Re: But...
Absolutely, as long as you use one of the affected OpenWRT versions. Why would you do that is another matter...
4735 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Mar 2013
Unlike, say, a Raspberry Pi, which could do things on its own...
What makes you think this can't run arbitrary code equally well as any other embedded McGuffin, fruity-named or otherwise? Yes, this obviously runs OpenWRT instead of <insert Linux distribution>, but for a headless application that doesn't make much of a difference, as long as you can script / compile whatever you need to get done for OpenWRT. There's nothing preventing you hosting a web server on it to toggle your lights or set your thermostat directly if you wish. How exactly do you define "on its own"...?
Of course, once you add the docking station, it stops having that problem.
I'm sure you realise the "dock" is all of three connectors on a PCB, routed directly to the module's pins, yes?
You don't necessarily need access to that secret - Armadillo Aerospace was experimenting with 3D printed rocket engine parts years ago, which they simply have had manufactured commercially for them; I can't recall exactly precisely where. I'm not saying you can mail-order one right now, but it's hardly a SpaceX monopoly...
As much as I appreciate the clean design, I can't help but wonder what exactly is one supposed to use to stabilize a capsule potentially spinning wildly out of control, as in that Agena incident way back...? Yes I saw that space-mouse thingy in the centre, but it doesn't look like something you can control a spacecraft with in conditions that make even moving one's arm rather hard...
...I'm pretty sure it's a mere marketing gimmick - so you'll be less grumpy when you realize you've spent a fifth of a MEEEELION on a five minute zero-g ride - more than anything that would actually be required / make sense in any meaningful way. I'm fairly confident it can be summed up as "the barf bag is here, and please don't disturb / talk to the bus driv... erm, to the pilot".
Recently he posted that he bought a new notebook, bought with cash from a local store.
Of course what he doesn't know is that every single store selling computers in US has a back room somewhere with a cabinet on the wall, a little hammer and a plaque saying "IN CASE OF BRUCE SCHNEIER BREAK GLASS, HAND OVER THIS LAPTOP!"...
The photographer has copyright because it's their creative work that is embodied in the photo - the composition, selection and general artistry in getting a good photo
Technically and legally speaking, I believe you're correct. And yes, I also do believe there are legitimate instances of (some amount of) creativity in photography - like photos requiring significant work to artificially create the subject, selecting a highly unusual perspective or setting up particularly elaborate capturing equipment. But "creativity" and "copyright" in photos that essentially document plain reality as it happens, in its original look...?!? Yeah sure, now pull the other one...
there's a 2/3 chance that you'll increase your distance
Just modelled the setup quickly in SolveSpace - you're absolutely right, outside the +/-60 degrees of the original step, any step takes you further (and subsequent steps tend to increase the angle towards 180 degrees - a 50/50 chance); it makes perfect sense now. Thank you very much - have a virtual one! -->
I'm the first to admit I'm rubbish at probabilities and such, but at a 'dummy' first-level approach, wouldn't taking many steps in random directions average out in the long run, leaving you pretty much where you started? Based on the article, I suppose not, but why...? Paris, obviously.
Anyway, loved the article!
A means by which a car can be forced into automatic mode by a vote of the people in the cars in its immediate vicinity.
Cue angry dude with a baseball bat stepping out of his car coming over to politely enquire about why on earth would you apparently want to scan the identifying QR code on the back of his vehicle with your cell phone.
Pfft. It's pigeon post for me.
Oh, I go the high-tech route: I prefer to share using entanglement - only with beer instead of qubits! Essentially, I use two (or more) pints of beer that became entangled in the keg to communicate with nearby mates by periodically sampling the quantum foam on the top. It's not faster than light of course, but it does prevent undetectable eavesdropping (and as a side-effect it does observably alter space-time if repeated sufficiently in a short amount of time)...
That's a particularly dodgy question, as phrased there. Of course I do believe in "scientists" as a source of information about environmental issues (or about anything else) - but "which particular scientists" is a different issue altogether, meaning possibly not the ones you're thinking of. And not being a climatologist (or indeed a scientist at all) myself, answering that second question with any confidence is unfortunately much harder than one might expect...
...how toggling a few lights and/or changing your thermostat setting from your smartphone (or from afar) constitutes having a smart house. Sorry, but no amount of "if the garage door is opened turn on all the lights in the house" will qualify as such in my book. You'd need an actual, working AI to do anything really useful, and I don't see that forthcoming...
"printers that do not refuse to print a black and white document just because the yellow ink has run out (again!)"
Ah, but we can't let you print without adding those invisible fingerprint dot-patterns identifying your printer. Why do you think the yellow ran out in the first place?!?
"What could be worse?"
How about 'updating it' in keeping with the times, pointing out that the Empire was only pursuing those evil pirating rebels rightfully defending its legitimate copyright...? I mean I'm pretty sure those stolen Death Star plans were (C)Empire... Not to mention all that Evil Hacking perpetrated by Mr. Solo's company while aboard said Death Star - why, it's actually lining up perfectly with the currently accepted crime/punishment ratios: you pirate a few files, you get your homeworld blown up, you bastard! Right? I'm sure Disney would see the value of the message there...
"...doesn’t mean that the vast majority of phone thieves would have a clue..."
Right - only every single one of those who would stay in 'business' after such anti-theft measures would become widely used. Oh, and mind you, it's quite alright if any number of thieves have no idea how to do this, their common fence 'knowing a guy' will suffice...
"OSMAnd is fine..."
...or, if you don't feel like either paying up or getting limited to 10 map updates total, you could also use the genuinely free-to-use-with-OSM-maps version of MapFactor Navigator, which is basically indistinguishable from any common satnav feature-wise, and can easily store offline most of Europe.
But the Creationist senator from Texas won't be interested in hearing those reasons, he'll just say 'do it with two craft, for (x) dollars or don't do it at all'.
NASA Tech 1: "What's the bare minimum we can do this with?"
NASA Tech 2: "Two craft."
NASA Tech 1: "We need to pull a Scotty - ask for three or four to make sure we can get it done with the two we'll get granted..."
You'll never have more than 2 colours on the same character space on a Spectrum, for example.
Well, strictly speaking, some games did have more than two colours on the same character space. It's a minor detail that what they were actually doing was swapping two for other two so fast it looked like three or four to you and me...
EDIT: yeah, okay, sarcasm filter fail. </tired>
Too many people no longer understand the distinction between content and presentation.
Perhaps that's because there is no such thing as content perfectly separable from presentation. [1][2]
[1] - http://rhetcomp.gsu.edu/~bgu/8121/TCQ-CMS(Clark).pdf
[2] - http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2011/11/14/separating-presentation-from-content/
Not just anybody can write a DRM module. It has to be carefully inspected and certified by the head DRM honchos. The main reason is to prvent you from writing a module that could be used to read and export content into another (non DRM) format.
Oh, okay then; we just need a honest-to-goodness user-unfriendly one, with a few carefully placed GOTO bugs inside, innit?
Oh, I get it now - so if I cheat the living daylights out of my wife, she finds out, but ultimately decides to not file for divorce after all, I have the right to demand that she better behave towards me in a manner indistinguishable from previous routine in all possible aspects, or else she'll be hearing from my attorney...? Is that it...?