* Posts by jelabarre59

2005 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Aug 2013

DXC Technology warns techies that all travel MUST now be authorised

jelabarre59

Re: Back in the distant past, before I worked for HP...

DXC don't supply pens, notepads, paperclips or anything else that would be useful to do our actual jobs.

the only reason most of us have paper to write on, is because we take it from the printers.......

One company I worked at many years ago (non-IT company, long since shut down) had one of the owners/execs fussing over having to buy toilet paper. My comment was if we ran out of toilet paper I could just start using incoming customer orders.

Look, we've tried, but we just can't write this headline without saying boffins have probed Uranus's cold ring

jelabarre59

Re: colour

I thought Uranus was greenish, Neptune blue. Seems current thinking is Uranus is blue-green.

Actually, Uranus was the blonde. Neptune had the green hair.

(and here I thought Neptune would have been the only one Uranus would have allowed to probe her cold ring... Except maybe Usagi.)

This isn't Boeing to end well: Plane maker to scrap some physical cert tests, use computer simulations instead

jelabarre59

Re: It all works fine in theory

Yes. I have no problem with modelling and running pre-production testing through a simulator. That makes some sense, but once the physical stuff starts being produced, it still needs to be double checked to make sure it is up to spec.

I would think the Software modelling would be useful to eliminate the models that simply won't work at all (the ones designed by the recent engineering graduates of Bonehead University). Find out before you even start building hardware test models, save some time and money that way. That would mean you would *now* have more budget to do the HARDWARE testing on models you have some expectation of success for.

jelabarre59

Re: Boeing reacts cunningly to the deadly crash of the XXX airliner

If they do rebrand, you-know-who is going to claim the credit and will be even more insufferabl

But didn't McDonnel-Douglas already do that with the DC-10 to MD-11?

The latest FCC plan to boost US broadband? Prevent competition in apartment blocks

jelabarre59

Re: Had this for years already

I think that will find that the internet is a bit more robust that you imagine. It was after all developed from a system designed to survive a nuclear war. (Arpanet)

I think you severely missed the point. Doesn't matter whether the physical infrastructure survives, the a=content thereof is well on it's way to being destroyed, and anti-consumer regulation will contribute to that.

In any case I think that your UScentic view is misplaced. There is a lot more to the internet than the FCC and the US.

Yeah, we'll see how Article13 plays out for you folks...

jelabarre59

Re: Had this for years already

See title. Same with cable TV.

There's the problem with the whole "Cable-TV" infrastructure, isn't it? Back when cable-tv was first being rolled out in the late 70's-early/mid 80's, communities and counties granted *exclusive* coverage contracts to one and only one company. The smart thing would have been to grant contracts to at minimum TWO companies. So too bad if you couldn't have one company kicking back bribes to government officials, too bad if they couldn't build such outrageous profit margins that they could overrun the entire entertainment industry.

Seems Ajit Pai and his masters in the cable/telco industries miss their heyday of beligerent monopolism, and want to do all they can to bring it back. They just might do it, and destroy the internet in the process.

jelabarre59

Why doesn't Idjit Pai do what a couple dozen other Drumpf appointees have done and bug out? I'm sure he could get a hellacious comp package from one of the telcos.

Because he's *already* working for the telcos, perhaps? He's their "inside man", so they can't have him leaving only to be replaced by someone who isn't beholden to them.

After years of listening, we've heard not a single peep out of any aliens, say boffins. You think you can do better? OK, here's 1PB of signals

jelabarre59

Small window

I think part of the problem is there's actually a small window in which we can receive transmissions from another planetary civilization. Look to our *own* broadcast structure. We have not much of a 100-year span between when we started any significant broadcasting until we went to digital signals (which probably won't propagate so readily), narrow-band communication, satellites which transmit downward rather than outward, etc. Even *WE* probably aren't putting out a significant signal anymore, even with all the cruft we're spweing into the communications system.

So unless you're picking up some other world's 100-year leakage period at exactly the right time, there probably won't be enough to get. We could have readily missed whatever signals were out there, since we wouldn't have been listening yet.

Why are fervid Googlers making ad-blocker-breaking changes to Chrome? Because they created a monster – and are fighting to secure it

jelabarre59

Re: Or, simply...

Or just DON'T use Google Chrome. There are plenty of other options, and we shouldn't be allowing Google Chrome to become "MSIE6 version2".

Microsoft's Edge gang pops a head above the parapet to give Linux fans a strong 'maybe'

jelabarre59

"stable" version?

...but the team were "super focused on bringing stable versions of Edge first to other versions of Windows (as well as macOS)".

Ah, so I guess we won't be expecting to see Edge on Linux for a few decades then...

Large Redmond Collider: CERN reveals plan to shift from Microsoft to open-source code after tenfold license fee hike

jelabarre59

Re: Remember Munich?

Even better if the developed something open source that did the full MAPI protocol and was able to use that to talk collaborative PIM/scheduler to an Exchange server exactly as does an outlook client.

Thunderbird has the basics of what's needed already. It needs some committed work to clean up a lot of the old Mozilla cruft out of the codebase, and some actual **COMMITMENT** to do something with it. But seems that **WAY** too many people think a web browser is an email client.

jelabarre59

Re: Same stunt they pull in any academic setup

Some people do get recognised because they've spent lots of their money on stuff, like Bill Gates and his Foundation,

Excuse us if we *ALSO* think some of what BG's Foundation has spent it's money on is less than exemplary as well. Microsoft isn't his only crime.

jelabarre59

Re: Same stunt they pull in any academic setup

I'm just hoping someone develops an alternative for MS Outlook that actually works. If I had the money I'd fund it, or start from Pegasus :).

Thunderbird, or Thunderbird-next. All the core system you should need. If a few more individuals AND companies would step up, it could be everything you want.

jelabarre59

Re: "pilot test of a mail service"

I'm just surprised Art C hasn't come on here to push CitadelUX...

jelabarre59

Re: The Open University provides 0365 and doesn't accept open document format

.doc, .docx have become defacto standards, not because they are the best or most open, but because their widespread adoption.

"Ah, this is obviously some strange usage of the word 'standard' that I wasn't previously aware of."

jelabarre59

Re: If they were looking for customers to move to Azure...

Maybe the Large Hadron Collider shifted Microsoft into an alternate universe where they're even stupider than they were before?

You like magic tricks? See this claim that IBM bungled an Obamacare IT project? Whoosh, now it's a $15m check

jelabarre59

But with federal funds up for grabs, news conferences to grandstand, backs to be kicked, scope had to creep up with the budget, and, the most expensive inappropriate software packages had to be purchased.

It's the same thing that happened with "Common Core". What probably started with a bunch of well-intentioned folks deciding that schools should pool their resources to devise a baseline everyone could build upon as they needed, gaining efficiency and economy of scale,soon became a boondoggle for various companies and special-interests to use to their own benefit. And in the end it's been nothing more than an exercise in checking checkboxes, with little to no concern on whether the process actually works.

Those darn users don't know what they're doing (not like us, of course)

jelabarre59

That's a perfectly reasonable complaint. I just spent most of a month beating a new smartphone into submission in an effort to make it work the same way as my old one.

Sometimes that's just not possible. Such as some big-name cellphone maker (hello, Moto...) that in their earlier units had a perfectly functional voice-dialing utility, with when connected to your bluetooth headset would allow you to call anyone in your phonebook with a simple "call <Name> at <Home|Work|Mobile>". But ***NOW*** they've decided to remove that completely functional, self-contained and OFFLINE utility with some hack-me/spy-on-me set of apps from Google. All of which demand you have mobile data always-on and always sucking down your mobile data allotment. And they have the gall to call it an "improvement". Yeah, it worked as it was before, and with time to evolve the tech and better processing power, you sould make that OFFLINE tool even better. Or at worst case just leave it where it is and don't fuck with it, since it was working fine before.

Meet the new Dropbox: It's like the old Dropbox, but more expensive, and not everyone's thrilled

jelabarre59

Guido

Maybe the folks at Dropbox figured they needed to find a bunch of meaningless projects for Guido van Rossum to work on, now that he isn't running the Python project.

Japan drops banhammer on drunk-droning for the sake of public safety

jelabarre59

I thought it meant playing the bagpipes while drunk.

What, that isn't how they're played normally? Or as the joke Dad would tell goes:

"Why do bagpipers walk around while playing?"

...

"To get away from the noise."

These boffins' deepfake AI vids are next-gen. But don't take our word for it. Why not ask Zuck or Kim Kardashian...

jelabarre59

Re: Seems good enough to fool most people to me

Why should anyone waste their time spoiling a ballet when it changes nothing and has no effect?

Vote for some obscure 3rd-party candidate then. Heck, your vote is worth more to *them* than to the "major" parties the mindless masses are voting for (such as getting enough votes to gain official status for that party).

Hate your IT job? Sick of computers? Good news: An electronics-frying Sun superflare may hit 'in next 100 years'

jelabarre59

Re: Yeah let's frrrryyyyyyy

" going round to your friend's to show them that cake you baked"

How are you going to bake that cake?

It's called a Dutch Oven. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtE065II9u8

Protip: No, the CIA will not call off a pedophilia probe into your life in exchange for Bitcoin

jelabarre59

Always a good windup when you pretend goss ignorance and lead them on unable to do what they want until finally identifying your box as a Linux installation.

I had thought of a whole "Billy-Bob Hicktown" routine to pull on a scammer, but never got one to call while I still remembered it. Of course, to make it really fun I would have had to record it too and post it along with the other "harass the scammer" clips.

Cooksie is *bam-bam* iGlad all over: Folk are actually buying Apple's fondleslabs again

jelabarre59

Re: So...

You are right in your summary. Shipping tends to mean they are being shipped into the warehouses of distributors and retailers. But these companies wouldn't accept the stock if they were not seeing the demand.

Not necessarily. The major record labels were pulling that scam at one time, shipping large numbers of an album they wanted and getting it declared "Gold" on shipping numbers alone. The RIAA eventually changed their rules to avoid the problem. There was also a saying about overly-hyped records, "shipped Gold, returned Platinum".

Let's Pope mass upgrade of Vatican Library data centre is blessed with some of that famed infallibility

jelabarre59

Re: Hoping they are using a reasonable file format

Not just on-going investigations. They have a large number of documents that basically are "eyes only" and limited to a very select few if the stories and rumors are to be believed.

*THOSE* are usually kept in the brain of a 14-yr-old nun with eidetic memory...

IEEE tells contributors with links to Chinese corp: Don't let the door hit you on Huawei out

jelabarre59

Re: @Chris G not quite.

And US industry is very good at lobbying the fools in Washington into anti-competitive behaviour and even a trade war that is damaging US trade quite severely.

The steel industry did it at one time. And the US automaker industry got various bits of favouritist legislation and rules passed, yet **STILL** couldn't manage to succeed even in a rigged market.

I may believe in "laissez-faire", but I see it as having TWO sides; you have the right to run your business as you see fit, but you ALSO have the right to fail with no expectation of bailouts. Many companies only see the first part and not the second.

jelabarre59

Re: careful

Why the US is still using a system created because it took a week to get from Maine to Washington DC in 1780, in 2020?

Because too many parties (in multiple usages of that word) benefit from the system as it stands. Mind you, in states like NY I would like to see an electoral-type system for electing US Senators where each county's popular vote is tallied and the winner for that county gets ONE "electoral" vote. Those get tallied and the Senator is elected by the county totals. As it stands right now the heavy population centers (hello, NYC and Buffalo) run roughshod over the rural areas of the state. The population centers would still have "personal" representation in the House of Representatives.

I have seen one suggestion that electors should simply be chosen at random, and the vote should be just theirs to do. At 538 electors, I think there's too much chance for tampering and undue influence. Rather, if you randomly chose between 25-50 (no more than 50) people per "electoral" seat, and had them decide the election, that would be between 13,450-26,900 votes, too big to readily manipulate, yet small enough to still be reached by ALL candidates (and not just the Demopublicans and Republicrats).

jelabarre59

Re: careful

Are you referring to the system that tries to keep the US as a union of equal States, rather than having the most populous states dominating absolutely everywhere?

Yeah, well the War of Northern Aggression put an end to the idea that the States had power equivalent to the National government. No matter how stupid the South's reason to leave was, they still had the right to.

One theory has it that with all the land acquisitions, and subsequent new states established in those territories, the National government has effectively established itself as the dominant power.

jelabarre59

Re: Presitator for life

The problem is, most of the gun-totin' fraternity, the ones with the biggest firepower anyway, are likely to be firmly entrenched in Camp Trump.

Not necessarily. There are plenty of libertarians in the fraternity, and there are plenty there who would like to see a one-term-then-leave philosophy. Personally I think we already *have* a "term limits" system in place, it's called an election. Just that we have too many sheeple and not enough citizens. Besides, I've seen "Yes Minister", and I fully understand where the real power base would flow in a stringent term limits system.

jelabarre59

Re: Presitator for life

It would take a constitutional amendment to change either the 4 year term or 2 term limit, I can’t see the slightest chance of several hundred lawmakers doing that before 2024. Congress can overturn any presidential emergency declaration or veto (two thirds of both houses puts congress in the driving seat).

I seem to remember a lot of the same talk going around about Obama when he was president, that he'd try to get a third term. And it was treated as a serious concern then as well. Only difference being that Obama in his delusional mind thought the country needed him for longer, while Trump would probably need it to flog his own ego. (disclaimer: I am not a fan of the candidates *either* side of the two-party-fraud have presented to us for the 40+ years I've been able to vote). Heck, not even sure if President-For-Life Roosevelt should have been in office as long as he was. And had JFK not been assassinated, would his legacy be anywhere near as big as it is?

DXC: We axed 10k staff, shut nine data centres, closed 4.6m sq ft of office space... and sales tumbled, funnily enough

jelabarre59

Re: 40,000 people jobless in two years.

"I realise that’s pure speculation as I don’t have an MBA."

I'm sure DXE have some spare they could lend you.

Hell no; they're the first ones to destroy the company and the last ones to leave.

Fixes for Windows 10 arrive (for Insiders, soz) and covers are pulled from Edge for macOS

jelabarre59
Joke

Sure, MSW7...

Nu-Edge for older versions of Windows, however, remains missing in action for the time being, although a Windows 7 build, leaked from the increasingly sieve-like Edge team, has been doing the rounds.

What, no Linux build? I thought MS were all touchy-feely in love with Linux now? Don't wanna share the pain privilege with us as well?

Never let something so flimsy as a locked door to the computer room stand in the way of an auditor on the warpath

jelabarre59

Re: whether if they'd had their sidearms they could have shot the lock off instead

I'd have tried to go through the wall beside the door.

Secure door, good quality lock, 50:50 it's stud partition wall.

Kind of like where dad worked in the 70's. The gate, with a guard shack just inside (at least on the US side) had a nice, impressive tall chain-link fence with barbed wire along the top. The fence ran just as strong and impressively about 50-100 yards into the woods, and stopped. Nothing past that point. For that matter, the Long Trail ran right past the Engineering building (the trail terminated at the Candian border).

Facebook removes about as many fake accounts as it has actual monthly users (yes, billions) in effort to clean up online

jelabarre59

For instance, I've lost count of the number of times I've seen the exact same right-wing propaganda posted in forums.

Probably about as much as you've seen left-wing propoganda?

We listened to more than 3 hours of US Congress testimony on facial recognition so you didn't have to go through it

jelabarre59

Wanted or unwanted?

Amazon Rekognition incorrectly matched members of the US Congress to criminal mugshots,...

No, those were probably correct matches.

It’s simply absurd for elected politicians to be wanted criminals.

Well at least that's correct. Politicians are *UN-wanted* criminals.

Guess what shrinks when it gets cold and then you shake it around a little? The Moon. We're talking about the Moon

jelabarre59

Re: Fascinating stuff

The analysis goes well beyond photos. There were issues of buffering the transmission data to simulate the lag times (there simply wasn't the storage capacity/capability to do it). Transmissions from the Apollo 11 mission were being received by multiple people, not just Mission Control, so there would have to be actual transmissions of some sort, not just Mission Control saying they got it.

But, as is the case for your typical Lunar Deny-er, you focus on merely ONE aspect that you could make reasonable sounding explanations, and thinking if you debunk one item out of 100, you think you're proving something.

But hey, delusionals gotta delude.

jelabarre59

Re: Fascinating stuff

A successful hoax on that scale would probably be as difficult to accomplish as an actual moon landing, though in a different way.

Actually, I've seen an analysis of the hoax, and it determined it would have been significantly more difficult to fake the moon landing than to actually do it for real. Probably outright impossible to do. With the level of tech we have now, maybe we could do it (but it also would get exposed within the year, probably a month). But you have to consider the level of computer, etc tech we had then, and we simply didn't have the compute power and storage capacity for a hoax.

Wanted: Big iron geeks to help restore IBM 360 mainframe rescued from defunct German factory by other big iron geeks

jelabarre59

That picture of the red system, with the two tape drives, is so Joe 90.

But would it play cool Go-Go theme music when it spools the tapes??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d9QZFdW8uQ

jelabarre59
Mushroom

I would think hacking together something with a flatbed scanner and image recognition software would be what they're looking for.

Hey, I know what, Google could use the scanned punch cards for the next variation of their ReCaptcha....

Dedicated techie risks life and limb to locate office conference phone hiding under newspaper

jelabarre59

Also: Hmmm. Yes, I did receive your urgent SMS to my personal phone. However, it seems I forgot to take the phone off silent after the meeting yesterday, so I didn't notice it until just now.

No one at work *GETS* my personal cell number.

.

.

.

.

Not that anyone calls me anyway...

Tangled in .NET: Will 5.0 really unify Microsoft's development stack?

jelabarre59

Re: Jesus wept

What a mess. And why oh why did they use the name .NET Core for something that isn't the core of .NET?

Because *MARKETING*!!!

It's a recohnizable name (good or not) and it's easier to market under an illusionary "unified" product line. IBM has been notorious for it well before Microsoft did it (yet another thing Microsoft didn't originate).

Legal bombs fall on TurboTax maker Intuit for 'hiding' free service from search engines

jelabarre59

Boot track

I wouldn't have trusted TurboTax regardless, not after that debacle where their installer was writing DRM code to the computer's boot sector (and trashing various systems). And that is just what they got **CAUGHT** doing. Who knows what nasty work they've managed to cover up.

FCC promises, yet again, to tackle robocalls. Translation: Expect six more months of waiting

jelabarre59

Pai-ed off...

I guess his masters at Crapcast haven't given him his orders on what to do yet.

Upgrade refuseniks, beware: Adobe snips away legacy versions of its Creative Cloud apps

jelabarre59

Heck it should still be possible to install it on XP or Vista if you wanted

But can you run it under ReactOS?

jelabarre59

Re: To be fair to Adobe ....

I don't understand why people raise this argument. Anyone using an old version of software is well aware of this already and have decided that the "improvements" aren't enough to be worth upgrading.

Definitely. Not an Adobe product, but we're still using Quicken98 even now (under MSWin10 for my brother's system, Crossover Office for mine). There's been absolutely nothing in the later versions that ever encouraged me to upgrade. Heck, if it hadn't been for a quirk involving faxmodems on MSWin NT4, would probably still be on an even earlier version.

And if I really DID feel the need to "upgrade", there are two later versions available for free download from Intuit themselves. And since Intuit has decided you're only allowed to bring in existing files with the overpriced "Deluxe" version, we won't be upgrading to any of the "current" versions.

Techie with outdated documentation gets his step count in searching for non-existent cabinet

jelabarre59

Re: So it wasn't his job

Try that one with "WWW" ;)

I have heard a radio announcer who would humorously say it as a very fast "WuhWuhWuh" when giving out URLs on air.

Google puts Chrome on a cookie diet (which just so happens to starve its rivals, cough, cough...)

jelabarre59

Re: Looking forward to "the Facebook brwoser", "the Amazon browser" and friends

Word. FireFox is our only hope.

Shame its such a bitch to fork.

Firefox has had their head so deeply embedded up their ass as of late I don't hold out much hope for them Our best hope is alternate-browser projects like Waterfox and PaleMoon (the latter of which already has it's own raft of problems).

It would *REALLY* have been nice if Microsoft hadn't been so brain-dead stupid to decide to move Edge to a Chromium-base. Should have gone with a Mozilla/Gecko base, if for nothing else but to stick it to Google. A sad situation when you can't even rely on one evil warlord to adequately go to war with another. (And would really have liked MS' help in developing Thunderbird).

Eggheads confirm: Rampant Android bloatware a privacy and security hellscape

jelabarre59

Moto

I could see at least ONE vendor-specific app I'd want back.

On the older Motorola phones (like the Droid Razr HD) the phone was able to handle voice recognition for dialing from a BT headset completely on it's own, no special user accounts or mobile data needed. NOW in the current models (like the Moto e5) they decided to dump taht perfectly functional stand-alone app in exchange for "Google ASSistant", which requires you to set it up in full-on Hack-Me/Spy-On-Me/Screw-The-User Mode.

Granted, in a properly designed, completely open infrastructure, you'd be able to install the stand-alone app on your own anyway.

jelabarre59

chuckle, chortle, and other such amusements

"Google might be a prime candidate for it given its capacity for licensing vendors and its certification programs," the researchers note.

Man, I'd like to know what they were smoking/snorting when they came up with *THAT* observation...

Kind of like the proverbial fox guarding the proverbial henhouse...

jelabarre59

Re: I agree

Exactly. Barring such things as the "Secure" Boot function in many modern UEFI firmwares, you are allowed to install or not install exactly whatever software you want on machines you bought and paid for. Even with all the crap MSWin10 bundles in, there are workarounds that can excise much of that out. That's because, as *YOUR* device, you (or in the case of managed corporate assets, the IT department) automatically have root access available to you, without having to have a Papal Dispensation to do it.

It's completely unacceptable that cellphone makers can demand exaggerated prices for their crapware, and have the chutzpah to tell you you can't actually manage the systems as you see fit. I'd think a good solution would be to require cellphone manufacturers to provide unlock codes/software for ALL their devices, so we can re-flash them with alternatives like LineageOS. No having to say "mother may I" or groveling to get the codes, but rather available to any and all.