition based on the maximum upload and download speeds. Let's, rather, have a service definition based on a combination of published figures for:

1: Minimum upload speed (in the absence of 'service failure', where 'service failure' is any period where the speed falls below a stated low water mark and is refundable to the user).

2: Maximum capped upload speed (because even Marketing folk have to eat, but a maximum supportable from user experience)

3: Mean average upload and download speeds over time in different use windows as experienced by users.

4: Modal average upload and download speeds over time from sampled user speeds, gathered from samples in a geographic service area, and sampled every N Minutes, where N is measurable without having to run to the store for more zeros.

5: Agility - much the same numbers for latency.

It's alright. I'll go and take my red pill now....

Marriott: The TRUTH about personal Wi-Fi hotel jam bid

The_Idiot

Tic, tick, tick....

"To be clear, this matter does not involve in any way Wi-Fi access in hotel guestrooms or lobby spaces (at the moment, because we figure we wouldn't get away with that right now. But so long as we can get the _principle_ of blocking approved, then we can both 'accidentally' and 'due to limitations in the technology' extend the block to rooms later. So hah!)."

There. Fixed.

Norks blame U.S. for TITSUP internet, unleash racist rant against Obama

The_Idiot

Hmmm.

North Korean media possibly (or possibly not - cultural differences are hard to interpret) likens elements of American President's behaviour to (old classification) another simian (New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, apes, and humans).

In other news, movie makers blow North Korean political leader into assorted virtual fragments.

According to some, one of these is more offensive than the other. For some value of 'some'. And some other value of 'more'. Sigh...

Doctor Who's tangerine dream and Clara's death wish in Last Christmas

The_Idiot

I could believe in Ecclestone as The Doctor. And believe as soon as he appeared on screen, heading for the roof to blow himself up. Maybe.

In a different way, I could believe in Tennant. From the very first 'Barcelona'.

In a different way again, I could believe in Smith. From the fall into the swimming pool to the fish fingers and custard - and all the way afterwards.

At a pinch, I could believe in Santa - but I regret, I can't believe in Mr Capaldi. Not from the beginning, and not since. And I've tried. I really have.

Since everyone is, of course, entitled to their own opinion, let's assume it's me who's at fault. After all, I'm an Idiot.

But I still can't believe in Mr Capaldi....

Microsoft's dodgy new Exchange 2010 update breaks Outlook clients

The_Idiot

And nobody at Miscrosoft...

... tested 'getting mail with an Outlook client from Exchange 2010' before releasing the patch?

Or they did - and it failed, but they released it anyway?

Or they did - and they didn't get the error/ see the issue?

Oh, well. Another day, another roll-back. And it's not just a Microsoft issue. I'm seriously considering doing the same thing with this year. Rolling back, I mean. It's demonstrated a number of usage failures, generally involving my lottery tickets and my lack-of-hair line. But I can't find the rollback protocol.... (blush).

Glasgow boffins: We can now do it, Captain. We DO have the molecular storage power

The_Idiot

Re: Potential for Confusion

Or, indeed, molecules of this:

.

http://www.pomwonderful.com/

.

I can see it now. 'No, that wasn't your breakfast dear. You just drank our disk drive. So if you want your cat pictures back, the data recovery is going to be, um, messy...'

Post-pub nosh neckfiller: The MIGHTY Scotch egg

The_Idiot

Elder and wise...

To avoid the egg falling out, wet the boiled egg and roll it in flour before putting the meat cover on. As it cooks, the fat from the meat and the flour make a seal between the egg and the meat, sort of gluing the egg in.

Well, it works with mine - but I bake mine, so I can't speak for deep frying giving the same effect (blush) :-).

The_Idiot

I can't be...

... the only one who's made my Scotch Eggs (I prefer baking them to deep frying) with pickled eggs (my own) instead of basic boiled - maybe I'm just the only one to admit it (blush).

I have to make them myself - you just can't get them in my bit of the land of the Maple... :-(.

Heresy, I know. But yummy, yummy heresy! :-)

Names, ages, addresses, SSNs of US postal staff slurped in 'mega-hack'

The_Idiot

It's OK...

... after all, the Post Office is only complying with currently recommended standards. A number of, um, 'authorities' have recently proclaimed from the very roof-tops that implementing effective encryption and security just plays into the hands of 'terrists, pedalo-philes and the like (though I've never quite got how those liking a little jaunt in those little swans and boats are bringing about the End of the World).

Apple patents autographs. Checkmate, eBay

The_Idiot

Sigh...

I know prior art isn't worth a damn thing these days.

I know the function isn't precisely the same.

But in concept? In concept, this isn't exactly new:

www.authorgraph.com

New GCHQ spymaster: US tech giants are 'command and control networks for terror'

The_Idiot

Re: Easy Solution

Lord Bernard (a personal foible, no more, and no slight intended :-) )

I didn't use the right to bear arms as a thing I agreed with or in fact one with which I disagreed. I meant it to show that a simple principle - holding X accountable for all uses of X's product or service - isn't really simple. That while it may appear logical, there are a number of ways it can be impossible to implement.

So just as it might appear 'easy' to suggest the creation of a regime where "Google, Twitter, Facebook and Microsoft found that they were now liable for the content that their users publish", it would be far from easy to implement, if even possible. As easy, in fact, as holding gun manufacturers liable for all uses of guns, or getting a specific group of folk to accept that imposition...

Again, if I may, at no time have I said whether I agreed or in fact disagreed with gun ownership and use :-). It is an example only, if one selected specifically to highlight a potential issue :-)).

The_Idiot

Re: Easy Solution

Mr AC. I'd like you to just walk this way - not, it's OK, just follow me over here - and sit down with these nice American folk. Oh, don't worry about those gun manufacturer reps, they're just folks, just like us. Now let's try that again. Tell all these nice people how all the nice gun companies should be held to account for every event in which a gun was used to the detriment of law, or to endanger the public.

Yes, sir. I'll be back to clean up the pieces later.

The_Idiot

Re: well said Evil Auditor

@R69

"There is one basic fact here - if you are not doing anything you shouldnt be doing, you dont have anything to worry about."

I question whether that is, in fact, a, um, fact. I'd quote examples, but it gets kind of boring. Never mind getting into all the different views held by different folk on what can be classified as 'doing something you shouldn't be doing'.

"IMHO there should be a complete social media blackout on the activities of ISIS and other terrorist groups."

And, of course, you are welcome to your opinion. If, however, such restrictions were put in place on everything to which _anyone_ has a similar opinion and objection, whether that means mothers breast feeding in public or internet cat pictures (yes, some people don't like them and think they're just bandwidth hogs, and surely their opinions are just as valid as yours), we'd have bugger all left to talk about.

"If you want to protect the freedoms you have then that means taking the rough with the smooth and accepting these things are a necessary evil."

There is an internet tradition that says at this point I should quote Ben Franklin at this point. I'll play nice, and refrain. However, if the protection of freedom requires the imposition of such an interception policy, I'd like to introduce those who support the idea to a new invention we call 'reductio ad absurdum', where we protect all freedoms by taking them away and locking them up in a nice, secure vault, where silly folk like the public can't mess them up.

"To quote Team America..."

I'm sorry - though actually, I'm not. I'd just much rather _not_ quote Team America, thank you very much.

Amazon's AWS opens data center in Germany – just as we said

The_Idiot

Interesting. It might be...

... a later edit, but I can see a number of quotes of a section here that appear to be missing one word from the article as it currently stands:

.

"customers’ content can now fall entirely under the umbrella of European Union data protection laws and outside the reach of some United States regulations."

.

'some'. Outside the reach of 'some' United States regulations. like, um, the ones regulating the marsh content in marsh mallows, perhaps? I mean, sure. Subject to, um, certain other, er, purely trivial regs. But we're good on that marsh mallow thing, right? Sigh...

Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots

The_Idiot

Re: Speculation...

Well, it has been said that 'Tardises are not made - they are grown'. So the idea of Clara being a 'baby' Tardis isn't impossible (and I'd love it to be true).

On the other hand, if you were a 'rogue' Tardis (perhaps you'd 'lost' your Time Person in some suitably HAL-esque way), or a TARDIS that had recently matured ('recent' in TARDIS terms), it might not be easy to find a Time Person in the absence of Gallifrey. So you might have to, um, start 'growing' one of your own. Clara has been shunted towards the Doctor a number of times (for instance the helpful little old lady in the shop who gave her the Doctor's number). If you want to grow your own, then sending her to school with the (apparently, ignoring The Doctor's Daughter, The Master and any others the script writers want to come up with) Last Time Lord might be a start...

The_Idiot

Speculation...

... of course, feel free to ignore. after all, I'm an Idiot (blush) :-).

*******

The last scene cuts to the enigmatic Missy watching Clara from some kind of tablet. “Clara, my Clara, I have chosen well,” Missy says wistfully.

********

From 'The Doctor's Wife':

The Doctor: How did you know about the boxes? You said they'd make me angry. How did you know?

Idris: Ah. It's my thief.

Also:

Idris: Do you ever wonder why I chose you all those years ago?

<br>

Clara could, to some eyes, be seen as being forced to act in a way a Time Lord would. And if Idris in these quotes were replaced by Missy, and The Doctor by Clara (who has been on Gallifrey more than once, and at least once very close to a bunch of TARDISs - er, TARDIi - er, Time Lord Boxes (blush), the same relationship might make sense...

Or, of course, not. After all, I'm an Idiot (blushes again).

GP records soon wide open again: Just walk into a ‘safe haven’

The_Idiot

Re: No one should be allowed to opt out...

@Neil Barnes

With respect sir - and a genuine and sincere respect for your views - may I disagree?

In your first line, you make a statement:

"No - provided that the data is used - and *only* used - for medical research purposes."

that appears to decide something for everyone. And, as a result, takes that decision away from _them_.

But then, later, you unilaterally identify a set of circumstances under which you can make a decision to exclude yourself:

"But the minute that data is sold - anonymised or not - the kindly include me out. "

If you have the right to decide when your data can be excluded, then logically everyone else does also - which may include the circumstances and choice in your first line. And if nobody else has the right to decide their data should be excluded, to satisfy your first line, then I regret to suggest _you_ cannot logically decide when to exclude your own data.

While I may, or may not, agree with your views in either case or both - logically either your data is yours, and everyone else's is theirs, at all times - or it isn't. For your or them.

Or so it appears to me. Of course, I'm an Idiot...

Hey, non-US websites – FBI don't have to show you any stinkin' warrant

The_Idiot

I think I...

... got thrown off on that last tight bend. So let me get this straight.

OK. So if your servers are in a foreign country, like, for instance, Ireland, they are still subject to US jurisdiction if you're an American or a US Company, and you have to give US authorities any and all data on them if they ask.. OK. I think I'm with it so far - whether or not I agree notwithstanding.

Buuuut...

If your servers are in a foreign country, and you're an American or a US citizen, those servers aren't within the scope of US law, so can be searched without a warrant.

SCREEEEEECH!

With apologies to Jan and Dean - I think I just hit Dead Man's curve again. Am I missing something?

I'll show you the D next week – billionaire space baron Elon Musk

The_Idiot

There are...

"Thats a particularly clueless statement."

... a number of things I could and will, at the drop of any hat you choose, say about Mr Musk. But to call someone who has already done and achieved what he has already done and achieved 'clueless' is not one I can ever see or hear myself saying.

You're right to do so is, of course, yours. Sigh...

Tripadvisor site coughs to card data breach for a potential 800k users

The_Idiot

Could we...

... maybe, instead of announcing that companies A-ZZZ have had major data breaches this week/ today/ in the past three minutes, just publish lists of those that _haven't_? It would probably save on electrons and screen space.

Sigh. Yes, I'm joking. Sort of. Probably...

The sound of silence: One excited atom is so quiet that the human ear cannot detect it

The_Idiot

So with apologies to...

... Simon and Garfunkel - is this the Sound of Science?

Oh. Right. Coat. Of course (blush).

DARPA-backed jetpack prototype built to make soldiers run faster

The_Idiot

Re: DARPA has a budget problem: How to spend it fast enough

Not just loud - but emitting enough IR to make any IR-targeting or sensor (smart bullets?) send a thank you letter to Santa.

Or maybe I'm wrong - after all, I'm an Idiot (blush).

Intellifridge terror: Internet of Stuff kit must fend off hackers of the FU-TURE-TURE-TURE

The_Idiot

Re: Stuff the...

Mostly anyone - with a phone call or two to a 'local contractor' if I was a sufficiently worthwhile target.

Your point, however, is of course entirely valid. It was more the whole concept of 'ten year security' applied to _anything_ that riled me some.

For any 'technology' or 'thing' I can't predict who will want to try to compromise it next flippin' _week_, or how they'll try to do it, never mind ten years. And there is no technology or thing of which I'm aware that has even been able to make such a promise. When the Plumbers were told to break into a room at the Watergate Hotel, the order wasn't issued from the room next door - or any room in the Hotel. But the Hotel was compromised easily. When someone in, as an example only and not intended to point any real fingers, the Far East wants a new Rolls Royce without actually going into a car showroom, or a Rembrandt some museum thinks is part of their decor, and sends a custom 'acquisition' order to a team to, um, 'acquisition' it, the team may be local to the item, but the order isn't. The channel is just that - a channel.

Security. I've heard of it. Mostly from folk who thought they had it - and didn't. Or folks who said they were selling it - and weren't.

The_Idiot

Stuff the...

... 'Internet of Things'. After all, can anyone sell me:

1: A vehicle sufficiently 'secure' that nobody will be able to steal it or otherwise compromise it for the next ten years?

2: A house sufficiently 'secure' that nobody will be able to break into it or otherwise compromise it for the next ten years?

3: A physical safe sufficiently 'secure' that nobody will be able to break into it or otherwise comp...

I think I'll stop there. All these 'technologies' have been around a lot longer than the 'Internet of Things' - and are not, nor likely ever will be, able to carry a point of sale guarantee of security, never mind the next decade.

Sigh.

Heavy VPN users are probably pirates, says BBC

The_Idiot

Re: I don't normally try...

I agree entirely - which is why I used the comparison. That is, the target pursued, and potentially supported by authorities in the US, is (in terms of impact) not even close to the target (no pun intended) that will _not_ be pursued - in the US at least.

And again - this is not intended in any way as an attempt to derail to a gun-control debate. Merely an attempt to rephrase the point made in Australia.

The_Idiot

I don't normally try...

... to be deliberately antagonistic (or at least I hope I don't), but perhaps this time...

For my American cousins. Let's replace 'use of a VPN' with 'possession of a firearm'. Let's replace 'high levels of traffic' with 'purchasing/ consumption of large (value of large to be determined as suits us best) quantities of ammunition'.

Would it then be acceptable to assume that those who both possess a firearm and who purchase what others see as large amounts of ammunition should be placed in a position of suspicion, and required to prove the validity of their activity?

In my view? No. In the context of my American cousins, both activities are legal. While authorities may decide to regard such a case with suspicion, as Mr Potts said earlier, they have to then open a case, investigate, establish grounds for more rigorous investigation - the whole nine yards. They may cheat while doing so, but that's another issue.

Before anyone goes off the deep end, this is not intended as a pro, or indeed anti, gun control comment. I'm simply attempting to transpose the BBC's position. Probably improperly, and probably ineffectively. And in either case, the fault is entirely mine (blush). After all - I'm an Idiot :-).

If the performance of VPNs did not induce an excess of lag (yes, I'm an online gamer as well), if the costs of effective and reliable VPNs were within my reach, I would also (as previously commented) configure my home net so all traffic was VPN routed. Should that mark me as 'suspicious'? If so, then perhaps locking my door each night should also - or maybe having more than one lock on it (blushes again).

Snowden shouldn't be extradited to US if he testifies about NSA spying, says Swiss gov

The_Idiot

Cue Sir Humphrey...

<

Only "higher state obligations" could overrule that position, the AG reportedly added.

>

Mr President, I have just heard we have had, or rather, are about to have, or rather, will get if certain events necessitate we get, a telephone call from the American Secretary of State. Apparently your forthcoming visit to the White House may not. Forth, I mean. Or possibly come. One of those. And in any case, even if it does, it won't be at the White House. They've picked out a rather quaint off-White House. In, I believe, Poughkeepsie. Yes, sir. I'm reliably informed that is, indeed, a place. And unfortunately the President won't be available. No, sir. Nor the Vice-President. They're sending the secretary to meet you. No, Mr President - not the Secretary. The secretary. Or someone's secretary, anyway. Probably. Possibly. No, Mr President. I have no idea what's happened. Oh - but purely by coincidence, and with absolutely no bearing on the matter, I see you haven't got round to signing Mr Snowdon's Extradition yet? Oh, you have? Telephone call, Mr President? I really don't know what you mean, sir....

The BNP can rip off your works for ‘parodies’ – but only if it's not racist

The_Idiot

So what happens if...

... I (not that I would, of course, or ever have) write a parody, utilising a main character of a rodent-like creature called, for example, Mikhail Moss, with a canine friend called Gawfy and another called Plato?

I'd be safe, in Europe at least?

I'm guessing not...

BOFH: The current value of our IT ASSets? Minus eleventy-seven...

The_Idiot

I commend...

... to the house the short story 'Allamagoosa' by Eric Frank Russell.

All hail the Offog!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allamagoosa

"The story is set on board a military starship, the Bustler, but the tale is comic rather than heroic. The ship's officers and crew are facing an official inspection, and worry about having stores they should not have, or not having something that they should have. Checking, they discover that they are supposed to have an "offog", but no one has any idea what this is, so they create a bogus electronic gadget ("an imposing allamagoosa") and call it an offog to fool the inspecting admiral, pretending that it is a special device to measure the intensity of gravity fields.

As soon as they depart from the starport, they realize that it will be difficult to cheat a more experienced inspector in the future, so that the offog must disappear from the inventory. The great idea is to report that it was broken and destroy it. The captain sends an official report to the central command, explaining that the offog came apart under gravitational stress. Almost immediately, a message of maximum priority from the central command arrives: all starships must return to the nearest spaceport, Bustler included, for an immediate inspection.

Too late, the captain and crew learn that "offog" is a misprint for "off. dog," the ship's official dog, Peaslake, which has spent the whole course of the inventory making a conspicuous nuisance of itself. The animal's collar, drinking bowl, sleeping basket and (the unchewed half of) its cushion were correctly ticked off the inventory list without alerting the crew to their oversight. Obviously the central command is worried about how a dog could come apart, under gravitational stress or not."

Six of the best gaming keyboard and mouse combos

The_Idiot

Re: citóg

@Paul Shirley

Not a gaming specialised product, though mine (and yes, I'm left handed) gets used for games as well as everything else - but for my own RSI, this was absolutely unbeatable:

http://www.evoluent.com/

They do left and right handed, wired and wireless - but the real difference is the hand position. It, for me at least, totally removed the stresses compounding RSI. I commend a viewing, and consideration for those it might serve, to the house :-).

Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays

The_Idiot

Re: Until workmen outside cut through your comms cable ......

<

We hear all about the resilience built up at the other end to near guaranty your data,

>

Hear about them - yes. See them in real operation, on too many occasions (for me at least, but I'm an Idiot) - definitely no. Otherwise we wouldn't hear of any service provider side cloud access failures. Wasn't that part of the logic?

The Register to boldly go where no Vulture has gone before: The Weekend

The_Idiot

Re: Grub/nosh/snacks

@Salts

And as you have swiftly and wisely seen, this is one of the benefits of the Knitting Needle Special - it's highly adaptable :-).

Variances I've tried:

1: Include the chopped up bacon, both with it mixed into the garlic butter and put on top to crisp while grilling the garlic

2: With suitable mushrooms that dip well in the centre) an egg cracked on top of the garlic once the mushroom is cooked, and put back in the oven to bake or under the grill to cook.

3: Add a side of pan-fried steak (striploin). Fry the steak in that melted butter that collected under the caps because it's got all that lovely garlic (sorry to those that hate or are allergic to garlic) flavour in.

4: Ditch the silver foil boats. Make quality beef burgers, but thicker than usual. Make boat wells in the burgers, and sit the mushrooms in the wells. Now the garlic butter melts down through the mushrooms, and into the burgers as they cook, to help them cook through and flavour them. When they're done, the mushrooms are cooked into the burgers - put them on a plate and enjoy!

So no. No risk of veggie-ness here - unless you want it that way. The choice, as they say on all the bad games shows, is yours! :-).

The_Idiot

Re: Grub/nosh/snacks

Then just for you (well, and everyone on my web site, but if I told you where that is, I could be accused of the Great Sin of Marketing) - Why Every Kitchen Needs a Knitting Needle!

************************************************************************************************************

There isn’t much garlic doesn’t go with. Well, except vampires. Though if you want to know why vampires really hate garlic, you’ll have to read my 'XXXXXXXXXXXXX' :-).

So. Garlic doesn’t go with vampires, at least it doesn’t if you’re the vampire and not the walking bottle of yum a vampire tends to look for on a dark and stormy… No. Not on a dark and stormy night. Definitely not on a dark and stormy night.

Cue lightning :-).

But garlic goes with most other things. Well, maybe not trifle. Perhaps. Though…. Hmmmmmm….

No. Not trifle :-).

Still. I was talking about garlic recently somewhere else. And I suggested every kitchen needed a knitting needle. A what? Yes. You heard right.

Every kitchen needs a knitting needle.

So why does every kitchen need a knitting needle? Listen very carefully, young paddy-wack. I shall tell you.

To start with, get some big Portabello mushrooms. When we say ‘big’ here, think about two or three to a plate. A dinner plate. A big dinner plate :-).

Next, take out the mushroom stalks. This is where I’m supposed to say ‘keep them and use them for… (insert something you never get round to doing here)’. I won’t. Eat them. Raw. They’re good. Alright. OK. If you insist. Chop them and mix them with some shredded cheese. Look at the cheese. Decide you don’t like that cheese. Throw it all away. So. We're good with the whole 'stalker' thing, right? Right. Onward and downward. Yes, Jones Minor. I can see you there at the back. Or sideways.

Next, chop up some fresh garlic. Don’t chop it too fine. You’re going to make garlic butter. It’s really, really hard. No, really. It is! It's like, so hard, it's harder than a.... OK. It isn’t. Hard to make, I mean. Just don’t tell anyone. It spoils the mystique :-P. Yes, if you insist. You can use store garlic butter if you want. But chop up some garlic anyway .

Make garlic butter.

What do you mean, how? OK. Get a ramekin. Yes, or a little bowl. But don’t call it a little bowl. Pretend it’s a ramekin. Why? Because I said so, that’s why :-P.

Put some butter in the small bo… in the ramekin. How much? It’s going to thickly cover the frilly sides of your mushrooms. Why do mushrooms have frills? Well, they’re Victorian mushrooms. They’re embarrassed. Yes, that means I don’t know. Or I do know and I don’t care :-PP.

Throw your chopped garlic on the top of the butter. Use a fork to mix it in.

Alright. Yes, I probably should have said ‘let the butter get soft' first. So sue me :-).

Throw on some more garlic. Mix some more with the fork.

Throw on some more… oh. We did that bit.

Now get some tin foil. Make little cups/ boats big enough for the mushroom caps to sit in. Yes. I know. They were big mushrooms. So make big boats :-). The rim of the boat/ cup should come higher than the top of the mushroom that’s going to sit in it.

Yes, you can wear a pirate hat while making the boats if you like.

Yes, or a sailor hat.

No. Not a Stetson. Oh. Alright then, Jones Minor. You can wear a Stetson. Yes, I know Stetsons are cool. Will you put the gun away now, please? Pretty please?

On with the motley. Whatever motley may be. Take your mushroom caps. Take your knitting needle. See? You knew a knitting needle was going to come in somewhere, right? Well, it is. It’s going to go in the mushrooms. Push holes through the cap, frill side to skin side, with the knitting needle. Don't worry that the holes seem to close up some. OK. Are you ready? Now for the next hard bit that's not really hard. Really ready? So....

Cover the frilly side of the mushroom caps with the garlic butter. Make the butter layer thick. When you've made it really, really thick - add more garlic butter. If your skin starts to blister, and a blonde runs through the door clutching a stake - you're a vampire. You probably aren't going to like the mushrooms. If you're not a vampire, put the mushroom caps in the tin foil boats.

Now heat up the oven. HOT. Put the mushroom boats on a baking tray, or in a shallow pan, and in the oven..

This is where the magic happens. The secret’s in those little holes you made. The butter starts to melt in the caps - and runs down through the holes. The melting butter cooks and flavours the inside of the caps, then through and pools under the caps. The oven’s hot. So the butter’s hot. It cooks/ fries the skin side from the underneath. And remember those bits of garlic you mixed into the butter? They won’t fit. Down the holes. So they sit there on the frills. Cooking.

This next bit is purely optional. You can put the mushroom caps under a hot grill (that's a brolier for our colonial cousins) for a while to brown the garlic a little. But you don't want to let them burn or scorch. Really. You don’t. Trust me on this.

No, I’m not a doctor. Yes, you can trust me on this anyway. Well, about burnt garlic, at least.

OK. You’re done. Take the caps out of the boats. Throw away the boats and the melted butter, unless you don't want to. I have no idea why you wouldn’t want to throw them away, but the choice is entirely yours :-P. Pat the bases of the mushrooms dry. Put them on a plate. If they live that long

So there you are. Why every kitchen needs a knitting needle. Or at least, why I think it does. Now it’s your turn. What unusual item is in your kitchen, and why?

No. Not that one. I’m probably too young :-).

************************************************************************************************************

Page: