The talk sounds great...
let's see what the delivery is like.
714 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jul 2007
Every wireless-enabled computer I have ever used reports to me what networks are in range and whether they are secured or not. I'm assuming that the routers recorded by Google were broadcasting their SSIDs, and broadcasting by definition means you will be heard.
Again, if you use an open, unencrypted wifi system, then you are broadcasting information to anyone who is listening. It's like having a conversation with the windows open, and then complaining that people in the street can hear you.(My netbook originally had a distressing preference for logging into the open network two houses away.)
Not sure what Google was recording this information, and agree it is creepy, but it's nothing but collating information which is not only freely available, but actively pushed on to listening computers.
According to this story, she was acquitted. But the rest of the tale is pretty hair-raising; and it makes you wonder what happens to people who can't afford expensive outside experts.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a_mZ01OHBDM8&refer=uk-redirectoldpage
There was another case (reported in the Reg a few years back) of a US man whose fingerprint hash matched that of a former felon,and he was jailed for having a gun in his car (which was legal for a non-felon). Because aforesaid felon was out on parole, this innocent guy was sent to prison to serve the rest of this felon's sentence.
And because he was being sent 'back' to prison, he did not even get a trial. It all took some sorting out afterwards.
Something of a fail for 'nothing to hide nothing to fear'.
There's a proverb that every country gets the government - and by extension the police force - it deserves. Not always true, but in the UK the people voted in the government that passed these laws, and came remarkably close to endorsing that government in the recent election.
So when the democratic will of the people is that they want to live in something fast approaching a police state/surveillance society, that's what the people get. Fact is, until the public in general come to understand that giving up their rights does not make them safer, it will keep happening.
(For the protection of our children, obviously)
As we and our families go through these screens, none of the airport staff will be keeping up a running commentary on any physical defects - or attributes - they see.
No sir, they will all be too busy stopping terrorists.
Or is having to parade your 16-year-old daughter's body in front of this sniggering gang part of the price of going on a foreign holiday?
Any organization that puts all its eggs into one basket like that is indeed run by a bunch of incompetents. What if the guy had a heart attack or got run over by a bus?
My last organization had an IT handover process (which we called a 'digital will') whereby you had to have a file (locked in a fireproof safe) detailing who was to do what if you should unexpectedly become unavailable, and how each person should obtain the necessary permissions.
(And like a good sysadmin I also made sure I had my own backdoor installed, should I need to intervene directly after I left the organization ...)
So Google is using its profits to subsidize other areas of its business?
I've just planned a road trip using Google earth, and carefully viewed all the essential intersections on streetview. Also with streetview/google earth I know what the streets around my hotels look like, and where I fancy dining in the evening.
If this free app was paid for by profits from advertising, good for Google.
Hand grenade. Consumer Watchdog can Google 'fanatical Islamic assassin' for instructions where to shove it.
Spam will be around as long as there are idiots who respond to it. And while the world will never want for idiots, the numbers of the simply naive or inexperienced are diminishing daily as people generally become more internet savvy. Also spam filters are getting better (I hardly ever see spam in my gmail inbox these days).
So while spam will never go away, I suspect the effort-to-reward ratio is increasing. Even MS is making it harder for computers to be pwned into botnets in the first place.
(I'm optimistic today - it must be spring)
Surely the school board made these kids - or their parents - sign something before handing over the comp. Even if just a receipt.
So did the Terms of Service say something like 'In signing this I acknowledge that authorized officials may, at their discretion, activate features or intercept communications on this device.'
If so it may go a long way towards getting the school off the hook. Not that this would make its actions any less contemptible or inexcusable.
If going for an out-and-out flying car is too ambitious, how about an APC with 'hop' capability? Driving in an operational area (apart from diversions such as IEDs) often means detouring 150km because a bridge is out, or driving parallel to where you want to go because of a drainage ditch or wall in the way.
Make something that can hop a standard humvee 100m forward, and/or 100m up (or any combination thereof) and you'll become the patron saint of soldiers in low-intensity wars everywhere.
'They will change the guidance to give people on the DNA database who have been wrongly accused of a minor crime an automatic right to have their DNA withdrawn.'
And if you are wrongly accused of a major crime? Does the automatic right to have your DNA withdrawn already exist, or do you stay on the record?
... did you read it?
Those 'poor unfortunates' don't have to buy win7 - they have to install the latest service pack, which costs nothing apart from the time and bandwidth involved in downloading it.
To return to your analogy, it is more like a car company saying 'You have not changed the tires or serviced this car since you purchased it - you can carry on driving but we want nothing to do with it.'
There's nowt wrong with XP. It's a very stable OS (takes about a decade of fiddling with it for MS to achieve that), and it doesn't have to regularly report to its owner (MS) what the person who has installed it is doing.
It also helps that after a decade or so I too know the OS pretty intimately, and can generally persuade it to do things my way. What bugs me about later windows version is that they are dumbed-down for dummies and nanny users who don't need it.
If I had to, I'd switch to Ubuntu if my games would still run.
It's about government taking control of the internet. The fact that there is such a large and dynamic development doing things for human productivity without government oversight cannot be allowed to continue.
It must be regulated, licensed and taxed. We need a Ministry of internet affairs, and users should buy their IP numbers from the government as they get car number plates today. Then there should be an annual tax on internet users to pay for the effort of keeping netizens safe from porn and terrorism, which should be raised by at least ten percent a year over inflation.
This was always going to happen, but it was nice for a while whilst it didn't. The filters are step one. The rest is coming.
Every time the climate debate, er, heats up, people throw pollution, lifestyles and SUVs into the debate. And there seems to be an assumption that if it can be proven the climate is warming up - that has become more iffy recently - then humans are to blame. But
Global Warming != Anthropocentric Global Warming (It might be the sun. Has anyone correlated temperature rises on Earth with surface temperatures on the moon and Mars?)
The current argument runs 'the earth is heating up, cut carbon emissions'. Given that Dr Jones & co have made rather a hash of the first assumption, I'm not looking for definitive proof any time soon that humans in general and carbon in particular are responsible.
In the interest of research, I popped over to the Cosmopolitan website to see this month's magazine offerings.
The Cosmo bachelor search, sexy beauty secrets and bedroom blog are well featured. Sex position of the week is apparently 'Magic mountain' which er ... bangs on about 'the mischievous thrill of doing it doggy style'. With pic, for those ladies unable to grasp the concept.
This is of course about modern women becoming confident with their own sexuality. Nothing like that revolting porn consumed by human animals with testicles.
In the USA according to
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/004772.html
150 million hotdogs are consumed in the USA on the fourth of July, let alone the total over the year. Even assuming just one in ten hotdogs are eaten by kids, the consumption to choking ratio should be getting the product a design safety award.
Odd, isn't it? The politically correct word to describe negroid people today is 'black'. (Though 'brown' is more accurate.) The Latin for 'black' is 'niger' (literally: black, dark, swarthy') , and this is where the dreaded N-word comes from.
So it's correct to call a race by the English word, but political dynamite to use the Latin. Perhaps it's the mis-spelling that makes it so offensive?
Starting with a disclaimer - I'm a writer, and I rather enjoy eating and having a roof over my head, so I'm watching this whole ebook thing closely.
I know that publishers have their backs to the wall financially at the moment, and that amazon has played its part in this. (Have you noticed a decline in the number of High Street booksellers recently?) At present ebooks are not that much cheaper to produce than paperbacks, because distribution is only a fraction of the overall cost of a book. (Professional books take a lot of producing, which is why I'm very happy with a contract that gives the author 10% of the retail price.)
The saving for not distributing a book is currently cancelled out by the cost of changing a book to ePub format, so its not like anyone is making a bundle. Once ebooks become more widespread this cost will go down, but at present very few ebooks sell more than a couple of hundred copies.
So if amazon gets its way, and bulldozes prices down, amazon is going to sell more books, but in the same way that supermarkets sell books. The range of books and the quality of books and the number of authors and publishers is going to drop sharply, because amazon *won't let* publishers ask for a viable price for some books.
I can't imagine a £9.99 Biochemistry textbook, but I can imagine a £9.99 Biochmeistry Textboke, complete with breakfast cereal and viagra advertisements on every second page.
There's one good reason for using MS office, and that's so you can make extraordinarily complex documents.
There's one bad reason for using MS office, and that's so that you can be compatible with the other people who use MS office.
If producing specialized documents is why people use MS office, it should be as rare as math software or 3d modelling programs, not something stuck on every second computer. So most people use MS office because most people use MS office. It's a con.
So, help break the cycle. Unless you really, really have to, don't accept anything sent to you in .docx or .doc.
Send it back, Sir or Madam, send it back and ask the sender to let you have it in a reasonable format.
"Sorry but the only difference from things as they are now is someone WHO WILL NOT BE IN CONTACT with the child will see a blurry image."
So that makes it okay? Try putting same image on your computer monitor, and explain to Mr Plod that there's no problem because the picture is blurry, and you are not in contact.
Now I've no problem about security people ogling my todger if they really have to, but asking parents to exhibit their children naked should not be a condition of flying.
But your basic point is that because predominantly young males of Middle Eastern/Muslim origins have been causing havoc, eighty-year old Swedish grannies should share the pain in the name of non-discrimination?
But as a Reg article mentioned, it's hard enough to find young male Muslim nutters prepared to blow up airlines and themselves. Finding a non-Muslim white family prepared to do the deed is considerably more difficult still.
And outrage about profiling doesn't seem to apply to white middle-aged males who are automatically labelled as 'potential child sex predator'. Perhaps the point is that when you have a certain type of person more likely to commit a certain type of crime, it's best to check that type more carefully. It's not racism, it's common sense.
Grenade. Obviously.
What's got into you?
People are interested in the Woz because he's an interesting character - is that hard to understand? And you come across like the whiny creep in the back of the class who can't understand why some other guy is so popular.
Rik - and I'm speaking as one 'Polack' to another - give it a rest.
According to the story 'Gonda was released without charge'. Since the man was demonstrably innocent of any wrongdoing, why the dickens was he held in the first place?
However, the pilot was quite right to fly knowing there was rdx on the plane. The explosive is totally stable and requires a lot of provocation before it goes off. If you are going to wet your knickers about that being on the cargo hold, don't even think about what's in the fuel tanks.
Grenade. Obviously.
If Google is selling these ads through its adsense/adwords programme, then they only get paid when someone clicks on an ad. And why would you click on an ad for a site when you are already there? Maybe Google is not worried because this is a non-issue.
WhenU are scummy though.
The pontificate was one of an ancient school of priests in pre-Christian Rome. Whilst hijacking other items (including the Saturnalia, which became Christmas) the Pope claimed for himself the office of Pontifex Maximus, the head priest. The Christian Pontiff did not take charge of the Vestal Virgins, a perk which originally went with the job.
Nevertheless, the term 'pontiff' was in use long before anyone had ever thought of being Catholic. but then I guess people were using windows long before they became a trademarked operating system.
Actually you can MAKE MONEY by reporting false adverts for the posting links to Google scam! It's not known that Google pays $25 for every one of these adverts reported!!! People make hundreds of dollars a day doing this.
All you need is your FREE GSPAMLINK WEBKIT system, and you can report these links from home and make $$$$ in your spare time!!!.
(Handling and processing charges apply)
Was this guy a harmless nut, or was he a potential terrorist?
If it's the first option, then assuming he needed sectioning and treatment, that's what happened.
If he was a potential terrorist, then the police were right to want to look at his files.
However, the problem here seems to be that the police decided he was a harmless nut, and continued to treat him as a terrorist. Which is wrong.
The gratuitous suggestion that he needed to prove he was not a child molester is beneath contempt. Have we really got to the point where we need to prove - and keep proving - our innocence?
The problem with this part of RIPA is that it won't work anyway. Or perhaps a real terrorist /perv will say 'Golly gee, 13 months in prison? Please, look at my Al-Quaeda plans to blow up parliament* , and my child porn collection from kindergarten II to Primary year I. Anything but 13 months in prison!"
*should we be stopping this?
It's obvious that this law is and always was about snooping on ordinary citizens, and when one (admittedly far from ordinary) citizen refused, they had to punish him.
Hand grenade. Obviously.
How bad was the tantrum? Since Daddy admits that the child has emotional issues, this looks like more than your average 10-year-old wobbly. If there was a chance of the kid actually harming herself - e.g. by banging her head violently on something - then she needed to be restrained.
Not sure that a tazer would be my restraint of choice, but I can see why the cop would be reluctant to lay hands on the girl - I see an earlier poster is already talking about child abuse.
I'm an academic, and read a lot of journals in my work. Since these days journals sit on the web, I download them as .pdfs. There are a few hundred that I was able to move to the e-reader and can now peruse in comfort away from the computer. I can also scribble notes on them.
And as it can also handle rtf, I can load student essays on to it and read them more conveniently. I'm reviewing a pre-publication book for a colleague, and again its a lot better than doing this on-comp.
I've yet to try reading an actual book, but I think for that, I actually prefer the old printed paper version.
And as an aside, can we leave off the old 'saving the trees' crap? Most of our paper comes from managed European forests, and European forests have grown over the past decades - because we use paper. Stop using paper, and that land will be put to other uses.