Re: Schmoo?
I was wondering if anyone would have noticed the (un)Official DEC Auxiliary Output Delivery System we had installed.
2005 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Aug 2013
If I'm remembering the name right, our PDP-11/20 in high school had a simpler text game called "Schmoo", which involved slinging mud at the schmoo creature (who liked mud being slung at it) by guessing direction and distance. Then you make YOU happy (so it thought) it would then sling mud back at you. Was probably a couple other basic games, can't remember what they were anymore.
Oh yes, and here was our old machine.
You'd think the programming "geniuses" at Microsoft should be able to figure out a containerization function for MSWindows too, right? Split out userspace functions into their own little boxes; after all MSWindows has such a rock-solid kernel, and distinct separation of kernel-space and user-space...
Wait... what? Oh, nevermind.
Really, why would anyone think this would be done any other way. You are installing an instance of SQL Server, so you license it on how many cores it has, like a VM.
If they're doing it like Oracle does, they charge by the number of cores on the *HOST* system, not the VM. So if you want to balance your VMs around to multiple hosts (maybe just two Oracle or SQL VMs per host) you have to pay for ALL the cores, even if you only assign 2 cores to that VM. This is where the problem comes in.
We had one of these in our multimedia lab at IBM when it first came out (we were testing the web view of our product at the time). Right off we found it was nearly unusable in our environment. Our lab was token-ring only, it was weeks before we got a phone jack we could use with the modem, and the lack of a floppy meant we couldn't even test our generated HTML & MVR files off of a floppy disk. A year or so later we eventually got an ethernet connection, but for a while it was a fancy but not entirely useful toy.
And eventually we got a replacement for that abominable "Babybel Cheese Mouse" the machine came with.
Years later I got a rev.D version of the iMac for real cheap at a tag sale (lost it in a house fire though).
Pretty amazing how Apple has got to where it is, given that according to the massed ranks of El Reg Commentardery, everything they've ever done is (a) a shameless copy of some unsung hero company's work, (b) crap, (c) ridiculously overpriced and (d) would never be bought by anybody.
I would give apple the credit that while yes, they did tend to take ideas others had made before, but they made their business giving those products polish and simplicity. They were good at taking a rough technology and giving it a finish. These days they make their money through hype, flashy products with less substance, and vendor lock-in.
The iPod more resembled a cigarette case (in size and rounded corners) a product which has a hundred year track record of being easy to pocket.
I thought the original whyPod resembled an upside-down radio/communicator from Joe90...
Is that one where Woz wanted to push the Apple IIgs, and Steve Jobs wanted to kneecap it so it wouldn't compete with his Macintosh? Don't know if that story is actually true (but I wouldn't have put it past Jobs to sabotage something that interfered with his "vision"), but I absolutely think the IIgs should have been pushed and developed a lot more. Just imagine what an "Apple i-GS" could have been like, had they kept up the development. (yeah, would have had an entirely different name by then, with or without the "i"). But I'm sure Apple would have found a way to lock-down and lock users out of an "Apple II zeta-zeta" by now.
For example, if you joined, or were forced to join, a website or forum because you ONE TIME wanted some information that was only available to members, it is quite reasonable to use abc123 as a universal password.
For those one-time usages I'm forced into, my chosen password is a bit "coarser"...
For sites that insist upon a phone number, it depends on what my usage of the site will be. If I feel I'll go back again, I'll use a Google Voice number (which doesn't get answered, and isn't even configured anyplace as a number which CAN be answered). If it's a one-time visit, I'll look up the number of their HQ office, or the HQ of a competitor.
What really bugs me are sites that won't let me paste in a password. As I always chose long complex passwords it can be a pain in the rear to type them in; so I tend to avoid such sites...
Sometimes those sites will take a bit longer, since before I leave I'll need to hunt down the contact information and send them a comment on their bad site engineering. And the harder they make it for me to send the message, the more harshly it will be worded.
Amazon have some weird suggestions; I recently bought a new cordless drill and under their heading "Customers who bought that item also bought" and suggested a salacious novel. The mind boggles.
I expect there was plenty of "drilling" going on in that novel, if you catch my meaning. (wink wink, nudge nudge}
Thunderbird is suffering a lot of breakage these days, severe memory leaks that necessitate closing the application at least once a day (sometimes twice). I suspect the massive boatload of code-breakage coming from Mozilla/Firefox is having it's way with Thunderbird, and with the Mozilla Project so intent on abandoning/not-abandoning it (really the first, they just loudly protest it isn't so) and not enough staff/support, I'm concerned it may not last. And seeing as the alternatives are the bloated and clumsy Evolution, or a multitude of email clients who believe that columnar-only UIs are in ANY way usable, not much available to replace it.
And to state it quite clearly; a web browser is *NOT* an email client.
Not so much a reverse takeover (in the way that Time-Warner took over AOL, even though AOL were the ones doing the buying). It could be possible (I cannot say how likely though) that some of the Directors realized IBM needs to start adopting some of RedHat's culture, or else die an agonizingly slow death.
Yes, Google needs to be held responsible for not making access controls more granular, and for taking too long to give us the level of granular control we have now. And I'm sure they grudgingly did that, as giving us better control might mean we'd find ways to avoid the Google-kaiju.
But a lot of blame also has to go to the lazy app developers, the ones who configured their apps to "request everything" for permissions, rather than actually THINKING about what they actually needed, and restricting the controls to just those.
And, six months ago, how many CFO's had a major worldwide pandemic virus and government orders for everyone to stay at home in their plans?
Wouldn't have much mattered if you DID plan for it. Consider the restaurant/theatre chain that actually had "pandemic insurance". Fecking insurance company (and their backers over your way, some place called "Lloyds") tried REAL hard to back out of paying, saying the contract didn't actually name "COVID-19" as a covered pandemic (but it did mention SARS *and* any mutations of it, and guess what COVID-19 is?)
I'm sure they'd stay in my ears just about as well as the Apple ones, which is to sat NOT AT ALL. I need to have ones with flexible-enough rubber cushions that they can be wedged in,, or they have to have something that hooks over the earlobes and goes around the back of my head to the other one. And tiny little things the size of a used piece of chewing gum? Yeah, that'll be lost instantly. I need a wire connecting the two so I have a likely chance of finding one side if I can manage to find the other.
Earbuds that can be lost, won't fit in my ears, and rely on flakey BT sync. I think they have the decimal point in the wrong place; should be two spaces to the left..
As for the colour names? I think Ford was far ahead of them in 1970, when the Ford Maverick came in "Anti-Establish Mint, Hulla Blue, Original Cinnamon, and Freudian Gilt (gold)".
How long do you think before the back-end data is processed to determine who's phone is seeing the most bluetooth signals regularly and the cops sent to 'remind' them about social distancing? I give it a month, perhaps two and of course it'll all be for our own good.
And how do they differentiate your Phone bluetooth from every other sort of bluetooth? So in your household you each have a phone, a tablet, a laptop (and even newer desktops), and in the house are two or three gaming consoles, a couple of media streaming devices, etc. All these have their bluetooth signatures, and perhaps the corresponding controllers, bluetooth headsets etc get counted here too. Suddenly there's a crowd of 25-30 "people" reported in your house.
About the one thing that was handy with my visiting a partner site every one or two weeks was I could stop by Lowes/Home Crappo/Harbor Freight on the way home and pick up supplies/parts/tools that the local home improvement center doesn't stock. Or some other thing that isn't worth an online order for (where shipping ends up about the same as the item itself).
But then again I have a proper workspace that I've used the past 6 years as a remote employee on multiple jobs.
I doubt WD is worried. They've got no effective competition in the spinning hard drive market (60% market share),
Which is what makes it such a pain in the ass to buy spinning disk these days, especially at your fiendly local WorstBuy store. Staples sells other brands, and on extremely rare occasions you might find some ion their stores (probably somebody slipped up and decided to actually send product to the store).
You utter b'stard.... I now have Icke Icke Baby - to the tune of Vanilla Ice's ICe Ice Baby - stuck in my head. So thanks for that......
Ah, fortunate then that Clean Tears' "Desperate" has been playing through my head all morning (which is interesting as I've been listening to a lot of Alstroemeria Records product as of late).
In all honesty I am quite convinced that it's the designers who insist that GUIs must be regularly changed because it's the only way they can justify their jobs.
I think it's the only reason ANY products, product packaging, etc get changed. And the stupider, the better. I know I've complained MULTIPLE times to companies that decide they'd rather put some big dopey picture of their product on BACK of the packing, while the microwave directions are in miniature type, and they tell you "see our website for conventional oven directions". NO, dickwits, get rid of the fecking picture and put all the text there, in READABLE type.
Because backtracks compatibility is one of the reasons Windows is such a mess?
Windows is the biggest example of how backtracks compatibility can go wrong and I saying that as someone who uses a virtual version of Windows XP to run some games that I love and some programs I am so used to that I don't want to look for replacements.
There's where I've thought MSWindows should just contribute all their old legacy code to Wine, and then just use Wine as a compatibility layer on top of a pared-down MSWin kernel/API. Old code is still supported, and the core gets cleaned up.
So Faceborg is, as usual, sucking up to the gun-grabbers. The action on the part of the gun advocacy groups is **NOT** to defy "social distancing. The fact is that the gun-grabbers are just frothing at the mouth to take advantage of this crisis to push through their anti-gun agenda, trying to bury their ever increasing restrictions deep into "must-pass" legislation. The gun advocacy groups are making sure any legislation ONLY deals with the critical issues at hand, and to make sure this doesn't get used to push the agenda of a small subset of people.
The only reason the advocacy groups have to act is BECAUSE the opposition is all set to twist and manipulate a crisis to their OWN failed ideology. NOTHING to do with opposing the emergency measures needed to address the crisis.
(now bring on the obvious downvotes)
I thought maybe they had implemented the MacBook Wheel.
Slack *might* be OK if it weren't for it's crap UI, their abomination known as "Threads", and their insistence on making it impossible to develop an alternative client (which would be your only hope of making the service at all usable). Unfortunately at work everybody is moving away from IRC and over to Slack.
JR "Bob" Dobbs should be insulted that Slack have managed to tarnish the good name of a central tenet of The Church of the Subgenius.
It would seem to me the major issue of not being to clear out such malware is that you the OWNER of the device are not allowed your rightful root-level access. Certainly, you shouldn't be running as root in your daily usage, but Android decides to tell you that you might be the owner, bit you don't actually *OWN* your own devices.
Properly designed, you should be able to boot your device from a clean and write-protected medium (most likely a microSD, or perhaps something on an OTG adapter) and do a full wipe of the storage, and then re-load a clean install. Perhaps the system/OS storage should be on a removable chip inside the phone, where in the worst-case you could pull it out and read/reflash it from your computer (probably not microSD, I think it would probably need a specialized spec, but that's not my field of expertise).
Given Google's own preferences, I'd expect Google would prefer Android be run as an extreme exaggeration of ChromeOS, where the *only* thing on your phone is a bootloader, and anything else has to be run off the internet from their servers.
How is it that the shit-show that was MSWindows Mobile looks to have been *more* open than the supposedly FLOSS-based Android?
Other libertarians than he --- even in the highest reaches of government --- also believe in absolute freedom of speech,
Just to clarify that point; libertarians believe strongly in free speech, but also that you are then responsible for that speech. People like to forget that second bit. It's like the big companies who push laissez-faire when it suits them, ignoring the second half that they are also perfectly free to fail unhindered.