Re: Are you ok?
I'm both old enough and mildly-dyslexic-enough to have called it Lunix until about 1996, when the only other person I knew who messed around with Slackware kindly pointed out my mistake. I'm such a newb....
2027 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2013
I don't see hybrid as a transitional architecture for the consumer (most plug-in hybrids have limited range, so are either hauling the ICE around short distances, or running longer distances largely on the ICE and hauling surplus battery).
I do see it as a transitional architecture for the manufacturer though. But not one I care to support. Went full EV myself three months ago and despite a few bouts of rotten weather (which naysayers wrongly say EVs can't handle) I would not go back.
Too many corporate comms teams have the "important thing here is we don't want to say anything and ever have to walk it back" mindset.
The important thing is to be truthful, with the facts that you have to hand. And be honest about any ambiguity. And when you say something that later turns out to be wrong, own it, admit to it, and do better next time.
Well I think you are entitled to your opinion, but:
- DeLorean sold far fewer cars
- DeLorean was (allegedly) fitted up for selling drugs, Musk actually does them ... and then issues investment advice
- DeLorean managed to part Mrs Thatcher from tax-payer's money. Musk managed to re-unite Mr Trump with Twitter, and has lost a shed load of money (on paper)
But as a pair of hubristic airbags, perhaps the comparison isn't too far from the truth :-)
UK would have been buying our fossil fuels from abroad regardless of having renewables, because overseas suppliers were historically cheaper (it's cheaper to tear up desert or virgin steppe than plumb the depths of the North Sea). The fact that contracts were signed to buy renewables regardless of market cost doesn't invalidate the technology's value, it just shows a lack of foresight in contract drafting.
If you are determined to paint renewables as the bogeyman of energy cost security, I'll leave you to it.
As somebody whose early career was spent as much troubleshooting printers as any actual coding or systems configuration, I welcome the demise of the damned things.
The only consolation of myriad printer problems is it took me into the reception office, where Christine - who had finished Uni the same year as me - distracted one from the unremitting hell of the HP Laserjet and WordPerfect 5.2
"diesel generators are quite compact, very cheap, well understood, generally reliable"
Yeah, about that ... the few times when the poo has really hit the fan in my career have been when those generally reliable gennys decide to not be reliable, and not so well understood. And the operators haven't understood the cutover/cutback procedures sufficiently well. Wrecked weekends, whole nights of lost sleep
Let me try an experiment:
"The proper role of government is just to guard the coastlines, and let UPS deliver the mail"
Now, if that get's censored I will have proven what a hot-bed of leftist sentiment El Reg is. On the other hand, I suspect it won't because it's a perfectly reasonable piece of discourse representing a generally right wing view point.
Or how about:
"Probably it is true enough that the great majority are rarely capable of thinking independently, that on most questions they accept views which they find ready-made, and that they will be equally content if born or coaxed into one set of beliefs or another. In any society freedom of thought will probably be of direct significance only for a small minority. But this does not mean that anyone is competent, or ought to have power, to select those to whom this freedom is to be reserved. It certainly does not justify the presumption of any group of people to claim the right to determine what people ought to think or believe" - F A Hayek
MyffyW - independent lefty
The rationale for not giving this money to warehouse workers would seem to be that they would merely waste it on planet-destroying luxuries rather than the fine things Jeff would save.
I was tempted to come up with my own invective, but George Orwell got it:
"The damned impertinence of these politicians, priests, literary men, and what not who lecture the working-class man for his ‘materialism’! All that the working man demands is what these others would consider the indispensable minimum without which human life cannot be lived at all. Enough to eat, freedom from the haunting terror of unemployment, the knowledge that your children will get a fair chance, a bath once a day, clean linen reasonably often, a roof that doesn’t leak, and short enough working hours to leave you with a little energy when the day is done. Not one of those who preach against ‘materialism’ would consider life livable without these things. And how easily that minimum could be attained if we chose to set our minds to it for only twenty years!"
The Conservative Party have been the governing party of Britain for the greater part of the last century:
During this period the country has fallen in stature, both comparative and absolute, by virtually every criterion of measurement which can be applied
- Sleeve notes to Alan Clark's The Tories