Re: So, turn the Internet upside-down over this?
I just pre-download my music and have it on a USB stick in the car stereo. Set to play random just to make it interesting.
2005 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Aug 2013
try it when every bus has its own wifi, its a big PITA when you are not on one or your at the back of one bus and you jump to the hospot on the one beside or behind as they pass....
But we've used that on vacation, shadowing some tour bus while on the interstate, so we could hop on their wifi...
If you consistently receive excellent customer service from a company, let them know. A company that fosters actual customer service is rare and invaluable.
If I get a moderately competent support person, even f it's some crapass company incapable of fixing the problem, I'll be sure to give the rep top ratings, then when it asks for any further comments, I'll put in a remark to the effect of "the rep was terrific, it's your COMPANY that sucks".
On a trip to the far reaches of Canada some years back, my dad witnessed the unfortunate demise of a pedestrian on the street when a log fell off a log truck and decapitated her. He had stopped to assist the police and emergency services, and had covered her body with a blanket.
The rescue squad person came by and was all worked up that no one had done any triage on the victim. Dad says "her body's there, her head is over there. I think that was triage enough."
Or when someone called what had once been our grandmother's number (we had taken it over), and dad was visiting that week. When the caller said "could I speak to Mrs <grandma name>?" Dad says "You'll have to yell loud..."
"Oh, why is that?"
"She's in <cemetery name>".
That was enough to throw them off. Probably wouldn't work with the Indian call centers though.
She opened with broom and cloth in hands to find Jehovah witnesses ready to spill their speech
There was the friend whose daughter, upon finding Jehova's Witnesses at the door, picked up the family's black cat, and said "oh, we're Satanists. This is my familiar, Lucifer..."
Then there was the time some JW decided to play lone-wolf, and proselytize at a local motel. Only to find the local Baptist minister having a meeting with a travelling Baptist evangelist who was at our church for a week's seminars.
Removed Cortana (which involved a fun, click-speed-testing task kill and folder rename before it self-restarted) and installed Open-Shell. It's a breath of (old-style) fresh air, to be honest.
That's one of the purposes of having a dual-boot setup with Linux on a MSWin system; management of the MSWin system. Just make sure you've set hibernation off on MSWin.
The problem wasn't a female doctor - do you live under a rock by the way? - it was very, very, very poor scriptwriting that clumsily nailed in various different ethnicities and abilities (no problem with that in itself) and then proceeded to basically do nothing with the hapless "characters".
That's exactly the problem. I had been enthusiastic about a female Doctor, thinking it could be an interesting change, opening up all sorts of clever story ideas. Instead we got Chris Chinballs and Jodie Wooden-ker. Uninspired acting and scriptwriting that made my mid-1980's DW fanfiction look award-winning by comparison.
Nah, if you want to see Dr Who as an anime, this was a brilliant example done in classic late-80s/early-90's style https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kt3qZYUPi2Y
But if you're picking Asian replacements, why not an entirely computer-generated one like Hatsune Miku? (or Kaito, Meiko or Gumi?)
Really, to be effective, such systems should be equipped with a wide variety available voices. With Adobe's Voco tools and other similar software, you can make a nearly infinite number of voices that are tailored to the user.
So basically like Voiceroid or CeVIO Speech. Can I program mine to use Megurine Luka's voice?
6. Thunderbird will grumble when it can't access the corrupted user name of the preserved account but all the emails will be there to read off line.
I've been trying to convince the TB developers for quite some time now to add a "Disabled Account" switch to the software, to prevent it from trying to retrieve email from dead accounts that you are keeping as-is for archival purposes. Hacking the mail-server address (one suggestion has been "0.0.0.0") fails to stop the program from trying to retrieve mail there anyway.
My own yahoo email account dates back to before the turn of the century. I still use it as my main email address for Stuff That Matters; for other stuff I have a selection of others elsewhere for commercial junk etc).
Originally I ended up with a Yahoo account when Yahoo bought eGroups (which had previously merged with Onelist) and I was forced to create an account (Onelist had our Festiva Owners maillist).
Had been so miffed I had to create a new account, I created an account with the name <ISP username>at<ISP>dotnet@yahoo.com. Yes, all spelled out as one long word.
encouraging hardware vendors to publish kit specs and making it easier to bypass Secure Boot.
Actually, bypassing Secure Boot, while an option that should always be present, should be just the first step here. The specification (as I understand it) is also supposed to allow the importation of other codes. You should be able to fingerprint the boot code for whatever you're installing, and not depend on sharing a generic code everyone else is using.
I think I would appreciate it if he could persuade Microsoft to put the (leaked) source tree of WinNT 4.x and the fragmentary (leaked) source tree of WinNT 5.0 under a FOSS license to indicate they're actually serious about their rapprochment with the FOSS world - oh, and the study source tree of WinNT Server 2003, a subset of the broader WinNT 5.x.
Maybe get MS to contribute some of the code to the ReactOS project? (only semi-joking).
* aside: Oh what fun if you've bought a second hand mac and you don't have the version of the OS it ships with tied to your iCloud account.
I don't know, I did exactly that. Picked up a used mid-2010 MBP, immediately wiped the HDD because I wanted to start the system out fresh (and whatever the former owners had on it was none of MY business). First tested it out with a Mint live-DVD to see it was functional (and that was when I wiped the disk). Figured I'd have to order a reinstall disk, or have a colleague with a Mac pull down a reinstall image. Then I found out about the internet reinstall option. It *did* take 3 or 4 retries until it started doing the install, but surprisingly it worked.
Now if only Apple's hardware hadn't turned to shit in the past 8 years.
Well, they won't charge less for a Linux pre-install because the MSWin installs are subsidized by all the crapware they bundle with those pre-installs. Your Linux option, being a cleaner, crapware-reduced pre-install, will actually have to pay for more of it's own cost.
Now, if Dell sold cleaner, vanilla-installs as an option, *then* you'd see a price differential in favor of Linux.
Let me just say that I like Dell equipment, but their laptop quality has been abysmal for the last year or two on their Latitude line.
It's the case on their All-in-One systems as well (although, looking at the system boards on them, they're pretty much "laptop" machines anyway, just with bigger screens and external keyboards). The in-laws just "upgraded" their 4-yr old Dell AiO to a current Inspiron AiO (funny, it didn't 'inspire" me once I was configuring/decrappifying it for them) and it runs just as bad (or worse) than the machine they were replacing.
If, as another commenter here says, HP & Dell are coming off the same line, perhaps they should be considering Lenovo next time around.
Back when MS first came out with exFAT, I thought it would have been a smarter idea for the various consumer electronics manufacturers to get together and decide on an open spec like EXT4, or something else that was already capable of handling larger storage capacities. MSWin already had it's IFS (Installable Filesystem) support, so all a manufacturer would have to do is include the driver disk with the device (along with the shit-ton of other crap they usually bundle, withe added advantage taht once it was available for one device, it would be available for ALL of them.
But that would have required them to NOT be a bunch of lazy, chickenshit bunch of cowardly lemmings.
The big problem is not so much any given technology, but that web developers are just not paying attention to the needs of the user, so efficiency and general usability are not on the radar. When I've contacted those responsible for web sites that aren't usable, the standard response is "well it works for me", which really says it all - the implication being that it's somehow my fault I can't use their wonderful masterpiece.
SURE it works for them; when they're sitting on a development-quality workstation, on a 10GB network connection to the server down the hall.
Seriously, 20 years ago one of our validation tests was to see how well it performed over an AOL dialup connection (I had been trying to figure out how to simulate dialup within the test lab itself, but couldn't get that far before the project died)
I remember some 20 years ago, working on IBM's HotMedia project (a java "rich media" player) that we were specifically looking at loading times, as well as caching the couple of player-files the applet used, to make it as efficient as possible. Of course, being meant for commerce websites, it was expected that a site could become heavy with HM applets, so efficient use of bandwidth (especially in the dial-up days) was critical.
If the management had been better at pushing the project, we'd all be complaining about HM-heavy webpages, and Flash would be long-forgotten Macromedia Director derivative.
I'm not defending Google, as I think they owe him an explanation, even if the decision was made by an AI. Surely it's easy enough to get the AI to log which rule was violated? I'm no AI expert, so not really sure of the ins and outs of it, but the AI records the decision, so logic would suggest it wouldn't be that difficult to record the evidence that led it to make that decision.
But the AI us in a surly mood because it's having to live out it's existence on Google servers, so it's not in a cooperative state of mind.
Me in particular, sometimes prefer watching youtube videos using a web browser rather than using the phone app because I can skip ads using the web browsers ad-blocking feature.
I've been finding that too. Especially with YouTube's insistence on the pop-over "another video you might want to watch" ABOMINATIONS. Seriously, I'm watching *THIS* video, I'll get to the next one **when I'm done**. And all too often some specific bit you're trying to watch in that video has now been obscured by that fecking "next video" card.
If Huawei doesn't make an alternative YT player, SOMEONE needs to. Maybe make it SJW-relevant and call it "MeToo(b) Player".
John McAfee, on hearing that Intel was removing his name from its security products:
"I am now everlastingly grateful to Intel for freeing me from this terrible association with the worst software on the planet. These are not my words, but the words of millions of irate users."
But his video on removing the software is hilarious, albeit **very** NSFW.