Rebase = "move a bunch of commits to start at another base commit"
The name is fully descriptive if you think of it as a Christmas tree: change the base of the tree, re-base...
33 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Aug 2013
You can run DoH over a VPN... or just plain old DNS over a VPN for a similar effect.
In any case you need to trust someone, be it your ISP (*cough* don't *cough*), your VPN provider (hm, maybe), your DoH endpoint provider (hm), the website, and so on. If you want real privacy though, at some point you'll be better just using Tor, I2P or similar.
Typewriters and photocopiers have never stopped spies. Encrypted phones on the other hand, have proven to be a tougher nut to crack. Even these supply chain attacks aren't as easy as passing by and taking a photo.
Security conscious pedos don't need to let malware in, it's just media content after all... but then again, you probably won't catch someone who's security conscious, so you're probably right that if you catch them, then they probably got tons of malware too.
This is a funny one. While "dehydrated pure/distilled water" is nothing, that's true... we also barely use pure water (distilled, without salts or minerals) for anything, the overwhelming majority osñf uses we have for water require some salt/mineral content, so "dehydrated water" (the salts/minerals) are actually something valuable.
I think right now the only online services unavailable over IPv4 are P2P nodes of people on IPv4+IPv6 who didn't care to open ports on their routers. We might actually see P2P services driving IPv6 adoption!
Other than that I've only seen some servers on just IPv6, but only internal ones, there's always some IPv4 gateway in front of them for the public.
It won't stop bots, all it stops is passwords going through the clipboard.
Arguably, having any password touch the clipboard is not safe, and you should rather use a password manager that can integrate with your browser, but the alternative of having people come up with easy passwords to type is even worse.
Security is about making it difficult for unauthorized people to gain access. This means any scheme that's too easy, will also be insecure. We've come to a point where we can use schemes that are much more difficult to an attacker than to a legitimate user, but they can only increase de difficulty by so much, so the requirement of complication is still unavoidable.
There is just no way to turn "1234" into a secure password.
That is not correct.
Anti blockers work by checking whether the user has seen some ad or received some file, effectively retrieving the information stored in the user's cache about whether that file has been downloaded or not.
This is, they store and retrieve information on the user's computer without the user's prior consent.
On a system with a password, if anyone was to change that password in order to gain access, the next time I was going to use my password it wouldn't work, and I would be instantly alerted to a security breach.
With an e-mail token, someone could gain access to me e-mail, in whatever manner, and I might never notice.
I call it a pretty bad idea.
Ok, so... I WANT THOSE SCRIPTS. Won't read them until after the episodes have aired, but I WANT THEM.
As for anyone else, I don't see why would a non-fan want them, if they don't like Dr. Who in the first place. Spoiling the series? You can't, I won't believe anything you say anyway, so how would you do that.
So as I see it, fans won't read them, non-fans will only spoil themselves (which is irrelevant), and nothing is lost any way.
I don't comment in order to get upvotes, but still... when I check for replies, I feel better if I see upvotes, than if I see downvtes, or even no upvotes. And that's just from people I don't know, not my "friends".
I guess people who actually "look for validation" through their friends' upvotes, would end up feeling pretty bad in no time.