So ...
If my router is leased from my ISP, it's not my property and my ISP is liable?
714 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jul 2007
This is going to be a good product ... in a few years. We went to get another (er ... is it compulsory to use 'fondleslab' here?) because the single iPad in the house had two people constantly trying to use it.
I really wanted to get a Xoom. It looks good, its more programmable and the screen is very responsive. But ... websites looked hellish on it, and one third of the apps we tried crashed - and that was on a store demo model.
Guess what we went home with - having got it at a lower price?
Were these just bundled in to make the thing more comprehensive? Let's say I have a wifi-only iPad (as in fact I do). When this has no connection, I really doubt anything is tracking it. A couple of apps have asked if they can use location and been told no.
So perhaps it depends on which iPad you have. I'm more worried about my car's GPS. I'm SURE that thing is tracking my movements.
As long as the darn thing shows facebook and porn, its not like the average user gives a flying fork about what code the browser is running.
For the vast majority 'optimized to run native HTML5' is simply marketing babble, like those shampoo adverts that claim 80% more shiny hair with new added shinerine molecules.
Anyone who actually understands what HTML5 even means is probably competent enough to judge Microsoft's implementation on its own merits (and I suspect probably doesn't run IE anyway.)
So what's this debate about?
Oh, it was very much in the public interest to prosecute - if we define 'public' as the ordinary people who live in the UK.
If we define 'public' as those public institutions that are very interested in intercepting the communications of ordinary citizens, and for whom a prosecution would have a pronounced chilling effect, then yes, the prosecution is definitely not in their interest.
Given that the CPS is naturally aligned with such institutions, their definition of 'public' comes as no surprise.
*So my text looks like this.
I gave in and got a keyboard for my iPad. Yes, that makes it more like a netbook, even if it is a netbook where you can type with the screen six feet away. However, you only take the keyboard along when you are going to need it - as I did recently for an online chat session with work colleagues while I was out of the office.
But Google docs has issues with the iPad, because every time it saves, it puts my cursor back to the top of the screen and my text goes on from there.*
I'm using notes now, but will look at some of the apps mentioned here. Thanks guys!
Has saved my sorry ass more than once.
Tape is not just for big outfits like Google. If you have not done so already, back your system onto tape and store it off-premises in a fireproof safe.
The thing about last-ditch backups is that you don't need them until you really, really need them. Back up, folks. Do it now.
Okay, Mr/Ms Anonymous Coward, I accuse you also of rape. Now you too can forever more describe yourself as 'an accused rapist'.
The best you could accurately do is 'I am subject - to having an allegation made, case dismissed then reconsidered, being allowed to leave the country and then being ordered back after all to answer more questions -that I am ...'
So nope, you ain't fixed nothin'
'Admit it. It's basically a chic games console. One third of all apps downloaded and almost all the top paid apps are games.'
So two-thirds of the apps downloaded are not games. And that's the best stat you have to support your argument? Or was it merely a rant?
My part of the world gets snowy and has webcams showing real-time road conditions. I can turn on the iPad, look at the situation five km down the road and be well on the way there while your laptop is still 'loading your personal profile'. (iPad goes from 'off' to 'web page loaded' in 20sec.)
And that's just one example of the iPad for everyday convenience. I could add half a dozen more examples but why should I bother trying to talk sense to you?
A lawyer I know remarked that - for the police - a perfect legislative system would be one in which every citizen was in violation of the law at any time. That way, rather than investigate crimes, they could simply pick up the guys they 'know' are guilty and charge them with breaking the same laws that the rest of the population are breaking.
And that is the dirty bargain the British public and parliament have made with the cops . 'Make it possible for anyone to be charged with child porn. That way, no perv will escape (And don't worry Sir, that you might be guilty under the same laws. We would never charge a law-abiding citizen like YOU.)'
'While we are at it, let's make almost anyone guilty of terrorism, because we will only actually go after people with swarthy skins and religious beliefs we don't like. (Not for example, people walking on a bicycle path, or heckling the Prime Minister, oh, no.)'
I don't think it's a co-incidence that so many people accused (and acquitted) of terrorism end up on sex charges. Basically, if the authorities have it in for you the law in these two areas is broad enough to get almost ANYONE for one or the other if the charges are applied creatively enough.
Look at Caravaggio's 'Love Triumphant'.
It's been considered a great work of art for hundreds of years. By today's standards, just viewing the pic over the internet should be good for about three years at Her Majesty's pleasure.
Of course, we could go back and retrofit all such pictures with fig leaves. It's a tried and trusted technique.
Actually, 'back shelf pokes' as you so colourfully describe them were legalized in 1969 - about the same time as in your native Illinois. (I note that a whole swathe of the southern USA caught up in 2003). So, no, that was not Canada.
And as far as goes my rather limited knowledge of kink play in the land of the maple leaf, I think the general rule here is that it's okay so long as it does not frighten the horses. So if you are going to select random examples, you might as well choose ones that make your point.
I'll take that beer though, and here's one to console you for when the Blackhawks don't make the play-offs!
"It is very difficult to legislate against what consenting adults might get up to behind closed doors.
OK. Canada and Wyoming try ..."
Why bring Canada into this? As far as I know Canada did not introduce the extreme porn law (without defining exactly what extreme porn is) or the concept of strict liability for possession of other types of porn. And isn't urinating in public in the UK enough to get you on the sex offenders list?
What happened? Did you get caught with a suitcase full of porn mags at Canada/ US customs?
Have part 1 on a post-it note next to your monitor. A list with alphanumeric code and the name of the applicable site. something like 2Hc5i = ebay.
Then add half of old car number plate (or an old postcode, or a chunk of a memorable phone number or whatever). Keep this part in your head.
And finish with a common ending such as x1X, also memorized.
The post-it part is vulnerable only to those physically on site. Someone with physical access to your comp still needs to guess your other details - and even someone who knows you intimately would have trouble with the last three digits.
So an eBay password would be 2Hc5ihe5x1X , and although the corresponding amazon account would have the same he5x1X suffix, a hacker would have to work hard on the unique prefix.
the details of the 'hack' don't make sense.
'Krebs set up a free account on the site, details of which Russo was able to recite back to him'
-umm which details exactly? Presumably not the details which were available to anyone browsing the site looking for information put up expressly for that purpose?
So are we talking banking details? Presumably not, as this was a free account. Email? Home address? Or was it possible to pwn the acct - and if it was, why not say so?
I guess I could follow up the links and find out, but isn't that kinda what the reporter of this story should have done?
If you think that 'hiding' in a university is any way to avoid redundancy then you have not looked at the UK academic job market lately.
The amount of slash-and-burn going on there is hair-raising. And since the average "professor" is usually on a short-term contract, having to re-apply for your job every three years or so is standard. So you are right - most academics don't face the same risks as the average employee. Their risks are so much higher.
And, if you are a specialist in a very technical market, its not as though there are as many jobs out there as there are for, say taxi-drivers, (which is what some academics have become).
Do try getting a job at a university before you mouth off about it. And here's a hint - learn to spell 'destruction' first.
...did the grandchildren of the people who fought in WWII end up as a generation of such abject cowards?
It's not the jobsworths at Gatwick who are to blame here - nor the politicians who passed the damn stupid laws in the first place.
It's the people who elected them. Our generation's unofficial motto is 'prove it is not dangerous' - even if its a 3" plastic rifle.
Hand grenade - to draw attention to the Reg's blatant and probably illegal incitement to violence by allowing the use of this icon.
>>"We live and work in a city that has been tragically marked as a favorite terrorist target..."
That'd be once, then. Not exactly a regular, favourite target by any stretch of the imagination.<<
Since the first attempt to destroy the WTC failed (car bombs in the basement) that would be twice at least.
And there I was thinking that Troy does still exist, albeit as a heap of ruins on the shores of Asia Minor. Pompeii is probably a delusion as well.
But surely Trojans are an orbital point in astronomy, or am I thinking of a US basketball team? It's surely not the wooden horse, because that was made by Greeks (well, Achaeans since we are being pedantic) and filled with Greeks.
However as the Trojans did not say at the time, timeo Danaos et dona ferentes. Don't these Chinese read Virgil?
The CIA has to operate within the law, but that's no help if the government gets all elastic about it. After all if the British government could redefine Iceland as a terrorist organization in order to freeze their bank assets (they did, really, look it up) then defining Assange as a terrorist ought to be a doddle.
And torture is out of the question, though the US government redefined waterboarding as not torture, even though they themselves imprisoned Japanese for doing this during the second world war. So all they need to do is make it legal to apply the 'manual digit reshaping devices' (formerly known as thumbscrews) and 'readjust Assange's height specifications' (put him on the rack), and bingo, all is done within the law.
Or of course, the US govt could do as they did with Al Capone, and pass a law effective retroactively, which makes it a crime to have done something which was legal at the time.
But of course, this is as improbable as the Swedish government redefining the meaning of rape in order to get Assange extradited in the first place.
Isn't it?
By the end of 2010 everything patentable or conceivable will have been patented. By 2030 or thereabouts, nothing will be patentable as all the current patents will have expired, and since those patents were so broad they covered EVERYTHING, the patent system will finally die an unlamented death.
(Dying, the act of popping one's clogs, was patented by me in 2010 so before you go to the great Sysadmin in the sky, don't forget to pass me my royalties.)
' They demonstrate an a (sic) fearsome addiction to money and attempt to create alternate realities and economic models which almost always eventually collapse or are simply reset and allowed to collapse again once the current disaster is a long distant memory...'
Oddly enough, that pretty much sums up the last Labour government.
On a five day overseas trip last month, I used email to keep up to date with work, I watched my usual TV programmes, and a movie on the airport bus. I read my normal newspapers and listened to my usual radio stations. I talked once or twice a day with the family on Skype. I read two books and bought one more.
I found where I needed to go with google maps, and checked I was at the right place on streetview. Changing planes on the way home, I played a game of Civ. All the while I kept an eye on our web server, and though I didn't need it, I had ssh set up for emergencies.
And I used nothing but the iPad for all the above. It's small and light enough to just slip into my luggage. A few years back, the kit I needed to do all the above WAS my luggage. The iPad doesn't let you do anything new. It just makes doing it easy, hassle-free - and expensive. It is a very Apple product.
If you need it, it's wonderful. If you don't need it, don't get it.
Does the Reg keep calling this a 'fondle slab'?
Excuse my Kryten-like literal-mindedness, but why should one fondle an iPad more than a laptop or mobile phone? You hold it and tap it, and if this is what Reg writers consider fondling, then perhaps they do indeed lead geeky solitary lives.
Perhaps the government should leverage the financial value of the early adopter database to defray some of the costs of this white elephant?
I mean these early adopters are people with a proven tendency to accept information at face value. Think how much certain types on the net would pay for their details. There would be a boom in seaside property in Oxfordshire purchased with the money from Nigerian dictator's widows.
Meanwhile we - the public - managed to pay £41,000,000 for 'developing the policy legislation and business case' (a case which anyway failed in every respect).
We've all been mugus.
"However, some companies have chosen to ignore our requests for good faith negotiations and discussions."
Rather as a bank might ignore the good faith negotiations of the men with crowbars and balaclavas who are 'requesting' access to the vaults.
Just because one is being blatant in trying to extort money does not mean there is any 'good faith' involved.
That this discovery doesn't show that extra-terrestrial life exists, but it increases the probability. Just a few decades back we didn't even know if other stars had planets (which most species would consider kind of a basic starting point.)
Now we know planets are ten a penny, and that life can exist in anaerobic environments. If life can also develop in different ways -e.g. using arsenic instead of phos. then it may be able to develop on non-earthlike planets.
None of this does more than increase the probability that we are not alone, but this discovery has significantly increased that probability, so IMHO it's important.
For about the last decade the internet has been an unrestricted all-the-porn-you-can-take buffet.
The evidence of whether the world is collapsing into moral depravity (well, collapsing faster than usual) should by now be pretty clear.
Have sex-crimes gone up dramatically? Teenage pregnancies? I'm cynical enough to believe that if there was any er, hard evidence that porn on the internet was seriously, or even noticeably damaging society, the dear old Daily Mail would have let us know.
OTOH, maybe some frustrated individuals can now blow off steam in front of a computer instead of pestering real-life humans.
Just a thought.