Nick Read of Vodafone
Good to hear there's pushback from someone in the industry. Mr Read might have a lot more clout than the Reg peanut gallery!
2841 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jan 2007
I think I'd've gone for a halfway house.
Admit, "sorry, yes, we got a bit carried away". But point out that this was about morale: having a bit of a laugh being an antidote to tedium and depression. And that, as you say, noone knew it had any consequence.
Not that I'd've gone sweary in the first place. My imagination would more likely have veered off into nature or literature or fantasy worlds for inspiration.
I see a hint of a shadow: on the fake woman's neck, and on the fake chap the right side is darker. Bear in mind that clear shadows come from sunlight or powerful artificial light, and won't exist in many perfectly-real photos.
The fake woman at the top seemed obvious to me. The mix of mostly-young features with a definitely-old crowsfoot by the eye. But the fake chap, with no pretensions to be either young or old, has no such easy giveaway - to my eye, at least.
Around 1991 our sparcstations were particularly loquacious, powered by pranks like
cat very-silly-fragment.wav > remote:/dev/audio
By the mid-90s that was all gone, as remote sounds were disabled by default, along with opening applications on a remote machine's display.
I wouldn't be too sure.
If he can provoke the Democrats into putting up another unelectable candidate and campaigning on Identity Politics, he could be looking to reelection as a lesser of two evils. You get strange effects when you have two lead candidates (or parties) who are both unspeakably awful, as witness Blighty 2017 when both parties got increased votes as people were more desperate than ever to keep the other one out.
When you declare a National Emergency, you do not go and play golf the very next day. The act is not on par with the words.
An honourable tradition. Fiddling while Rome burns. Sometimes used by history's winners:
"With a hey nonny no on Plymouth Hoe, in the merry merry month of May, Turelay!
Pardon me Sir Francis, but I think you ought to know,
the Armada has been sighted while you're bowling on the Hoe."
The 'bias' is simply the difference between today's prejudices and norms vs those of recent history. That is to say, those years whose data are used for training.
To see such data as biased is to accept (consciously or otherwise) the values of a pressure group lobbying (rightly or wrongly, or most likely both) for social change.
Was that addressed to me? Institutionally autistic is a play on the phrase "institutionally racist", which entered the language here in Blighty after a high-profile report used the phrase to describe London's police. And a 600-page book - in a context that indicates it's one of many - suggests a staggering lack of empathy for the poor buggers expected to abide by the contents.
We can't share intelligence with you. Just take our word. We have a dossier showing incontrovertible proof of Iraq^Hn's WMD and evil plans, and you have to join us in yet further destabilising an ever-growing region.
Though to be fair, the dodgy dossier itself was a British contribution to f***ing up the middle-east and the Moslem world more widely. I wonder what Great Cause Richard Dearlove ("Mr Dodgy Dossier") might be championing today?
Like the time I had a conference presentation to give, only to find that my laptop was incompatible with the conference's OHP? I actually tried very hard to test that in advance (and fix as necessary), but was thwarted by the perfectly legitimate claims of earlier speakers from the moment the room was opened.
After that I took to uploading material to the 'net[1] ahead of time for maximal alternative access methods.
[1] The term "cloud" wasn't yet in use. Can't remember how widely-available wifi was at the time.
The time it takes you to load a webpage is not necessarily down to the speed of your 'net connection.
My 'net connection has been 4G for the past year, and it's a huge improvement on Virgin cable (which was fine when it worked, but all-too-often didn't). I'm not looking for more speed, but if 5G improves other things (I understand capacity is a core objective), that sounds like a good reason for it.
There was a story floating around in the 1970s about a consignment of luminous watches that was due to be disposed of at Windscale/Sellafield, before someone pointed out that the radiation levels were higher than they could legally handle. They had to be sent to Aldermaston instead.
Around that time my schoolboy self inherited a luminous watch from my grandfather. On dark nights, it could be the brightest thing around, and occasionally served as a torch on the country lanes where for a mad year or two I used to jog.
Have you read the actual Amazon figures? I haven't: I've only read the story here.
El Reg clearly call the number a profit. The one use of the words "net income" is very loose, and I wouldn't read anything into it unless I had some external reason to suppose it was not in fact a profit as reported.
As for investing sufficient to avoid tax, I've done that myself for quite a few years. Not on Amazon's scale of course, but I've had some big tax rebates (the biggest in five figures UK£) and my tax-free dividend income roughly speaking pays the rent.
I'm not an accountant, but I thought I had some idea of the definition of profit. Isn't it basically the difference between income and expenditure? The latter includes investment, so a reported profit of $11.2bn would be after accounting for investment.
Who is being misleading here?
... not to mention the kneejerk reaction seen here that Amazon should be funding Trump.
What the tax-efficient multinationals have shown is that corporation tax is not fit for purpose. Governments are making noise about it and discussing idiocies, but at the same time they're also (more quietly) Doing Something. Here in Blighty that's taken the form of reducing corporation tax while introducing new taxes on dividends instead. Time will tell how that turns out.
Seems to me that what is at issue here is that the liberal elite are getting all huffed up that somebody other than their political organisations might be able to influence.
Agreed, this is democratisation they're worrying about. Echoes of the Establishment reaction to Gutenberg, and many other historic events.
But I'm not convinced by your describing the likes of Rupert Murdoch as a "Liberal" elite!
Must've been a cray for help?
Sorry. Like other commentards, I'm sure I've read this story at on-call (or maybe who-me) too recently before. Mine's the one with ... oh, they all are.
Edit to add: Here's a much more dramatic rendition.
Bugs can lurk.
But would you try to slip something deliberate in to an open codebase where every commit goes out immediately to a bunch of active developers, as well as of course being on public display to security researchers and AI tools? That's an altogether different proposition!
Compare the amount of (hostile) scrutiny Huawei is getting to any of its rivals, and tell us which is the safer bet?
With (say) Cisco, you have all the same risks as Huawei, plus the additional risk that someone is smuggling in a backdoor (NSA made them an offer they can't refuse) invisible to anyone outside a small team within the company. That makes the hurdles to finding it thousands of times higher: you need a Snowden instead.
Evidence previously reported on El Reg tells us at least two existing-or-former HP directors were among those to say the deal was mad and vastly overpriced.
As did others, like Oracle.
I think I said at the time, this looks like an ill-judged MeToo from HP, trying to play with IBM and Oracle (who had recently acquired hardware capability in the form of Sun) in high-end enterprise stuff.
Who decides what is 'terrorist' ...
Well, if they view the material to make that decision, then they won't want to incriminate themselves. So they'll have to make it in complete ignorance.
Unless we outsource it outside plod's jurisdiction? Have Kim Jong Trump's minions decide?
Terrorist organisation? Sounds more like a 14-year-old who doesn't get out enough.
But why a browser hijack? A simple spam run would catch loads of users whose mailers make it a faff to delete messages unread. I wonder if companies like Apple might be indicted as accomplices in that?
Indeed, but being cut off from (one imagines) a big part of the team would surely hurt. They'd no doubt make ruexit provisions - probably without even the kind of fiasco we've seen with non-ferry-companies or lorry parks - but that might not be how a sufficiently-bitter divorcee thinks about it.
Other Russian-centred projects - like nginx - are of course heavily reliant on connectivity, as much as Russian users of worldwide stuff.
Is the lady in charge still on speaking terms with her ex, or does she utterly loathe him?
We need to know whether anything she does might be motivated by revenge there! Disconnecting would of course do huge damage to Russian companies whose legitimate business has an online component.
What purpose does a week count actually serve in computing a position? I'm old enough to remember pre-GPS times[1], and we already had 32-bit timestamps. Is that final week purely coincidental with other silly traditions and tragically stupid one-off events, or might this be made a scapegoat for something?
[1] In fact I even spent some time in the 1980s working on a pre-GPS tracking and positioning system for vehicles, where fitting the entire onboard software into a 128k ROM was one of the issues we had to deal with.
By assaulting a sales office when support is bad, you are punishing the wrong people.
Up to a point, Lord Copper.
You're also putting pressure on the company, by what may be the only means available to you. Especially when a company has gone to great lengths to make it impossible to contact support.
You may have a point. But noone forces you to use windoze 10: indeed, I haven't used any windoze since about 2000.
What I meant with Utterly Evil was their actions that blighted the 'net as a whole, not just their own users. As in, breaking MIME, thus releasing the first wave of email viruses (Melissa, Lovebug) on their own users, but also breaking standards-compliant systems and stifling innovation on the 'net.
One casualty of that was my own web-based office software (think google docs for the idea), that relied on MIME standards and broke in MSIE. Mail-by-web where MSIE would do its own random thing with attachments, and miscellaneous documents that MSIE might try to load in $random-app.