Posts by Binra

What if the idea of the 'state' is in effect captured as a proxy or extension of a broad spectrum corporately networked capacity?

What if whether known to Apple or not, agents within its employ set up or leaked the various components independently that can then be drawn together by a third party at some remove?

The ability to conceal toxic debt or intent in complex instruments of packaged obfuscation is part of the attempt of gaining power by the back door (deceit). The essential being to armour against exposure by trails of plausible deniability - which is itself the usurpation of National Security (anywhere) for private agenda.

Rather than make a conspiracy theory - why not see that this is the way the mind works when it no longer trusts, believes or engages in relational communication - not least from believing its own spin.

Seriously

Astroboffins get funded to come up with Astrobaffle?

No doubt the simulation was rigorously set up to optimise the model.

Why are electrical forces not openly acknowledged in our Cosmology?

Instead of digging ever deeper into absurdity we could admit we don't know and then identify conjecture as such but analyze evidence to see if it is supported. Its a strange idea I know and will probably never catch on. But perhaps a loss of face - over millions of years - will reveal a more coherent appreciation of Life, the Universe and Everything.

One to rule them all?

From being a corporately captured and managed asset to becoming a digital input is not so big a jump. Doublethink is actually simpler and life outside gridlock is a lie.

I first saw the PR in Trusted Reviews. It great how we can tell everyone what we are so they can simply be serviced. There was nothing in that article that hinted at being captured. At least the Register allows some indication of the underlying nature of 'trusting' Google with all your passwords - albeit without alarm, outrage, warning or protest.

It isn't that privacy is possible - so much as proportionate checks and balances against acquiring undue and overwhelming influence.

It would seem that there is great willingness to get in the nice man's car because he gives away sweeties.

I remember the Internet - before A.I took over...

Is Big G truly a universal CONSTANT?

Is Big G truly a universal CONSTANT?

We have extrapolated a model of the Universe upon local conditions applying universally.

Why does G vary on Earth - such as to be replaced by a mathematically mandated 'constant'?

Note that the remote 'Ultima Thule' is also unexpectedly lacking mass and so also asserted to be surprisingly porous.

What exactly is gravity and mass? Newton worked out mathematical laws or ratio and relation as describing the force. mass and actions but we do not understand what gravity is or how it operates. I am attracted to the theory that it is a function of dipolar alignments in electrically charged bodies which (like cells) have negatively charged surface relative to positively charged core. IE: Gravity as a weak but locally significant function of The electrical force.

Ad hoc extensions to a model that does not meet its predictions in empirical observation only serve to make matters dark and lead us into black holes with corresponding budgets to search for the saviour of the MODEL - while a false not only leads astray, but denies the benefits of aligning in a true appreciation - in a broad spectrum of reintegrative alignment back from death by fragmented specialisations under a gov-corps narrative dictate.

The operating system is the way the world is thinking now. If it does not fit in, it does not really run.

The way the world is thinking is not concerned with helping so much as masking for validating and funding in the narratives that are set. So dealing with Co2 may not address any of the toxic pollutions that operate at a cellular level to degrade life on Earth, but it is more likely to find support in the narrative driven system of control that is itself the possession and defence of captured revenue streams at expense of true sense.

To align in true sense may not be to gain the world or to gain in terms of the consensual group or society, but it may be to live the live that you are the movement to be instead of 'selling out' to a sense of security.

There are many more tragic denials in our history than this one. He did get recognition and did get to sell working models of his idea. Perhaps he wanted more control over and licensing fees for what he felt was his. Others have spoken into this.

Patents are for by far the most part serving corporate gods that demand human serf-ship.

The 'electric universe' of charged plasma as communication of energy and information, is implicit to such observations - but joining up the dots is not allowed so much as gradually leaked to the general public.

Perhaps the term 'alien' rightly belongs to the nature of such thinking - set apart from EVERYTHING as if to define, predict and control... the narrative if not the outcome itself.

Alien thinking cuckolds truly shared Thought - but is it 'other' or is it simply not true - running as a programming in place of true appreciation?

In appreciating our 'energetic' environment or relational field - as a synchronicity rather than of actions of 'parts' upon each other - and the intent of 'understanding' the sum of such 'parts' as if the 'whole', Humpty has not fallen - and all the king's motivations and machinations are redundant. However, the program may now run as the reintegrative movement of being to itself - for all awareness of existence is of the same source nature regardless its screen coordinate 'identity'.

'Space weather' embraces more than 'space' has been designated to be. Awareness is always of tangible witnessing to existence at any and every level. Self-specialness seems to 'set apart' to run its moment of 'victory' over an all embracing unconditional 'love'. "It's love - but not as we know it Jim"

Here's something easily overlooked

No one comments on the article's context - which is one of multi billion dollar market rivalries and 'news' media outlets sowing hatred and provocation in order to either make clickbait out of such rivalry or perhaps profit from 'planting' such headlines in the subconscious - for that is what the corporates and politicos do now. They don't use reasoned honouring modes of communication, but seek to manipulate.

All consumers/readers/populations are to do now is react.

Not unlike a rat-maze, people are conditioned by their OWN reactions that are set up and anticipated in advance.

The framework that is set forth in this provocation of an 'article' is puerile in its appeal. The whole thing stinks but once one reacts to the bait, one is essentially serving to set the framework as if it were discussion rather than propaganda (propagating hates, invalidations and disinfo).

The article says; "Hate Apple" and "Apple are hateful" and uses recent update stats as a cover to attack under.

Those who love to hate, hate to love ...and fear it - or they would not seek out and invest in conflict as an escape for their own lack of substance.

I invite a positive extension of value from news vendors and aggregates. One can be critical within an honest communication. Truly what one gives out is what one gets back. Hating is a form of self-harm. Manipulative deception can seem to get a hit of pleasure and self-righteousness from it in the short term, but mental sickness is neither pleasurable or validating to who you truly are.

It's fair comment to say that Apple used a kind of marketing approach that is now backfiring on them. For a while they were a media darling - because the 'halo affect' also sold copy or made for easy clickbait. Now everyone else is advertising and marketing in a similar fashion and cool is rather cold.

I would prefer if Apple positioned itself to be of service rather than to seduce with shiny products loaded with hype - but they are after all a highly competitive profit seeking global corporation who see service as something to own, monopolize, control, manipulate. In this they are no different from other companies - though the new models of Google and Amazon and Facebook (though admittedly FB don't sell proprietary hardware yet) are selling hardware at a loss or a discount and then selling customers - as well as their customer usage data - to advertisers, corporate entities and any other entity that pays the going rate.

Apple have pluses and minuses - as do others in the marketplace. But in such a billion dollar market how 'independent' is information able to be? Looking at so called articles on any of this device led revolution in global communication society there is scant attention to users as citizens and mostly pandering to consumer-consciousness (and there;s an oxymoron).

Currently I see a 'love to hate' Apple movement. It largely expresses a mob mentality which consolidates what Apple personified so well - the association of a kind of self righteous tribal identity with branded product choices.

The products that are being sold are increasing selling 'identity substitution'. Data mining is only an outgrowth of what advertisers and corporations have been pursuing for decades now; a war on our mind.

This can continue without being openly recognized because the media are so much a party to the same manipulative mentality.

A deep cultural shift that is occurring is in many ways being brought in with such devices but is largely unrecognized by those who are under the spell. The Snowdenball is gathering momentum - and is relevant to the whole business of digital information technology. But NSA are not the only entity seeking to predate upon and manipulate a population of 'users'.

Underneath the alarm and antipathies - what is this about?

The idea/technology/intent of systems that identify personal and social value (Life communicating) as transactions and marketize and weaponize these transactions as means of levering personal control over the system and its outcomes.

The word personal as used above can represent any private interest that has access to the system on the inside; both Corporate, Government or indeed hacker.

But on the outside is no less a control mentality in the construct, presentation and maintenance of a sense of self that 'gets' from its transactions in forms it values.

I'm only sketching here - but the ideas that we accept as to what we are and who life is - are the active determiners of all that comes therefrom. This has always been so.

The scientific split from the non-measurable or non-objectifiable has bequeathed a loveless machine mentality that runs a front end persona-mask as part of its function.

Distraction with persona-realities will delay the appreciation of the wholeness that is essential for meaningful relationships. Of course 'meaningful relationships' can be transacted within the getting system such as to obtain mutual consent - but the true Meaning of all things is not in the parts in themselves nor the relations between the parts minus the whole - but the part-whole relationship. The substitution of a control mentality for the wholeness is one of taking the concept instead of the Living Sharing Knowing Feeling Being.

My sense is that the 'control mentality' is the (Bible's) 'Beast' becoming exposed to plain sight that is also hidden at the foundations of our consciousness. To recognize it in our own mind is to be initially disturbed. But to recognize it as false and NOT use or employ it as a basis for living - OPENS a true Foundation.

It's no good asking about this true foundation - as if to get a 'handle on it' . Do you see what I mean?

It is what you are - or what is being you - when the false foundation is not employed, subscribed to, identified with, energised, reacted from and traded in our world of relations as if it were true currency.

Sure - it feels good to be flowing in the presence of one's true being - but DON'T let that become marketized oir weaponized by deception. To reclaim our life is only necessary to notice and disregard what baited us into a false sense of power and protection.

No one likes to lose what they think they have and power and protection figure LARGE in the mind.

Noticing anything real becomes disallowed if what is uncovered threatens the apparent stability of an upside down mentality. So there is a way of it that comes from a sense of value felt directly and not as provided by 'thinks' whether apparently our own or those 'thinks' by which the system maintain itself in your name.